Heterodoxy, the Mainstream and Policy

References

• Arthur, W. Brian. 1999. “Complexity and the Economy.” Science 284 (5411): 107–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5411.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhouse, Roger E. 2000. “Progress in Heterodox Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (2): 149–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710050025358
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, Roger E., and Beatrice Cherrier. 2017. “The Age of the Applied Economist: The Transformation of Economics since the 1970s.” History of Political Economy 49 (Supplement): 1–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-4166239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhouse, Roger E., and Steven G. Medema. 2009. “Retrospectives: On the Definition of Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 23, no. 1 (Winter): 221–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, Robert. 2017. “Orthodoxie, Heterodoxies et Capitalismes Contemporains.” Revue de la Régulation, Available at http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/12626. Accessed March 30, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman, Harry. 1975. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, Daniel W. 1989. Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, James M. 1991. Constitutional Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cedrini, Mario, and Magda Fontana. 2018. “Just Another Niche in the Wall? How Specialization Is Changing the Face of Mainstream Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 42 (2): 427–451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bex003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, Ronald H. 1988. The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago: Chicago University Press
   Google Scholar
• Colander, David. 2000. “The Death of Neoclassical Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (2): 127–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710050025330
   Google Scholar
• Commons, John R. 1924. Legal Foundations of Capitalism. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, Colin. 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• David, Paul. 1997. “Path Dependence and the Quest for Historical Economics: One More Chorus of Ballad of QWERTY.” Oxford Economic and Social History Working Paper 020. University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, Paul. 2003–2004. “Setting the Record Straight on A History of Post Keynesian Economics.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 26 (2): 245–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, John B. 2008. “The Turn in Recent Economics and Return of Orthodoxy.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 32 (3): 349–366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bem048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsetz, Harold. 1969. “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint.” Journal of Law & Economics, March doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/466657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, Dudley. 1980. “A Monetary Theory of Production: Keynes and the Institutionalists.” Journal of Economic Issues 14 (2): 255–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1980.11503744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobusch, Leonhard, and Jakob Kapeller. 2012. “Heterodox United vs. Mainstream City? Sketching a Framework for Interested Pluralism in Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 66 (4): 1035–1058. doi:https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, Joseph. 1970. “Heterodox Economic Thinking and Public Policy.” Journal of Economic Issues 4 (1): 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1970.11502934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, Sheila C. 2000. “Prospects for the Progress of Heterodox Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (2): 157–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710050025367
   Google Scholar
• Dow, Sheila C. 2012. “Babylonian Mode of Thought.” In The Elgar Companion to Post Keynesian Economics, edited by John Edward King, 15–19. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar:
   Google Scholar
• Dutt, Amitava Krishna. 2005. “On Post Walrasian Economics, Macroeconomic Policy and Heterodox Economics.” In Interactions in Analytical Political Economy: Theory, Policy and Applications, edited by Mark Setterfield, 247–264. London: Armonk.
   Google Scholar
• Elsner, Wolfram. 2017. “Complexity Economics as Heterodoxy: Theory and Policy.” Journal of Economic Issues 51 (4): 939–978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2017.1391570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsner, Wolfram, Torsten Heinrich, and Henning Schwardt. 2015. The Microeconomics of Complex Economies: Evolutionary, Institutional, Neoclassical, and Complexity Perspectives. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreras, Isabelle, Dominique Méda, and Julie Battilana, eds. 2020. Le Manifeste travail: Démocratiser, Démarchandiser, Dépolluer. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, Giuseppe, and Bill Gerrard. 2006. “The Future of Post Keynesian Economics.” Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro Quarterly Review 59 (236): 49–80.
   Google Scholar
• Frigato, Pietro, and Francisco Javier Santos-Arteaga. 2012. “Planned Obsolescence and the Manufacturing of Doubt. On Social Costs and the Evolutionary Theory of the Firm.” In Social Costs Today: Institutional Analyses of the Present Crises, edited by Paolo Ramazzotti, Pietro Frigato, and Wolfram Elsner. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garegnani, Pierangelo. 1987. “Surplus Approach to Value and Distribution.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, edited by John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, Peter Newman, 560–574. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 1969. “Process in Farming Versus Process in Manufacturing: A Problem of Balanced Development.” In Economic Problems of Agriculture in Industrial Societies: Proceedings of a Conference Held by the International Economic Association, edited by Ugo Papi and Charles Nunn. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35 (4): 519–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1949. “The Meaning of Competition.” In Individualism and Economic Order. London: Routledge and Kegan.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1978. “The Errors of Constructivism.” In New Studies: In Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. London: Routledge & Kegan.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2006. “What Are Institutions?” Journal of Economic Issues 40 (1): 1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, Tae-Hee, Lynne Chester, and Carlo D’Ippoliti, eds. 2017. The Routledge Handbook of Heterodox Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kalecki, Michal. 1990. “Political Aspects of Full Employment.” In Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Volume 1. Capitalism: Business Cycles and Full Employment, edited by Edited by Jerzy Osiatynski. Translated by Chester Adam Kisiel, 347–356. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kapp, Karl William. 2000. The Social Costs of Business Enterprise. Nottingham: Spokesman.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, John Maynard. 1973a. “A Monetary Theory of Production.” In The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. 13: The General Theory and After. 1, Preparation, edited by Donald Edward Moggridge. London, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, John Maynard. 1973b. The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kirzner, Israel M. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, Marc. 2012. “Perspectives for Post-Keynesian Economics.” Review of Political Economy 24 (2): 321–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2012.664356
