Formative Assessment and Increased Student Involvement Increase Grades in an Upper Secondary School Biology Course

References

• Asghar, A. 2010. “Reciprocal Peer Coaching and Its Use as a Formative Assessment Strategy for First‐year Students.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (4): 403–417.10.1080/02602930902862834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beesley, A. D., and H. S.Apthorp, eds. 2010. Classroom Instruction That Works, Second Edition: Research Report. Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL). Denver, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL).
   Google Scholar
• Berg, C. A. R., V. C. B. Bergendahl, B. Lundberg, and L. Tibell. 2003. “Benefiting from an Open-ended Experiment? A Comparison of Attitudes To, and Outcomes Of, an Expository versus an Open-inquiry Version of the Same Experiment.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (3): 351–372.10.1080/09500690210145738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. 1996. “Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment.” Higher Education 32: 347–364.10.1007/BF00138871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliam. 2003. Assessment for Learning – Putting It into Practice. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1): 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, E., and V. Lindberg. 2010. Svensk Forskning Om Bedömning – En Kartläggning [Swedish Research on Assessment – A Mapping Survey]. Report. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Gioka, O. 2007. “Assessment For Learning In Biology Lessons.” Journal of Biological Education 41 (3): 113–116.10.1080/00219266.2007.9656079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., and K. A. Renninger. 2006. “The Four-phase Model of Interest Development.” Educational Psychologist 41 (2): 111–127.10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, M., F. Campbell, and J. Westwood. 2010. “Oral versus Written Assessments : A Test of Student Performance.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 37 ( 1): 125–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, M., F. Campbell, and J. Westwood. 2012. “Oral versus Written Assessments: A Test of Student Performance and Attitudes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (1): 125–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, A. 2008. “Educative Assessment for/of Teacher Competency – A Study of Assessment and Learning in the ‘Interactive Examination’ for Student Teachers.” PhD diss., Malmö University.
   Google Scholar
• Korp, H. 2003. Kunskapsbedömning-Hur, Vad Och Varför [Assessment of Knowledge – How, What and Why]. Stockholm: Myndigheten för Skolutveckling.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, C. F., D. S. DeRue, E. P. Karam, and J. R. Hollenbeck. 2011. “The Impact of Feedback Frequency on Learning and Task Performance: Challenging the ‘more Is Better’ Assumption.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 116 (2): 217–228.10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, F. E., and D. K. Schneider. 2013. “Good Student Questions in Inquiry Learning.” Journal of Biological Education 47 (3): 166–174.10.1080/00219266.2013.821749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. 2010. What Expert Teachers Do. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and K. Reiling. 1996. “The Importance of Marking Criteria in the Use of Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 21 (3): 239–250.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. 2010. “Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse.” Science 328 (5977): 463–466.10.1126/science.1183944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., and A. Jonsson. 2013. “The Use of Scoring Rubrics for Formative Assessment Purposes Revisited: A Review.” Educational Research Review 9 (Jun.): 129–144.10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, G. 2009. Evidence-based Teaching: A Practical Approach. 2nd ed. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, Y. M., and H. Andrade. 2010. “A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (4): 435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchhart, R., M. Church, and K. Morrison. 2011. Making Thinking Visible: How to Promote Engagement, Understanding, and Independence for All Learners. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeh, I., and M. Zion. 2011. “Which Type of Inquiry Project Do High School Biology Students Prefer: Open or Guided?” Research in Science Education 42 (5): 831–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144.10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoultz, J., R. Säljö, and J. Wyndhamn. 2001. “Conceptual Knowledge in Talk and Text: What Does It Take to Understand a Science Question?” Instructional Science 29 (3): 213–236.10.1023/A:1017586614763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. 2008. “Focus on Formative Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 78 (1): 153–189.10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2000. Syllabus – Biology A. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2014. “Forskning För Skolan.” Accessed October 20. http://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/forskning
   Google Scholar
• Stone Wiske, M. 1998. Teaching for Understanding. Linking Research with Practice. The Jossey-Bass Education Series. Edited by Martha Stone Wiske. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, E. E., D. D. Suthers, and A. M. Lesgold. 2002. “‘Mapping to know’: The Effects of Representational Guidance and Reflective Assessment on Scientific Inquiry.” Science Education 86 (2): 264–286.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P. 1998. Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. 2011. “What is assessment for learning?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 3–14.10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
   Google Scholar