Bringing context back into international business studies: own research experiences, reflections and suggestions for future research

References

• Boddewyn, J. 1999. “The Domain of International Management.” Journal of International Management 5 (1):3–14. doi: 10.1016/S1075-4253(99)00003-4.
   Google Scholar
• Boddewyn, J., and G. Iyer. 1999. “International-Business Research: Beyond Déjà Vu 1.” Management International Review 39 (2):161–84.
   Google Scholar
• Brannen, M. Y., and Y. Doz. 2010. “From a Distance and Detached to up Close and Personal: Bridging Strategic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives in International Management Research and Practice.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 26 (3):236–47. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2010.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, P. 2002. “Is the International Research Agenda Running out of Steam?” Journal of International Business Studies 33 (2):365–73. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, P., and D. Lessard. 2005. “Regaining the Edge for International Business Research.” Journal of International Business Studies 36 (6):595–9. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, P., J. Doh, and M. Benischke. 2017. “Towards a Renaissance in International Business Research? Big Questions, Grand Challenges, and the Future of IB Scholarship.” Journal of International Business Studies 48 (9):1045–64. doi: 10.1057/s41267-017-0102-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J., A. Piepenbrink, and P. Shukla. 2014. “Assessing the Impact of JIBS as an Interdisciplinary Journal: A Network Approach.” Journal of International Business Studies 45 (7):787–99. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2014.40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J., and M. Y. Brannen. 2011. “Positioning JIBS as an Interdisciplinary Journal.” Journal of International Business Studies 42 (1):1–9. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2010.50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, C., and M. Pudelko. 2006. “Convergence of Management Practices in Strategy, Finance and HRM between the USA, Japan and Germany.” International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 6 (1):75–100. doi: 10.1177/1470595806062353.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, J., W. Henisz, K. Roth, and A. Swaminathan. 2009. “From the Editors: Advancing Interdisciplinary Research in the Field of International Business: Prospects, Issues and Challenges.” Journal of International Business Studies 40 (7):1070–4. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2009.41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R., R. M. Fuller, and J. S. Valacich. 2008. “Media, Tasks and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity.” MIS Quarterly 32 (3):575–600. doi: 10.2307/25148857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doh, J. 2015. “Why We Need Phenomenon-Based Research in International Business.” Journal of World Business 50 (4):609–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dore, R. 2000. Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism. Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., and M. E. Graebner. 2007. “Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (1):25–32. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., K. G. Corley, and A. L. Hamilton. 2013. “Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research Notes on the Gioia Methodology.” Organizational Research Methods 16 (1):15–31. doi: 10.1177/1094428112452151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J. J., and R. A. Thompson. 2007. “Emotion Regulation: Conceptual Foundations.” In Handbook of Emotion Regulation, edited by J. J. Gross, 3–24. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajro, A., C. Gibson, and M. Pudelko. 2017. “Knowledge Exchange Processes in Multicultural Teams: Linking Organizational Diversity Climates to Teams’ Effectiveness.” Academy of Management Journal 60 (1):345–72. doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.0442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajro, A., and M. Pudelko. 2009. “Multinational Teams in the Context of Organizational Culture: A Multi-Company Case Study.” Paper presented at the Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Hajro, A., and M. Pudelko. 2010. “An Analysis of Core-Competences of Successful Multinational Team Leaders.” International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 10 (2):175–94. doi: 10.1177/1470595810370910.
   Google Scholar
• Hajro, A., and M. Pudelko. 2012. “Multinational Teams: How Team Interactions Mediate between Cultural Differences and Team Performance.” Academy of Management Proceedings 2012 (1):15783. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2012.166.
   Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W. 2003. “The Role of Culture in Entry Mode Studies: From Negligence to Myopia?” Advances in International Management 15 (15):75–127.
   Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W. B. S. Reiche, and M. Pudelko. 2020. “Intercultural Survey Research: Challenges and Suggested Solutions.” In Field Guide to Intercultural Research, edited by D. Guttormsen, J. Lauring, and M. Chapman. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W., and M. Pudelko. 2013. “Language Competencies, Policies and Practices in Multinational Corporations: A Comprehensive Review and Comparison of Anglophone, Asian, Continental European and Nordic MNCs.” Journal of World Business 48 (1):87–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2012.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W., and M. Pudelko. 2014. “Hablas Vielleicht un Peu la Mia Language? A Comprehensive Overview of the Role of Language Differences in Headquarters-Subsidiary Communication.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 25 (5):696–717. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2013.809013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W., and M. Pudelko. 2016. “Do We Need to Distance Ourselves from the Distance Concept? Why Home and Host Country Context Might Matter More than (Cultural) Distance.” Management International Review 56 (1):1–34. doi: 10.1007/s11575-015-0265-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W., M. Pudelko, and S. Reiche. 2016. “The Bridging Role of Expatriates and Inpatriates in Knowledge Transfer in Multinational Corporations.” Human Resource Management 55 (4):679–95. doi: 10.1002/hrm.21681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W., S. Reiche, and M. Pudelko. 2013. “Challenges in International Survey Research: A Review with Illustrations and Suggested Solutions for Best Practice.” European Journal of International Management 7 (1):112–34. doi: 10.1504/EJIM.2013.052090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences. Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations, 2nd ed. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, G., and R. Deeg. 2019. “Comparing Capitalisms and Taking Institutional Context Seriously.” Journal of International Business Studies 50 (1):4–19. doi: 10.1057/s41267-018-0206-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M., V. Worm, and X. Li. 2018. “Making Sense of Context in International Business: Some Methodological Reflections.” Asia Pacific Management Review 23 (4):251–7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, H., and O. Darbishire. 2000. Converging Divergences: Worldwide Changes in Employment Systems. Ithaca: ILR/Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, C., J. T. Dunlop, F. H. Harbison, and C. A. Myers. 1960. Industrialism and Industrial Man. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kogut, B., and H. Singh. 1988. “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode.” Journal of International Business Studies 19 (3):411–32. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostova, T., K. Roth, and M. Dacin. 2008. “Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions.” Academy of Management Review 33 (4):994–1006. doi: 10.5465/amr.2008.34422026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. M., and K. S. Cook. 2004. “Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches.” In Trust and Distrust in Organizations, edited by R. M. Kramer and K. S. Cook, 239–72. New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Little, L. M., D. Kluemper, D. L. Nelson, and J. Gooty. 2012. “Development and Validation of the Interpersonal Emotion Management Scale.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 85 (2):407–20. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02042.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschan, R., D. E. Welch, and L. S. Welch. 1997. “Language: The Forgotten Factor in Multinational Management.” European Management Journal 15 (5):591–8. doi: 10.1016/S0263-2373(97)00038-8.
   Google Scholar
• Matanle, P. 2003. Japanese Capitalism and Modernity in a Global Era. Re-Fabricating Lifetime Employment Relations. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman. 1995. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3):709–34. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, D. J. 1995. “Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 38 (1):24–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ornatowski, G. K. 1998. “The End of Japanese-Style Human Resource Management.” Sloan Management Review 39 (3):73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Oswick, C., P. Fleming, and G. Hanlon. 2011. “From Borrowing to Blending: Rethinking the Processes of Organizational Theory Building.” Academy of Management Review 36 (2):318–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltokorpi, V., and M. Pudelko. 2020. “Expatriate Host Country Language Proficiency and Social Categorization by Host Country Nationals in Foreign Subsidiaries: Linear, Curvilinear, and Moderated Relations.” Journal of International Business Studies. doi: 10.1057/s41267-020-00316-y.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 1990. Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M. 2000a. Das Personalmanagement in Deutschland, Den USA Und Japan. Band 1: Die Bedeutung Gesamtgesellschaftlicher Rahmenbedingungen im Wettbewerb Der Systeme. (Human Resource Management in Germany, the USA and Japan. Vol. 1: The Significance of Societal Contextual Factors in the Competition of the Systems), 356. Cologne: Saborowski.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M. 2000b. Das Personalmanagement in Deutschland, Den USA Und Japan. Band 2: Eine Systematische Und Vergleichende Bestandsaufnahme. (Human Resource Management in Germany, the USA and Japan. Vol. 2: A Systematic and Comparative Report.), 268. Cologne: Saborowski.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M. 2000c. Das Personalmanagement in Deutschland, Den USA Und Japan. Band 3: Wie Wir Voneinander Lernen Können. Mit Einer Empirischen Studie Über Die 500 Größten Unternehmen Der Drei Länder. (Human Resource Management in Germany, the USA and Japan. Vol. 3: How We Can Learn From One Another. With an Empirical Study of the 500 Largest Companies of the Three Countries), 324. Cologne: Saborowski.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M. 2004a. “Benchmarking: Was Amerikanische, Japanische Und Deutsche Personalmanager Voneinander Lernen. (Benchmarking: What American, Japanese and German HR Managers Learn from Each Other).” Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung 18 (2):139–63.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M. 2004b. “HRM in Japan and the West: What Are the Lessons to Be Learnt from Each Other?” Asian Business & Management 3 (3):337–61. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.abm.9200098.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M. 2005a. “Cross-National Learning from Best Practice and the Convergence-Divergence Debate in HRM.” International Journal of Human Resource Management 16 (11):2047–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M. 2005b. “Japanese Human Resource Management: From Being a Miracle to Needing One?” In Japanese Management: The Search for a New Balance between Continuity and Change, edited by R. Haak, and M. Pudelko, 184–212. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M. 2005c. “Continuity versus Change: The Key Dilemma for Japanese Management.” In Japanese Management: The Search for a New Balance between Continuity and Change, edited by R. Haak and M. Pudelko, 241–52. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M. 2006a. “A Comparison of HRM Systems in the USA, Japan and Germany in Their Socio-Economic Context.” Human Resource Management Journal 16 (2):123–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2006.00009.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M. 2006b. “German Human Resource Management: A Source of Inspiration?” European Management Journal 24 (6):430–8. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2006.10.003.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M. 2006c. “The Seniority Principle in Japanese Companies: A Relic of the Past?” Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 44 (3):276–94. doi: 10.1177/1038411106069412.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M. 2006d. “Decision Making in Japanese Companies.” In The Changing Structure of Labor in Japan: Japanese Human Resource Management between Continuity and Innovation, edited by R. Haak, 88–112. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M. 2006e. “Universalities, Particularities and Singularities in Cross-National Management Research.” International Studies of Management & Organization 36 (4):9–37.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M. 2009. “The End of Japanese-Style Management?” Long Range Planning 42 (4):439–62. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M., and A.-W. Harzing. 2007b. “Country-of-Origin, Localization or Dominance Effect? an Empirical Investigation of HRM Practices in Foreign Subsidiaries.” Human Resource Management 46 (4):535–59. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M., and A.-W. Harzing. 2007a. “How European is Management in Europe? an Analysis of past, Present and Future Management Practices in Europe.” European Journal of International Management 1 (3):206–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M., and A.-W. Harzing. 2008. “The Golden Triangle for MNCs: Standardization towards Headquarters Practices, Standardization towards Global Best Practices and Localization.” Organizational Dynamics 37 (4):394–404. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M., and H. Tenzer. 2011a. “Cultural and Institutional Sources of Conflict in Foreign Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations.” Schmalenbach Business Review 63 (S3):117–37. doi: 10.1007/BF03396834.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M., and H. Tenzer. 2011b. “Conflict in Foreign Subsidiaries of Japanese and Western Multinational Corporations: The Impact of Cultural Distance and Differences in Home-Host Country Combinations.” Zeitschrift Für Betriebswirtschaft 81 (S3):49–71. doi: 10.1007/s11573-011-0456-9.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M., and H. Tenzer. 2013. “Subsidiary Control in Japanese, German and US Multinational Corporations: Direct Control from Headquarters versus Indirect Control through Expatriation.” Asian Business & Management 12 (4):409–31. doi: 10.1057/abm.2013.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M., and H. Tenzer. 2019. “Boundaryless Careers or Career Boundaries? The Impact of Language Barriers on Academic Careers in International Business Schools.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 18 (2):213–40. doi: 10.5465/amle.2017.0236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M., and M. Mendenhall. 2007. “The Japanese Management Metamorphosis: What Western Executives Need to Know about Current Japanese Management Practices.” Organizational Dynamics 36 (3):274–87. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2007.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M., and M. Mendenhall. 2009. “The Contingent Nature of Best Practices in National Competitiveness: The Case of American and Japanese Innovation Process.” European Management Journal 27 (6):456–66. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2008.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M., and R. Haak. 2005. “The Current State of the Japanese Economy and Challenges for Japanese Management: An Overview.” In Japanese Management: The Search for a New Balance between Continuity and Change, edited by R. Haak, and M. Pudelko, 3–18. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Pudelko, M., H. Tenzer, and A.-W. Harzing. 2015. “Cross-Cultural Management and Language Studies within International Business Research: Past and Present Paradigms and Suggestions for Future Research.” In Routledge Companion to Cross-Cultural Management, edited by N. Holden, S. Michailova, and S. Tietze, 85–94. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quintanilla, J., and A. Ferner. 2003. “Multinationals and Human Resource Management: Between Global Convergence and National Identity.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 14 (3):363–8. doi: 10.1080/0958519022000031799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiche, S., A.-W. Harzing, and M. Pudelko. 2015. “Why and How Does Shared Language Affect Subsidiary Knowledge Inflows? A Social Identity Perspective.” Journal of International Business Studies 46 (5):528–51. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2015.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoorman, F. D., R. C. Mayer, and J. H. Davis. 2007. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present and Future.” Academy of Management Review 32 (2):344–54. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.24348410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenkar, O. 2001. “Cultural Distance Revisited: Towards a More Rigorous Conceptualization and Measurement of Cultural Differences.” Journal of International Business Studies 32 (3):519–35. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenkar, O. 2004. “One More Time: International Business in a Global Economy.” Journal of International Business Studies 35 (2):161–71. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenkar, O. 2012. “Beyond Cultural Distance: Switching to a Friction Lens in the Study of Cultural Differences.” Journal of International Business Studies 43 (1):12–7. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2011.42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenzer, H., and M. Pudelko. 2015. “Leading across Language Barriers: Successful Management of Language-Induced Emotions in Multinational Organizations.” The Leadership Quarterly 26 (4):606–25. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenzer, H., and M. Pudelko. 2016. “Media Choice in Multilingual Virtual Teams: Rethinking Theories of Media Richness, Synchronicity, Naturalness and Redundancy.” Journal of International Business Studies 47 (4):427–52. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2016.13.
   Google Scholar
• Tenzer, H., and M. Pudelko. 2017. “The Influence of Language Differences on Power Dynamics in Multinational Teams.” Journal of World Business 52 (1):45–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2016.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenzer, H., and M. Pudelko. 2020. “The Impact of Language Diversity on Multinational Teamwork.” In Managing Multilingual Workplaces: Empirical, Methodological, and Pedagogic Perspectives, edited by S. Horn, P. Lecomte, and S. Tietze, Ch. 5. London: Routledge, CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tenzer, H., M. Pudelko, and A.-W. Harzing. 2014. “The Impact of Language Barriers on Trust Formation in Multinational Teams.” Journal of International Business Studies 45 (5):508–35. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2013.64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toynbee, P. 2001. “Who’s Afraid of Global Culture?” In On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism, edited by W. Hutton and A. Giddens, 191–212. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. 2007. “From Homogenization to Pluralism: International Management Research in the Academy and Beyond.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (6):1353–64. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.28166121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaara, E., J. Tienari, R. Piekkari, and R. Säntti. R. 2005. “Language and the Circuits of Power in a Merging MNC?” Journal of Management Studies 42 (3):595–623. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00510.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volk, S., T. Köhler, and M. Pudelko. 2014. “Brain Drain: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Foreign Language Processing in Multilingual Organizations.” Journal of International Business Studies 45 (7):862–85. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2014.26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, H. M., and R. Cropanzano. 1996. “Affective Events Theory: A Theoretical Discussion of the Structure, Causes and Consequences of Effective Experiences at Work.” In Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, edited by B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, Vol. 18, 1–74. Greenwich: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. 2000. Divergent Capitalisms. The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 2007. “Building Genuine Trust through Interpersonal Emotion Management: A Threat Regulation Model of Trust and Collaboration across Boundaries.” Academy of Management Review 32 (2):595–621. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.24351867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheer, S., M. S. Schomaker, and L. Nachum. 2012. “Distance without Direction: Restoring Credibility to a Much-Loved Construct.” Journal of International Business Studies 43 (1):18–27. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2011.43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar