Mode I traction-separation measured using rigid double cantilever beam applied to structural adhesive

References

• Goede, M.;. Sustainable Production Technologies of Emission Reduced Lightweight Car Concepts (Superlight-Car): Publishable Final Activity Report; European Commission Community Reshearch and Development Information Service: Brussles, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Conklin, J.; Beals, R.; Brown, Z. BIW Design and CAE. SAE Tech. Pap. Ser.2015, 2015-01-0408. DOI: 10.4271/2015-01-0408.
   Google Scholar
• Trimino, L.; Cronin, D. Evaluation of Numerical Methods to Model Structural Adhesive Response and Failure in Tension and Shear Loading. J. Dynamic Behav. Materials.2016, 2(1), 122–137. DOI: 10.1007/s40870-016-0045-7.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, L.; Campilho, R. Advances in Numerical Modelling of Adhesive Joints; Springer Berlin: Heidelberg, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Q.; Thouless, M. Mixed-Mode Fracture Analyses of Plastically-Deforming Adhesive Joints. Int. J. Fract.2001, 110(2), 175–187. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010869706996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallquist, J.;. LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual Volume II-R8876; Livermore Software Technology Corporation: Livermore, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Marzi, S.; Hesebeck, O.; Brede, M.; Kleiner, F. A Rate-Dependent, Elasto-Plastic Cohesive Zone Mixed-Mode Model for Crash Analysis of Adhesively Bonded Joints. Presented at the 7th European LS-DYNA conference, Salzburg, Austria, May 14-15, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, G.; Kies, J. Critical Energy Rate Analysis of Fracture Strength. Weld. J., Res. Suppl.1954, 33, 193s–198s.
   Google Scholar
• Ripling, E.; Mostovoy, S.; Patrick, R. Application of Fracture Mechanics to Adhesive Joints. In Adhesion, Committee D-14, Eds; ASTM International: Philadephia, 1964; pp 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D3433-99. Standard Test Method for Fracture Strength in Cleavage of Adhesives in Bonded Metal Joints; American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 25217:2009. Adhesives – Determination of the Mode 1 Adhesive Fracture Energy of Structural Adhesive Joints Using Double Cantilever Beam and Tapered Double Cantilever Beam Specimens; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, CH. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, R.; Campilho, R.; da Silva, F.; Faneco, T. Comparative Evaluation of the Double-Cantilever Beam and Tapered Double-Cantilever Beam Tests for Estimation of the Tensile Fracture Toughness of Adhesive Joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes.2016, 67, 103–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.12.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripling, E.; Mostovoy, S.; Corten, H. Fracture Mechanics: A Tool for Evaluating Structural Adhesives. J. Adhes.1971, 3(2), 107–123. DOI: 10.1080/00218467108081158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Moura, M. F. S. F.; Campilho, R. D. S. G.; Gonçalves, J. P. M. Crack Equivalent Concept Applied to the Fracture Characterization of Bonded Joints under Pure Mode I Loading. Composites Sci. Technol.2008, 68(10–11), 2224–2230. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzi, S.; Hesebeck, O.; Brede, M.; Kleiner, F. A Rate-Dependent Cohesive Zone Model for Adhesively Bonded Joints Loaded in Mode I. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol.2009, 23(6), 881–898. DOI: 10.1163/156856109X411238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastjerdi, A.; Pagano, M.; Kaartinen, M.; McKee, M.; Barthelat, F. Cohesive Behavior of Soft Biological Adhesives: Experiments and Modeling. Acta Biomater.2012, 8(9), 3349–3359. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastjerdi, A.; Tan, E.; Barthelat, F. Direct Measurement of the Cohesive Law of Adhesives Using a Rigid Double Cantilever Beam Technique. Exp. Mech.2013, 53(9), 1763–1772. DOI: 10.1007/s11340-013-9755-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högberg, J.; Sørensen, B.; Stigh, U. Constitutive Behaviour of Mixed Mode Loaded Adhesive Layer. Int. J. Solids Struct.2007, 44(25), 8335–8354. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, C.-H.; Watson, B.; Worswick, M.; Cronin, D. Mode I RDCB Test and Analysis Incorporating Adhesive Compliance Applied to Structural Adhesives. Presented at the 2017 Conference and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Indianapolis, USA, June 12-15, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Q.; Thouless, M.; Ward, S. Numerical Simulations of Adhesively-Bonded Beams Failing with Extensive Plastic Deformation. J. Mech. Phys. Solids.1999, 47(6), 1337–1353. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00101-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva, L.; Rodrigues, T.; Figueiredo, M.; De Moura, M.; Chousal, J. Effect of Adhesive Type and Thickness on the Lap Shear Strength. J. Adhes.2006, 82(11), 1091–1115. DOI: 10.1080/00218460600948511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P.; Sohier, L.; Cognard, J.; Bourmaud, A.; Choqueuse, D.; Rinnert, E.; Créac’hcadec, R. Influence of Adhesive Bond Line Thickness on Joint Strength. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes.2009, 29(7), 724–736. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva, L.; da Silva, R.; Chousal, J.; Pinto, A. Alternative Methods to Measure the Adhesive Shear Displacement in the Thick Adherend Shear Test. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol.2008, 22(1), 15–29. DOI: 10.1163/156856108X292241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D.; Christian, W. Simulating What You See: Combining Computer Modeling with Video Analysis. Presented at the 8th International Conference on Hands on Science, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Oct 11-13, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R.; Coppendale, J. The Stress-Strain Behaviour of Axially-Loaded Butt Joints. J. Adhes.1979, 10(1), 49–62. DOI: 10.1080/00218467908544611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallquist, J.;. LS-DYNA Theory Manual-R8697; Livermore Software Technology Corporation: Livermore, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Tvergaard, V.; Hutchinson, J. The Relation between Crack Growth Resistance and Fracture Process Parameters in Elastic-Plastic Solids. J. Mech. Phys. Solids.1992, 40(6), 1377–1397. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(92)90020-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafkalidis, M.; Thouless, M. The Effects of Geometry and Material Properties on the Fracture of Single Lap-Shear Joints. Int. J. Solids Struct.2002, 39(17), 4367–4383. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00344-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, M.; Hesebeck, O.; Marzi, S.; Böhme, W.; Lienhard, J.; Kilchert, S.; Brede, M.; Hiermaier, S. Rate Dependent Behavior of Crash-Optimized adhesives–Experimental Characterization, Model Development, and Simulation. Eng. Fract. Mech.2015, 133, 112–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesebeck, O.; Meyer, U.; Sondag, A.; Brede, M. Investigations on the Energy Balance in TDCB Tests. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes.2016, 67, 94–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.12.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman, B.; Hadavinia, H.; Kinloch, A.; Paraschi, M.; Williams, J. The Calculation of Adhesive Fracture Energies in Mode I: Revisiting the Tapered Double Cantilever Beam (TDCB) Test. Eng. Fract. Mech.2003, 70(2), 233–248. DOI: 10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00031-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karac, A.; Blackman, B.; Cooper, V.; Kinloch, A.; Sanchez, S.; Teo, W.; Ivankovic, A. Modelling the Fracture Behaviour of Adhesively-Bonded Joints as a Function of Test Rate. Eng. Fract. Mech.2011, 78(6), 973–989. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, D.; Blackman, B.; Guild, F.; Kinloch, A. Mode I Fracture in Adhesively-Bonded Joints: A Mesh-Size Independent Modelling Approach Using Cohesive Elements. Eng. Fract. Mech.2014, 115, 73–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar