Relating ecological technical terms to students’ reasoning between 1st and 4th grades

References

• Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, M. J., and R. G. Boutilier. 1992. “The Development of Dynamic System Reasoning.” Human Development 35 (3): 121–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. 2004. “Scientific Literacy: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective.” Science Education 89 (2): 335–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2004. “Language in the Science Classroom: Academic Social Languages as the Heart of School-Based Literacy.” In Crossing Borders in Literacy and Science Instruction: Perspectives on Theory and Practice, edited by E. Wendy Saul, 13–32. Arlington, VA: Reading Association & NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2014. How to Do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gunckel, K. L., B. A. Covitt, I. Salinas, and C. W. Anderson. 2012. “A Learning Progression for Water in Socio-Ecological Systems.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (7): 843–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. “Systemic Theory”. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 8, edited by R. E. Asher. Pergamon Press. Reprinted in full in Halliday, M. A. K. 2003. On Language and Linguistics: Volume 3 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1998. “Things and Relations: Regrammaticising Experience as Technical Knowledge.” In Martin, J. R., & Veel, R. (Eds.). (2005). Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and J. R. Martin, eds. 1996. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hokayem, H., and A. Gotwals. 2016. “Early Elementary Students’ Understanding of Complex Ecosystems: A Learning Progression Approach.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53: 1524–1545.10.1002/tea.v53.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, H., and C. W. Anderson. 2012. “Developing Assessments for a Learning Progression on Carbon-transforming Processes in Socio-ecological Systems.” In Learning Progressions in Science, edited by A. C. Alonzo and A. Gotwals, 151–181. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, H., H. Hokayem, S. Wang, and X. Wei. 2015. “How Do US and Chinese Biology Students Compare in Explaining Energy Consumption Issues?” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 10: 301–318.
   Google Scholar
• Kutz, E. 1997. Language and Literacy: Studying Discourse in Communities and Classrooms. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, J., R. Driver, P. Scott, and C. Wood-Robinson. 1995. “Children’s Ideas about Ecology: Theoretical Background, Design and Methodology.” International Journal of Science Education 17: 721–732.10.1080/0950069950170604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. 1998. “Teaching All the Languages of Science: Words, Symbols, Images, and Actions.” In Conference on Science Education in Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. 2004. “The Literacies of Science.” In Crossing Borders in Literacy and Science Instruction: Perspectives on Theory and Practice, edited by E. Wendy Saul, 33–47. Arlington, VA: International Reading Association & NSTA press.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., and D. J. Pickering. 2005. Building Academic Vocabulary: Teacher’s Manual. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw-Hill Education. 2015. Biology Teacher’s Edition. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Accessed December 1, 2015. http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
   Google Scholar
• Pearson Education, Inc. 2015. Interactive Science Teacher’s Edition, Grade 5. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. 2004. The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., and M. M. Fairbanks. 1986. “The Effects of Vocabulary Instruction: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 56 (1): 72–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D. 2004. “Why Do Future Scientists Need to Study the Language Arts.” In Crossing Borders in Literacy and Science Instruction: Perspectives on Theory and Practice, edited by E. Wendy Saul, 71–94. Arlington, VA: International Reading Association & NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar