Critical Realism and Institutionalism in Economics: A New Perspective on an Old Debate

References

• Alston, Lee, Thrainn Eggertsson, and Douglass North. 1996. “Introduction.” In Empirical Studies in Institutional Change, edited by Lee Alston, Thrainn Eggertsson, and Douglass North, 1–5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austen, Siobhan, and Therese Jefferson. 2007. “Comparing Responses to Critical Realism.” Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (2): 257–282.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. (1975) 2008. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. (1979) 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism, 3th edition. London: Routledge,
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, Mark. 1997. Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boettke, Peter, and Virgil Henry Storr. 2002. “Post-classical Political Economy: Polity, Society and Economy in Weber, Mises and Hayek—Austrian School Perspectives—Max Weber, Ludwig Von Mises, Friedrich A. von Hayek.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 61 (1): 161–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, Paul D. 1987. “Theory of Institutional Change.” Journal of Economic Issues 21 (3): 1075–1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, Ronald. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica New Series, 4 (16): 387–405.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, Ronald. 1992. “The Institutional Structure of Production.” American Economic Review 82 (4): 713–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, Ronald. 1998. “The New Institutional Economics.” The American Economic Review 88 (2): 72–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colander, David. 2002. “The Death of Neoclassical Economics.” Journal of the History Thought 22 (2): 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, David, Richard Holt and Barkley RosserJr. 2004. “The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics.” Review of Political Economy, 16 (4): 485–499.
   Google Scholar
• Commons, John. 1931 “Institutional Economics.” American Economic Review 21: 648–657.
   Google Scholar
• Commons, John. 1934. Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political Economy. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Commons, John. 1950. The Economics of Collective Action. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Milton. 1953. The Methodology of Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furubotn, Eirik and Rudolf Richter. 1997. Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giannakouros, Panayotis and Lihua Chen. 2018. “A problem-solving approach to data analysis for economics.” Forum for Social Economics 47 (1): 87–114. DOI:10.1080/07360932.2015.1078737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, Walton. 1919. “The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory.” The American Economic Review, Supplement, Papers and Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association 9 (1): 309-318.
   Google Scholar
• Hands, Wade. 1993. “Popper and Lakatos in Economic Methodology.” In Rationality, Institutions; and Economic Methodology, edited by Bo Gustafsson, Christian Knudsen and Uskali Mäki, 61–75. Florence, KY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, John, Janet Hunter, and Collin Lewis. 1997. “Introduction Development and Significance of the NIE.” In The New Institutional Economics in Third World Development edited by John Harris, Janet Hunter, Collin Lewis, 1–16. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1988. Economics and Institutions: A Manifest for a Modern Institutional Economics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1993. “Institutional Economics: Surveying the ‘Old’ and the ‘New’.” Metroeconomica 44 (1): 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1998. “On the Evolution of Thorstein Veblen's Evolutionary Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 22 (4): 415–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2000. “What is the Essence of Institutional Economics?” Journal of Economic Issues 34 (2): 317–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2009. “Institutional Economics into the Twenty-First Century.” Studi e Note di Economia 14 (1): 03–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, Terence W. 1938. The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kapp, William. 1976. “The Nature and Significance of Institutional Economics.” KYKLOS 29 (2): 209–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, Frank. 1941. “The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economics: a Rejoinder.” Journal of Political Economy 49 (5): 750–753.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1th edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langlois, Richard. 1986. “The New Institutional Economics: an Introductory Essay.” In Economics as a Process, Essays in the New Institutional Economics, edited by Richard Langlois, 1–25, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Clive. 1996. “Holism and Collectivism in the Work of J. R. Commons.” Journal of Economic Issues 30 (4): 967–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Clive. 2015. “Order and Process in Institutionalist Thought: Commons and Ayres.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (4): 1053–1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 1997. Economics and Reality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 2003. “Institutionalism: on the Need to Firm up Notions of Social Structure and the Human Subject.” Journal of Economic Issues 37 (1): 175–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 2005. “The Nature of Institutional Economics.” Evolutionary Economics Institutions Review 2 (1): 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 2015a “Process, Order and Stability in Veblen.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (4): 993–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 2015b. “A Conception of Social Ontology.” In Social Ontology and Modern Economics, edited by Stephen Pratten, 19–52. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 2015c. “What is an Institution?” In Social Ontology and Modern Economics, edited by Stephen Pratten, 553–577. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Frederic. 2008. “Heterodox Economics.” The Long Term View. How Economics is Changing 7 (1): 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Machlup, Fritz. 1946. “Marginal Analysis and Empirical Research.” American Economic Review 36 (4): 519–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. 1998. “Is Coase a Realist?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (1): 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. 2004. “Theoretical Isolation and Explanatory Progress: Transaction Cost Economics and the Dynamics of Dispute.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 28 (3): 319–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, Deirdre. 1983. “The Rhetoric of Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 31 (2): 482–504.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, Thomas. 1993. Truth versus Precision in Economics. Cambridge: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ménard, Claude. 2001. “Methodological Issues in New Institutional Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1): 85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Ménard, Claude, and Mary Shirley. 2008. “Introduction.” In Handbook of New Institutional Economics, edited by Claude Ménard and Mary Shirley, 1–20. Verlag-Berlin-Heidelberg: Spring.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchel, Wesley C. 1925. “Quantitative Analysis in Economic Theory.” The American Economic Review 15 (1): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, Phillip. 1981. “Is There a Mathematical Neo Institutional Economics?” Journal of Economic Issues 15 (1): 593–613.
   Google Scholar
• North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, Douglass. 1992. “Institutions and Economic Theory.” The American Economist 36 (1): 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl. 1934. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Pratten, Stephen. 1997. “The Nature of Transaction Cost Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 31 (3): 781–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roncaglia, Alessandro. 2005. The Wealth of Ideas. A History of Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Dorothy. 1991. The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Malcolm. 1996. “Institutions in Economics: the Old and the New Institutionalism.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Malcolm. 2011. The Institutionalist Movement in American Economics, 1918–1947: Science and Social Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, Warren. 1995. “The Present State of Institutional Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 19 (4): 569–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, Andrew. 2000. Realism in Social Science. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, Robert. 2000. “Credible Worlds: The Status of Theoretical models in Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (1): 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Stanfield, James. 1999. “The Scope, Method and Significance of Original Institutional Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 38 (3): 231–255.
   Google Scholar
• Sturgeon, James. 1984. “Induction and Instrumentalism in Institutional Thought.” Journal of Economic Issues 38 (2): 599–609.
   Google Scholar
• Tauheed, Linwood. 2011. “Proposed Methodological Synthesis of Post-Keynesian and Institutional Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 45 (4): 819–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tauheed, Linwood. 2013. “A Critical Institutionalist Reconciliation of ‘Contradictory’ Institutionalist Institutions: Institutions and Social Provisioning.” Journal of Economic Issues 47 (4): 827–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. 1904. The Theory of Business Enterprise. New York: Charles Scribner & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. (1898) 1919. “Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Science?.” In The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays, edited by Thorstein Veblen, 56–81. New York: B. W. Huebsch,
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. (1909) 1919. “The Limitations of Marginal Utility.” In The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays, edited by Thorstein Veblen, 231–251, Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers,
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. (1899) 2005. The Theory of Economic Leisure: an Economic Study of Institutions. New Delhi (IN): Aakar Books.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, William. 1988. “Radical Institutionalism: Methodological Aspects of the Radical Tradition.” Journal of Economic Issues 22 (3): 667–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, Oliver. 1975. Market and Hierarchies. Analysis and Antitrust Implication. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Oliver. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Oliver. 2000. “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead.” Journal of Economic Literature 38 (3): 596–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, Oliver. 2008. “Forewords.” In New Institutional Economics: a Guidebook, edited by Erik Brousseau and Jean-Michel Glachant, xxiii–xxviii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, James. 2007. “Pragmatisms (Plural) Part I: Classical Pragmatism and Some Implications for Empirical Inquiry.” Journal of Economic Issues 41 (4): 1063–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Matthew. 2005. “The Veblenian Critique and Critical Realism: a comparison of critical theories of mainstream economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 39 (2): 519–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonay, Yuval. 1998. The Struggle over the Soul of Economics: Institutionalist and Neoclassical Economists in America between the Wars. Princeton-: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar