Protection of Biotechnological Inventions: A Burden Too Heavy for the Patent System

References

• Barton, J. H. “Patent Scope in Biotechnology.” IIC 26, 5 (1995): 605–618.
   Google Scholar
• Berrier, E. F. “Global Patent Costs Must Be Reduced.” IDEA 36, no. 4 (1996): 473–499.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, J. “A Theory of Law and Information: Copyright, Spleens, Blackmail, and Insider Training.” Calif. L. Rev. (1992): 1413–1490.
   Google Scholar
• Cambrosio, A., P. Keating, and M. Mackenzie. “Scientific Practice in the Courtroom: The Construction of Sociotechnical Identities in a Biotechnology Patent Dispute.” Social Problems 37, no. 3 (1990): 275–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, N. H. “Patents on Genomes and Animals.” In The Human Genome Project: Legal Aspects. Madrid, Fundacion BBV Documenta, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. C. “Social Construction of Invention through Patent Management: Thomas Blanchard’s Woodworking Machinery.” Technology and Culture 32, no. 4 (1991): 960–998.
   Google Scholar
• Cornish, W. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks, and Allied Rights. Sweet & Maxwell, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, C. M. Sovereign and Property Rights over Plan Genetic Resources. Background Study Paper, no. 2. Commission on Plan Genetic Resources. November 1994. FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Crespi, S. “Biotechnology Patenting: The Wicked Animal Must Defend Itself.” European Intellectual Property Review 9 (1995): 431–441.
   Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H. “Toward a Theory of Property rights.” American Economic Review (1967): 347–359.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, Q. “Commissioner’s Page.” PTO TODAY (2000): 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P. A Philosophy of Intellectual Property. England: Dartmouth Publishing Company Limited, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P. “Biotechnology Patents, Markets, and Morality.” European Intellectual Property Review 9 (1999a): 441–449.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P. “The Universality of Intellectual Property Rights: Origins and Development. States and Intellectual Property.” In Intellectual Property and Human Rights WIPO (1999b): 13–41.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. “The Economics of Intellectual Property Rights and Systems of Innovation: The Inevitable Diversity.” Paper prepared for the Conference “Maastricht Revisited,” 1992 MERIT, mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. W. “The Emerging Primacy of Secondary Considerations as Validity Ammunition: Has the Federal Circuit Gone Too Far?” JPTOS (March 1989): 185–201.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, M. A., and Eisenberg, R. S. “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research.” Science 280 (1998): 98–701.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horwitz, M. J. “The History of the Public/Private Distinction.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review (1982): 1423–1428.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplinsky, R. “Industrial and Intellectual Property Rights in the Uruguay Round and Beyond.” The Journal of Development Studies 25, 3 (1989): 373–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastriner, G. L. “The Revival of Confidence in the Patent System.” JPTOS (1991): 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, A. “Dangers in Using the Idea of Property Rights: Modem Property Rights Theory and the Neo-Classical Trap.” Journal of Economic Issues XIX, 4 (1985): 959–966.
   Google Scholar
• Merges, R. P., and Nelson, R. R. “On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope.” Columbia Law Review 90, no. 4 (1990): 839–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. “What Is Private and What Is Public about Technology.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 14 (3) (1989): 229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normile, D. “Monsanto Donates Its Share of Golden Rice.” Science 289 (August 2000): 843–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. “Broad Claims for Biotechnological Inventions.” European Intellectual Property Review (1994): 371–373.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. “Innovation and Competition: Conflicts over Intellectual Property Rights in New Technologies.” In Owning Scientific and Technical Information: Value and Ethical Issues, edited by V. Weil and J. W. Snapper. New Brunswick and London: Rutgers University Press, 1989, 169–192.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V., and I. Moser. “Biopolitics: A Feminist and Ecological Reader on Biotechnology.” London & New Jersey: Zed Books Ltd., 1995.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). “Human Development Report.” Pags. Quoted from the Spanish edition, 1999.
   Google Scholar