Elementary and middle level biology topics: a content analysis of Science and Children and Science Scope from 1990 to 2014

References

• Akerson, Valarie L. 2001. “Teaching Science When Your Principal Says ‘Teach Language Arts’.” Science and Children 38 (7): 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Allchin, Douglas, Hanne Møller Andersen, and Keld Nielsen. 2014. “Complementary Approaches to Teaching Nature of Science: Integrating Student Inquiry, Historical Cases, and Contemporary Cases in Classroom Practice.” Science Education 98 (3): 461–486.10.1002/sce.21111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1994. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Richard C., and P. David Pearson. 1984. “A Schema-theoretic View of Basic Processes in Reading Comprehension.” Handbook of Reading Research 1: 255–291.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, Ken. 1995. “Student Teachers’ Confidence to Teach Science: Is More Science Knowledge Necessary to Improve Self-confidence?” International Journal of Science Education 17 (3): 357–369.10.1080/0950069950170307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausubel, David Paul. 2000. The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge: A Cognitive View. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-015-9454-7
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, David Paul, Joseph Donald Novak, and Helen Hanesian. 1969. Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, 15–31. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Banilower, Eric R., P. Sean Smith, Iris R. Weiss, Kristen A. Malzahn, Kiira M. Campbell, and Aaron M. Weis. 2013. Report of the 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnett, Michael, and Jacquetta Williams. 1998. “Environmental Education and Primary Children’s Attitudes towards Nature and the Environment.” Cambridge Journal of Education 28 (2): 159–174.10.1080/0305764980280202
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Rodger W. 1997. Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cabells. 2012. Science Scope: About the Journal. Accessed November 10 2012. http://www.cabells.com/review.aspx?p1=4383151_d6
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Ian. 2007. “Chi-squared and Fisher–Irwin Tests of Two-by-two Tables with Small Sample Recommendations.” Statistics in Medicine 26 (19): 3661–3675.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capps, Daniel K., and Barbara A. Crawford. 2013. “Inquiry-based Instruction and Teaching about Nature of Science: Are They Happening?” Journal of Science Teacher Education 24 (3): 497–526.10.1007/s10972-012-9314-z
   Google Scholar
• Carlan, Francele de Abreu, Lenira Maria Nunes Sepel, and Elgion Lucio Silva Loreto. 2014. “Teaching Cell Biology in Primary Schools.” Education Research International 2014 (2014): 1–5. Article ID 272475, doi:10.1155/2014/272475.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, Thomas F. 1972. Content Analysis: A Technique for Systematic Inference from Communications. London: Batsford.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Ying-Chih, Brian Hand, and L. E. A. H. Mcdowell. 2013. “The Effects of Writing to Learn Activities on Elementary Students’ Conceptual Understanding: Learning about Force and Motion through Writing to Older Peers.” Science Education 97 (5): 745–771.10.1002/sce.2013.97.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, Susan M., and Rebecca Crawford Burns. 2004. Meeting Standards through Integrated Curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Dressel, Paul L. 1958. “The Meaning and Significance of Integration.” In The Integration of Educational Experiences, edited by N. B. Henry, 3–25. The 57th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Part III. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feehan, Patricia E., WL II Gragg, W. Michael Havener, and Diane D. Kester. 1987. “Library and Information Science Research: An Analysis of the 1984 Journal Literature.” Library & Information Science Research 9 (3): 173–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrichsen, Patricia Meis. 2001. “Moving from Hands-on to Inquiry-based: A Biology Course for Prospective Elementary Teachers.” The American Biology Teacher 63 (8): 562–568.10.1662/0002-7685(2001)063[0562:MFHTIA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend, Harold. 1985. “The Effect of Science and Mathematics Integration on Selected Seventh Grade Students’ Attitudes Toward and Achievement in Science.” School Science and Mathematics 85 (6): 453–461.10.1111/ssm.1985.85.issue-6
   Google Scholar
• Frykholm, Jeffrey, and George Glasson. 2005. “Connecting Science and Mathematics Instruction: Pedagogical Context Knowledge for Teachers.” School Science and Mathematics 105 (3): 127–141.10.1111/ssm.2005.105.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Howell, M., F. McDonald, P. Esplin, G. B. Schaalje, and G. M. Booth. 2013. “What Biology Concepts Are Important in General Education? A Survey of Faculty Members and Students Science Education and Civic Engagement.” Science Education and Civic Engagement: An International Journal 5 (1): 38–46.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, Andrew, Philip Wagreich, and Martin Gartzman. 1997. “The Quest for Integration: School Mathematics and Science.” American Journal of Education 106: 179–206.10.1086/444180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaid, L. L. 1989. “Content Analysis.” In Measurement of Communication Behavior, edited by P. Emmert and L. L. Barker, 197–217. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Khodor, Julia, D. Gould Halme, and Graham C. Walker. 2004. “A Hierarchical Biology Concept Framework: A Tool for Course Design.” Cell Biology Education 3 (2): 111–121.10.1187/cbe.03-10-0014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kondracki, Nancy L., Nancy S. Wellman, and Daniel R. Amundson. 2002. “Content Analysis: Review of Methods and Their Applications in Nutrition Education.” Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 34 (4): 224–230.10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60097-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krall, Rebecca Mc Nall, Kimberly H. Lott, and Carol L. Wymer. 2009. “Inservice Elementary and Middle School Teachers’ Conceptions of Photosynthesis and Respiration.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 20 (1): 41–55.10.1007/s10972-008-9117-4
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. Richard, and Gary G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33 (1): 159–174.10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, William F. 2009. “Thinking, Teaching, and Learning Science outside the Boxes: Reconsidering Interdisciplinarity in Science Instruction.” The Science Teacher 6 (2): 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2000. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, W. 2013. “Integration and Innovation in Teaching Science.” In Learning and Teaching Primary Science, edited by A. Fitzgerald, 127–144. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, Johanna E., Lisa Y. Flores, La Verne Berkel, Codi L. Schale, Rachel M. Linnemeyer, and Irene Summer. 2007. “International Career Articles: A Content Analysis of Four Journals across 34 Years.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 70 (3): 602–613.10.1016/j.jvb.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, Johanna E., Keisha M. Love, Kathryn J. Taylor, and Anita L. Slusher. 2007. “A Content and Sample Analysis of Quantitative Articles Published in the Journal of Counseling & Development between 1991 and 2000.” Journal of Counseling and Development: Journal of Counseling and Development 85 (3): 353–363.10.1002/j.1556-6678.2007.tb00484.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSTA (National Science Teachers Association). 2012. Publications and Products. Accessed from http://www.nsta.org/publications/journals.aspx?lid=ele#authors
   Google Scholar
• NSTA (National Science Teachers Association). 2013a. Science and Children 2013 Editorial Profile and Issue Themes. Accessed November 12 2012. http://www.nsta.org/docs/RateCardS&C2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NSTA (National Science Teachers Association). 2013b. Science Scope 2013 Editorial Profile and Issue Themes. Accessed November 12 2012. http://www.nsta.org/docs/RateCardScope2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paris, Scott G., Kirsten M. Yambor, and Becky Wai-Ling Packard. 1998. “Hands-on Biology: A Museum–School–University Partnership for Enhancing Students’ Interest and Learning in Science.” The Elementary School Journal 98 (3): 267–288.10.1086/461894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, P. 2014. “Social Interactions and familial Relationships Preservice Science Teachers Describe During Interviews About Their Drawings of the Endocrine and Gastrointestinal Systems.” International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 9 (2): 159–175.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, Jean. 1964. “Part I: Cognitive Development in Dhildren: Piaget Development and Learning.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2 (3): 176–186.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, W. James, and Deborah Levine-Donnerstein. 1999. “Rethinking Validity and Reliability in Content Analysis.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 27: 258–284.10.1080/00909889909365539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romance, Nancy R., and Michael R. Vitale. 2012. “Science IDEAS: A Research-based K-5 Interdisciplinary Instructional Model Linking Science and Literacy.” Science Educator 21 (1): 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satchwell, Richard E., and Franzie L. Loepp. 2002. “Designing and Implementing an Integrated Mathematics, Science, and Technology Curriculum for the Middle School.” Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 39 (3): 41–66.
   Google Scholar
• Schauble, Leona, Robert Glaser, Richard A. Duschl, Sharon Schulze, and Jenny John. 1995. “Students’ Understanding of the Objectives and Procedures of Experimentation in the Science Classroom.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4 (2): 131–166.10.1207/s15327809jls0402_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, Betty Jean Eklund. 1991. “Education 2000 Integrated Curriculum.” The Phi Delta Kappan 72 (10): 793–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Robin G. 1997. “‘Before Teaching This I’d Do a Lot of Reading’: Preparing Primary Student Teachers to Teach Science.” Research in Science Education 27 (1): 141–154.10.1007/BF02463038
   Google Scholar
• Stark-Rose, Rose M., Tina M. Livingston-Sacin, Niloufer Merchant, and Amanda C. Finley. 2012. “Group Counseling with United States Racial Minority Groups: A 25-year Content Analysis.” The Journal for Specialists in Group Work 37 (4): 277–296.10.1080/01933922.2012.690831
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, Carol, and George Wenner. 1996. “Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs Regarding Science and Mathematics.” School Science and Mathematics 96 (1): 2–9.10.1111/ssm.1996.96.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Teach.com. 2016. Science Teacher. Accessed January 15, 2016. http://teach.com/what/teachers-know/teaching-science
   Google Scholar
• Tilgner, Peggy J. 1990. “Avoiding Science in the Elementary School.” Science Education 74 (4): 421–431.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacca, Richard T., Jo Anne L. Vacca, and Maryann E. Mraz. 2005. Content Area Reading: Literacy and Learning across the Curriculum. 6th ed. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Walia, Paramjeet Kaur, and Manpreet Kaur. 2012. “Content Analysis of Journal Literature Published from UK and USA.” Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Paper 833. Accessed January 15, 2016. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/833
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, Carolyn S., Mai Yin Tsoi, Jamie Calkin, and Marshall Darley. 2003. “Learning from Inquiry-based Laboratories in Nonmajor Biology: An Interpretive Study of the Relationships among Inquiry Experience, Epistemologies, and Conceptual Growth.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (10): 986–1024.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar