Evolution of adhesion force behavior at the silica-HOPG interface from humidity-independent to humidity-dependent revealed on an AFM

References

• Maboudian, R.; Howe, R. T.; Howe, R. T. Critical Review: Adhesion in Surface Micromechanical Structures. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 1997, 15(1), 1–20. DOI: 10.1116/1.589247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y.-P.; Wang, L.-S.; Yu, T.-X. Mechanics of Adhesion in MEMS - a Review. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2003, 17(4), 519–546. DOI: 10.1163/15685610360554393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaghloul, U.; Papaioannou, G.; Bhushan, B.; Coccetti, F.; Pons, P.; Plana, R. On the Reliability of Electrostatic NEMS/MEMS Devices: Review of Present Knowledge on the Dielectric Charging and Stiction Failure Mechanisms and Novel Characterization Methodologies. Microelectron. Reliab. 1810, 2011(51). DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2011.07.081.
   Google Scholar
• Butt, H. J.; Cappella, B.; Kappl, M. Force Measurements with the Atomic Force Microscope: Technique, Interpretation and Applications. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2005, 59, 1–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfrep.2005.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite, F. L.; Bueno, C. C.; Da Roz, A. L.; Ziemath, E. C.; Oliveira, O. N., Jr. Theoretical Models for Surface Forces and Adhesion and Their Measurement Using Atomic Force Microscopy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 12773–12856. DOI: 10.3390/ijms131012773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quon, R. A.; Ulman, A.; Vanderlick, T. K. Impact of Humidity on Adhesion between Rough Surfaces. Langmuir. 2000, 16, 8912–8916. DOI: 10.1021/la000372l.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L.; Wan, K.-T.; Liu, -K.-K. Influence of Relative Humidity on Interparticle Capillary Adhesion. Langmuir. 2021, 37, 12714–12722. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. J.; Corti, D. S.; Beaudoin, S. P. Capillary Forces in Nanoparticle Adhesion: A Review of AFM Methods. Part. Sci. Technol. 2015, 33, 526–538. DOI: 10.1080/02726351.2015.1045641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, M. Y.; Blum, A. S.; Aston, D. E.; Buenviaje, C.; Overney, R. M.; Luginbuhl, R. Critical Phenomena of Water Bridges in Nanoasperity Contacts. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 1355–1360. DOI: 10.1063/1.1331298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukunishi, A.; Mori, Y. Adhesion Force between Particles and Substrate in a Humid Atmosphere Studied by Atomic Force Microscopy. Adv. Powder Technol. 2006, 17, 567–580. DOI: 10.1163/156855206778440552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paajanen, M.; Katainen, J.; Pakarinen, O. H.; Foster, A. S.; Lahtinen, J. Experimental Humidity Dependency of Small Particle Adhesion on Silica and Titania. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 304, 518–523. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.09.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziebert, C.; Zum Gahr, K. H. Microtribological Properties of Two-Phase Al2O3 Ceramic Studied by AFM and FFM in Air of Different Relative Humidity. Tribol. Lett. 2004, 17, 901–909. DOI: 10.1007/s11249-004-8098-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D.-I.; Grobelny, J.; Pradeep, N.; Cook, R. F. Origin of Adhesion in Humid Air. Langmuir. 2008, 24, 1873–1877. DOI: 10.1021/la702412y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.-T.; Walczak, W.; Banerjee, J.; Smith, N. J.; Agnello, G.; Zoba, A. N.; Manley, R.; Kim, S. H. Particle Size and Humidity Effects on Nanocellulose Adhesion to Glass: Implications for Mitigating Particulate Contamination in Industrial Processes. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022. DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.2c03938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, S.; Gorb, S. N. Fresh “Pollen Adhesive” Weakens Humidity-Dependent Pollen Adhesion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019, 11, 24691–24698. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b04817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D.; Choi, W. T.; Lin, H.; Qu, Z.; Breedveld, V.; Meredith, J. C. Humidity-Tolerant Rate-Dependent Capillary Viscous Adhesion of Bee-Collected Pollen Fluids. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1379. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09372-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadirov, N.; Booth, J. A.; Turner, K. L.; Israelachvili, J. N. Influence of Humidity on Grip and Release Adhesion Mechanisms for Gecko-Inspired Microfibrillar Surfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017, 9, 14497–14505. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b01624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, D.; Luo, A.; Wang, X.; Shi, Z.; Lei, Y.; Steinhart, M.; Kovalev, A.; Gorb, S. N.; Turner, K. T.; Humidity-Modulated Core–Shell, X. L. Nanopillars for Enhancement of Gecko-Inspired Adhesion. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 3596–3603. DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.0c00314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Materzok, T.; Gorb, S.; Müller-Plathe, F. Gecko Adhesion: a Molecular-Simulation Perspective on the Effect of Humidity. Soft Matter. 2022, 18, 1247–1263. DOI: 10.1039/D1SM01232K.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, B. N. J. Influence of Humidity on the Binding of Stone Fragments via Capillary Bridges. Europhys. Lett. 2022, 137, 46001. DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/ac5fcf.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, C. A.; Scheirey, S.; Monroe, J.; Zhang, R.; Main, E.; Jones, O.; Cheah, W.; Park, S.; Nobbe, B.; Sura, I., et al. The Effects of Surface and Particle Properties on Adhesion in Humid Environments Using the Enhanced Centrifuge Method. Colloids Surf. A. 2023, 656, 130478. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.130478.
