Conceptions of meiosis: misunderstandings among university students and errors

References

• Albaladejo, C., and A. M. Lucas. 1988. “Pupils’ Meanings for ‘Mutation’.” Journal of Biological Education 22 (3): 215–219. doi:10.1080/00219266.1988.9654986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., and N. Orion. 2005. “Development of System Thinking Skills in the Context of Earth System Education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (5): 518–560. doi:10.1002/tea.20061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayuso, E., and E. Banet. 2002. “Alternativas a la enseñanza de la genética en educación secundaria.” [Alternatives to Teaching Genetics in Secondary Education.] Enseñanza De Las Ciencias 20 (1): 133–157.
   Google Scholar
• Ayuso, E., E. Banet, and T. Abellán. 1996. “Introducción a la genética en la enseñanza secundaria y el bachillerato: II. Resolución de problemas o realización de ejercicios.” [Introduction to Genetics in Secondary and High School: II. Problem Solving and Exercises.] Enseñanza De Las Ciencias 14 (2): 127–142.
   Google Scholar
• Banet, E., and E. Ayuso. 1995. “Introducción a la genética en la enseñanza secundaria y bachillerato: I. Contenidos de Enseñanza y conocimientos de los alumnos.” [Introduction to Genetics in Secondary and High School: I. Contents of Teaching and Knowledge of Students.] Enseñanza De Las Ciencias 13 (2): 137–153.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. R. 1990. “Some Misconceptions in Meiosis Shown by Students Responding to an Advanced Level Practical Examination Question in Biology.” Journal of Biological Education 24 (3): 182–186. doi:10.1080/00219266.1990.9655138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caballero Armenta, M. 2008. “Algunas ideas del alumnado de secundaria sobre conceptos básicos de genética.” [Some Ideas from High School Students About Basic Concepts of Genetics.] Enseñanza De Las Ciencias 26 (2): 227–243.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero, M., M. P. González, E. Olivares, A. Santisteban, and P. Serrano. 1997. “Didáctica de las Leyes de Mendel.” [ Didactics of Mendel’s Laws]. Cuadernos de la UNED.
   Google Scholar
• Cajas, F. 2001. “Alfabetización científica y tecnológica: la transposición didáctica del conocimiento tecnológico.” [Scientific and Technological Literacy: The Didactic Transposition of Technological Knowledge.] Enseñanza De Las Ciencias 19 (2): 243–254.
   Google Scholar
• Chemisquy, M. A., S. G. R. Gil, C. L. Scioscia, and Liliana M. Mola. 2008. “Cytogenetic Studies of Three Lycosidae Species from Argentina (Arachnida, Araneae).” Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 (4): 857–867. doi:10.1590/S1415-47572008005000022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevallard, Y. 1998. La transposición didáctica. Del saber sabio al saber enseñado [ The Didactic Transposition. From Wise to Learned Knowledge]. 3rd ed. AIQUE Grupo Editor.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, H. H., J. Kahle, and F. H. Nordland. 1985. “An Investigation of High School Biology Textbooks as Sources of Misconceptions and Difficulties in Genetics and Some Suggestions for Teaching Genetics.” Science Education 69 (5): 707–719. doi:10.1002/sce.3730690512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohésine. 2017. Accessed January 20. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coh%C3%A9sine#/media/File:Role_de_la_cohesine_lors_d%27un_crossing_over.jpg
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., and J. H. Stewart. 1989. “The Knowledge Structure of Mendelian Genetics.” The American Biology Teacher 47 (4): 233–236.
   Google Scholar
• Corbacho, V., and P. De. 2009. “Enseñanza de la genética en la educación de nivel superior: dificultades para comprender conceptos y resolver problemas.” [ Teaching Genetics in Higher Education: Difficulties in Understanding Concepts and Solving Problems.] Enseñanza De Las Ciencias (Extra Issue VIII): 1021–1025.
   Google Scholar
• Dikmenli, M. 2010. “Misconceptions of Cell Division Held by Student Teachers in Biology: A Drawing Analysis.” Scientific Research and Essays 5 (2): 235–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figini, E., and A. De Micheli. 2005. “La enseñanza de la genética en el nivel medio y la educación polimodal: contenidos conceptuales en las actividades de los libros de texto.” [ The Teaching of Genetics in the Middle Level and Polymodal Education: Conceptual Contents in the Activities of Textbooks]. Enseñanza De Las Ciencias (Extra issue VII): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Genética. 2017. “Programa de la materia Genética de la licenciatura en Biología,.” Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Accessed January 18. http://www.fciencias.unam.mx/asignaturas/1404.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Genética General. 2016. “Programa de la materia Genética General.” Universidad de San Martín, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológica INTECH. Accessed January 18, 2017. http://www.unsam.edu.ar/oferta/carreras/agrobiotecnologia_materias.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Genética I. 2016. “Programa de la materia Genética 1.” Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Accessed January 18, 2017. http://server.ege.fcen.uba.ar/genetica/htmlInternos/programa.html
   Google Scholar
• Gimeno Sacristán, J. (1991) 1994. “El Currículum en la acción. La arquitectura de la práctica.” En El Currículo: una reflexión sobre la práctica. Ediciones Morata.
   Google Scholar
• Heim, W. G. 1991. “What is a Recessive Allele?” The American Biology Teacher 53 (2): 94–97. doi:10.2307/4449229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibáñez Orcajo, T., and M. Martínez Aznar. 2005. “Solving Problems in Genetics II: Conceptual Restructuring.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (12): 1495–1519. doi:10.1080/09500690500186584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, M., K. H. Craig, and A. Choo. 2005. “Kiss and Break up – A Safe Passage to Anaphase in Mitosis and Meiosis.” Chromosoma 114 (4): 252–262. doi:10.1007/s00412-005-0010-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalas, P., A. O’Neill, C. Pollock, and G. Birol. 2013. “Development of a Meiosis Concept Inventory.” Cell Biology Education 12 (4): 655–664. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-10-0174.
   Google Scholar
• Kargbo, D. B., E. D. Hobbs, and Gaalen L. Erickson. 1980. “Children's Beliefs about Inherited Characteristics.” Journal of Biological Education 14 (2): 137–146.10.1080/00219266.1980.10668980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindfield, A. C. H. 1991. “Confusing Chromosome Number and Structure: A Common Student Error.” Journal of Biological Education 25 (3): 193–200. doi:10.1080/00219266.1991.9655206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1971. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levan, A. 1938. “The Effect of Colchicine on Root Mitoses in Allium.” Hereditas 24 (4): 471–486.
   Google Scholar
• Longden, B. 1982. “Genetics – Are There Inherent Learning Difficulties?” Journal of Biological Education 16 (2): 135–140. doi:10.1080/00219266.1982.9654439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez Aznar, M. M., and T. M. Ibáñez Orcajo. 2006. “Resolver situaciones problemáticas en genética para modificar las actitudes relacionadas con la ciencia.” [ Solve Problematic Situations in Genetics to Modify Attitudes Related to Science.] Enseñanza De Las Ciencias 24 (2): 193–206.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, T. R. 1992. “A Paper-&-Pencil Strategy for Teaching Mitosis & Meiosis, Diagnosing Learning Problems & Predicting Examination Performance.” The American Biology Teacher 54 (8): 470–474. doi:10.2307/4449552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, M. B., and R. D. Allen. 1987. “Student Difficulties with Mendelian Genetics Problems.” The American Biology Teacher 49 (4): 229–233. doi:10.2307/4448497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, T. H., A. H. Sturtevant, H. J. Muller, and C. B. Bridges. (1915) 1957. “Linkage”. Chapter III. In The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity. Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. L., C. M. Catavero, and L. K. Wright. 2012. “Students Fail to Transfer Knowledge of Chromosome Structure to Topics Pertaining to Cell Division.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 11 (4): 425436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashley, M. 1994. “A Chromosome Model.” Journal of Biological Education 28 (3): 157–161. doi:10.1080/00219266.1994.9655385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford, A., and J. A. Bird-Stewart. 1982. “Teaching Genetics in Schools.” Journal of Biological Education 16 (3): 177–180.10.1080/00219266.1982.9654454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reindl, K. M., A. R. White, C. Johnson, B. Vender, B. M. Slator, and P. McClean. 2015. “The Virtual Cell Animation Collection: Tools for Teaching Molecular and Cellular Biology.” PLoS Biology 13 (4): e1002118. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez Arnaiz, R., A. N. Castañeda-Sortibrán, and M. G. Ordáz Téllez. (2016). Conceptos Básicos De Genética. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Gil, S. G., María Susana Merani, Cristina Luisa Scioscia, and Liliana María Mola. 2007. “Cytogenetics in Three Species of Polybetes Simon 1897 from Argentina (Araneae, Sparassidae) I. Karyotype and Chromosome Banding Pattern.” Journal of Arachnology 35 (2): 227–237.10.1636/S05-69.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saka, A., L. Cerrah, A. R. Akdeniz, and A. Ayas. 2006. “A Cross-Age Study of the Understanding of Three Genetic Concepts: How Do They Image the Gene, DNA and Chromosome?” Journal of Science Education and Technology 15 (2): 192–202. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-9006-6.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. U. 1988. “Successful and Unsuccessful Problem Solving in Classical Genetic Pedigrees.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 25 (6): 411–433. doi:10.1002/tea.3660250602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trask, B. J. 2002. “Human Cytogenetics: 46 Chromosomes, 46 Years and Counting.” Nature Reviews Genetics 3 (10): 769–778. doi:10.1038/nrg905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Robinson, C., J. Lewis, J. Leach, and R. Driver. 1998. ““Genética Y Formación Científica: Resultados De Un Proyecto De Investigación Y Sus Implicaciones Sobre Los Programas Escolares Y La Enseñanza.” [Genetics and Scientific Education: Results of a Research Project and its Implications for School Curricula and Teaching.] Enseñanza De Las Ciencias 16 (1): 43–61.
   Google Scholar