Student-centered introductory biology course: evidence for deep learning

References

• Ash, D. 2004. “Reflective Scientific Sense-Making Dialogue in Two Languages: The Science in the Dialogue and the Dialogue in the Science.” Science Education 88 (6): 855–884.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, S. J., C. W. Chan, and J. A. Tanner. 2014. “Diverse Assessment and Active Student Engagement Sustain Deep Learning: A Comparative Study of Outcomes in Two Parallel Introductory Biochemistry Courses.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 42 (6): 474–479.10.1002/bmb.v42.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. 1987. Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., and C. Tang. 2007. Teaching for Quality Learning at University Third Edition (the Society for Research in Higher Education). Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., and D. E. Brown. 2000. “Learning in Science: A Comparison of Deep and Surface Approaches.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (2): 109–138.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<>1.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppola, B. P., and J. S. Krajcik. 2014. “Discipline-Centered Post-Secondary Science Education Research: Distinctive Targets, Challenges and Opportunities.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (6): 679–693.10.1002/tea.v51.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and D. L. Miller. 2000. “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry.” Theory into Practice 39 (3): 124–130.10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberlein, T., J. Kampmeier, V. Minderhout, R. S. Moog, T. Platt, P. Varma-Nelson, and H. B. White. 2008. “Pedagogies of Engagement in Science.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 36 (4): 262–273. doi:10.1002/bmb.20204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. 2000. “Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: Conceptual frameworks and educational contexts.” Paper presented at the first annual conference of the Teaching and Learning Research Programme, Leicester. http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/publications.html.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., V. McCune, and P. Walker. 2001. “Conceptions, Styles and Approaches within Higher Education: Analytic Abstractions and Everyday Experience.” In Perspectives on Cognitive, Learning, and Thinking Styles, edited by R. J. Sternberg and L.-F. Zhang, 103–136. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Eylon, B. S., and M. C. Linn. 1988. “Learning and Instruction: An Examination of Four Research Perspectives in Science Education.” Review of Educational Research 58 (3): 251–301.10.3102/00346543058003251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, J., and B. R. Belland. 2012. “A Conceptual Framework for Organizing Active Learning Experiences in Biology Instruction.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 21 (4): 465–475.10.1007/s10956-011-9338-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamp, R., D. H. Dolmans, H. van Berkel, and H. G. Schmidt. 2012a. “The Relationship Between Students' Small Group Activities, Time Spent on Self-study, and Achievement.” The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning 64 (3): 385–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamp, R., D. Dolmans, H. van Berkel, and H. G. Schmidt. 2012b. “The Relationship between Students’ Small Group Activities, Time Spent on Self-Study, and Achievement.” Higher Education 64: 385–397.10.1007/s10734-011-9500-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. 2001. “Articulating Communities: Sociocultural Perspectives on Science Education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38: 296–316.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marbach-Ad, G., V. Briken, K. Frauwirth, L. Y. Gao, S. W. Hutcheson, S. W. Joseph, D. Mosser, et al. 2007. “A Faculty Team Works to Create Content Linkages among Various Courses to Increase Meaningful Learning of Targeted Concepts of Microbiology.” CBE - Life Sciences Education 6 (2): 155–162. doi:10.1187/cbe.06-12-0212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marton, F. 1981. “Phenomenography? Describing Conceptions of the World around Us.” Instructional Science 10 (2): 177–200.10.1007/BF00132516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and R. Säaljö. 1976. “On Qualitative Differences in Learning-II Outcome as a Function of the Learner’s Conception of the Task.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46 (2): 115–127.10.1111/bjep.1976.46.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelsen, L. K., and M. Sweet. 2008. “The Essential Elements of Team-Based Learning.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2008 (116): 7–27.10.1002/tl.v2008:116
   Google Scholar
• Park Rogers, M. A., and S. K. Abell. 2008. “The Design, Enactment, and Experience of Inquiry-Based Instruction in Undergraduate Science Education: A Case Study.” Science Education 92 (4): 591–607. doi:10.1002/sce.20247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pask, G. 1988. “Learning Strategies, Teaching Strategies, and Conceptual or Learning Style.” In Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, edited by R. R. Schmeck, 83–100. New York, NY: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-2118-5
   Google Scholar
• Patchen, T., and D. W. Smithenry. 2014. “Diversifying Instruction and Shifting Authority: A Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) Analysis of Classroom Participant Structures.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (5): 606–634.10.1002/tea.v51.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagy, O., Y. Kali, M. Tsaushu, and T. Tal. 2016. “The Culture of Learning Continuum (CLC): Promoting Internal Values in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1174205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. S., P. M. Sadler, G. Sonnert, and R. H. Tai. 2009. “Depth versus Breadth: How Content Coverage in High School Science Courses Relates to Later Success in College Science Coursework.” Science Education 93 (5): 798–826.10.1002/sce.v93:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, S. R., N. R. Nielsen, and H. A. Schweingruber. 2012. Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, H., and N. J. Entwistle. 1996. “Identifying Students at Risk through Ineffective Study Strategies.” Higher Education 31 (1): 97–116.10.1007/BF00129109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaushu, M., T. Tal, O. Sagy, Y. Kali, S. Gepstein, and D. Zilberstein. 2012. “Peer Learning and Support of Technology in an Undergraduate Biology Course to Enhance Deep Learning.” CBE – Life Science Education 11: 402–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warburton, K. 2003. “Deep Learning and Education for Sustainability.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 4 (1): 44–56.10.1108/14676370310455332
   Google Scholar