The Entrepreneurial Function as an Element of the Institutional Framework of Capitalism: The Enterprise, Not the Pure Entrepreneur, is Relevant

References

• Barreto, Humberto. 1989. The Entrepreneur in Microeconomic Theory: Disappearance and Explanation. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baumol, William J. 1968. “Entrepreneurship in Economic Theory.” American Economic Review 58 (2) Papers and Proceedings: 64–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol, William J. 2010. The Microtheory of Innovative Entrepreneurship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, Wilhelm Eduard. 1904. Zur Lehre von der Produktion (Notes on the Theory of Production). Leipzig: Jäh & Schunke.
   Google Scholar
• Biondi, Yuri. 2007. “Accounting and the Economic Nature of the Firm as an Entity.” In The Firm as an Entity. Edited by Y. Biondi, A. Canziani, and T. Kirat, 237–265. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biondi, Yuri. 2013. “The Governance and Disclosure of the Firm as an Enterprise Entity.” Seattle University Law Review 36 (2): 391–416.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Eduard. 2017. “The Theory of Capital as a Theory of Capitalism.” Journal of Institutional Economics 13 (2): 305–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Eduard. 2019. “Gibt es eine liberale Position zur Haftungsbeschränkung für Kapitalgesellschaften?” (Does Liberalism have a Position on the Limitation of Liability for Business Corporations?) Jahrbuch normative und institutionelle Grundfragen der Ökonomik 17: 101–116
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Eduard. 2021. “The Institutional Preconditions of Homo Economicus.” Journal of Economic Methodology 28 (2): 231–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Eduard. 2022. “Accounting for Market Equilibrium: Comparing the Revenue-Expense to the Balance-Sheet Approach.” Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium 12 (1): Article 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Eduard, and David Howden. 2017. “The Rise and Fall of the Subsistence Fund as a Resource Constraint in Austrian Business Cycle Theory.” Review of Austrian Economics 30 (2): 235–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brentano, Lujo. 1907. Der Unternehmer (The Entrepreneur). Berlin: Leonhard Simion.
   Google Scholar
• Bylund, Per L., and Matthew McCaffrey. 2017. “A Theory of Entrepreneurship and Institutional Uncertainty.” Journal of Business Venturing 32 (5): 461–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casson, Mark 2003. The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory, 2nd edition. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Casson, Mark and Wadeson, Nigel. 2007. “The Discovery of Opportunities: Extending the Economic Theory of the Entrepreneur.” Small Business Economics 28: 285–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheah, Hock-Beng. 1990. “Schumpeterian and Austrian Entrepreneurship: Unity within Duality.” Journal of Business Venturing 5 (6): 341–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commons, John R. 1924. Legal Foundations of Capitalism. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Demsetz, Harold. 1983. “The Neglect of the Entrepreneur.” In Entrepreneurship. Edited by Joshua Ronen, 271–280. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foss, Nicolai J., and Peter G. Klein. 2012. Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giménez-Roche, Gabriel A. 2016. “The Impossibility of Entrepreneurship Under the Neoclassical Framework: Open vs. Closed-Ended Processes.” Journal of Economic Issues 50 (3): 695–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gindis, David 2009. “From Fictions and Aggregates to Real Entities in the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Institutional Economics 5 (1): 25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gindis, David 2016. “Legal Personhood and the Firm: Avoiding Anthropomorphism and Equivocation.” Journal of Institutional Economics 12 (3): 499–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, Frank H. 1971. “Equilibrium with Transaction Costs.” Econometrica 39 (3): 417–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansman, Henry, and Reinier Kraakman. 2000. “The Essential Role of Organizational Law.” The Yale Law Journal 110 (3): 387–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansman, Henry, Reinier Kraakman, and Richard Squire. 2006. “Law and the Rise of the Firm.” Harvard Law Review 119 (5): 1333–1403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, Frederick Barnard. 1927. “The Orientation of Economics on Enterprise.” American Economic Review 17 (3): 409–428.
   Google Scholar
• Hébert, Robert F., and Albert N. Link. 2009. A History of Entrepreneurship. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, Wolfgang 1941. “Die volkswirtschaftliche Leistung des Kapitals” (The Economic Merit of Capital). Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 153: 382–399.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2003. “The Hidden Persuaders: Institutions and Individuals in Economic Theory.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 27 (2): 159–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2014. “What is Capital? Economists and Sociologists have Changed its Meaning: Should it be Changed Back?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 38: 1063–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2015. Conceptualizing Capitalism. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda, Sanford 1990. “Market-Process Theory and ‘Dynamic’ Theories of the Market.” Southern Economic Journal 57 (1): 75–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, Tae-Hee. 2019. “The Institutionalist Theory of the Business Enterprise: Past, Present, and Future.” Journal of Economic Issues 53 (3): 597–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, Tae-Hee, and John F. Henry. 2015. “The Business Enterprise in the Age of Money Manager Capitalism.” Journal of Economic Issues 49 (1): 23–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanbur, S. M. 1980. “A Note on Risk Taking, Entrepreneurship, and Schumpeter.” History of Political Economy 12 (4): 489–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoury, Theodore, and Ajnesh Prasad. 2016. “Entrepreneurship Amid Concurrent Institutional Constraints in Less Developed Countries.” Business & Society 55 (7): 934–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirzner, Israel M. (1973) 2013. The Collected Works of Israel M. Kirzner: Competition and Entrepreneurship, edited by Peter J. Boettke and Frederic Sautet. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Kirzner, Israel M. 2000. “Rationality, Entrepreneurship, and Economic ‘Imperialism.’” In The Driving Force of the Market, edited by Israel M. Kirzner, 258–271. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinwächter, Friedrich v. 1923. Lehrbuch der theoretischen Nationalökonomie (Textbook of Theoretical Economics), 4th edition. Leipzig: Hirschfeld.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Frank H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Laidler, David 2015. “Three Revolutions in Macroeconomics: Their Nature and Influence.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (1): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibenstein, Harvey 1966. “Allocative Efficiency vs. ‘X-Efficiency.’” American Economic Review 56 (3): 392–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, Peter, and Nicholás Cachanosky. 2018. “Value and Capital: Austrian Capital Theory, Retrospect and Prospect.” Review of Austrian Economics 31 (1): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, Peter, and Nicholás Cachanosky. 2019. Austrian Capital Theory. A Modern Survey of the Essentials. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liefmann, Robert. 1928. Die Unternehmungsformen: Mit Einschluss der Genossenschaften und der Sozialisierung (The Types of Enterprises: Including Cooperatives and Socialization), 4th edition. Stuttgart: Ernst Heinrich Moritz.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, Matthew. 2014. “On the Theory of Entrepreneurial Incentives and Alertness.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 38 (4): 891–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, Bruce A. 2005. “A Contemporary View of Joseph A. Schumpeter’s Theory of the Entrepreneur.” Journal of Economic Issues 39 (2): 485–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, John S. 2004. “The Entrepreneur and the Style of Modern Economics.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14: 157–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart. (1848) 1965. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. 2: Principles of Political Economy: with some of their Applications to Social Philosophy, Books I—II. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mises, Ludwig v. 1949. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plenge, Johann. 1926. “Zum ‘Tableau économique’” (Notes on the ‘Tableau Économique’). Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 24: 109–129.
   Google Scholar
• Quante, Peter. 1935. “Unternehmergewinn und Kapitalprofit als einheitliches Einkommen” (Profit and Interest as Uniform Income). Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 141: 129–158.
   Google Scholar
• Riedel, Adolph F. 1839. Nationalöconomie oder Volkswirthschaft (Economics and Economy), 2nd Volume. Berlin: Morin.
   Google Scholar
• Say, Jean Baptiste. 1803. Traité d’Économie Politique, ou Simple Exposition de la Manière dont Se Forment, Se Distribuent, et Se Consomment les Richesses (A Treatise on Political Economy; or The Production, Distribution, and Consumption of Wealth). Paris: Chez Deterville.
   Google Scholar
• Schloss, Henry H. 1968. “The Concept of Entrepreneurship in Economic Development.” Journal of Economic Issues 2 (2): 228–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, Theodore W. 1975. “The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria.” Journal of Economic Literature 13 (3): 827–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1911) 1997. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (Theory of Economic Development), 9th edition. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter. Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, Brian, Thomas J. Quasney, and Curtis M. Grimm. 2000. “Firm Level Performance Implications of Nonmarket Actions.” Business & Society 39 (2): 126–143.
   Google Scholar
• Sombart, Werner. 1919. Der modern Kapitalismus (Modern Capitalism), Volume 2:1. München and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Stauss, James H. 1944. “The Entrepreneur: The Firm.” In The Firm as an Entity, edited by Yuri Biondi, Arnaldo Canziani, and Thierry Kirat, 216–234. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Streller, Rudolf. 1926. “Zur Lehre vom Unternehmergewinn” (Notes on the Theory of Profit). Schmollers Jahrbuch 50 (1): 161–181.
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, Gunther. 1988. “Enterprise Corporatism: New Industrial Policy and the ‘Essence’ of the Legal Person.” American Journal of Comparative Law 36 (1): 130–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. (1904) 1954. The Theory of Business Enterprise. New York: New American Library.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. (1922) 1968. Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Translated from the German. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zwiedineck-Südenhorst, Otto von. 1930. “Kapital und Kapitalismus.” (Capital and Capitalism.) Schmollers Jahrbuch 54 (2): 1059–1092.
   Google Scholar