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 2006. “The Nature of Heterodox Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 30 (4): 483–505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, Peter, and Cassey Lee. 2018. “A Review of the Recent Literature on the Institutional Economics Analysis of the Long-Run Performance of Nations.” Journal of Economic Surveys 32 (1): 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. 2009. “MISSing the World. Models as Isolations and Credible Surrogate Systems.” Erkenntnis 70 (1): 29–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-008-9135-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marglin, Stephen A. 1976. “What Do Bosses Do? The Origins and Functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production.” The Division of Labour: The Labour Process and Class Struggle in Modern Capitalism, edited by A. Gorz, 13–54. Brighton; Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 1992. Capital: Volume 1: A Critique of Political Economy. Edited by Ernest Mandel. Translated by Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Mearman, Andrew. 2012. “‘Heterodox Economics’ and the Problems of Classification.” Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (4): 407–424. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2012.742201
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, Alan. 1981. “‘Unreal Assumptions’ in Economic Theory: The F-Twist Untwisted.” Kyklos 34 (3): 377–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1981.tb01195.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrave, Richard A. 2008. “Merit Goods.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed. Vol. 5, edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence Blume. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Richard R. 2003. “On the Complexities and Limits of Market Organization.” Review of International Political Economy 10 (4): 697–710. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290310001601885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, Richard R. (ed.) 2005. The Limits of Market Organization. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Richard R. 2007. “Institutions and Economic Growth: Sharpening the Research Agenda: Remarks upon Receipt of the Veblen-Commons Award.” Journal of Economic Issues XLI (2): 313–323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2007.11507018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, Douglass C. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Okun, Arthur M. 1975. Equality and Efficiency, the Big Tradeoff. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, Luigi L. 1986. “Theory of Value: A Source of Alternative Paradigms in Economic Analysis.” In Foundations of Economics: Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, edited by Mauro Baranzini and Roberto Scazzieri. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. Toronto: Rinehart & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ramazzotti, Paolo. 2014. “Shared Economic Thought and the Neglect of Social Costs: Reflections on Why Progressive Economists Often Stick to Conventional Wisdom.” Journal of Economic Issues 48 (4): 1113–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramazzotti, Paolo. 2020. “Economic Policy, Social Identity and Social Consensus.” International Journal of Political Economy 49 (2): 139–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2020.1778864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Review of Political Economy. 2012. Symposium: The Future of Post-Keynesian Economics and Heterodox Economics contra their Critics. Review of Political Economy 24 (2): 303–368.
   Google Scholar
• Review of Radical Political Economics. 2011. Symposium: The Pluralism Debate in Heterodox Economics. Review of Radical Political Economics 43 (4): 540–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röpke, Wilhelm. 1960. A Humane Economy: The Social Framework of the Free Market. Chicago: H. Regnery.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, Warren J. 1977. “Technology Vis-a-Vis Institutions in the JEI: A Suggested Interpretation.” Journal of Economic Issues 11 (4): 871–895 doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1977.11503490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, Warren J., Steven G. Medema, and A. Allan Schmid. 1997. “The Concept of Cost in Economics.” In The Economy as a Process of Valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, Warren J., Allan A. Schmid, and James D. Shaffer. 1994. “An Evolutionary Approach to Law and Economics.” In Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics, edited by Richard W. England. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, A. Allan. 1987. Property, Power, and Public Choice: An Inquiry into Law and Economics. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Susan K. 2019. “Vision, Value, and Pluralism: A Comment on Analytical Political Economy.” Journal of Economic Issues 53 (2): 433–439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2019.1594530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1934) 2011. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Edited by Redvers Opie. Cambridge: Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 1982. “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory.” In Choice, Welfare, and Measurement. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 1986. “Rationality, Interest, and Identity.” In Development, Democracy, and the Art of Trespassing: Essays in Honor of Albert O. Hirschman, edited by Alejandro Foxley, Michael S. McPherson, and Guillermo O’Donnell, 343–354. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert A. 1972. “Theories of Bounded Rationality.” In Decision and Organization: A Volume in Honor of Jacob Marschak, edited by C. B. McGuire, Kenneth J. Arrow, Roy Radner, and Jacob Marschak. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Stanfield, James Ronald, and Michael C. Carroll. 2004. “Governance and the Legitimacy of Corporate Power: A Path for Convergence of Heterodox Economics?” Journal of Economic Issues 37 (2): 363–370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2004.11506695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2000. Economics of the Public Sector. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, Jan. 1956. Economic Policy: Principles and Design. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Tool, Marc R. 2000. The Discretionary Economy: A Normative Theory of Political Economy. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vanberg, Viktor J. 2001. The Constitution of Markets: Essays in Political Economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. 1904. The Theory of Business Enterprise. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. 1908. “On the Nature of Capital: Investment, Intangible Assets, and the Pecuniary Magnate.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 23 (1): 104–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1883967
   Google Scholar
• Vernengo, Matias. 2010. “Conversation or Monologue? On Advising Heterodox Economists.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 32 (3): 389–396. doi:https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477320304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, Oliver E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies, Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York and London: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Oliver E. 1993. “Contested Exchange versus the Governance of Contractual Relations.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (1): 103–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.1.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, Oliver E. 1998. “Transaction Cost Economics: How It Works: Where It Is Headed.” De Economist 146 (1): 23–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar