Guest Editors’ Introduction

References

• Aiken, M. 2010. “Social Enterprises: Challenges from the Field.” In Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector. Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy, ed. D. Billis 153–174. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H., and M. Ruef. 2006. Organizations Evolving. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J.; H. Stevenson; and J. Wei-Skillern. 2006. “Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?.” Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 30(1): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery, G.; A. Bell; M. Hilb; and A.E. Witte. 2004. Understanding Leadership: Paradigms and Cases. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barraket, J., and V. Archer. 2009. Changing the Rules in Use?. An Examination of Social Enterprise in Local Governance. Sydney: Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., and M. Lee. 2014. “Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing – Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises.” The Academy of Management Annals 8(1): 397–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., and S. Dorado. 2010. “Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 53(6): 1419–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besharov, M. L., and W. K. Smith. 2014. “Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 39(3): 364–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billis, D. 2010. “Towards a Theory of Hybrid Organizations.” In Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector. Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy, ed. D. Billis 46–69. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Borner, S.; F. Bodmer; and M. Kobler. 2004. Development Centre Studies Institutional Efficiency and Its Determinants: The Role of Political Factors in Economic Growth. Washington, DC: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, D. 2007. How to Change the World: Social Entrepreneurs and the Power of New Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosma, N., and J. Levie. 2010. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association. Available at http://www.gemconsortium.org/docs/download/265
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, A. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Washington, DC: Beard Books.
   Google Scholar
• Claver, N. 2005. “Spanish Childcare Services: Trends in the Role of Social Enterprises, Participation, and Governance.” International Journal of Public Administration 28: 827–833.
   Google Scholar
• Clynes, M.E., and N.S. Kline. 1960. “Cyborgs and Space.” Astronautics (September): 26–27, 74–76.
   Google Scholar
• Cooney, K. 2006. “The Institutional and Technical Structuring of Nonprofit Ventures: Case Study of a U.S. Hybrid Organization Caught Between Two Fields.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 17(2): 137–155.
   Google Scholar
• Cornforth, C., and R. Spear. 2010. “The Governance of Hybrid Organizations.” In Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector. Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy, ed. D. Billis 70–90. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crepaldi, C.; E. de Rosa; and F. Pesce. 2012. Workpackage 1: Literature Review on Innovation in Social Services in Europe (Sectors of Health, Education and Welfare Services) Report. A deliverable of the project INNOSERV, European Commission—7th Framework Programme. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dart, R. 2004. “The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 14(4): 411–424.
   Google Scholar
• Dees, J.G. 1998. “Enterprising Nonprofits.” Harvard Business Review (January–February): 55–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorado, S. 2006. “Social Entrepreneurial Ventures: Different Values So Different Process of Creation, No?.” Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship 11(4): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, J., and J. Pfeffer. 1975. “Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior.” The Pacific Sociological Review 18(1): 122–136.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. “The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.” Research Policy 29(2): 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers, A. 2005. “Mixed Welfare Systems and Hybrid Organizations: Changes in the Governance and Provision of Social Services.” International Journal of Public Administration 28(9–10): 737–748.
   Google Scholar
• Glänzel, G., and B. Schmitz. 2012. “Hybride Organisationen—Spezial- oder Regelfall?.” In Soziale Investitionen. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven, ed. H.K. Anheier A. Schröer and V. Then. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H. 1980. “The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise.” The Yale Law Journal 89(8): 835–902.
   Google Scholar
• Hout, E. van; A. de Jong; and S. van Breukelen. 2010. Responses to Social Liquefaction: Understanding Actual Ways to Hybridize. Paper presented at 2010 EGPA conference, Toulouse, France.
   Google Scholar
• Joldersma, C., and V. Winter. 2002. “Strategic Management in Hybrid Organizations.” Public Management Review 4(1): 83–99.
   Google Scholar
• Koppell, J.G.S. 2001. “Hybrid Organizations and the Alignment of Interests: The Case of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.” Public Administration Review 61(4): 468–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2005. “Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of ‘Multiple Accountabilities Disorder.’” Public Administration Review 65(1): 94–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krlev, G. 2012. “Strategies in Social Entrepreneurship: Depicting Entrepreneurial Elements and Business Principles in SEOs from Germany and Bangladesh.” Journal of Entrepreneurship Perspectives 1(1): 61–96.
   Google Scholar
• Low, C. 2006. “A Framework for the Governance of Social Enterprise.” International Journal of Social Economics 33(5–6): 376–385.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, J., and I. Marti. 2009. “Entrepreneurship in and around Institutional Voids: A Case Study from Bangladesh.” Journal of Business Venturing 24: 419–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, C. 2010. “Choosing Sides: Contrasting Attitudes to Governance Issues in Social Firms in the UK.” Social Enterprise Journal 6(1): 6–22.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, C.; J. Kirkbride; and D. Bryde. 2007. “From Stakeholders to Institutions: The Changing Face of Social Enterprise Governance Theory.” Management Decision 45(2): 284–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménard, C. 2004. “The Economics of Hybrid Organizations.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160(3): 345–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B.; W. van Haverbeeke; G. Duysters; V. Gilsing; and A. van den Oord. 2007. “Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity.” Research Policy 36(7): 1016–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, A.L., and K. Montgomery. 2000. “Creating a Hybrid Organizational Form from Parental Blueprints: The Emergence and Evolution of Knowledge Firms.” Human Relations 53(1): 33–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. 2005. “Voluntary Action in a Changing Europe: Critical Perspectives.” International Journal of Public Administration 28(9–10): 733–735.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S.P. 1998. “The Innovative Capacity of Voluntary Organizations: Implications for Local Government.” Local Government Studies 24(1): 19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S.P.; C. Chew; and K. McLaughlin. 2008. “The Once and Future Pioneers?. The Innovative Capacity of Voluntary Organisations and the Provision of Public Services: A Longitudinal Approach.” Public Management Review 10(1): 51–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A.-C., and F. Santos. 2013. “Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics.” Academy of Management Journal 56(4): 972–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C.L., and J.A. Conger. 2003. Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Scheuerle, T.; B. Schmitz; and M. Hoelz. 2013. “Governancestrukturen bei Sozialunternehmen in Deutschland in verschiedenen Stadien der Organisationsentwicklung.” In Sozialunternehmen in Deutschland. Analysen, Trends und Handlungsempfehlungen, eds. S.A. Jansen R. Heinze and M. Beckmann. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, B., and V. Then. 2011. “Legitimation durch Narration—Bindungskräfte durch das Erzählen von Geschichten.” In Social Entrepreneurship—Social Business. Für die Gesellschaft unternehmen, eds. H. Hackenberg and S. Empter 339–350. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Schuppert, G.F. 2006. Governance-Forschung: Vergewisserung über Stand und Entwicklungslinien. 2nd ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verl.-Ges.
   Google Scholar
• Seelos, C.; J. Mair; J. Battilana; and M.T. Dacin. 2011. “The Embeddedness of Social Entrepreneurship: Understanding Variation across Local Communities.” In Communities and Organizations, ed. C. Marquis M. Lounsbury and R. Greenwood. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Spear, R.; C. Cornforth; and M. Aiken. 2009. “The Governance Challenges of Social Enterprises: Evidence from a UK Empirical Study.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 80(2): 247–273.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M.C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. 2009. “Schumpeter’s Full Model of Entrepreneurship: Economic, Non-economic and Social Entrepreneurship.” In An Introduction to Social Entrepreneurship. Voices, Preconditions, Contexts, ed. R. Ziegler 77–106. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, I. 2005. “Social Enterprise and Social Inclusion: Social Enterprises in the Sphere of Work Integration.” International Journal of Public Administration 28(9–10): 807–825.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O.E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1991. “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives.” Administrative Science Quarterly 36(2): 269–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wistow, G., and M. Knapp. 2011. The Governance of Choice and Control: Social Care and Health Care in England. Paper presented at 2011 CSI Symposium, Leadership and Governance in Hybrid Organizations, Heidelberg, Germany, December.
   Google Scholar