“Now, What Exactly is the Problem?“ Media Coverage of Economic Inequalities and Redistribution Policies: The Piketty Case

References

• Albarran, Alan. 2016. The Media Economy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Antonelli, Gilberto, and Boike Rehbein. 2018. Inequality in Economics and Sociology: New Perspectives. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, Anthony. 2015. Inequality: What Can Be Done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, Stefan, and Andreas Thiemann. 2016. “Hohe Erbschaftswelle, Niedriges Erbschaftsaufkommen.” DIW Wochenbericht 3: 63–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bagdikian, Ben Haig. 2004. The New Media Monopoly. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bank, Julian. 2016. “Leerstelle in der wirtschaftspolitischen Debatte? Die Piketty‐Rezeption und Vermögensungleichheit in Deutschland.” Ethik und Gesellschaft 1: 1‐31.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Carole V., and Robert M. Entman. 2011. “The Media's Role in America's Exceptional Politics of Inequality: Framing the Bush Tax Cuts of 2001 and 2003.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (4): 548–572.
   Google Scholar
• Bernau, Patrick. 2014. “Geld Bringt Weniger: Reichtum war noch nie so nutzlos.” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, June 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bettig, Ronald V., and Jeanne Lynn Hall. 2012. Bid Media, Big Money: Cultural Texts and Political Economics, 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Birkinbine, Benjamin J., Rodrigo Gómez, and Janet Wasko, eds. 2017. Global Media Giants. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, Samuel. 1988. “Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1): 75–111.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, Samuel, Richard Edwards, Frank Roosevelt, and Mehrene Larudee. 2017. Understanding Capitalism: Competition, Command, and Change (4th Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, Samuel, and Yongjin Park. 2005. “Emulation, Inequality, and Work Hours: Was Thorsten Veblen Right?” The Economic Journal 115 (507): F397–F412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, Samuel, and Sandra Polania‐Reyes. 2012. “Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements?” Journal of Economic Literature 50 (2): 368–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau van Dijk. Orbis. 2017. Available at https://orbis.bvdinfo.com/. Accessed November 10, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Champlin, Dell P., and Janet Knoedler. 2002. “Operating in the Public Interest or in Pursuit of Private Profits? News in the Age of Media Consolidation.” Journal of Economic Issues 36 (2): 459–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champlin, Dell P., and Janet T. Knoedler. “American Prosperity and the ‘Race to the Bottom’: Why Won't the Media Ask the Right Questions?” Journal of Economic Issues 42 (1): 133–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dröge, Kai, Kira Marrs, Wolfgang Menz, eds. 2008. Rückkehr der Leistungsfrage: Leistung in Arbeit, Unternehmen und Gesellschaft. Berlin: Edition sigma.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2018. “Stuck In the Past: Countries Must Overhaul Their Tax Systems to Make Them Fit for the 21st Century.” The Economist, August 11, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Eley, Jay. 2014. “Growing More Relaxed About the Filthy Rich.” Financial Times, April 26.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, Larry. 2014. “Thomas Piketty: The French Economist Changing the Way We Think About Wealth” The Guardian, May 3, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media Discourse. New York: E. Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman. 2013. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Policy Studies.” Critical Policy Studies 7, no. 2: 177–197.
   Google Scholar
• Feld, Lars P. 2014. Lars Feld: Hauptsache, Mehr Staat: Das Fatale Französische Rezept. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, May 15, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ferschli, Benjamin, Daniel Grabner, and Hendrik Theine. 2019. Zur Politischen Ökonomie der Medien in Deutschland: Eine Analyse der Konzentrationstendenzen und Besitzverhältnisse. ISW‐Report Nr. 118, München: Institut für Sozial‐Ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times. 2014. “Big Questions Hang Over Piketty's Work: Data Problems and Errors in Bestseller Must be Addressed.” Financial Times, May 27, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fullbrook, Edward. 2003. The Crisis in Economics. New York and Abingdon (UK): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, James K. 2012. Inequality and Instability: A Study of the World Economy Just Before the Great Crisis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, James K. 2014. “Unpacking the First Fundamental Law.” Real‐World Economics Review 69: 145–149.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, James K. 2019. “Sparse, Inconsistent and Unreliable: Tax Records and the World Inequality Report 2018.” Development and Change 50 (2): 329–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, John K. 1958. The Affluent Society. Boston, MA: Houghton‐Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, John K. 1970a. “Economics as a System of Belief.” The American Economic Review 60 (2): 469–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, John K. 1970b. The Anatomy of Power. London: Hamish Hamilton.