   Google Scholar
• Birleanu, C.; Pustan, M.; Rusu, F.; Dudescu, C.; Muller, R.; Baracu, A. Relative Humidity Influence on Adhesion Effect in MEMS Flexible Structures. Microsyst. Technol. 2022, 28, 1–11. DOI: 10.1007/s00542-018-3848-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, T.; Zhu, T.; Chen, Y.; Guo, M. Different Evolution Behaviors of Adhesion Force with Relative Humidity at Silica/Silica and Silica/Graphene Interfaces Studied Using Atomic Force Microscopy. Langmuir. 2021, 37, 13075–13084. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, K.; Hu, M.; Huang, P. Influences of Relative Humidity and Dwell Time on Silica/Graphene Adhesion Force of a Cone–Plane Contact. Langmuir. 2022, 38, 12432–12440. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, B.; Tang, C.; Chen, L.; Xiao, C.; Rosenkranz, A.; Qian, L. Nanoscopic Humidity-Dependent Adhesion Behaviors of 2D Materials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 572, 151394. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, J.; Yang, M.; Schatz, G. Microscopic Origin of the Humidity Dependence of the Adhesion Force in Atomic Force Microscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 174705. DOI: 10.1063/1.2734548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H.; Smit, B.; Jang, J. Monte Carlo Study on the Water Meniscus Condensation and Capillary Force in Atomic Force Microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012, 116, 21923–21931. DOI: 10.1021/jp307811q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. J.; Beaudoin, S. P.; Corti, D. S. Wang-Landau Monte Carlo Simulation of Capillary Forces at Low Relative Humidity in Atomic Force Microscopy. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2016, 30, 1165–1177. DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2016.1143581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, Z.; Zhao, Y.-P. Growth of Liquid Bridge in AFM. J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys. 2007, 40, 4368–4375. DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/40/14/036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinovich, Y. I.; Singh, A.; Hahn, M.; Brown, S.; Moudgil, B. Kinetics of Liquid Annulus Formation and Capillary Forces. Langmuir. 2011, 27, 13514–13523. DOI: 10.1021/la202191c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transport, S. L. Mechanisms in Capillary Condensation of Water at a Single-asperity Nanoscopic Contact. Langmuir. 2012, 28, 2558–2566. DOI: 10.1021/la202917d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, X.; Qian, L. Investigation of Humidity-dependent Capillary Force. Langmuir. 2000, 16, 8153–8158. DOI: 10.1021/la000770o.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asay, D. B.; Kim, S. H. Effects of Adsorbed Water Layer Structure on Adhesion Force of Silicon Oxide Nanoasperity Contact in Humid Ambient. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 174712. DOI: 10.1063/1.2192510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R.; Pollock, H. M.; Cleaver, J. A. S.; Hodges, C. S. Adhesion Forces between Glass and Silicon Surfaces in Air Studied by AFM: Effects of Relative Humidity, Particle Size, Roughness, and Surface Treatment. Langmuir. 2002, 18, 8045–8055. DOI: 10.1021/la0259196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köber, M.; Sahagún, E.; García-Mochales, P.; Briones, F.; Luna, M.; Sáenz, J. J. Nanogeometry Matters: Unexpected Decrease of Capillary Adhesion Forces with Increasing Relative Humidity. Small. 2010, 6, 2725–2730. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201001297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. L.; Vaughn, M. W.; DeYoreo, J. J. Direct Imaging of Meniscus Formation in Atomic Force Microscopy Using Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy. Langmuir. 2005, 21, 8096–8098. DOI: 10.1021/la0512087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordillo, M. C.; Martı́, J. Molecular Dynamics Description of a Layer of Water Molecules on a Hydrophobic Surface. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 3425–3430. DOI: 10.1063/1.1495843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asay, D. B.; Kim, S. H. Evolution of the Adsorbed Water Layer Structure on Silicon Oxide at Room Temperature. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005, 109, 16760–16763. DOI: 10.1021/jp053042o.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdaguer, A.; Weis, C.; Oncins, G.; Ketteler, G.; Bluhm, H.; Salmeron, M. Growth and Structure of Water on SiO2 Films on Si Investigated by Kelvin Probe Microscopy and in Situ X-Ray Spectroscopies. Langmuir. 2007, 23, 9699–9703. DOI: 10.1021/la700893w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asay, D. B.; Barnette, A. L.; Kim, S. H. Effects of Surface Chemistry on Structure and Thermodynamics of Water Layers at Solid-Vapor Interfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2009, 113, 2128–2133. DOI: 10.1021/jp806815p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willard, A. P.; Chandler, D. The Molecular Structure of the Interface between Water and a Hydrophobic Substrate Is Liquid-Vapor Like. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 18C519. DOI: 10.1063/1.4897249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L.; He, X.; Liu, H.; Qian, L.; Kim, S. H. Water Adsorption on Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Surfaces of Silicon. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2018, 122, 11385–11391. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Physical, H. G. Adsorption on Non-Uniform Surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 1948, 16, 931–937. DOI: 10.1063/1.1746689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel, J. Kinetic Theory of Liquids; Oxford University Press: London and New York, 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, T. L. Physical Adsorption and the Free Volume Model for Liquids. J. Chem. Phys. 1949, 17, 590. DOI: 10.1063/1.1747341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman, T.; Zhu, D.-M. Adhesion Forces between Surface-Modified AFM Tips and a Mica Surface. Langmuir. 1996, 12, 2859–2862. DOI: 10.1021/la9504220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazrafshan, M.; de Rooij, M. B.; Schipper, D. J. Adhesive Force Model at a Rough Interface in the Presence of Thin Water Films: The Role of Relative Humidity. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2018, 140, 471–485. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.03.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, T.; Sun, J.; Chen, Y. Relative Humidity Is Not a Direct Factor to Influence Adhesion Force between Two Silica Surfaces. J. Adhes. 2022, 98, 413–428. DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2020.1839429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, C.; Shi, P.; Yan, W.; Chen, L.; Qian, L.; Kim, S. H. Thickness and Structure of Adsorbed Water Layer and Effects on Adhesion and Friction at Nanoasperity Contact. Colloids Interfaces. 2019, 3, 55. DOI: 10.3390/colloids3030055.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L.; Qian, L. Role of Interfacial Water in Adhesion, Friction, and Wear—A Critical Review. Friction. 2021, 9, 1–28. DOI: 10.1007/s40544-020-0425-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çolak, A.; Wormeester, H.; Zandvliet, H. J. W.; Poelsema, B. The Influence of Instrumental Parameters on the Adhesion Force in a Flat-on-Flat Contact Geometry. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 308, 106–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çolak, A.; Wormeester, H.; Zandvliet, H. J. W.; Poelsema, B. The Influence of Instrumental Parameters on the Adhesion Force in a Flat-on-Rough Contact Geometry. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 353, 1285–1290. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartošík, M.; Kormoš, L.; Flajšman, L.; Kalousek, R.; Mach, J.; Lišková, Z.; Nezval, D.; Švarc, V.; Šamořil, T.; Šikola, T. Nanometer-Sized Water Bridge and Pull-off Force in AFM at Different Relative Humidities: Reproducibility Measurement and Model Based on Surface Tension Change. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2017, 121, 610–619. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b11108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt, H.-J.; Farshchi-Tabrizi, M.; Kappl, M. Using Capillary Forces to Determine the Geometry of Nanocontacts. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 100, 24312. DOI: 10.1063/1.2210188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çolak, A.; Wormeester, H.; Zandvliet, H. J. W.; Poelsema, B. Surface Adhesion and Its Dependence on Surface Roughness and Humidity Measured with a Flat Tip. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 6938–6942. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.03.138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J.; Wang, C.; Liu, M. Z.; Su, M.; Bai, C. L. Effect of Humidity on the Surface Adhesion Force of Inorganic Crystals by the Force Spectrum Method. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2001, 46, 912–914. DOI: 10.1007/bf02900464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farshchi-Tabrizi, M.; Kappl, M.; Butt, H.-J. Influence of Humidity on Adhesion: An Atomic Force Microscope Study. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2008, 22, 181–203. DOI: 10.1163/156856108x306948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarate, N. V.; Harrison, A. J.; Litster, J. D.; Beaudoin, S. P. Effect of Relative Humidity on Onset of Capillary Forces for Rough Surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 411, 265–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.05.048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ondarçuhu, T.; Fabié, L. Capillary Forces in Atomic Force Microscopy and Liquid Nanodispensing. In In Surface Tension in Microsystems; Lambert, P., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013; pp 279–305.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Y.-S.; Huefner, N. D.; Chan, W. S.; Dryden, P.; Hagenhoff, B.; Beebe, T. P. Organic and Inorganic Contamination on Commercial AFM Cantilevers. Langmuir. 1999, 15, 6522–6526. DOI: 10.1021/la990371x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirghi, L.; Kylián, O.; Gilliland, D.; Ceccone, G.; Rossi, F. Cleaning and Hydrophilization of Atomic Force Microscopy Silicon Probes. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006, 110, 25975–25981. DOI: 10.1021/jp063327g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, J. L.; Bechhoefer, J. Calibration of Atomic-Force Microscope Tips. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1993, 64, 1868–1873. DOI: 10.1063/1.1143970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, T.; Meng, Y. Logarithmic Contact Time Dependence of Adhesion Force and Its Dominant Role among the Effects of AFM Experimental Parameters under Low Humidity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 419, 294–304. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, R. Nanomechanical Mapping of Soft Materials with the Atomic Force Microscope: Methods, Theory and Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 5850–5884. DOI: 10.1039/D0CS00318B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israelachvilli, J.;. Intermolecular and Surface Forces; Elsevier Pte Ltd: Singapore, 2011; pp 253–255.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinovich, Y. I.; Adler, J. J.; Ata, A.; Singh, R. K.; Moudgil, B. M. Adhesion between Nanoscale Rough Surfaces - I. Role of Asperity Geometry. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 232, 10–16. DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.7167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajina, B. A.; Kocherlakota, L. S.; Overney, R. M. Direct Determination of the Local Hamaker Constant of Inorganic Surfaces Based on Scanning Force Microscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 164707. DOI: 10.1063/1.4898799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, L.; Gao, B.; Tian, Y.; Muñoz-Carpena, R.; Zigler, K. J. DLVO Interactions of Carbon Nanotubes with Isotropic Planar Surfaces. Langmuir. 2013, 29, 3976–3988. DOI: 10.1021/la3048328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, H. W.; Baró, A. M.; Sáenz, J. J. Electrostatic and Contact Forces in Force Microscopy. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 1991, 9, 1323–1328. DOI: 10.1116/1.585188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacks, D. J.; Sankaran, R. M. Contact Electrification of Insulating Materials. J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 453001. DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/44/45/453001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y.; Pahtz, T.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; Shen, Y.; Ji, R.; Cai, B. Electric Field and Humidity Trigger Contact Electrification. Phys. Rev. X. 2015, 5, 011002. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.011002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindersberger, J.; Lederle, C. Surface Charge Decay on Insulators in Air and Sulfurhexafluorid-Part II: Measurements. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2008, 15, 949–957. DOI: 10.1109/TDEI.2008.4591215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindersberger, J.; Lederle, C. Surface Charge Decay on Insulators in Air and Sulfurhexafluorid - Part I: Simulation. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2008, 15, 941–948. DOI: 10.1109/TDEI.2008.4591214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B.; Zhang, G. Interpretation of the Surface Charge Decay Kinetics on Insulators with Different Neutralization Mechanisms. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 121, 105105. DOI: 10.1063/1.4978001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, T.; Guo, M.; Chen, Y. Evolution of Millimetric-Range Electrostatic Forces between an AFM Cantilever and a Charged Dielectric via Suspended Force Curves. J. Adhes. 2022, 98, 2277–2294. DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2021.1969922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamson, A. W.; Gast, A. P. Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, 6th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Z.; Sun, Y.; Ding, W.; Wang, Z. The Formation of Liquid Bridge in Different Operating Modes of AFM. Sci. Chin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 2016, 59, 1–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11433-016-0241-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilamakuri, S. K.; Bhushan, B.; Bhushan, B. A Comprehensive Kinetic Meniscus Model for Prediction of Long-Term Static Friction. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 86, 4649–4656. DOI: 10.1063/1.371416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y.-P. Physical Mechanics of Surfaces and Interfaces; Science Press: Beijing, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinovich, Y. I.; Esayanur, M. S.; Moudgil, B. M. Capillary Forces between Two Spheres with a Fixed Volume Liquid Bridge: Theory and Experiment. Langmuir. 2005, 21, 10992–10997. DOI: 10.1021/la0517639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, T.; Meng, Y. Time-Dependent Dynamic Behaviors of a Confined Liquid to Achieve Tailored Adhesion Force with Repeated Contacts Revealed by Atomic Force Microscopy. Langmuir. 2018, 34, 15211–15227. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar