The teacher writing toolkit: enhancing undergraduate teaching of scientific writing in the biological sciences

References

• Allan, E. G., and D. L. Driscoll. 2014. “The Three-Fold Benefit of Reflective Writing: Improving Program Assessment, Student Learning, and Faculty Professional Development.” Assessing Writing 21: 37–55. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alley, M. 1996. The Craft of Scientific Writing. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Alley, M. 2013. The Craft of Scientific Presentations: Critical Steps to Succeed and Critical Errors to Avoid. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Amores, M. J. 1997. “A New Perspective on Peer-Editing.” Foreign Language Annals 30 (4): 513–522. doi:10.1111/flan.1997.30.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anson, C. M., and L. L. Forsberg. 1990. “Moving beyond the Academic Community: Transitional Stages in Professional Writing.” Written Communication 7: 200–231. doi:10.1177/0741088390007002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avanzino, S. 2010. “Starting from Scratch and Getting Somewhere: Assessment of Oral Communication Proficiency in General Education across Lower and Upper Division Courses.” Communication Teacher 24 (2): 91–110. doi:10.1080/17404621003680898.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, K. M. 2016. “Peer Review as a Strategy for Improving Students’ Writing Process.” Active Learning in Higher Education 17 (3): 179–192. doi:10.1177/1469787416654794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. W., and J. S. Blumner. 2001. The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Writing Center Theory and Practice. Boston: MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, E. S. 2006. “Can Paraphrasing Practice Help Students Define Plagiarism?” College Student Journal 40 (2): 377–384.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, J. 2001. “Tutor Training and Reflection on Practice.” The Writing Center Journal 21 (2): 79–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. 2005. “Factors Associated with Student Plagiarism in a Post-1992 University.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (2): 137–162. doi:10.1080/0260293042000264244.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M. S., G. Little, R. C. Miller, and B. Hartman. 2010. “Soylent: A Word Processor with a Crowd Inside.” Communications of the ACM 58 (4): 85–94. doi:10.1145/2791285.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C., E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palincsar. 2011. “Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning, Educational Psychologist.” Educational Psychologist 26 (3–4): 369–398. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139.
   Google Scholar
• Bombaro, C. 2007. “Using Audience Response Technology to Teach Academic Integrity: “The Seven Deadly Sins of Plagiarism” at Dickinson College.” Reference Services Review 35 (2): 296–309. doi:10.1108/00907320710749209.
   Google Scholar
• Brammer, C., and M. Reyes. 2007. “Peer Review from the Students’ Perspective: Invaluable or Invalid?” Composition Studies 35 (2): 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Breuch, L.-A. K. 2004. Virtual Peer Review: Teaching and Learning about Writing in Online Environments. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, E. 1965. “What Is Technical Writing?” College Composition and Communication 16: 113–116. doi:10.2307/354886.
   Google Scholar
• Caverly, D. C., and L. MacDonald. 2000. “Techtalk: Teaching Writing Online.” Journal of Developmental Education 24 (1): 42–43.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M.-H., S.-T. Huang, J. S. Chang, and H.-C. Liou. 2015. “Developing a Corpus-Based Paraphrase Tool to Improve EFL Learners’ Writing Skills.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 28 (1): 22–40. doi:10.1080/09588221.2013.783873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K., and C. MacArthur. 2010. “Student Revision with Peer and Expert Reviewing.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 328–338. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Science Editors. 2014. Scientific Style and Format: The CSE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers. 8th ed. Wheat Ridge, CO: Council of Scientific Editors.
   Google Scholar
• Covington, D., D. Petherbridge, and S. E. Warren. 2005. “Best Practices: A Triangulated Support Approach in Transitioning Faculty to Online Teaching.” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 8 (1): 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Crossman, J. M., and S. L. Kite. 2012. “Facilitating Improved Writing among Students through Directed Peer Review.” Active Learning in Higher Education 13 (3): 219–229. doi:10.1177/1469787412452980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab, N. M. 2011. “Assessing the Relationship between Different Types of Student Feedback and the Quality of Revised Writing.” Assessing Writing 16 (4): 274–292. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Dirrigl, F. J., Jr., and M. Noe. 2014. “The Student Writing Toolkit: Enhancing Undergraduate Teaching of Scientific Writing in the Biological Sciences.” Journal of Biological Education 48 (3): 163–171. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.863795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dix, S. 2015. “Teaching Writing: A Multilayered Participatory Scaffolding Practice.” Literacy 50 (1): 23–31. doi:10.1111/lit.12068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drobney, K. 2014. “Ancient Falconry.” accessed April 19, 2018. http://www.firstscience.com/site/articles/dobney.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. A. 2004. “University Student Approaches to Learning Science through Writing.” International Journal of Science Education 26 (15): 1835–1853. doi:10.1080/0950069042000243772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enginarlar, H. 1993. “Student Response to Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing.” System 21 (2): 193–204. doi:10.1016/0346-251X(93)90041-E.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. 1987. “Research on Revision in Writing.” Review of Educational Research 57 (4): 481–506. doi:10.3102/00346543057004481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstein, J. M. 2008. “Conducting Research in the Gray Space: How Writing Associates Negotiate between WAC and WID in an Introductory Biology Course.” Across the Disciplines 5 Rewriting Across The Curriculum: Writing Fellows As Agents Of Change In WAC, Special Issue. accessed April 19, 2018. http://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-english-lit/10
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A., M. Russell, and A. Cook. 2003. “The Effect of Computers on Student Writing: A Meta-Analysis of Studies from 1992 to 2002.” The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 2 (1). online http://www/jtla.org.
   Google Scholar
• Gormally, C., P. Brickman, B. Hallar, and N. Armstrong. 2009. “Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 3(2): Article 16. doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030216.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 2006. “Strategy Instruction and the Teaching of Writing: A Meta-Analysis.” In Handbook of Writing Research, edited by C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, and J. Fitzgerald, 187–207. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graner, M. H. 1987. “Revision Workshops: An Alternative to Peer Editing Groups.” The English Journal 76 (3): 40–45. doi:10.2307/818540.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, J., and D. Minter. 2013. “The Rise of the Online Writing Classroom: Reflecting on the Material Conditions of College Composition Teaching.” College Composition and Communication 65 (1): 140–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, R., and K. O. Vered. 2016. “(Online). “Developing Communication as a Graduate Outcome: Using “Writing across the Curriculum” as a Whole-Of-Institution Approach to Curriculum and Pedagogy.” Higher Education Research & Development. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1238882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwell, P. 1985. “Grammar, Grammars, and the Teaching of Grammar.” College English 47 (2): 105–127. doi:10.2307/376562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R., and L. S. Flower. 1986. “Writing Research and the Writer.” American Psychologist 41 (10): 1106–1113. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewett, B., and C. Ehmann. 2004. Preparing Educators for Online Writing Instruction: Principles and Processes. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Hollis, K. 1991. “More Science in the Writing Center: Training Tutors to Lead Group Tutorials on Biology Lab Reports.” In The Writing Center, New Directions, edited by R. Wallace and J. Simpson, 247–462. New York: NY: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Holyoak, A. R. 1998. “A Plan for Writing Throughout (Not Just Across) the Biology Curriculum.” The American Biology Teacher 60: 186–190. doi:10.2307/4450448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, C. R. 2016. “Do Scaffolding Tools Improve Reflective Writing in Professional Portfolios? A Content Analysis of Reflective Writing in an Advanced Preparation Program.” Action in Teacher Education 38 (4): 399–409. doi:10.1080/01626620.2016.1226201.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, X., and C. S. Kalman. 2012. “A Case Study on Reflective Writing.” Journal of College Science Teaching 42 (1): 92–99.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2015. Teaching and Researching Writing. New York: NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jerde, C. L., and M. L. Taper. 2004. “Preparing Undergraduates for Professional Writing.” Journal of College Science Teaching 33 (7): 267–272.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. F., A. S. Palincsar, D. S. Ogle, and E. G. Carr. 1987. “Strategic Teaching: A Cognitive Focus.” In Strategic Teaching and Learning: Cognitive Instruction in the Content Areas, edited by B. F. Jones, A. S. Palincsar, D. S. Ogle, and E. G. Carr, 33–63. Elmhurst, IL: North Central Educational Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. 1989. “Biological Literacy.” The American Biology Teacher 51: 480–481. doi:10.2307/4448993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, J. 2011. “Reflective Writing’s Synecdochic Imperative: Process Descriptions Redescribed.” College English 73 (6): 628–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kail, H. 2008. “Innovation and Repetition: The Brooklyn College Summer Institute in Training Peer Writing Tutors 25 Years Later.” The Writing Center Journal 28 (2): 43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kakkonen, T., and N. Myller. 2009. “Antiplag—A Sampling-Based Tool for Plagiarism Detection in Student Texts.” In Proceedings on the 8th European Conference on e-Learning, edited by D. Remenyi, 287–293. Reading, UK: Academic Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W. 1999. “Revitalizing Instruction in Scientific Genres: Connecting Knowledge Production with Writing to Learn in Science.” Science Education 83 (2): 115–130. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, P. D. 1999. “Reopening Inquiry into Cognitive Process in Writing-To-Learn.” Educational Psychology Review 11 (3): 203–270. doi:10.1023/A:1021913217147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knisely, K. 2004. A Student Handbook for Writing in Biology. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, L.L., 2014. “Can They Tutor Science? Using Faculty Input, Genre, and WAC-WID to Introduce Tutors to Scientific Realities.” Composition Forum 29. accessed April 19, 2018. http://compositionforum.com/issue/29/can-they-tutor-science.php
   Google Scholar
• Kolikant, Y. B.-D., D. W. Gatchell, P. L. Hirsch, and R. A. Linsenmeier. 2006. “A Cognitive-Apprenticeship-Inspired Instructional Approach for Teaching Scientific Writing and Reading.” Journal of College Science Teaching 36: 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kolln, M. 2010. “It’s Time to Let Go of the ‘Grammar Bogeyman.’.” The English Journal 99 (6): 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Krest, M., and D. O. Carle. 1999. “Teaching Scientific Writing: A Model for Integrating Research, Writing, and Critical Thinking.” The American Biology Teacher 61: 223–227. doi:10.2307/4450655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, H. 2013. “Personal, Reflective Writing: A Pedagogical Strategy for Teaching Business Students to Write.” Business Communication Quarterly 76 (2): 192–206. doi:10.1177/1080569913478155.
   Google Scholar
• Likkel, L. 2012. “Calibrated Peer Review Essays Increase Student Confidence in Assessing Their Own Writing.” Journal of College Science Teaching 41 (3): 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Lipson, C. 2008. Doing Honest Work in College: How to Prepare Citations, Avoid Plagiarism, and Achieve Real Academic Success. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, R., and L. Bol. 2007. “A Comparison of Anonymous versus Identifiable E-Peer Review on College Student Writing Performance and the Extent of Critical Feedback.” Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6 (2): 100–115.
   Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K., and W. Baker. 2009. “To Give Is Better than to Receive: The Benefits of Peer Review to the Reviewer’s Own Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 18 (1): 30–43. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, R. W., P. C. Blumenfeld, J. S. Krajcik, and E. Soloway. 1997. “Enacting Project-Based Science.” The Elementary School Journal 97 (4): 341–358. doi:10.1086/461870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynes, N., L. Julien-Schultz, and C. Dunn. 2010. “Modeling and the Gradual Release of Responsibility: What Does It Look like in the Classroom?” Brock Education Journal 19 (2): 65–77. doi:10.26522/brocked.v19i2.136.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J., and L. Dominguez. 2009. “Reflective Writing.” The Science Teacher 76 (3): 46–49.
   Google Scholar
• McLafferty, C. L., and K. M. Foust. 2010. “Electronic Plagiarism as a College Instructor’s Nightmare-Prevention and Detection.” Journal of Education for Business 79 (3): 186–190. doi:10.3200/JOEB.79.3.186-190.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, I. A. M., and D. Webber. 2009. “Enhancing Student Engagement and Performance in an Ecology Course.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 4 (4): 365–380.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, V. E. 2012. Writing Papers in the Biological Sciences (4th Edition). Boston, MA: Bedford Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mehlenbacher, B., C. R. Miller, D. Covington, and J. S. Larsen. 2000. “Active and Interactive Learning Online: A Comparison of Web-Based and Conventional Writing Classes.” EEE Transactions on Professional Communication 43 (2): 166–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micciche, L. R. 2004. “Making a Case for Rhetorical Grammar.” College Composition and Communication 55 (4): 716–737. doi:10.2307/4140668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milićević, A., S. Misailovic, D. Marinov, and S. Khurshid. 2007. “Korat: A Tool for Generating Structurally Complex Test Inputs.” ICSE ‘07 Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Software Engineering May 20–26, 2007: 771–774.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. 1992a. Writing to Learn Biology. Orlando, FL: Saunders College Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. 1992b. “Writing About Biology: How Should We Mark Students’ Essays?” BioScene: the Journal of College Biology Teaching 18 (3): 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. 1993. “Does Writing About Science Improve Learning About Science?” Journal of College Teaching 22 (4): 212–217.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. 1994. “Writing as a Tool for Learning Biology.” BioScience 44 (9): 613–617. doi:10.2307/1312461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, D. M. 1997. “Teach Writing as A Process Not Product.” In Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, edited by V. Villanueva Jr, 7–16. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Neff, J., G. J. McAuliffe, C. Whithaus, and N. P. Quinlan. 2012. “Low-Stakes, Reflective Writing: Moving Students into Their Professional Fields.” Currents in Teaching & Learning 4 (2): 18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Otfinowski, R., and M. Silva-Opps. 2015. “Writing toward a Scientific Identity: Shifting from Prescriptive to Reflective Writing in Undergraduate Biology.” Journal of College Science Teaching 45 (2): 19–23. doi:10.2505/4/jcst15_045_02_19.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. 2003. “In Other (People’s) Words: Plagiarism by University Students-Literature and Lessons.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (5): 471–488. doi:10.1080/02602930301677.
   Google Scholar
• Parkhurst, C., and E. Moore. 2006. “Nipping Plagiarism in the Bud: Using Turnitin to Teach Novice Science Writers How to Paraphrase.” The Write Stuff 15 (4): 125–128.
   Google Scholar
• Pechenik, J. 2010. A Short Guide to Writing about Biology (7th Edition). New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Phadtare, A., A. Bahmani, A. Shah, and R. Pietrobon. 2009. “Scientific Writing: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Standard and On-Line Instruction.” BMC Medical Education 9: 27. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-9-27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., J.G. Borkowski, and W. Schneider. 1987. Strategies: Good Strategy Users Coordinate Metacognition and Knowledge.”, edited by ., . Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohman, D. G. 1965. “Pre-Writing and the Stage of Discovery in the Writing Process.” College Composition and Communication 16 (2): 106–112. doi:10.2307/354885.
   Google Scholar
• Roig, M. 1999. “When College Students’ Attempts at Paraphrasing Become Instances of Potential Plagiarism.” Psychological Reports 84 (3): 973–982. doi:10.2466/pr0.1999.84.3.973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roig, M., and L. DeTommaso. 1995. “Are College Cheating and Plagiarism Related to Academic Procrastination?” Psychological Reports 77 (2): 691–698. doi:10.2466/pr0.1995.77.2.691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. 2011. “Improving Reflective Writing in Higher Education: A Social Semiotic Perspective.” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (1): 99–111. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.507311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salend, S. J. 2015. Creating Inclusive Classrooms: Effective, Differentiated and Reflective Practices. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Sams, L. 2003. ““How to Teach Grammar, Analytical Thinking, and Writing: A Method that Works.” The English Journal 92 (3): 57–65. doi:10.2307/822261.
   Google Scholar
• Sapp, D. A., and J. Simon. 2005. “Comparing Grades in Online and Face-To-Face Writing Courses: Interpersonal Accountability and Institutional Commitment.” Computers and Composition 22 (4): 471–489. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2005.08.005.
   Google Scholar
• Savenye, W. C., Z. Olina, and M. Niemczyk. 2001. “So You are Going to Be an Online Writing Instructor: Issues in Designing, Developing, and Delivering an Online Course.” Computers and Composition 18 (4): 371–385. doi:10.1016/S8755-4615(01)00069-X.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, P. M. 2003. “Student Online Plagiarism: How Do We Respond?” College Teaching 51 (4): 161–165. doi:10.1080/87567550309596432.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, P. M., and D. R. Neumann. 2002. “Internet Plagiarism among College Students.” Journal of College Student Development 43 (3): 374–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. M. P., and D. L. Ralph. 2016. “The Flipped Classroom: A Twist on Teaching.” Contemporary Issues in Education Research 9 (1): 1–6. doi:10.19030/cier.v9i1.9544.
