Response CDF sensitivity and its solution based on sparse grid integration

References

• Au, S.K., & Beck, J.L. (2001). Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 16, 263–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthelmann, V., Novak, E., & Ritter, K. (2000). High dimensional polynomial interpolation on sparse grids. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 12, 273–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgonovo, E. (2007). A new uncertainty importance measure. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92, 771–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzzard, G.T. (2012). Global sensitivity analysis using sparse grid interpolation and polynomial chaos. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 107, 82–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M.H., Han S.J., & Tak, N.I. (2000). An uncertainty importance measure using a distance metric for the change in a cumulative distribution function. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 70, 313–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L.J., Lu, Z.Z., & Zhao, X.P. (2010). Moment-independent importance measures of basic random variable and its probability density evolution solution. Science China Technological Sciences, 53, 1138–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstner, T., & Griebel, M. (1998). Numerical integration using sparse grids. Number Algorithms, 18, 209–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstner, T., & Griebel, M. (2003). Dimension-adaptive tensor-product quadrature. Computing, 71, 65–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiss, F., & Winschel, V. (2008). Likelihood approximation by numerical integration on sparse grids. Journal of Econometrics, 144, 62–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado, J.E. (2004). Structural reliability: Statistical learning perspectives. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lebrun, R., & Dutfoy, A. (2009). Do Rosenblatt and Nataf isoprobabilistic transformations really differ? Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 24, 577–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P.L., & Kiureghian, A. (1986). Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 1, 105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Z.Z., Song, J., Song, S.F., Yue, Z.F., & Wang, J. (2010). Reliability sensitivity by method of moments. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34, 2860–2871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Z.Z., Song, F.F., Yue, Z.F., & Wang, J. (2008). Reliability sensitivity method by line sampling. Structural Safety, 30, 517–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Z.Z., Zhou, C.C., Song, Z.S., & Song, S.F. (2012). Subset simulation-based method for cumulative distribution function sensitivity of output response in random environment. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 226, 2770–2790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchers, R.E. (1989). Importance sampling in structural system. Structural Safety, 6, 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, S., & Wu, Y.T. (2001). CDF sensitivity analysis technique for ranking influential parameters in the performance assessment of the proposed high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, USA. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 73, 167–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rackwitz, R. (2001). Reliability analysis – a review and some perspectives. Structural Safety, 23, 365–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, S. (2009). Stochastic sensitivity analysis by dimensional and score functions. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 24, 278–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A. (2002). Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment. Risk Analysis, 22, 579–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolyak, S.A. (1963). Quadrature and interpolation formulae for tensor products of certain classes of functions. Soviet Mathematics Doklady, 4, 240–243.
   Google Scholar
• Song, B.F. (1994). A study on computing failure probability of structural system (doctoral dissertation). Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.T. (1994). Computational methods for efficient structural reliability and reliability analysis. AIAA Journal, 32, 1717–1723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.T., & Mohanty, S. (2006). Variable screening and ranking using sampling-based sensitivity measures. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91, 634–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, F., Greene, S., Chen, W., Xiong Y., & Yang, S.X. (2010). A new sparse grid based method for uncertainty propagation. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 41, 335–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y.G., & Ono, T. (2001). Moment methods for structural reliability. Structural Safety, 23, 47–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, C.C., Lu, Z.Z., Li, L.Y., Feng, J., & Wang, B.T. (2013). A new algorithm for variance based importance analysis of models with correlated inputs. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 864–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J.H., & Nowak, A.S. (1988). Integration formulae to evaluate functions of random variables. Structural Safety, 5, 267–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar