Bargaining over New Technology: Possible Effects of Removing Legal Constraints

References

• Abraham, S., and B. Finzel. “New Technology in Unionized Firms: Advantages of Mandatory Bargaining.” Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Albin, P. “Job Design, Control Technology, and Technical Change.” Journal of Economic Issues 19 (September 1985): 703–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “America’s Choice: High Skills or Low Wages!” Rochester, N.Y.: National Center on Education and the Economy, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, E., and R. Batt. High-Performance Work Systems: American Models of Workplace Transformation. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, J., and S. Smith. “The Transformation of Industrial Relations in the American Steel Industry.” In Contemporary Collective Bargaining in the Private Sector, edited by P. Voos, 135–180. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Ashford, N., and C. Ayres. “Changes and Opportunities in the Environment for Technology Bargaining.” Notre Dame LawReview 62 (1987): 810–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. “Automating the Workplace: Mandatory Bargaining Under Otis II.” Note, University of Illinois Law Review (1989): 435–471.
   Google Scholar
• Bamber, G., and R. Lansbury, eds. New Technology: International Perspectives on Human Resources and Industrial Relations. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• “Bargaining on Nonmandatory Topics Constitutes Refusal to Bargain.” Comment, Stanford Law Review 11 (1958): 188.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman, H. Labour and Monopoly Capital; the Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelli, P. “Are Skill Requirements Rising? Evidence from Production and Clerical Jobs.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46 (April 1993): 515–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael, H., and W. MacLeod. “Multiskilling, Technical Change, and the Japanese Firm.” The Economic Journal 103 (January 1993): 142–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimini, M., S. Behrmann, and E. Johnson. “Labor-Management Bargaining in 1992.” Monthly Labor Review 116 (January 1993): 19–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commision on Engineering and Technical Systems, Manufacturing Studies Board. Hitman Resource Practices for Implementing Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Conti, R. “Work Practice Barriers to Flexible Manufacturing in the US and the UK.” New Technology, Work and Employment (Spring 1992): 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cornfield, D., ed. Workers, Managers and Technological Change. New York: Plenum, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A. “Labor Decisions of the Supreme Court of the October Term, 1957.” Virginia Law Review 44 (1958): 1057–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, T. “Special Project: The Viability of Distinguishing Between Mandatory and Permissive Subjects of Bargaining in a Cooperative Setting: In Search of Industrial Peace.” Vanderbilt Law Review 41 (April 1988): 577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, J., and D. Sockell. “The Mandatory-Permissive Distinction and Collective Bargaining Outcomes.” Industrial & Labor Relations Review 42, no. 4 (July 1989): 566–583.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, J., D. Sockell, and J. Brockner. “Bargaining Effects of the Mandatory-Permissive Distinction.” Industrial Relations 27, no. 1 (Winter 1988): 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, S. “New Technology, Union Strategies and Worker Participation.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 7 (November 1986): 529–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Enforcing the NLRA: The Need for a Duty to Bargain Over Partial Plant Closings.” Note, Texas Law Review 60 (1982): 279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, C. “Collective Bargaining in the Aerospace Industry in the 1980s.” In Contemporary Collective Bargaining in the Private Sector, edited by P. Voos, 97–134. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association. 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Finzel, B. “A Labor Voice in Production Technique: Theoretical, Empirical and Human Resource Implications.” Ph.D. diss., Cornell University, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, O. “The Robot Revolution.” Time (December 8, 1980): 72–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gacek, S. “The Employer’s Duty to Bargain on Termination of Unit Work.” Labor Law Journal 32, no. 11 (November 1981): 699–724.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, J. “Technological Change in The Office Workplace and Implications for Organizing.” In Labor and Technology: Union Response to Changing Environments, edited by D. Kennedy, C. Craypo, and M. Lehman, 83–101. State College: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, M. “Leveling the Road From Borg-Warner to First National Maintenance: The Scope of Mandatory Bargaining.” Virginia Law Review 68, no. 8 (November 1982): 1447–1504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedlund, J. “An Economic Case for Mandatory Bargaining Over Partial Termination and Plant Relocation Decisions.” Note, Yale Law Journal 95, no. 5 (April 1986): 949–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, F. “Human Resource Management and the Socio-Technical Approach.” In New Technology: International Perspectives on Human Resources and Industrial Relations, edited by G. Bamber, and R. Lansbury, 181–196. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, H., T. Kochan, and J. Keefe. “Effects of Industrial Relations on Productivity.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 3, Special Issue (1987): 716–734.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, H., T. Kochan, and R. McKersie. The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York: Basic Books, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, H., and J. MacDuffie. “Collective Bargaining in the U.S. Auto Assembly Sector.” In Contemporary Collective Bargaining in the Private Sector, edited by P. Voos, 181–224. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Keefe, J. “Do Unions Hinder Technological Change?” In Unions and Economic Competitiveness, edited by L. Mishel and P. Voos, 109–141. Economic Policy Institute. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Keefe, J., and K. Boroff. “Telecommunications Labor-Management Relations after Divestiture.” In Contemporary Collective Bargaining in the Private Sector, edited by P. Voos, 303–372. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. “Unionization and Job Design Under Programmable Automation.” Industrial Relations 28 (Spring 1989): 174–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D., C. Craypo, and M. Lehman, eds. Labor and Technology: Union Response to Changing Environments. State College: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, C., J. Dunlop, F. Harbison, and C. Myers. Industrialism and Industrial Man. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Kochan, T., and B. Tamir. “Collective Bargaining and New Technology: Some Preliminary Propositions.” In New Technology: International Perspectives on Human Resources and Industrial Relations, edited by G. Bamber, and R. Lansbury, 60–74. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Latreille, P. “Unions and the Inter-establishment Adoption of New Microelectronic Technologies in the British Private Manufacturing Sector.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 54 (1992): 31–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, F., and R. Murname. “U.S. Earnings Levels and Earnings Inequality: A Review of Recent Trends and Proposed Explanations.” Journal of Economic Literature 30 (September 1992): 1333–1381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Major Operational Decisions and Free Collective Bargaining: Eliminating the Mandatory-Permissive Distinction.” Note, Harvard Law Review 102, no. 8 (June 1989): 1971–1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, D. The Impact of Labor Unions on the Rate and Direction of Technological Innovation. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations, The University of Michigan, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, C. “Technology, Robotics and the Work Preservation Doctrine: Future Considerations for Labor and Management.” Pepperdine Law Review (1987): 403–420.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, E. “Innovating-By-Doing: Skill Innovation as a Source of Technological Advance.” Journal of Economic Issues 29 (March 1995): 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, D. “Social Choice in Machine Design: The Case of Automatically Controlled Machine Tools.” In Case Studies of the Labor Process, edited by Z. Zimbalist. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Osterman, P. “New Technology and the Organization of Work: A Review of the Issues.” In The Challenge of New Technology to Labor-Relations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor-Management Relations, 135, 1989, pp. 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Post, F. “Do Compelling Economic Considerations Actually Exist Under the National Labor Relations Act?.” Connecticut Law Review 25 (Winter 1993): 321–364.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A. “Comment: Automation and the Work Preservation Doctrine: Accomodating Productivity and Job Security Interests.” UCLA Law Review (1984): 135–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaiken, H. Work Transformed: Automation and Labor in the Computer Age. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Simler, N. “The Economics of Featherbedding.” In Featherbedding and Technological Change, edited by P. Weinstein. Boston: D.C. Heath and Co., 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Slichter, S., J. Healy, and R. Livernash. “Union Policies Towards Technological Change.” Chapter 12 in The Impact of Collective Bargaining on Management. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Sockell, D. “The Scope of Mandatory Bargaining: A Critique and A Proposal.” Industrial & Labor Relations Review 40, no. 1 (October 1986): 566–583.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, J. “Union Responses to Technological Change: Protecting the Past or Looking to the Future?” Labor Studies Journal (Fall 1987): 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. The Wealth of Nations. 1776. Reprint. New York: Random House, 1937.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, K. Van Wezel. “The Legacy of Industrial Pluralism: The Tension Between Individual Employment Rights and the New Deal Collective Bargaining System.” University of Chicago Law Review (Spring 1992): 575–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D., and A. Caston. Paradigm Shift: The New Promise of Information Technology. New York: McGraw Hill, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• “The Impact of the Borg-Warner Case on Collective Bargaining.” Note, Minnesota Law Review 43 (1959): 1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. “Technological Choice and Union-Management Cooperation.” Industrial Relations 30, no. 2 (Spring 1991): 167–192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor-Management Relations. The Challenge of New Technology to Labor-Relations. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Major Collective Bargaining Agreements: Interplant Transfer and Relocation Allowances.” Bulletin 1425-20. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, July 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. The Instinct of Workmanship. New York: Viking, 1914.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, A., and T. Kochan. “The Growth and Nature of the Nonunion Sector within a Firm.” In Challenges and Choices Facing American Labor, edited by T. Kochan, 89–117. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R. “Managing New Technology and Labor Relations: An Opportunity for Mutual Influence.” In The Challenge of New Technology to Labor-Relations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor-Management Relations, 135, 1989, pp. 33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Woodbury, S. “The Scope of Bargaining and Bargaining Outcomes in the Public Schools.” Industrial & Labor Relations Review 38, no. 2 (January 1985): 195–210.
   Google Scholar
• Zifchak, W. “Automation, Technological Change, and the Limits of Collective Bargaining: A Management View.” In Labor Law and Business Change: Theoretical and Transactional Perspectives, edited by S. Estreicher, and D. Collins, 235–254. New York: Quorum Books, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. New York: Basic Books, 1988.
   Google Scholar