   Google Scholar
• Gandy, Oscar H. Jr. 2007. Minding the Gap: Covering Inequality in the NY Times and the Washington Post. Paper presented at the IAMCR Section on Political Communication, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, Chris. 2014. “Piketty Did His Sums Wrong in Bestseller that Tapped into the Inequality Zeitgeist.” Financial Times, May 24, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gimpelson, Vladimir, and Daniel Treisman. 2018. “Misperceiving Inequality.” Economics & Politics 30 (1): 27–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisold, Andrea. 2004. Kulturindustrie Fernsehen. Zum Wechselverhältnis von Ökonomie und Massenmedien. Wien: Löcker‐Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Grisold, Andrea. 2011. “Zwischen Zähmung und Entfaltung. Der regulationstheoretische Ansatz.” In Gesellschaft! Welche Gesellschaft? Nachdenken über eine sich wandelnde Gesellschaft. Edited by Walter Ötsch, Karin Hirte and Jürgen Nordmann, 119–142, Marburg: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Grisold, Andrea, and Daniel Patrick Grabner. 2018. “Maturity and Decline in Press Markets of Small Countries. The Case of Austria.” Recherche en Communication 44: 49–80.
   Google Scholar
• Grisold, Andrea, Paschal Preston, eds. 2020. Economic Inequality and News Media: Discourse, Power, and Redistribution. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grisold, Andrea, Paschal Preston, Maria Rieder, Henry Silke, Hendrik Theine. 2017. The Mediation of Economic Inequality. Media Coverage of Piketty's Book ‘Capital in the 21st Century.’ Vienna: Institute for Institutional and Heterodox Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Grisold, Andrea, and Henry Silke. 2019. “Denying, Downplaying, Debating: Defensive Discourses of Inequality in the Debate on Piketty.” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (3): 264‐281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisold, Andrea, and Hendrik Theine. 2017. “How Come We Know? The Media Coverage of Economic Inequality.” International Journal of Communication 11: 4265–4284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, Robin. 2014. “Incomes Fail to Recover, Except for Those at the Very Top of the Ladder.” Financial Times, October 9, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, Jennifer, and Alisa Perren, eds. 2009. Media Industries: History, Theory, and Method. Chichester (UK): Wiley‐Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Huckin, Thomas. 2002. Textual Silence and the Discourse of Homelessness. Discourse & Society 13 (3): 347–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäger, Siegfried. 2015. Kritische Diskursanalyse: Eine Einführung, 6th ed. Duisburg: Unrast Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, Adam, and Crispin Thurlow. 2017. “Mediatizing the “Super‐Rich,” Normalizing Privilege.” Social Semiotics 27 (3): 276–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, Gerald. 2014. “Kluft zwischen Arm und Reich wächst auch bei uns.” Der Standard, June 5, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Nathan J., and Peter K. Enns. 2010. “Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self‐Reinforcing Link Between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 855–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, Marie Luise. 2005. Medienökonomik: Einführung in eine ökonomische Theorie der Medien. 2nd ed. München and Wien: R. Oldenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Kommission zur Ermittlung der Konzentration im Medienbereich (KEK). 2017. Mediendatenbank. Available at: https://www.kek‐ online.de/medienkonzentration/mediendatenbank/. Accessed November 12, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Korom, Philipp. 2017. “Erben [heirs].” In Handbuch Reichtum: Neue Erkenntnisse aus der Ungleichheitsforschung, edited by Nikolaus Dimmel, Julia Hofmann, Martin Schenk and Martin, Schürz, 244–254. Wien: Studienverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Mark, and Stefan Schmid. 2015. “Germany's Industrial Family Firms: Prospering Islands of Social Capital in a Financialized World?” Competition & Change 19 (4): 301–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippmann, Walter. 1923. Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Littler, Joe. 2018. Against Meritocracy. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 1996. Die Realität der Massenmedien [The Reality of the Mass Media], 2nd ed. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, Mariana. 2015. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. Vol. 1. Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mishel, Lawrence, John Schmitt, and Heidi Shierholz 2014. “Wage Inequality: A Story of Policy Choices.” New Labor Forum 23 (3): 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Monbiot, George. 2014. “The Rich Want Us to Believe Their Wealth is Good For Us All: As the Justifications for Gross Inequality Collapse, Only the Green Party is Brave Enough to Take on the Billionaires’ Boot Boys” The Guardian, July 30, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Noam, Eli. 2016. Who Owns the World´s Media? Media Concentration and Ownership around the World. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, Julie. 2014. The Panel: Thomas Piketty's Capital, The Guardian, May 1, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, Nat. 2014. “Why Raising Taxes in Ireland Would Be Good For Everybody.” Irish Independent, June 20, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ortner, Christian. 2014. “Wäre Österreich denn besser dran, wenn es keine Milliardäre gäbe?” Die Presse, May 16 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty‐First Century. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, Paschal, and Henry Silke. 2011. “Market ‘Realities’: De‐Coding Neoliberal Ideology and Media Discourses.” Australian Journal of Communications 28 (3): 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Priestland, David. 2014. “Are we at a Piketty Tipping Point for the Left? Unfortunately, History Suggests Not.” The Guardian, May 7, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, Maria, and Hendrik Theine. 2019. “‘Piketty is a Genius, But…’: An Analysis of Journalistic Delegitimation of Thomas Piketty's Economic Policy Proposals.” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (3): 248–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saez, Emmanuel, and Gabriel Zucman. 2014. “The Distribution of US Wealth, Capital Income and Returns since 1913.” University of California, Berkeley, October 2014. Accessed August 20, 2017. http://gabriel-zucman.eu/files/SaezZucman2014Slides.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scherrer, Christoph, and Timm B. Schützhofer. 2016. “Countermeasures Against Inequality.” In Combating Inequality, edited by Alexander Gallas, Hansjörg Herr, Frank Hoffer and Christoph Scherrer, 300–316. Oxon: Routledge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, Jakob. 2014 “Erben ist ungerecht.” Süddeutsche Zeitung, December 16, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Silke, Henry, and Ciara Graham. 2017. “Framing Privatisation: The Dominance of Neoliberal Discourse and the Death of the Public Good.” TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique 15 (2): 796–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, David. 2014. “Why Has This Frenchman Got the World at His Feet?” The Sunday Times, April 27, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sum, Ngai‐Ling, and Bob Jessop. 2013. Towards a Cultural Political Economy: Putting Culture in its Place in Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Theine, Hendrik, and Daniel Grabner. 2020. “Trends in Economic Inequality and News Mediascape.” In Economic Inequality and News Media: Discourse, Power, and Redistribution, edited by Andrea Grisold and Paschal Preston, 21–47. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theine, Hendrik, and Maria Rieder. 2019. “‘The Billionaires’ Boot Boys Start Screaming’: A Critical Analysis of Economic Policy Discourses in Reaction to Piketty's ‘Capital in the 21st Century,’” In Critical Policy Discourse Analysis, edited by Edited by Nicolina Montesano Montessori, Michael Farrelly and Jane Mulderrig. Edward Elgar, 169–192.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Richard. 2016. “‘I Think it's Absolutely Exorbitant!’ How UK Television News Reported the Shareholder Vote on Executive Remuneration at Barclays in 2012.” Critical Discourse Studies 13 (1): 94–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaara, Eero. 2014. “Struggles Over Legitimacy in the Eurozone Crisis: Discursive legitimation Strategies and Their Ideological Underpinnings.” Discourse & Society 25, no. 4: 500–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, Teun A. 2004. From Text Grammar to Critical Discourse Analysis. A Brief Academic Biography. Program of Discourse Studies. University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. 1904. The Theory of Business Enterprise. New York: Scribner's Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, Richard, and Kate Pickett. 2009. The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Tom. 2018. Inheritance Tax on Property: Everything You Need to Know about the 2017 Changes to Inheritance Tax on your Home, Houses and Property, and the Rules and Thresholds for the Main Residence Nil‐Rate Band in 2018/19. Which. Accessed April 19, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer. 2009. Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Martin. 2014. “A More Equal Society Will Not Hinder Growth.” The Irish Times, April 23, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zizzo, Daniel John. 2003. “Empirical Evidence on Interdependent Preferences: Nature or Nurture?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 27 (6): 867–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zizzo, Daniel John. 2005. Endogenous Preferences. SSRN, Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=823684. Accessed May 19, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, Ross. 2001. Democratic Distributive Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar