Effect of hollow adherends on stress peak reduction in single-lap adhesive joints: FE and analytical analysis

References

• Keipour, N.; Valipour, H. R.; Bradford, M. A. Steel-timber Composite Beam-to-column Joints: Effect of Connections between Timber Slabs. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2018, 151, 132–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žigon, J.; Kovač, J.; Zaplotnik, R.; Saražin, J.; Šernek, M.; Petrič, M.; Dahle, S. Enhancement of Strength of Adhesive Bond between Wood and Metal Using Atmospheric Plasma Treatment. Cellulose. 2020, 27(11), 6411–6424. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-020-03212-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H.-Y.; Lee, S.-Y. A Steel-reinforced Hybrid GFRP Deck Panel for Temporary Bridges. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 34, 192–200. DOI: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2012.02.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banea, M. D.; Rosioara, M.; Carbas, R. J. C. C.; Da Silva, L. F. M. M. Multi-material Adhesive Joints for Automotive Industry, Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 151, 71–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parate, B. A. Propellant Actuated Device for Parachute Deployment during Seat Ejection for an Aircraft Application. HighTech Innov J. 2020, 1, 112–120. DOI: 10.28991/HIJ-2020-01-03-03.
   Google Scholar
• Fecht, S.; Vallée, T.; Tannert, T.; Fricke, H. Adhesively Bonded Hardwood Joints under Room Temperature and Elevated Temperatures. J Adhes. 2014, 905–6, 401–419. DOI:10.1080/00218464.2013.836968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderucci, T.; Terlizzi, V.; Urso, S.; Borsellino, C.; Munafò, P. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives Experimental Study of the Adhesive Glass-steel Joint Behavior in a Tensegrity Fl Oor. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2018, 85, 293–302. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.04.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchione, F.; Munafò, P. Experimental Strength Evaluation of Glass/aluminum Double-lap Adhesive Joints. J. Build. Eng. 30, 2020. DOI:10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchione, F. Stress Distribution in Double-lap Adhesive Joints: Effect of Adherend Reinforcement Layer. Int. J. Adhes Adhes. 2021, 105. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkersen, O. Die Nietkraftverteilung in Zugbeanspruchten Nietverbindungen Mit Konstanten Laschenquerschnitten. 1938.
   Google Scholar
• Goland, M.; Reer, E. Stresses in Cemented Joints. J Appl Mech. 1944, 66(1), A17. DOI: 10.1115/1.4009336.
   Google Scholar
• Hart-Smith, L. Adhesive-bonded Double-lap Joints. 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, M. Y.; Oplinger, D. W.; Morton, J. Improved Theoretical Solutions for Adhesive Lap Joints. Int. J. Solids Struct. 1998, 35(12), 1163–1185. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00097-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaro, A. M.; Neto, M. A.; Loureiro, A.; Reis, P. N. B. Taper’s Angle Influence on the Structural Integrity of Single-lap Bonded Joints. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2018, 96, 231–246. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, R. D.; Comyn, J.; Wake, W. C. Structural Adhesive Joints in Engineering; Chapman and Hall, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R. D.; Harris, J. A. The Influence of Local Geometry on the Strength of Adhesive Joints. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 1987, 7(2), 69–80. DOI: 10.1016/0143-7496(87)90092-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ávila, A. F.; De Bueno, P. D. O. An Experimental and Numerical Study on Adhesive Joints for Composites. Compos. Struct. 2004, 643–4, 531–537. DOI:10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrami, B.; Ayatollahi, M. R.; Beigrezaee, M. J.; Da Silva, L. F. M. Strength Improvement in Single Lap Adhesive Joints by Notching the Adherends. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2019, 95, 102401. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P.; Guo, W.; Zhao, Y.; Li, E.; Yang, Y.; Liu, H. Numerical Analysis of the Strength and Interfacial Properties of Adhesive Joints with Graded Adherends. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2019, 90, 88–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dos Reis, M. Q.; Marques, E. A. S.; Carbas, R. J. C.; Da Silva, L. F. M. Functionally Graded Adherends in Adhesive Joints: An Overview. J. Adv. Join. Process. 2020, 2, 100033. DOI: 10.1016/j.jajp.2020.100033.
   Google Scholar
• Fessel, G.; Broughton, J. G.; Fellows, N. A.; Durodola, J. F.; Hutchinson, A. R. Evaluation of Different Lap-shear Joint Geometries for Automotive Applications. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2007, 27(7), 574–583. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lousdad, A.; Megueni, A.; Bouchikhi, A. S. Geometric Edge Shape Based Optimization for Interfacial Shear Stress Reduction in Fiber Reinforced Polymer Plate Retrofitted Concrete Beams. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2010, 47(4), 911–918. DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cognard, J. Y.; Créac’hcadec, R.; Maurice, J. Numerical Analysis of the Stress Distribution in Single-lap Shear Tests under Elastic assumption—Application to the Optimisation of the Mechanical Behaviour. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2011, 31(7), 715–724. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannert, T.; Vallée, T.; Hehl, S. Probabilistic Strength Prediction of Adhesively Bonded Timber Joints, Wood Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 503–513. DOI: 10.1007/s00226-011-0424-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, R.; Al-Emrani, M.; Kliger, R. Interfacial Stress Analysis of Geometrically Modified Adhesive Joints in Steel Beams Strengthened with FRP Laminates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23(3), 1413–1422. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stazi, F.; Giampaoli, M.; Rossi, M.; Munafò, P. Environmental Ageing on GFRP Pultruded Joints: Comparison between Different Adhesives. Compos Struct. 2015, 133, 404–414. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchione, F.; Munafò, P. Influence of High Temperature Exposure on the Mechanical Performance of Double-lap Adhesive Joints between Glass and Aluminium Adherends. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 299, 124268. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D904-99. Standard Practice for Exposure of Adhesive Specimens to Artificial Light; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2013. n.d. www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar