Fragmented State in a Neo-Developmental Experience: Examining Limits in Argentine Industrial Policy

References

• Alexander, Ernest. 1993. “Interorganizational Coordination: Theory and Practice.” Journal of Planning Literature 7 (4): 328–343. 10.1177/088541229300700403
   Google Scholar
• Alfini, Fabricio. Programas y Beneficios para la Industria Argentina. Guía 2015. Ministerio de Industria de la Nación - Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo.
   Google Scholar
• Amsden, Alice. 2001. The Rise of ‘The Rest’. Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amsden, Alice, and Wan-wen Chu. 2003. Beyond Late Development: Taiwan’s Upgrading Policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amsden, Alice, Takashi Hikino, and Leandro Wolfson. 1995. “La Industrialización Tardía En Perspectiva Histórica.” Desarrollo Económico 35 (137): 3–34. 10.2307/3467421
   Google Scholar
• Andreoni, Antonio. 2017. “Varieties of Industrial Policy. Models, Packages, and Transformation Cycles.” In Efficiency, Finance, and Varieties of Industrial Policy. Guiding Resources, Learning, and Technology for Sustained Growth, edited by Akbar Noman and Joseph Stiglitz, 245–305. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andreoni, Antonio, and Ha-Joon Chang. 2019. “The Political Economy of Industrial Policy: Structural Interdependencies, Policy Alignment and Conflict Management.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 48: 136–150. 10.1016/j.strueco.2018.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barletta, Florencia, Virginia Moori-Koering, and Gabriel Yoguel. 2014. “Política e Instrumentos Para Impulsar La Innovación En Las Pymes Argentinas.” In Una Promesa y Un Suspirar. Políticas de Innovación Para Pymes En América Latina, edited by Marco Dini, Sebastián Rovira, and Giovanni Stumpo, 23–69. Santiago: CEPAL - GIZ.
   Google Scholar
• Botto, Mercedes. 2007. “Los Think Tanks En Las Negociaciones Comerciales Externas, ¿Aconsejan, Median o Legitiman Intereses? Un Análisis Comparado Del Cono Sur.” In Saber y Política En América Latina: El Uso Del Conocimiento En Las Negociaciones Comerciales Internacionales, edited by Mercedes Botto, 81–128. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, Geert, Guy Peters, and Koen Verhoest. 2010a. “Coordination: What Is It and Why Should We Have It?” In The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations, edited by Geert Bouckaert, Guy Peters, and Koen Verhoest, 13–33. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, Geert, Guy Peters, and Koen Verhoest. 2010b. “Resources, Mechanisms and Instruments for Coordination.” In The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations, edited by Geert Bouckaert, Guy Peters, and Koen Verhoest, 34–66. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, Geert, Guy Peters, and Koen Verhoest. 2010c. The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cejudo, Guillermo, and Cynthia Michel. 2017. “Addressing Fragmented Government Action: Coordination, Coherence, and Integration.” Policy Sciences 50 (4): 745–767. 10.1007/s11077-017-9281-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Ha-Joon. 2010. “How to ‘Do’ a Developmental State: Political, Organisational and Human Resource Requirements for the Developmental State.” In Constructing a Democratic Developmental State in South Africa: Potentials and Challenges, edited by Omano Edigheji, 82–96. Cape Town: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Ha-Joon, and Antonio Andreoni. 2020. “Industrial Policy in the 21st Century.” Development and Change (51) 2: 324–51. 10.1111/dech.12570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherif, Reda, and Fuad Hasanov. 2019. “The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be Named: Principles of Industrial Policy.” IMF Working Paper 19/74: 1–79. 10.5089/9781498305402.001
   Google Scholar
• Chibber, Vivek. 2002. “Bureaucratic Rationality and the Developmetal State.” American Journal of Sociology 107 (4): 951–988. 10.1086/341010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chibber, Vivek. 2003. Locked in Place: State-Building and Late Industrialization in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chimhowu, Admos, David Hulme, and Lauchlan Munro. 2019. “The ‘New’ National Development Planning and Global Development Goals: Processes and Partnerships.” World Development 120: 76–89. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Mun‐boo. 1992. “Analyzing State Structure: Japan and South Korea in Comparative Perspective.” Pacific Focus 7 (2): 161–74. 10.1111/j.1976-5118.1992.tb00151.x
   Google Scholar
• Chodor, Tom. 2015. Neoliberal Hegemony and the Pink Tide in Latin America. Breaking up with TINA? London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Tom, Ole Martin Laegreid, and Per Laegreid. 2019. “Administrative Coordination Capacity; Does the Wickedness of Policy Areas Matter?” Policy and Society 38 (2): 237–54. 10.1080/14494035.2019.1584147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chudnovsky, Mariana, and María Laura Cafarelli. 2018. “Los Cambios En Las Estructuras Organizacionales Del Estado y Su Vínculo Con La Composición Del Empleo Público. Argentina, 2003–2016.” Foro Internacional 58 (2): 275–312. 10.24201/fi.v58i2.2465
   Google Scholar
• Cimoli, Mario, Giovanni Dosi, and Joseph Stiglitz. 2009. Industrial Policy and Development, the Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cimoli, Mario, Mario Castillo, Gabriel Porcile, and Giovanni Stumpo. 2017. Políticas Industriales y Tecnológicas En América Latina. Santiago: CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• de Ávila Gomide, Alexandre, and Roberto Rocha Pires. 2014. Capacidades Estatais e Democracia: Arranjos Institucionais de Políticas Públicas. Brasilia: IPEA.
   Google Scholar
• de la Cruz Prego, Fernando. 2020. “Structural Change in Post-Neoliberal Bolivia? Between Industrialization and the Commodity Boom.” America Latina Hoy 86 (Oct.): 103–121. 10.14201/alh.22554
   Google Scholar
• du Gay, Paul. 2012. En Elogio de La Burocracia: Weber, Organización, Ética. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Peter, and James Rauch. 1999. “Bureaucracy and Growth: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effects of ‘Weberian’ State Structures on Economic Growth.” American Sociological Review 5: 748–765. 10.2307/2657374
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, Víctor Ramiro. 2016. “Desde El Laboratorio Neo-Desarrollista a La Resurgencia Neoliberal. Una Revisión Creativa Del ‘Doble Movimiento’ Polanyiano En América Latina.” Revista Estado y Politicas Públicas 7: 21–47.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, Víctor Ramiro. 2017. La Trilogía Del Erizo-Zorro. Redes Globales, Trayectorias Nacionales y Dinámicas Regionales Desde La Periferia. Santa Fe: Anthropos y Universidad Nacional del Litoral.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, Víctor Ramiro, Matthias Ebenau, and Alcides Bazza. 2018. “Rethinking Varieties of Capitalism from the Latin American Periphery.” Review of Radical Political Economics 50 (2): 392–408. 10.1177/0486613417690139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, Víctor Ramiro, and Carolina Lauxmann. 2014. “¿Cuál(Es) Camino(s) Conduce(n) a Roma? Estado y Políticas Industriales En Los Desafíos Del Desarrollo Latinoamericano.” Cuadernos Del Cendes 31 (86): 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, Víctor Ramiro, and Cristhian Seiler. 2016. “Procesos de Acumulación, Industria y Pyme. El Caso Argentino y Los Límites Del Neodesarrollismo.” Sociedad y Economía 30 (enero-junio): 225–53. 10.25100/sye.v0i30.3907
   Google Scholar
• García Delgado, Daniel, and Agustina Gradin. 2017. El Neoliberalismo Tardío. Teoría y Praxis. Buenos Aires: FLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Evelin, and Matías Kulfas. 2011. “Alcances y Limitaciones de Las Políticas de Apoyo a Las Pymes En América Latina: Debates Para Un Nuevo Marco Conceptual y de Implementación.” Apoyando a Las Pymes: Políticas de Fomento En América Latina y El Caribe, edited by Carlo Ferraro, 429–90. Santiago: CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Grugel, Jean, and María Pia Riggirozzi. 2007. “The Return of the State in Argentina.” International Affairs 83 (1): 87–107. 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2007.00604.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grugel, Jean, and María Pia Riggirozzi. 2012. “Post-Neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and Reclaiming the State after Crisis.” Development and Change 43 (1): 1–21. 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01746.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, Omar. 2004. La Nueva Gestión Pública. Neoliberalismo En Administración Pública. México: Fontamara.
   Google Scholar
• Gulick, Luther. 1937. “Notes on the Theory of Organization.” In Papers on the Science of Administration, edited by Luther Gulick and Lyndall Urwick,1–47. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, Thomas. 1990. “In Defense of Luther Gulick’s’ Notes on the Theory of Organization.” Public Administration 68 (2): 143–73. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1990.tb00752.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, Brian, and John Alford. 2015. “Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management.” Administration and Society 47 (6): 711–39. 10.1177/0095399713481601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, Michale. 2000. “Managing the ‘Hollow State’: Procedural Policy Instruments and Modern Governance.” Canadian Public Administration 43 (4): 412–431. 10.1111/j.1754-7121.2000.tb01152.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, Edward, and Dale Krane. 1994. “Coordination and Welfare Reform: The Quest for the Philosopher’s Stone.” Public Administration Review 54 (4): 341–348. 10.2307/977381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, Bob. 2009. “The State and Power.” In The SAGE Handbook of Power, edited by Stewart Clegg and Mark Haugaard, edited by Stewart Clegg and Mark Haugaard, 367–382. Trowbridge: The Cromwell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy: 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karo, Erkki, and Rainer Kattel. 2014. “Public Management, Policy Capacity, Innovation and Development.” Revista de Economia Política 34 (1): 80–102. 10.1590/S0101-31572014000100006
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Claudio. 2015. “Qué Es El Neodesarrollismo? Una Visión Crítica. Argentina y Brasil” [What Is Neo-Developmentism? A Critical View. Argentina and Brazil]. Revista Serviço Social & Sociedade 122: 224–249. 10.1590/0101-6628.021
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, Atul. 2004. State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, Atul. 2009. “Estado y Desarrollo Económico.” Documentos y Aportes En Administración Pública y Gestión Estatal 9 (12): 7–29. 10.14409/da.v1i12.1242
   Google Scholar
• Kulfas, Matías. 2009. Las PYMES Argentinas En El Escenario Post Convertibilidad: Políticas Públicas, Situación y Perspectivas. Buenos Aires: CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Kulfas, Matías. 2016. Los Tres Kirchnerismos. Una Historia de La Economía Argentina 2003–2015. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Kulfas, Matías. 2018. Banca de Desarrollo e Inclusión Financiera de Las Pequeñas y Medianas Empresas: Un Estudio a Partir de Los Casos de La Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica y El Perú. Santiago: CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Lagreid, Per, and Lise Rykkja. 2015. “Organizing for ‘Wicked Problems’–Analyzing Coordination Arrangements in Two Policy Areas: Internal Security and the Welfare Administration.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 28 (6): 475–93. 10.1108/IJPSM-01-2015-0009
   Google Scholar
• Lavarello, Pablo. 2017. “El (Incompleto y Breve) Regreso de La Política Industrial: El Caso de Argentina 2003–2015.” Problemas Del Desarrollo. Revista Latinoamericana de Economía 48 (190): 109–35. 10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2017.190.58275
   Google Scholar
• Lavarello, Pablo, Matías Mancini, and Marianela Sarabia. 2017. “Respuestas Nacionales Frente a La Desindustrialización. Algunas Lecciones de La Política Industrial de Argentina 2003–2015.” Cuadernos Del CENDES 34 (95): 67–89.
   Google Scholar
• Lavarello, Pablo, and Marianela Sarabia. 2015. La Política Industrial En La Argentina Durante La Década de 2000. Buenos Aires: CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Justin, and Ha-Joon Chang. 2009. “Should Industrial Policy in Developing Countries Conform to Comparative Advantage or Defy It? A Debate Between Justin Lin and Ha-Joon Chang.” Development Policy Review 27 (5): 483–502. 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2009.00456.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, Emiliano. 2012. “El Rol de Los Actores Con Poder de Veto Informal En La Determinación Del Gasto Social En La Argentina Post-Neoliberal (2002–2008).” Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales 57 (215): 97–114.
   Google Scholar
• Manzanelli, Pablo, and Martín Schorr. 2012. “Extranjerización y Poder Económico Industrial En Argentina.” Problemas Del Desarrollo 43 (170): 39–67.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, Mariana, Rainer Kattel, and Josh Ryan-Collins. 2020. “Challenge-Driven Innovation Policy: Towards a New Policy Toolkit.” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 20 (2): 421–437. 10.1007/s10842-019-00329-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migdal, Joel, Atul Kohli, and Vivienne Shue. 1994. State Power and Social Forces: Domination and Transformation in the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, Guillermo. 2009. El Estado Burocrático Autoritario 1966–1973: Triunfos, Derrotas y Crisis. Prometeo.
   Google Scholar
• Oszlak, Oscar. 2006. “Burocracia Estatal: Política y Políticas Públicas.” POSTData Revista de Reflexión y Análisis Político 11: 11–56.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, Martin. 1981. “Central Agencies and the Coordination Principle.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 40 (4): 265–280. 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1981.tb00519.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEI [Plan Estratégico Industrial]. 2011. Plan Estratégico Industrial 2020. Buenos Aires: Presidencia de la Nación Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Perissinotto, Renato, Eric Dantas, Adriano Codato, and Thais Fillipi. 2015. “Ministros de Economía, Burocracia y Política Económica En El Desarrollismo Brasileño (1930–1964).” Anuario Del CEEED 7 (7): 57–102.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Guy. 1998. “Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Co-Ordination.” Public Administration 76 (2): 295–311. 10.1111/1467-9299.00102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, Guy. “2017. What Is so Wicked about Wicked Problems? A Conceptual Analysis and a Research Program.” Policy and Society 36 (3): 385–96. 10.1080/14494035.2017.1361633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, Guy. 2018. “The Challenge of Policy Coordination.” Policy Design and Practice 1 (1): 1–11. 10.1080/25741292.2018.1437946
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Guy, and Donald Savoie. 1996. “Managing Incoherence: The Coordination and Empowerment Conundrum.” Public Administration Review 56 (3): 281–290. 10.2307/976452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauch, James, and Peter Evans. 2000. “Bureaucratic Structure and Bureaucratic Performance in Less Developed Countries.” Journal of Public Economics 75 (1): 49–71. 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00044-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, Dani. 2009. “Industrial Policy: Don’t Ask Why, Ask How.” Middle East Development Journal 1 (1): 1–29. 10.1142/S1793812009000024
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal, Bishwapriya. 2005. “Planning as Anticipation of Resistance.” Planning Theory 4 (3): 225–245. 10.1177/1473095205058495
   Google Scholar
• Schapiro, Mario. 2014. “Ativismo Estatal e Industrialismo Defensivo: Instrumentos e Capacidades Na Política Industrial Brasileira.” In Capacidades Estatais e Democracia: Arranjos Institucionais de Políticas Públicas, edited by Alexandre de Ávila Gomide and Roberto Rocha Pires, 239–266. Brasilia: IPEA.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, Philippe. 1985. “Neocorporativismo y Estado.” ReiS. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 31: 47–77.
   Google Scholar
• Seiler, Cristhian. 2020. “La Paradoja de La Política Industrial En Argentina. Jerarquización y Ahuecamiento Del Ministerio de Industria de La Nación (2009–2015).” Colombia Internacional 104: 95–129. 10.7440/colombiaint104.2020.04
   Google Scholar
• Seiler, Cristhian. 2021. “Estado, Estrategias de Desarrollo y Las Ideas ‘Correctas’ En América Latina.” Sociedad y Economía 42: 1–17. 10.25100/sye.v0i42.10871
   Google Scholar
• Seiler, Cristhian, and Víctor Ramiro Fernández. 2017. “Política Pyme y Estructuras Estatales En Argentina (2003–2015): Vínculos Opacos y Sombras Inexploradas.” Revista Del CLAD Reforma y Democracia 68: 205–240.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, Eric, and Helga Leitner. 2010. “Quo Vadis Neoliberalism? The Remaking of Global Capitalist Governance after the Washington Consensus.” Geoforum 41 (2): 185–194. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, Theda. 1989. “El Estado Regresa Al Primer Plano: Estrategias de Análisis En La Investigación Actual.” Zona Abierta 50: 71–122.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, Theda. 2008. “Bringing the State Back In: Retrospect and Prospect The 2007 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture.” Scandinavian Political Studies 31 (2): 109–124. 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00204.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spink, Peter. 1999. “Technical Possibilities and Political Imperatives: Seventy Years of Administrative Reform in Latin America.” In Reforming the State: Managerial Public Administration in Latin America, edited by Carlos Bresser Pereira and Peter Spink, 91–114. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stumpo, Giovanni, and Diego Rivas. 2013. La Industria Argentina Frente a Los Nuevos Desafíos y Oportunidades Del Siglo XXI. Santiago: CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Sztulwark, Sebastián. 2010. “Políticas e Instituciones de Apoyo a Las Pymes En La Argentina.” In Políticas de Apoyo a Las Pymes En América Latina, edited by Giovanni Stumpo, 45–96. Santiago: CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoest, Koen, and Geert Bouckaert. 2005. “Machinery of Government and Policy Capacity: The Effects of Specialization and Coordination.” In Challenges to State Policy Capacity. Global Trends and Comparative Perspectives, edited by Martin Painter and Jon Pierre, 92–111. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, Robert. 2012. “Return of Industrial Policy?” International Review of Applied Economics 26 (2): 223–239. 10.1080/02692171.2011.640312
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Xum, M. Ramesh, and Michael Howlett. 2015. “Policy Capacity: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Policy Competences and Capabilities.” Policy and Society 34 (3–4): 165–171. 10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylde, Christopher. 2012. Latin America after Neoliberalism: Developmental Regimes in Post-Crisis States. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wylde, Christopher. 2016. “Post-Neoliberal Developmental Regimes in Latin America: Argentina under Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner.” New Political Economy 21 (3): 322–341. 10.1080/13563467.2016.1113949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, Henry Wai-chung. 2017. “Rethinking the East Asian Developmental State in Its Historical Context: Finance, Geopolitics and Bureaucracy.” Area Development and Policy 2 (1): 1–23. 10.1080/23792949.2016.1264868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar