A Comparative Analysis of Cases of Conflictual Labor Relations in the Corn Processing, Steel, Paper, and Coal Industries

References

• Adams, R.J. “The ‘Old Industrial Relations’ and Corporate Competitiveness: A Canadian Case.” ER 10, no. 2 (1988): 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• American Iron and Steel Institute. Annual Statistical Reports. Washington, D.C.: AISI, various years.
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, E., and R. Batt. The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United States. New York: ILR Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, J., and J. Dworkin. “Current Topics in Industrial and Labor Relations Research and Practice.” Journal of Management 17, no. 3 (1991): 515–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, J., and S. Konzelmann Smith. “The Transformation of Industrial Relations in the American Steel Industry.” In Contemporary Collective Bargaining in the Private Sector, edited by P. Voos. Madison, Wis.: IRRA, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Bandzak, R. “The Strike as Management Strategy.” Journal of Economic Issues (June 1992): 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birecree, A. M. “Capital Restructuring and Labor Relations: The International Paper Company Strike.” International Contributions to Labour Studies 1 (1991): 59–86.
   Google Scholar
• Birecree, A. M. “Corporate Development, Technological Change, and Strategic Choice: Bargaining at International Paper Company in the 1980s.” Industrial Relations (Fall 1993a): 343–366.
   Google Scholar
• Birecree, A. M. “Union Strike and Decertification at Clinton Corn Products.” In Grand Designs: The Impact of Corporate Strategies on Workers, Unions and Communities, edited by C. Craypo and B. Nissen. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press, Fall 1993b.
   Google Scholar
• Cutcher-Gerschenfeld, J. R., R. McKersie, and R. Walton. “Dispute Resolution and the Transformation of U.S. Industrial Relations: A Negotiations Perspective.” Labor Law Journal (August 1995): 475–483.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, J. T., C. Ichniowski, and D. Lewin. “Employment Involvement Programs and Firm Performance.” Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting. Madison, Wis.: IRRA, 1988, pp. 48–58.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. Contested Terrain. New York: Basic Books, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. “The Effect of the Union Wage Differential on Management Opposition and Union Organizing Success.” American Economic Review (May 1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gary Works. Gary, Ind.: USS Gary Works, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Paul. Assessing Organizational Change: The Rushton Quality of Work Experiment. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Hoerr, J. And the Wolf Finally Came. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. C. “The Productivity Effects of Worker Directors and Financial Participation in the Firm: The Case of British Retail Cooperatives.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 41 (1987): 79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Harry. “Policy Debates Over Work Reorganization in North American Unions.” In New Technology and Industrial Relations, edited by R. Hyman and W. Streeck, 19–47. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Harry, Thomas Kochan, and J. Keefe. “Industrial Relations and Productivity in the US Auto Industry.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3 (1987): 685–727.
   Google Scholar
• Keefe, J., and Harry Katz. “Job Classifications and Plant Performance in the Auto Industry.” Industrial Relations 29 (1990): 111–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiner, M. M., and M. L. Bouillon. “Providing Business Information to Workers: Correlates of Compensation and Productivity.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 41 (1988): 605–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kochan, Thomas, Harry Katz, and Kenneth Gobeille. “Industrial Relations Performance, Economic Performance and QWL Programs: An Interplant Analysis.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review (October 1983): 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kochan, T., H. Katz, and R. McKersie. The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York: Basic Books, Inc, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Konzelmann Smith, S. “Technological Integration and Fragmented Labour Market Structures: The Decline and Restructuring of the US Steel Integrated Sector.” International Contributions to Labour Studies 1 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Konzelmann Smith, S. “Internal Cooperation and Competitive Success: The Case of the American Steel Minimill Sector.” Cambridge Journal of Economics (April 1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konzelmann Smith, S. “Cooperative Corporate Level Strategies and Divergent Labor Relations Outcomes: An Institutional Analysis.” Journal of Economic Issues (forthcoming).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., and D. M. Schweiger. “Participation in Decision-Making: One More Look.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by B. M. Straw, 265–340. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Tading, R. and S. F. Wilkinson. “The Level, Structure and Flexibility of Costs.” In Flexibility in Labour Markets, edited by R. Tading. London: Academic Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, Richard. “The Diffusion of New Work Structures in Explaining Why Success Didn’t Take.” Organizational Dynamics (Winter 1975).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. F. “Productive Systems.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 7 (1983): 413–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarrow, M. “The Labor Process in Coal Mining: Struggle for Control.” In Case Studies in the Labor Process, edited by A. Zimbalist, 170–192. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar