When do Women Take the Lead? Exploring the Intersection Between Gender Equality and Women’s Environmental Political Participation from a Comparative Perspective

References

• Amnesty International. 2024. LGBTI RIGHTS. Retrieved May 11, 2024 (https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/discrimination/lgbti-rights/).
   Google Scholar
• Ares, E., and P. Bolton. 2020. The Rise of Climate Change Activism?. House of Commons Library. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/the-rise-of-climate-change-activism/
   Google Scholar
• Awiti, A. O. 2022. “Climate Change and Gender in Africa: A Review of Impact and Gender-Responsive Solutions.” Frontiers in Climate 4: 1–14. doi: 10.3389/fclim.2022.895950.
   Google Scholar
• Balzekiene, A., and A. Telesiene. 2012. “Explaining Private and Public Sphere Personal Environmental Behaviour.” Social Sciences 74(4): 7–19. doi: 10.5755/j01.ss.74.4.1031.
   Google Scholar
• Birkmann, J., E. Liwenga, R. Pandey, E. Boyd, R. Djalante, F. Gemenne, W. L. Filho, P. F. Pinho, L. Stringer, and D. Wrathall. 2022. “Poverty, Livelihoods and Sustainable Development,” in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change C. U. Cambridge, UK | NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briscoe, Michael D., Jennifer E. Givens, Shawn Olson Hazboun, and Richard S. Krannich. 2019. “At Home, in Public, and in between: Gender Differences in Public, Private and Transportation Pro-Environmental Behaviors in the US Intermountain West.” Environmental Sociology 5 (4):374–92. doi: 10.1080/23251042.2019.1628333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEIC. 2023. “Taiwan GDP per Capita. Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan.” Retrieved September 01, 2023 (https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/taiwan/gdp-per-capita).
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, B. 2019. “The Greta Thunberg Effect: The Rise of Girl Eco-Warriors.” Forbes. (https://www.forbes.com/sites/bonniechiu/2019/09/19/the-greta-thunberg-effect-the-rise-of-girl-eco-warriors/).
   Google Scholar
• Coffé, H., and C. Bolzendahl. 2010. “Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation.” Sex Roles 62 (5–6):318–33. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovic, D., N. Harring, and S. C. Jagers. 2019. “The Contingent Effects of Environmental Concern and Ideology: Institutional Context and People’s Willingness to Pay Environmental Taxes.” Environmental Politics 29(4):674–96. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1606882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEIC. (2023). "Taiwan GDP per Capita. Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan." Taiwan: Department of Gender Equality. (2022). GENDER AT A GLANCE IN R.O.C. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/taiwan/gdp-per-capita.
   Google Scholar
• Deth, J. W. 2016. “Political Participation.” The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication 1–12. doi: 10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc171.
   Google Scholar
• Dieleman, R., and F. Andersson. 2016. “Measuring Women’s Political Empowerment and Investigating the Role of Women’s Civil Liberties in Democratization.” U. O. Gothenburg. (https://v-dem.net/media/publications/policy_brief_4.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., L. Kalof, and P. C. Stern. 2002. “Gender, Values, and Environmentalism.” Social Science Quarterly 83(1):353–64. doi: 10.1111/1540-6237.00088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, K. 2015. “Gendered Activism.” Social Currents 2(4):377–92. doi: 10.1177/2329496515603730.
   Google Scholar
• Dzialo, L. 2017. “The Feminization of Environmental Responsibility: A Quantitative, Cross-National Analysis.” Environmental Sociology 3(4):427–37. doi: 10.1080/23251042.2017.1327924.
   Google Scholar
• Eastin, J. 2018. “Climate Change and Gender Equality in Developing States.” World Development 107:289–305. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EIGE. 2022. “Gender Equality Index 2022: The COVID-19 Pandemic and Care.” E. I. f. G. Equality 1–126. doi:10.2839/03588.
   Google Scholar
• El Khoury, C., A. Felix, J. Lorenzini, and J. Rosset. 2022. “The Gender Gap in Pro‐Environmental Political Participation among Older Adults.” Swiss Political Science Review 29(1):58–74. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GESIS. 2023. “ISSP 2020 – Environment IV, Variable Report: Documentation Release 2023/08/25 Related to the International Dataset GESIS Study-No. ZA7650 Version 2.0.0.” GESIS-Variable Reports, Issue. 1–693.
   Google Scholar
• Giugni, M. 2011. “Political Opportunities: From Tilly to Tilly.” Swiss Political Science Review 15(2):361–7. doi: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2009.tb00136.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundelach, B., and D. Kalte. 2021. “Explaining the Reversed Gender Gap in Political Consumerism: Personality Traits as Significant Mediators.” Swiss Political Science Review 27(1):41–60. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heisig, J. P., and M. Schaeffer. 2019. “Why You Should Always Include a Random Slope for the Lower-Level Variable Involved in a Cross-Level Interaction.” European Sociological Review 35(2):258–79. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcy053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höllinger, F., M. Hadler, and W. Aschauer. 2020. “International Social Survey Programme: Environment IV – ISSP 2020. GESIS, Cologne.” (https://search.gesis.org/research_data/ZA7650).
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., and D. Stolle. 2004. “Good Girls Go to the Polling Booth, Bad Boys Go Everywhere.” Women & Politics 26(3–4):1–23. doi: 10.1300/J014v26n03_01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoominfar, E. (2019). "Gender Socialization". In Gender Equality. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-70060-1_13-1.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, L. M., A. Hatch, and A. Johnson. 2004. “Cross‐National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors.” Social Science Quarterly 85(3):677–94. doi: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00239.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISSP 2023. Environment Gesis, Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. Retrieved March 06 (https://www.gesis.org/en/issp/modules/issp-modules-by-topic/environment).
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, E. H., and J. Kmec. 2018. “Reinterpreting the Gender Gap in Household Pro-Environmental Behaviour.” Environmental Sociology 4(3):299–310. doi: 10.1080/23251042.2018.1436891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, K. W. 2019. “Explaining Cross-National Variation in the Climate Change Concern Gender Gap: A Research Note.” The Social Science Journal 56(4):627–39. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2018.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R. 1999. “Political. Opportunity. Structure. Some Splitting to Balance the Lumping.” Sociological Forum 14(1):93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koos, S. 2012. “What Drives Political Consumption in Europe? A Multi-Level Analysis on Individual Characteristics, Opportunity Structures and Globalization.” Acta Sociologica 55(1):37–57. doi: 10.1177/0001699311431594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, B. L. M., and M. T. Zint. 2013. “Toward Fostering Environmental Political Participation: Framing an Agenda for Environmental Education Research.” Environmental Education Research 19 (5):553–76. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2012.717218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D., L. Zhao, S. Ma, S. Shao, and L. Zhang. 2019. “What Influences an Individual’s Pro-Environmental Behavior? A Literature Review.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 146:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, H., A. Lazarus, and M. Shaby. 2020. “Economic Exchange or Gender Identities? Housework Division and Wives’ Economic Dependency in Different Contexts.” European Sociological Review 36(6):831–51. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcaa023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marien, S., M. Hooghe, and E. Quintelier. 2010. “Inequalities in Non-Institutionalised Forms of Political Participation: A Multi-Level Analysis of 25 Countries.” Political Studies 58(1):187–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00801.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masad, R. 2020. “The struggle for women in politics continues.” https://www.undp.org/blog/struggle-women-politics-continues
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. 1996. “Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Direction.” Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements 23–40. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511803987.003.
   Google Scholar
• McCammon, H. J., K. E. Campbell, E. M. Granberg, and C. Mowery. 2001. “How Movements Win: Gendered Opportunity Structures and U.S. Women’s Suffrage Movements, 1866 to 1919.” American Sociological Review 66(1):49–70. doi: 10.1177/000312240106600104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., and C. Xiao. 2014. “Gender and Environmental Concern: Insights from Recent Work and for Future Research.” Society & Natural Resources 27(10):1109–13. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2014.918235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohai, P. 1992. “Men, Women, and the Environment: An Examination of the Gender Gap in Environmental Concern and Activism.” Society & Natural Resources 5(1):1–19. doi: 10.1080/08941929209380772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Intelligence Council. 2021. “The Future of Women’s Rights.” Retrieved August 03, 2023 (https://www.dni.gov/index.php/gt2040-home/gt2040-deeper-looks/future-of-womens-rights).
   Google Scholar
• Noth, F., and L. Tonzer. 2022. “Understanding Climate Activism: Who Participates in Climate Marches Such as “Fridays for Future” and What Can we Learn from It?” Energy Research & Social Science 84:102360. 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyas 2023. Petition. Retrieved October 01, 2023. https://www.polyas.com/election-glossary/petition
   Google Scholar
• Ramstetter, L., and F. Habersack. 2019. “Do Women Make a Difference? Analysing Environmental Attitudes and Actions of Members of the European Parliament.” Environmental Politics 29(6):1063–84. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1609156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaftenaar, S. 2022. "Gender Equality and Conflict Gendered Determinants of Armed Conflict, Violent Political Protest, and Nonviolent Campaigns" [Dissertation]. pp. 1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, I. 2014. “An Empirical Study of the Determinants of Green Party Voting.” Ecological Economics 105:306–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayegh, S., and S. Dasgupta. 2022. “Climate Change, Labour Availability and the Future of Gender Inequality in South Africa.” Climate and Development 16 (3):209–26. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2022.2074349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., and S. A. Soule. 2010. A Primer on Social Movements. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Steenvoorden, E. 2018. “One of a Kind, or All of One Kind? Groups of Political Participants and Their Distinctive Outlook on Society.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 29(4):740–55. doi: 10.1007/s11266-018-0002-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. 2000. “New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior.” Journal of Social Issues 56(3):407–24. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strumskyte, S., S. Ramos Magaña, and H. Bendig. 2022. Women’s Leadership in Environmental Action. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Sultana, F. 2013. “Gendering Climate Change: Geographical Insights.” Professional Geographer 66(3):372–81. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2013.821730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 1996. “States and Opportunities: The Political Structuring of Social Movements.” Pp. 41–61, in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, edited by D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, & M. Zald. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tindall, D. B., S. Davies, and C. MauboulÈS. 2003. “Activism and Conservation Behavior in an Environmental Movement: The Contradictory Effects of Gender.” Society & Natural Resources 16(10):909–32. doi: 10.1080/716100620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trelohan, M. 2021. “Do Women Engage in Pro-Environmental Behaviours in the Public Sphere Due to Social Expectations? The Effects of Social Norm-Based Persuasive Messages.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 33(1):134–48. doi: 10.1007/s11266-020-00303-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschakert, P., K. Zimmerer, B. King, and S. Baum. 2023. Individual vs. Collective Action Penn State, The College of Earth and Mineral Sciences. Retrieved August 28, 2023 (https://www.e-education.psu.edu/geog30/node/346).
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2022. Dimensions and Examples of the Gender-Differentiated Impacts of Climate Change, the Role of Women as Agents of Change and Opportunities for Women. U. N. F. C. o. C. Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNWomen 2022. “Explainer: How Gender Inequality and Climate Change are Interconnected. Retrieved January 26 (https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/explainer/2022/02/explainer-how-gender-inequality-and-climate-change-are-interconnected).
   Google Scholar
• UNWomen 2023. “Women’s Leadership and Political Participation. UNWomen.” Retrieved September 19, 2023 (https://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/leadership-and-political-participation).
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, A. E. University of Missouri-St. Louis, USA, and IZA, Germany. 2022. “Women’s Labor Force Participation.” IZA World of Labor 1–11. doi: 10.15185/izawol.289.v2.
   Google Scholar
• Wolak, J. 2020. “Conflict Avoidance and Gender Gaps in Political Engagement.” Political Behavior 44(1):133–56. doi: 10.1007/s11109-020-09614-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman, B., C. Pascoe Leahy, J. Peel, K. Bowen, and R. Markey-Towler. 2022. Women Leading the Fight Against Climate Change. https://climatechampions.unfccc.int/women-leading-the-fight-against-climate-change/
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group 2023a. GDP per capita (current US$). Retrieved November 20, 2023 (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?view=map&year=2018).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group 2023b. Metadata Glossary. Retrieved November 20, 2023 (https://databank.worldbank.org/metadataglossary/statistical-capacity-indicators/series/5.51.01.10.gdp).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group 2023c. Ratio of Female to Male Labor Force Participation Rate (%) (Modeled ILO Estimate). Retrieved November 20, 2023 (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.CACT.FM.ZS?view=map&year=2018).
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. 2022. Global Gender Gap Report.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, P. Q., and M. L. Wilson. 2023. “Explaining Personal and Public Pro-Environmental Behaviors.” Sci 5(1):6. doi: 10.3390/sci5010006.
   Google Scholar
• Zelezny, L. C., P.-P. Chua, and C. Aldrich. 2000. “New Ways of Thinking about Environmentalism: Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism.” Journal of Social Issues 56(3):443–57. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., D. S. Kori, M. Sibanda, and K. Nhundu. 2022. “An Analysis of the Differences in Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Review of Rural and Urban Areas in South Africa.” Climate 10(8):118. doi: 10.3390/cli10080118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar