The Recent Critique of Theoretical Economics: A Methodologically Informed Investigation

References

• Acemoglu, Daron. “The Crisis of 2008: Lessons for and from Economics.” Critical Review 21, 2-3 (2009): 185–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerlof, George. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, 3 (1970): 488–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki, Masanao and Hiroshi Yoshikawa. Reconstructing Macroeconomics: A Perspective from Statistical Physics and Combinatorial Stochastic Processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Boumans, Marcel. “Models in Economics.” In The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy, edited by John B. Davis, D.W. Hands and Uskali Mäki, pp. 260–282. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, Vinca and Negru, Ioana. “Mathematical Modelling in the Wake of the Crisis: A Blessing or a Curse? What Does the Economics Profession Say?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 38, 2 (2013): 329–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, Lawrence. “Realism in Economic Model Building.” SFU, 2012. Available at www.sfu.ca/boland/how-to-fd.pdf. Accessed 30 April 30, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero, Ricardo. “Macroeconomics After the Crisis: Time to Deal with the Pretense-of-Knowledge Syndrome.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, 4 (2010): 85–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, Nancy. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, Nancy. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, Nancy. “If No Capacities Then No Credible Worlds. But Can Models Reveal Capacities?” Erkenntnis 70, 1 (2009): 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, Nancy and Jeremy Hardie. Evidence-Based Policy, a Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press Oxford, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, David. “How Economists Got It Wrong: A Nuanced Account.” Critical Review 23, 1-2 (2011): 127.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, David, Michael Goldberg, Armin Haas, Katarina Juselius, Alan Kirman, Thomas Lux, and Brigitte Sloth. “The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of the Economics Profession.” Critical Review 21, 2-3 (2009): 249–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condorcet, Marquis de. Discours sur l’astronomie. Paris, France: J.B. Sajou, 1818.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, Diane. What’s the Use of Economics: Teaching the Dismal Science After the Crisis. London: London Publishing Partnership, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, Partha. “Modern Economics and Its Critics.” In Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism, and Social Construction, edited by Uskali Mäki, pp. 57–89. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Debreu, Gerard. Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, Brad. “Economics in Crisis.” 2011. Available at www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/economics-in-crisis. Accessed June 30, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• DeMartino, George F. The Economist’s Oath: On the Need for and Content of Professional Economic Ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, Sheila. “Codes of Ethics for Economists: A Pluralist View.” Economic Thought 2, 1 (2013): 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Eichengreen, Barry. “The Last Temptation of Risk.” National Interest (May/June 2009): 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Gerald and Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth. “Letter to the American Economic Association.” January 3, 2011. Available at www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/other_publication_types/AEA_letter_Jan4.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Milton. “Conversation with Milton Friedman.” In Conversations with Leading Economists: Interpreting Modern Macroeconomists, edited by Brian Snowdon and Howard R. Vane, pp. 122–144. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, Ronald N. Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, Ronald N. Science Without Laws. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Grüne-Yanoff, Till. “Genuineness Resolved: A Reply to Reiss’ Purported Paradox.” Journal of Economic Methodology 20, 3 (2013): 255–261.
   Google Scholar
• Guala, Francesco. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, Daniel. “Paradox Postponed.” Journal of Economic Methodology 20, 3 (2013): 250–254.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “Evolutionary and Institutional Economics as the New Mainstream?” Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 4, 1 (2007): 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “The Great Crash of 2008 and the Reform of Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33, 6 (2009): 1205–1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “Sickonomics: Diagnoses and Remedies.” Review of Social Economy 69, 3 (2011): 357–376.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, Kevin. “Pragmatism, Perspectival Realism, and Econometrics.” In Economics for Real: Uskali Mäki and the Place of Truth in Economics edited by Aki Lehtinen, Jaakko Kuorikoski and Petri Ylikoski, pp. 223–240. London: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, John and Chris Doucouliagos. “What’s to Know About the Credibility of Empirical Economics?” Journal of Economic Surveys 27, 5 (2013): 997–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaletsky, Anatole. “Goodbye, Homo Economicus.” Real-world Economics Review 50 (2009): 151–156.
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid, Harold. “Some Issues Concerning the Nature of Economic Explanation.” In Philosophy of Economics, edited by Uskali Mäki, pp. 137–158. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kirman, Alan. “The Economic Crisis Is a Crisis for Economic Theory.” CESifo Economic Studies 4 (2010): 498–535.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, Anne O. “Report on the Commission on Graduate Education in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 29, 3 (1991): 1035–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, Paul. Development, Geography, and Economic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, Paul. “How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?” The New York Times, September 6, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. “The Current Economic Crisis: Its Nature and the Course of Academic Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33, 4 (2009): 759–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. “What Is This ‘School’ Called Neoclassical Economics?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 37, 5 (2013): 947–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Keith. Theory of Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Leijonhufvud, Axel. “Out of the Corridor: Keynes and the Crisis.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33, 4 (2009): 741–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, Richard G. “Successes and Failures in the Transformation of Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 8, 2 (2001): 169–201.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, Robert E. “Methods and Problems in Business Cycle Theory.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 12, 4 (1980): 203–220.
   Google Scholar
• Lux, Thomas and Frank Westerhoff. “Economics Crisis.” Nature Physics 5 (2009): 2–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machlup, Fritz. “The Problem of Verification in Economics.” Southern Economic Journal 22, 1 (1955): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. “Comment on Hands.” In Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Research Programmes, edited by Neli de Marchi and Mark Blaug, pp. 85–90. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. “On the Methods of Isolation in Economics.” Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and Humanities 26 (1992): 319–354.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. “Models.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes, pp. 9931–9937. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. “Theoretical Isolation and Explanatory Progress: Transaction Cost Economics and the Dynamics of Dispute.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 28, 3 (2004): 319–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. “Realistic Realism About Unrealistic Models.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics, edited by Harold Kincaid and Don Ross, pp. 68–98. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. “On a Paradox of Truth, or How Not to Obscure the Issue of Whether Explanatory Models Can Be True.” Journal of Economic Methodology 20, 3 (2013): 268–279.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Alfred. “The Present Position of Economics.” In Memorial of Alfred Marshall, edited by Arthur C. Pigou, pp. 152–174. London: Macmillan, [ 1885] 1925.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Alfred. “Letter to Arthur Bowley of 27 Feb. 1906.” In How Economics Became a Mathematical Science, Roy E. Weintraub, p. 22. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, James C. “On Faraday’s Lines of Force.” In The Scientific Papers of J.C. Maxwell, volume 1, edited by W.D. Niven, pp. 155–229. New York, NY: Dover Publications, [ 1855] 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, Thomas. “The Influence of Friedman’s Methodological Essay.” In The Methodology of Positive Economics: Reflections on the Milton Friedman Legacy, edited by Uskali Mäki, pp. 119–142. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, Donald. “Economics Science: A Search Through the Hyperspace of Assumptions?” Methodus 3 (1991): 6–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Melanie. Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: John W. Parker, 1843.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, Philip. “The When, the How and the Why of Mathematical Expression in the History of Economic Analysis.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, 1 (1991): 145–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negru, Ioana. “How Reflexive Have Economists Been in the Wake of the Crisis: ‘The Times They Are a-Changin’?” Post-Keynesian Economics Study Group Working Paper 1306. Accessed July 24, 2013. Available at www.postkeynesian.net/downloads/wpaper/PKWP1306.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Niiniluoto, Ilkka. Critical Scientific Realism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Niiniluoto, Ilkka. “The Verisimilitude of Economic Models.” In Economics for Real: Uskali Mäki and the Place of Truth in Economics, edited by Aki Lehtinen, Jakko Kuorikoski and Petri Ylikoski, pp. 65–80. New York, NY: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, Willard. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, Peter. “Ethics in Economics — Where Is It?” Real-World Economics Review 58 (2011): 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, Julian. “Social Capacities.” In Nancy Cartwright’s Philosophy of Science, edited by Luc Bovens, Stephan Hartmann and Carl Hoefer, pp. 265–288. New York, NY: Routledge, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, Julian. “The Explanation Paradox.” Journal of Economic Methodology 19, 1 (2012): 43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ritholtz, Barry. “The Hubris of Economics.” 2009. Available at www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/the-hubris-of-economics/. Accessed July 30, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, Dani. The Globalization Paradox: Why Global Markets, States, and Democracy Can’t Coexist. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, Paul. “Fundamentalists Versus Realists.” 2008. Available at http://wayback.archi.ve-it.org/2180/20101029231801. Accessed July 30, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, Paul. “Discussion (with G. C. Archibald, Herbert A. Simon).” American Economic Review 53, 2 (1963): 227–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senior, Nassau W. An Outline of the Science of Political Economy. New York, NY: Augustus M. Kelly, 1836.
   Google Scholar
• Shiller, Robert J. and Virginia M. Shiller. “Economists as Worldly Philosophers.” American Economic Review 101, 3 (2011): 171–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. The History of Astronomy. In Adam Smith’s Essays on Philosophical Subjects, edited by W.P.D. Wightman, J.C. Bryce and L.S. Ross, pp. 33–105. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, [ 1795] 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Solow, Robert. “A Native Informant Speaks.” Journal of Economic Methodology 8, 1 (2001): 111–112.
   Google Scholar
• Solow, Robert. “Building a Science of Economics for the Real World.” Prepared Statement, House Committee on Science and Technology, Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, July 20, 2010. Available at www2.econ.iastate.edu/classes/econ502/tesfatsion/Solow.StateOfMacro.CongressionalTestimonyJuly2010.pdf;. Accessed April 30, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Spaventa, Luigi. “Economists and Economics: What Does the Crisis Tell Us?” Centre for Economic Policy Research. Policy Insight 38 (August 2009): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, Joseph. “The Journal of Economic Perspectives and the Marketplace of Ideas: A View from the Founding.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26, 2 (2012): 19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez, Mauricio. “Fictions, Inference, and Realism.” In Fictions and Modek: New Essays, edited by John Woods, pp. 225–246. Munich, Germany: Philosophia Verlag, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Suppe, Frederick. The Semantic View of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, Bas. The Scientific Image. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Walras, Léon. Elements of Pure Economics. London: George Allen, [ 1877] 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, Roy E. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar