How children characterise living beings and the activities in which they engage

References

• Acher, A., M. Arca, and N. Sanmartí. 2007. “Modeling as a Teaching Learning Process for Understanding Materials: A Case Study in Primary Education.” Science Education 91 (3): 398–418.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedau, M. 1996. The Nature of Life. InThe Philosophy of Artificial Life, edited by M. Boden 332–357. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caravita, S., and E. Falchetti. 2005. “Are Bones Alive?” Journal of Biological Education 39 (4): 163–170.10.1080/00219266.2005.9655990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S. 1985. Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. G., and C. E. Hmelo-Silver. 2009. “Learning Progressions: Aligning Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (6): 606–609.10.1002/tea.v46:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hani, C. N. 2008. “Theory-Based Approaches to the Concept of Life.” Journal of Biological Education 42 (4): 147–149.10.1080/00219266.2008.9656132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmeche, C. 1997. “Autopoietic Systems, Replicators, and the Search for a Meaningful Biologic Definition of Life.” Ultimate Reality and Meaning 20: 244–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Barros, S., and C. Martínez-Losada. 2001. “Qué Actividades y qué Procedimientos Utiliza y Valora el Profesorado de Educación Primaria.” Enseñanza de las Ciencias 19 (3): 433–452.
   Google Scholar
• García-Barros, S., Martínez-Losada, C. and Jiménez-Liso, R. (2009). How Practising Teachers and Teachers in Training Value Key Ideas about Sexual Reproduction. ESERA 2009 Conference, Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Garrido, M. 2007. La evolución de las Ideas de los Niños Sobre los Seres Vivos. Doctoral thesis: A Coruña, A Coruña University.
   Google Scholar
• Garrido, M., and C. Martínez. 2009. “¿Qué Enseñar Sobre los Seres Vivos en los Niveles Educativos Iniciales?” Aula 183–184: 34–36.
   Google Scholar
• Gatt, S., S. D. Tunnicliffe, K. Borg, and K. Lautier. 2007. “Young Maltese Children’s Ideas about Plants.” Journal of Biological Education 41 (3): 117–121.10.1080/00219266.2007.9656080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J., and C. Boulter. 2000. Developing Models in Science Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-010-0876-1
   Google Scholar
• Gómez Galindo, A., N. Sanmartí, and R. Pujol. 2007. “Fundamentación Teórica y Diseño de una Unidad Didáctica para la Enseñanza del Modelo ser Vivo en la Escuela Primaria.” Enseñanza de las Ciencias 25 (3): 325–340.
   Google Scholar
• González Rodríguez, C., Barros S. García, and C. Martínez Losada. 2009. “Plant Nutrition in Spanish Secondary Textbooks.” Journal of Biological Education 43: 54–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., and D. F. I. Treagust. 2000. “A Typology of School Science Models.” International Journal of Science Education 22 (9): 1011–1026.10.1080/095006900416884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inagaki, K., and G. Hatano. 2002. Young Children’s Thinking about the Biological World. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, F. C. 1992. “The Origins of an Autonomous Biology.” In Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, edited by M. Gunnar and M. Maratsos, 103–137. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Korzeniewski, B. 2001. “Cybernetic Formulation of the Definition of Life.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 209: 275–286.10.1006/jtbi.2001.2262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, P. 2005. “‘Loveable’ Mammals and ‘Lifeless’ Plants: How Children’s Interest in Common Local Organisms can be Enhanced through Observation of Nature.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (6): 655–677.10.1080/09500690500038116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link-Pérez, M. A., V. H. Dollo, K. M. Weber, and E. E. Schussler. 2010. “What’s in a Name: Differential Labelling of Plant and Animal Photographs in Two Nationally Syndicated Elementary Science Textbook Series.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (9): 1227–1242.10.1080/09500690903002818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looft, W. R. 1974. “Animistic Thought in Children: Understanding ‘Living’ Across Its Associated Attributes.” Journal of Genetic Psychology 124: 17–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, A. M., R. D. Linke, and P. P. Sedgwick. 1979. “School Children’s Criteria for ‘Alive’: A Content Analysis Approach.” Journal of Psychology 103: 103–112.10.1080/00223980.1979.9915120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí, J. 2012. Aprender Ciencias en la Educación Primaria. Graó: Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Maturana, H., and Varela, F. J. 1981. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Boston: Dordrecht, D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., and S. Atran. 1999. Folkbiology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Opfer, J. E., and R. S. Siegler. 2004. “Revisiting Preschooler’s Living Things Concept: A Microgenetic Analysis of Conceptual Change in Basic Biology.” Cognitive Psychology 49: 301–332.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peraíta, H. 1988. La Representación del Mundo en Niños de EGB. Madrid: MEC.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. 1929. The Child’s Conception of the World. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Pujol, R. M. 2003. Didáctica de las Ciencias en la Educación Primaria. Madrid: Síntesis Educación.
   Google Scholar
• Schussler, E. E., M. A. Link-Pérez, K. M. Weber, and V. H. Dollo. 2010. “Exploring Plant and Animal Content in Elementary Science Textbooks.” Journal of Biological Education 44 (3): 123–128.10.1080/00219266.2010.9656208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., and Achér, A., Fortus, D., Schwarz, Y., Hug, B. and Krajcik, J. 2009. “Developing a Learning Progression for Scientific Modeling: Making Scientific Modeling Accessible and Meaningful for Learners.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (6): 632–654.10.1002/tea.v46:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavy, R., and N. Wax. 1989. “Children’s Conceptions of Plants as Living Things.” Human Development 32: 88–94.10.1159/000276367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamir, P., R. Gal-Chappin, and R. Nussinovitz. 1981. “How Do Intermediate and Junior High School Students Conceptualise Living and No Living?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 18 (3): 241–248.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Google Scholar
• Tolman, M. N., G. R. Hardy, and R. R. Sudweeks. 1998. “Current Science Textbook Use in the United States.” Science and Children 35 (8): 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Trowbridge, J., and J. J. Mintzes. 1988. “Alternative Conceptions in Animal Classification: A Cross Age Study.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 26: 547–571.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunnicliffe, S. D. 2001. “Talking about Plants – Comments of Primary School Groups Looking at Plants as Exhibits in a Botanical Garden.” Journal of Biological Education 36: 27–34.10.1080/00219266.2001.9655792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunnicliffe, S. D., C. Gatt, Agius, and S. A. Pizzuto. 2008. “Animals in the Lives of Young Maltese Children.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 4 (3): 215–221.
   Google Scholar
• Tunnicliffe, S. D., and M. J. Reiss. 2000. “Building a Model of the Environment: How Do Children See Plants?” Journal of Biological Education 34 (4): 172–177.10.1080/00219266.2000.9655714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venville, G. 2004. “Young Children Learning about Living Things: A Case Study of Conceptual Change from Ontological and Social Perspectives.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (5): 449–480.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorek, N., M. Sahin, and H. Haidin. 2009. “Are Animals ‘More Alive’ than Plants? Animistic–Anthropocentric Construction of Life Concept.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 5 (4): 369–378.
   Google Scholar