Flexible modelling and altitude control for powered parafoil system based on active disturbance rejection control

References

• Adelfang, S., & Smith, O. E. (1998, January 12–15). Gust models for launch vehicle ascent. Proceedings of 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, H. (2013, March 25–28). Influence of wind on terminal approach and landing accuracy. AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems (ADS) Conference, Daytona Beach, FL (1345).
   Google Scholar
• Aoustin, Y., & Martinenko, Y. (2012, July 2–4). Control algorithms of the longitude motion of the powered paraglider. Proceedings of ASME 2012 11th Biennial conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, Nantes, France (pp. 775–784).
   Google Scholar
• Baquero-Suarez, M., Cortes-Romero, J., Arcos-Legarda, J., & Coral-Enriquez, H. (2019). A Robust two-stage active disturbance rejection control for the stabilization of a riderless bicycle. Multibody System Dynamics, 45(1), 7–35. doi: 10.1007/s11044-018-9614-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrows, T. (2002). Apparent mass of parafoils with spanwise camber. Journal of Aircraft, 39(3), 445–451. doi: 10.2514/2.2949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, E., & Costello, M. (2015). Flight dynamics and control authority of flap-controlled open boxes. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 30(3), 827–834. doi: 10.2514/1.25301
   Google Scholar
• Bezos, G. M., Dunham, R. E.,Jr., Gentry, G. L.,Jr., & Melson, W. E.,Jr. (1992). Wind tunnel aerodynamic characteristics of a transport-type airfoil in a simulated heavy rain environment (NASA Technical Report, NASA-TP-3184).
   Google Scholar
• Cacan, M. R., Costello, M., Ward, M., Scheuermann, E., & Shurtliff, M. (2019). Human-in-the-loop control of guided airdrop systems. Aerospace Science and Technology, 84, 1141–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacan, M. R., Scheuermann, E., Ward, M., Costello, M., & Slegers, N. (2015). Autonomous airdrop systems employing ground wind measurements for improved landing accuracy. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 20(6), 3060–3070. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2015.2405851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. (2007). Longitudinal dynamics modeling and control of powered parachute aircraft (Thesis). Rochester Institute of Technology, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W.-H., Yang, J., Guo, L., & Li, S. (2016). Disturbance-observer-based control and related methods – an overview. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(2), 1083–1095. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2015.2478397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devalla, V., Mondal, A. K., Arun Jeya Prakash, A. J., Prateek, M., & Prakash, O. (2016). Guidance, navigation and control of a powered parafoil aerial vehicle. Current Science, 111(6), 1045. doi: 10.18520/cs/v111/i6/1045-1054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoreyshi, M., Bergeron, K., Seidel, J., Jirasek, A., Lofthouse, A. J., & Cummings, R. M. (2015, January 5–9). Computational fluid dynamics for the aerodynamic design and modeling of a ram-air parachute with bleed-air actuators. 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, FL (0555).
   Google Scholar
• Gockel, W., & Gockel, W. (1997, June 3–5). Concept studies of an autonomous GNC system for gliding parachute. 14th Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference, San Francisco, CA (1465).
   Google Scholar
• Godbole, A. A., Kolhe, J. P., & Talole, S. E. (2013). Performance analysis of generalized extended state observer in tackling sinusoidal disturbances. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 21(6), 2212–2223. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2012.2231512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, B. Z., & Zhao, Z. L. (2011). On the convergence of an extended state observer for nonlinear systems with uncertainty. Systems and Control Letters, 60(6), 420–430. doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2011.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J. Q. (1998). ADRC controller and its application. Control and Decision 1, 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Jann, T. (2005, May 23–26). Advanced features for autonomous parafoil guidance, navigation and control. Proceedings of 18th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, Munich, Germany (AIAA 2005-1642).
   Google Scholar
• Kaesemeyer, S. (2005, May 23–26). Testing of guided parafoil cargo delivery systems. 18th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, Munich, Germany (1668).
   Google Scholar
• Kaminer, I., & Yakimenko, O. A. (2003, December 9–12). On the development of GNC algorithm for a high-glide payload delivery system. 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control, Maui, HI (pp. 5438–5443). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, Y., Sharma, A., Shadaab, Shalvi, S., Srivastava, P., Prakash, O., & Devalla, V. (2017, June 5–9). Validation of canopy and payload relativemotion estimation for parafoil aerial vehicle using computer vision. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Denver, CO (3728).
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., Yan, J., & Liu, Y. (2016, August 12–14). Improved digital model of parafoil-unmanned aerial vehicle accurate recycling system. IEEE Chinese Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference (CGNCC), Nanjing, China (pp. 1857–1863). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., Yang, J., Chen, W.-H., & Chen, X. (2012). Generalized extended state observer based control for systems with mismatched uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 59(12), 4792–4802. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2011.2182011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linares-Flores, J., Barahona-Avalos, J. L., Sira-Ramirez, H., & Contreras-Ordaz, M. A. (2013). Robust passivity-based control of a Buck–Boost-Converter/DC-Motor system: An active disturbance rejection approach. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 48(6), 2362–2371. doi: 10.1109/TIA.2012.2227098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklosovic, R., Radke, A., & Gao, Z. (2006, June 14–16). Discrete implementation and generalization of the extended state observer. 2006 American Control Conference, Minneapolis, MN. IEEE. doi:10.1109/ACC.2006.1656547.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, M. A., & Johari, H. (2015). Computation of flow over a high-performance parafoil canopy. Journal of Aircraft, 47(4), 1338–1345. doi: 10.2514/1.47363
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, O., & Ananthkrishnan, N. (2006, August 21–24). Modeling and simulation of 9-DOF parafoil-payload system flight dynamics. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, Keystone, CO (pp. 21–24).
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, J., Sun, K., Wang, T., & Gao, H. (2019). Observer-based fuzzy adaptive event-triggered control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems with prescribed performance. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2895560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, J., & Slegers, N. (2013, September). Robust parafoil terminal guidance using massively parallel processing. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 36(5), 1336–1345. doi: 10.2514/1.59782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Cubides, H., Cortes-Romero, J., Coral-Enriquez, H., & Rojas-Cubides, H. (2019). Sliding mode control assisted by GPI observers for tracking tasks of a nonlinear multivariable Twin-Rotor aerodynamical system. Control Engineering Practice, 88, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabzehparvar, M. (2005). In-flight thrust measurements of propeller-driven airplanes. Journal of Aircraft, 42(6), 1543–1547. doi: 10.2514/1.12837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuermann, E., Ward, M., Cacan, M. R., & Costello, M. (2015). Combined lateral and longitudinal control of parafoils using upper-surface canopy spoilers. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 38(11), 2122–2131. doi: 10.2514/1.G000892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipanov, G. (2013). Theory and methods ol designing automatic regulators. Automatika in Telemekhanika, 4(1939), 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Shanmugasundram, R., Zakaraiah, K. M., & Yadaiah, N. (2013). Modeling, simulation and analysis of controllers for brushless direct current motor drives. Journal of Vibration and Control, 19(8), 1250–1264. doi: 10.1177/1077546312445200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sira-Ramirez, H., Luviano-Juárez, A., Ramírez-Neria, M., & Zurita-Bustamante, E. W. (2018). Active disturbance rejection control of dynamic systems: A flatness based approach. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Slegers, N. (2017, June 5–9). Comparison of parafoil dynamic modes with varying payload connections. 24th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference, Denver, CO (3878).
   Google Scholar
• Slegers, N., & Costello, M. (2005). Model predictive control of a parafoil and payload system. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 28(4), 816–821. doi: 10.2514/1.12251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slegers, N., & Yakimenko, O. A. (2009, May 4–7). Optimal control for terminal guidance of autonomous parafoils. Proceedings of 20th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, Seattle, WA (AIAA 2009–2958).
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Gao, J., Zhang, H., Peng, D., & Liqin (2016, September 7–8). The application of BPNN based on improved PSO in main steam temperature control of supercritical unit. 22nd International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC), Colchester (pp. 188–192). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, K., Mou, S., Qiu, J., Wang, T., & Gao, H. (2019). Adaptive fuzzy control for non-triangular structural stochastic switched nonlinear systems with full state constraints. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27(8), 1587–1601. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2883374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamayo-León, S., Pulido-Guerrero, S., & Coral-Enriquez, H. (2017, October 18–20). Self-stabilization of a riderless bicycle with a control moment gyroscope via model-based active disturbance rejection control. IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC), Cartagena, Colombia (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, M., Tanaka, K., & Wang, H. O. (2019). Practical model construction and stable control of an unmanned aerial vehicle with a parafoil-type wing. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems, 49(6), 1291–1297. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2707393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, J., Sun, Q., Liang, W., Chen, Z., He, Y., & Dehmer, M. (2017). Computational fluid dynamics based dynamic modeling of parafoil system. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 54, 136–150. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2017.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, J., Sun, Q., Tan, P., Chen, Z., & He, Y. (2016). Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC)-based autonomous homing control of powered parafoils. Nonlinear Dynamics, 86(3), 1461–1476. doi: 10.1007/s11071-016-2972-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Jianbin, Q., & Gang, F. (2018). Finite frequency memory output feedback controller design for T-S fuzzy dynamical systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(6), 3301–3313. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2821654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Qiu, J., Chadli, M., & Wang, M. (2016). A switched system approach to exponential stabilization of sampled-data T-S fuzzy systems with packet dropouts. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 46(12), 3145–3156. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2015.2498522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Qiu, J., & Feng, G. (2018). A novel piecewise affine filtering design for TS fuzzy affine systems using past output measurements. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. doi:10.1109/TCYB.2018.2883476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, M., & Ochi, Y. (2007, September 17–20). Modeling and motion analysis for a powered paraglider (PPG). Proceedings of 2007 Annual Conference of SICE, Takamatsu, Japan (pp. 3007–3012). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Yakimenko, O. A. (2015). Precision aerial delivery systems: Modeling, dynamics, and control. Reston: AIAA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Q., Gaol, L. Q., & Gao, Z. (2007, December 12–14). On stability analysis of active disturbance rejection control for nonlinear time-varying plants with unknown dynamics. 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA (pp. 3501–3506). IEEE. doi:10.1109/CDC.2007.4434676.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Q., Dong, L., Lee, D. H., & Gao, Z. (2008, June 11–13). Active disturbance rejection control for MEMS gyroscopes. 2008 American Control Conference, Seattle, WA (pp. 4425–4430). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, E. L., Sun, Q. L., Tan, P. L., Kang, X. F., Chen, Z. Q., & He, Y. P. (2015). Modeling of powered parafoil based on Kirchhoff motion equation. Nonlinear Dynamics, 79(1), 617–629. doi: 10.1007/s11071-014-1690-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar