344
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Short Rise and Long Fall of Heterodox Economics in Germany After the 1970s: Explorations in a Scientific Field of Power and Struggle

References

  • Abel, Andrew and Ben Bernanke. Macroeconomics. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley, 2005.
  • Arrow, Kenneth. “Workshop on the Economy as an Evolving Complex System: Summary.” In The Economy As An Evolving Complex System, edited by Philip Anderson, Kenneth Arrow and David Pines, pp. 275-284. Redwood City, CA: West View Press, 1988.
  • Arthur, W. Brian. “Complexity, the Santa Fe Approach, and Non-Equilibrium Economics.” History of Economic Ideas 18, 2 (2010): 149-166.
  • Auroi, Claude et al. “Renewing the Research and Teaching in Finance, Economics and Management to Better Serve the Common Good.” Geneva, Switzerlad: Responsiblefinance, March 2011. Available at www.responsiblefinance.ch/aufruf/. Accessed August 18, 2016.
  • Backhouse, Roger. “On the Credentials of Methodological Pluralism.” In Economics Broadly Considered: Essays in Honor of Warren J. Samuels, edited by Jeff Biddle, John Davis and Steven Medema, pp. 161-181. London: Routledge, 2001.
  • Backhouse, Roger. “The Rise of Free Market Economics: Economists and the Role of the State since 1970.” History of Political Economy 37, 1 (2005): 355-392.
  • Barkley Rosser, John. “Introduction.” In Complexity in Economics: Methodology, Interacting Argents, and Microeconomic Models, edited by John Barkley Rosser, pp.1-20. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2004.
  • Besley, Tim and Peter Hennessey. “Letter in Response to a Question of Queen Elizabeth.” London: British Academy of Science, July 2009. Available at www.feed-charity.org/user/image/besley-hennessy2009a.pdf. Accessed August 18, 2016.
  • Blanchard, Olivier. “The State of Macro.” NBER Working Paper No. 14259. NBER, August 2008.
  • Blanchard, Olivier, Giovanni Dell’Ariccia and Paolo Mauro. “Rethinking Macroeconomic Policy.” IMF Staff Position Note No. 10/03. Washington, D.C.: IMF, February 2010.
  • Blanchard, Olivier and David Johnson. Macroeconomics. New York, NY: Pearson, 2013.
  • Bloch, Roland and Anke Burkhardt. “Arbeitsplatz Hochschule und Forschung für wissenschaftliches Personal und Nachwuchskräfte.” In Expertise für die Hochschule der Zukunft, edited by Hans Böckler Stiftung, pp. 401-478. Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Klinkhardt, 2011.
  • Blume, Lawrence and Steven Durlauf. “The Interaction-Based Approach to Socioeconomic Behavior.” In Social Dynamics, edited by Steven Durlauf and H. Peyton Young, pp. 15-44. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by John Richardson, pp241-258. New York, NY: Greenwood Press, 1986.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. Homo Academicus. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995.
  • Bronk, Richard. “Epistemological Difficulties with Neoclassical Economics.” Paper presented at the Southern Economic Conference, November 20, 2011, Washington D.C. Available at http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/39423/. Accessed August 18 2016.
  • Busch, Alexander. Die Geschichte des Privatdozenten: Eine soziologische Studie zur großbetrieblichen Entwicklung der deutschen Universitäten. Stuttgart, Germany: Enke, 1959.
  • Caballero, Ricardo. “Macroeconomics After the Crisis: Time to Deal with the Pretense-of-Knowledge Syndrome.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, 4 (2010): 85-102.
  • Chesney, Marc et al. “Baseler Manifest für ökonomische Aufklärung.” Basel, Germany: Zentrum für Religion, Wirtschaft und Politik, November 2011. Available at www.zrwp.ch/uploads/basler_manifest.pdf. Accessed August 18, 2016.
  • Clower, Robert. “The Keynesian Counter-Revolution: A Theoretical Appraisal.” In The Theory of Interest Rates, edited by Frank Hahn and F.P.R. Brechling, pp. 103-125. London: Macmillan, 1965.
  • Cohen, Avi and Geoffrey Harcourt. “Whatever Happened to Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18, 1 (2003): 199-214.
  • Colander, David. “The Death of Neoclassical Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22, 2 (2000): 127-143.
  • Colander, David. “Introduction.” In Changing Face of Economics: Conversations with Cutting Edge Economists, edited by David Colander, Richard Holt and J. Barkley Rosser. pp. 1-25. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 2009.
  • Colander, David, Richard Holt and J. Barkley Rosser. “The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics.” Review of Political Economy, 16, 4 (2004): 485-499.
  • Colander, David and Arjo Klamer. “The Making of an Economist.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1, 2 (1987): 95-111.
  • Cross, Richard. “The Duhem-Quine-Thesis, Lakatos and the Appraisal of Theories in Macroeconomics.” Economic Journal 92 (1982): 320-340.
  • Davidson, Paul. “Reviving Keynes’ Revolution.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 6, 4 (1984): 561-575.
  • Davidson, Paul. “Would Keynes Be a New Keynesian?” Eastern Economic Review 18, 4 (1992): 449-463.
  • Davidson, Paul. “Responses to Lavoie, King, and Dow on What Post Keynesianism Is and Who Is a Post Keynesian.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 27, 3 (2005): 393-408.
  • Davidson, Paul. “What Was the Primary Factor Encouraging Mainstream Economists to Marginalize Post Keynesian Theory?” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 37, 3 (2015): 369-383.
  • Davis, John. “Pluralism in Social Economics.” History of Economic Ideas 2, 3 (1994): 119-128.
  • Dobusch, Leonhard and Jakob Kapeller. “Heterodox United vs. Mainstream City? Sketching a Framework for Interested Pluralism in Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 45, 4 (2012): 1035-1057.
  • Drakopoulos, Stavros and Anastassios Karayiannis. “A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian ‘Explanations’ in Economics.” History of Economic Ideas 12, 2 (2005): 51-73.
  • Düppe, Till and E. Roy Weintraub. Finding Equilibrium: Arrow, Debreu, McKenzie and the Problem of Scientific Credit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.
  • Feyerabend, Paul. Against Method. London: New Left Books, 1975.
  • Finkenstaedt, Thomas. “Die Universitätslehrer.” In Geschichte der Universität in Europa, Vol. IV: Vom Zweiten Weltkrieg bis zum Ende des 20 Jahrhunderts, edited by Walter Rüegg, pp. 153-188. Munich, Germany: Beck, 2010.
  • Fontana, Magda. “The Complexity Approach to Economics: A Paradigm Shift.” Working paper No. 8. Department of Economics, University of Torino, 2008.
  • Fourcade, Marion. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.
  • Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion. “Politics, Institutional Structures, and the Rise of Economics: A Comparative Study.” Theory and Society 30 (2001): 397-447.
  • Frey, Beuno, Stefan Humbert and Friedrich Schneider. “Was denken deutsche Ökonomen? Eine empirische Auswertung einer Internetbefragung unter den Mitgliedern des Vereins für Socialpolitik im Sommer 2006.” Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 8, 4 (2007): 359-377.
  • Galbraith, James. “The Third Crisis in Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 47, 2 (2013): 311-322.
  • Garnett, Robert. “Paradigms and Pluralism in Heterodox Economics.” Review of Political Economy 18, 4 (2006): 521-546.
  • Gräfing, Birte. Tradition Reform: Die Universität Bremen, 1971–2001. Bremen, Germany: Donat, 2012.
  • Graham, Hugh and Nancy Diamond. The Rise of American Research Universities: Elites and Challengers in the Postwar Era. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1997.
  • Greenfield, Robert. “Walras’s Law in Macroeconomic Disequilibrium.” Austrialian Economic Papers 25, 47 (1986): 257-260.
  • Heise, Arne. “Krise der Wirtschaftswissenschaft — Raum für Alternativen? Plädoyer für einen Pluralismus in der Ökonomik.” In Methodenpluralismus in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften, edited by Uwe Jens and Hajo Romahn, pp. 33-50. Marburg, Germany: 2010.
  • Heise, Arne, Katrin Hirte, Walter Ötsch, Stephan Pühringer, Andreas Reichl, Henrike Sander and Sebatsian Thieme. Ökonomen und Ökonomie. Eine wissenschaftssoziologische Entwicklungsanalyse zum Verhältnis von Ökonomen und Ökonomie im deutschsprachigen Raum ab 1945. Final Report of Research Projekt sponsored by the Hans Böckler Foundation, Unpublished manuscript. Hamburg, Germany: 2015.
  • Heise, Arne, Jürgen Kromphardt and Jan Priewe. “Alternative Konzeptionen makroökonomischer Politik im Spannungsfeld von Arbeitslosigkeit, Globalisierung und hoher Staatsverschuldung.” In Die arbeitslose Gesellschaft und ihr Sozialstaat, edited by Kai Eicker-Wolf et al., pp. 95-136. Marburg, Germany: Metropolis, 1998.
  • Hermann-Pillath, Carsten. Grundriß der Evolutionsökonomik. München, Germany: W. Fink, 2002.
  • Hesse, Jan-Otmar. “Hochschulreformgeschichte als Disziplingeschichte — Das Beispiel der Wirtschaftswissenschaften.” In Zwischen Idee und Zweckorientierung: Vorbilder und Motive von Hochschulreformen seit 1945, edited by Andreas Franzmann and Barbara Wolbring, pp. 121-135. Berlin, Germany: Akademie Verlag, 2007.
  • Hesse, Jan-Otmar. Wirtschaft als Wissenschaft: Die Volkswirtschaftslehre in der frühen Bundesrepublik, Frankfurt, Germany: Campus, 2010.
  • Kampe, Dieter. “Fünf Weise in der Wirtschaft — Sachverstand live erlebt.” In Millionen Arbeitslose! Streitschrift gegen den Rat der Fünf Weisen: Eine Bilanz nach zwanzig Jahren, edited by Rudolf Hickel and Harald Mattfeldt, pp. 35-52. Reinbeck b. Hamburg, Germany: Rowohlt, 1983.
  • Kellert, Stephen, Helen Longino and C. Kenneth Waters, eds. Scientific Pluralism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2006.
  • Keynes, John Maynard. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan, 1936.
  • King, John. “Three Arguments for Pluralism.” Journal of Australian Political Economy 50 (2002a): 82-88.
  • King, John. A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2002b.
  • Klamer, Arjo. “Does This Have to Be Our Future?” In The Making of an Economist, Redux, edited by David Colander, pp. 227-233. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.
  • Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 1962.
  • Kuhn, Thomas. “Reflections on my Critics.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, pp. 231-278. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
  • Lakatos, Imre. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Imre Lakatos: The Methodology of Scientifc Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers Vol. I, edited by John Worrall and Gregory Currie, pp. 8-71. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
  • Lawson, Tony. “The Nature of Heterodox Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 30, 4 (2006): 483-507.
  • Lee, Fred. A History of Heterodox Economics: Challenging the Mainstream in the 20th Century. New York, NY: Routledge, 2009.
  • Lucas, Robert. “Macroeconomic Priorities.” American Economic Review 93, 1 (2009): 1-14.
  • Merkel, Angela. “Rede von Frau Bundeskanzlerin Merkel bei der 5. Lindauer Tagung der Wirtschaftswissenschaften.” www.bundesregierung.de, August 20, 2014. Available at www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Rede/2014/08/2014-08-20-lindau.html. Accessed August 18 2016.
  • Mirowski, Philip. More Heat Than Light. Economics as Social Physics: Physics as Nature’s Economics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  • Mishan, Ezra. “Say’s Law and Walras’ Law Once More.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 77, 4 (1963): 617-625.
  • Planck, Max. Wissenschaftliche Selbstbiographie. Leipzig, Germany: J.A. Barth, 1948.
  • Ptak, Ralf. Vom Ordoliberalismus zur Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Stationen des Neoliberalismus in Deutschland. Opladen, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2004.
  • Rosser, J. Barkley, Richard Holt and David Colander. European Economics at a Crossroads, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2010.
  • Sargent, Thomas. Macroeconomic Theory. New York, NY: Emerald, 1979.
  • Schipper, Lena. “Marx im Regen.” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, October 8, 2013. Available at www.faz.net/-gyq-7i47e. Accessed August 18, 2016.
  • Schmidt, Christof and Nils aus dem Moore. “Die Methodendiskussion in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften vor dem Hintergrund der Finanzkrise.” In Methodenpluralismus in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften, edited by Uwe Jens and Hajo Romahn, pp. 143-182. Marburg, Germany: Metropolis, 2010.
  • Skousen, Mark. “The Perseverance of Paul Samuelson’s Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11, 2 (1997): 137-152.
  • Smith, Vernon. “Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics.” In The Nobel Prizes 2002, edited by Tore Frängsmyr, pp. 502-561. Stockholm: Nobel Foundation, 2003.
  • Snowdon, Brian and Howard Vane. “The Development of Modern Macroeconomics.” In A Macroeconomic Reader, edited by Brian Snowdon and Howard Vane, pp. 1-25. London: Routledge, 1997.
  • Solow, Robert. “What Is a Nice Girl Like You Doing in a Place Like This? Macroeconomics After Fifty Years.” Eastern Economic Journal 12, 3 (1986): 191-198.
  • Sraffa, Piero. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1960.
  • Stabu. “Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.4.” Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistisches Bundesamt, 2012.
  • Stiglitz, Joseph. “Moving Beyond Market Fundamentalism to a More Balanced Economy.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80, 3 (2009a): 345-360.
  • Stiglitz, Joseph. “The Current Economic Crisis and Lessons for Economic Theory.” Eastern Economic Journal 35, 3 (2009b): 281-296.
  • Stiglitz, Joseph. “Rethinking Macroeconomics: What Failed and How to Repair It.” Journal of the European Economic Association 9, 4 (2011): 591-645.
  • Stiglitz, Joseph. “The Lessons of the North Atlantic Crisis for Economic Theory and Policy.” In What Have We Learned? Macroeconomic Policy After the Crisis, edited by George Akerlof, Olivier Blanchard, David Romer and Joseph Stiglitz, pp. 335-347. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.
  • Summers, Peter. “What Caused the Great Moderation? Some Cross-Country Evidence.” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review 90, 3 (2005): 5-32.
  • Thielemann, Ulrich et al. “Für eine Erneuerung der Ökonomie: Memorandum besorgter Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler.” Berlin, Germany: March 2012. Available at www.mem-wirtschaftsethik.de/memorandum-2012/. Accessed August 16, 2016.
  • Vogt, Winfried. “Einleitung.” In Seminar: Politische Ökonomie. Zur Kritik der herrschenden Nationalökonomie, edited by Winfried Vogt, pp. 7-36. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp, 1973.
  • Von der Vring, Thomas. Hochschulreform in Bremen, Bericht des Rektors über Gründung und Aufbau der Universität Bremen während seiner Amtszeit von 1970–1974. Frankfurt, Germany: Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1975.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.