   Google Scholar
• Seow, A. 2002. “The Writing Process and Process Writing.” In Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice, edited by J. C. Richards and W. A. Renandya, 315–320. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sitko, B.M. 1998. “Knowing How to Write: Metacognition and Writing Instruction.” In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, edited by, 93-115. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, N., and L. Saltz. 2004. “The Novice as Expert: Writing In The Freshman Year.” College Composition and Communication 56 (1): 124-149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, P., and R. Stewart. 2012. “Reflective Writing in Medical Education.” Medical Teacher 34 (11): 955–956. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.716552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, J. R., Y. Song, W. Brantley, and O. L. Liu. 2014. “Assessing Written Communication in Higher Education: Review and Recommendations for Next-Generation Assessment.” ETS Research Report Series 2014 (2): 1–52. doi:10.1002/ets2.12035.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, L. A., and A. Solomon. 2006. “Effective Faculty Feedback: The Road Less Travelled.” Assessing Writing 11 (1): 22–41. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Stine, L. 2004. “The Best of Both Worlds: Teaching Basic Writers in Class and Online.” Journal of Basic Writing 23 (2): 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Straub, R. 2000. “The Student, the Text, and the Classroom Context: A Case Study of Teacher Response.” Assessing Writing 7: 23–55. doi:10.1016/S1075-2935(00)00017-9.
   Google Scholar
• Stunk, W., Jr., and E. B. White. 1979. The Elements of Style. New York, NY: MacMillian.
   Google Scholar
• Summy, K. R. 2016. Fundamentals of Modern Scientific Communication. Dubuque, LA: Kendall Hunt Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. C. 2006. “Unintended Lessons: Plagiarism and the University.” Teachers College Record 108 (12): 2439–2449. doi:10.1111/tcre.2006.108.issue-12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thonus, T. 2001. “Triangulation in the Writing Center: Tutor, Tutee, and Instructor Perceptions of the Tutor’s Role.” The Writing Center Journal 22 (1): 59–82.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, M. 2008. “WAC Program Vulnerability and What to Do about It: An Update and Brief Bibliographic Essay.” The WAC Journal 19: 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Trautmann, N. M. 2009. “Interactive Learning through Web-Mediated Peer Review of Student Science Reports.” Educational Technology Research and Development 57 (5): 685–704. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9077-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkington, C., and J. R. Harris. 2006. The Encyclopedia of Learning Disabilities (Facts on File Library of Health and Living). 2nd ed. New York, NY: Infobase Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Berg, I., W. Admiraal, and A. Pilot. 2006. “Designing Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: Analysis of Written and Oral Peer Feedback.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (2): 135–147. doi:10.1080/13562510500527685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Valk, T., and O. De Jong. 2009. “Scaffolding Science Teachers in Open-Inquiry Teaching.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (6): 829–850. doi:10.1080/09500690802287155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walvoord, B. E., and L. P. McCarthy. 1990. Thinking and Writing in College: A Naturalistic Study of Students in Four Disciplines. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Warn, J. 2006. “Plagiarism Software: No Magic Bullet!.” Higher Education Research & Development 25 (2): 195–208.a. doi:10.1080/07294360600610438.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, C. 1996. “Teaching Grammar in the Context of Writing.” The English Journal 85 (7): 15–24. doi:10.2307/820502.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhoit, S. 2010. “Helping Students Avoid Plagiarism.” College Teaching 42 (4): 161–164. doi:10.1080/87567555.1994.9926849.
   Google Scholar
• Woodford, F. P. 1968. Scientific Writing for Graduate Students: A Manual on the Teaching of Scientific Writing. New York, NY: Rockefeller University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodford, F. P. 1972. “Experiences in Teaching Scientific Writing in the U.S.A.” Journal of Biological Education 6: 9–12. doi:10.1080/00219266.1972.9653737.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, H. V. 1975. “Writing and Speaking: Communication for Biologists.” Journal of Biological Education 9: 256–258. doi:10.1080/00219266.1975.9654040.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. F. 2010. “Students’ Reflection on Online Self-Correction and Peer Review to Improve Writing.” Computers & Education 55 (3): 1202–1210. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, H. C., and Y. F. Yang. 2011. “Prospective Teachers’ Insights Towards Scaffolding Students’ Writing Processes through Teacher-Student Role Reversal in an Online System.” Educational Technology Research and Development 59 (3): 351–368. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9170-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamel, V. 1985. “Responding to Student Writing.” Tesol Quarterly 19 (1): 79–101. doi:10.2307/3586773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekeri, A. A. 2004. “College Curriculum Competencies and Skills Former Students Found Essential to Their Careers.” College Student Journal 38 (3): 412–422.
   Google Scholar