Student exam performance in flipped classroom sections is similar to that in active learning sections, and satisfaction with the flipped classroom hinges on attitudes toward learning from videos

References

• Abeysekera, L., and P. Dawson. 2015. “Motivation and Cognitive Load in the Flipped Classroom: Definition, Rationale and a Call for Research.” Higher Education Research & Development 34 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.934336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, R., A. Brand, J. Grant, J. Kirk, and T. Zimmermann. 2014. “Leveraging Recorded Mini-Lectures to Increase Student Learning.” Online Classroom 14 (2): 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., and A. Sams. 2012. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Eugene, OR.: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Braxton, J. M., W. A. Jones, A. S. Hirschy, and H. V. Hartley. 2008. “The Role of Active Learning in College Student Persistence.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 115: 71–83. doi:10.1002/tl.326.
   Google Scholar
• Bristol, T. 2014. “Flipping the Classroom.” Teaching and Learning in Nursing 9 (1): 43–46. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2013.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, A. J., O. R. Aragon, X. N. Chen, B. A. Couch, M. F. Durham, A. Bobrownicki, D. I. Hanauer, and M. J. Graham. 2016. “Student Buy-In to Active Learning in a College Science Course.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 15 (4): ARTN ar76. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-07-0212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., F. Nguyen, and J. Sweller. 2006. Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load, Edited by R. Taff. Hoboken, NJ: Pfeiffer, An Imprint of John Wiley & Sons, .
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, P. 1986. “The Myth of Cut-Throats among Premedical Students: On the Role of Stereotypes in Justifying Failure and Success.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 27 (2): 150–160. doi:10.2307/2136313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, M. P. 2006. “Visual Representations in Science Education: The Influence of Prior Knowledge and Cognitive Load Theory on Instructional Design Principles.” Science Education 90 (6): 1073–1091. doi:10.1002/sce.20164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, E. L. 2015. “Biology Education Research 2.0.” Cbe-Life Sciences Education 14 (4): ARTN ed1. doi:10.1187/cbe.15-11-0229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., K. A. Rawson, E. J. Marsh, M. J. Nathan, and D. T. Willingham. 2013. “Improving Students’ Learning with Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions from Cognitive and Educational Psychology.” Psychol Sci Public Interest 14 (1): 4–58. doi:10.1177/1529100612453266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert-May, D., C. Brewer, and S. Allred. 1997. “Innovation in Large Lectures: Teaching for Active Learning.” BioScience 47 (9): 601–607. doi:10.2307/1313166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, S. L., and K. A. Hogan. 2014. “Getting under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work?” Cbe-Life Sciences Education 13 (3): 453–468. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., and E. R. Peterson. 2004. “Conceptions of Learning and Knowledge in Higher Education: Relationships with Study Behaviour and Influences of Learning Environments.” International Journal of Educational Research 41 (6): 407–428. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.009.
   Google Scholar
• Foldnes, N. 2016. “The Flipped Classroom and Cooperative Learning: Evidence from a Randomised Experiment.” Active Learning in Higher Education 17 (1): 39–49. doi:10.1177/1469787415616726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (23): 8410–8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, P. J., J. Kim, and R. Rubin. 2014. “How Video Production Affects Student Engagement: An Empirical Study of MOOC Videos.” In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, New York, NY. 41-50, doi: 10.1145/2556325.2566239.
   Google Scholar
• Herreid, C. F., N. A. Schiller, K. F. Herreid, and C. B. Wright. 2014. “A Chat with the Survey Monkey: Case Studies and the Flipped Classroom.” National Science Teachers Association 44 (1): 75–80. doi:10.2505/4/jcst14_044_01_75.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, G. 2010. “It’s Not Always Just about the Grade: Exploring the Achievement Goal Orientations of Pre-Med Students.” The Journal of Experimental Education 78 (2): 215–245. doi:10.1080/00220970903352746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. L., T. A. Kummer, and P. D. Godoy. 2015. “Improvements from a Flipped Classroom May Simply Be the Fruits of Active Learning.” CBE Life Sciences Education 14 (1): ar5. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-08-0129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., T. Johnson, and M. B. Stanne. 2000. Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta-Analysis. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., R. T. Johnson, and K. A. Smith. 1998. “Cooperative Learning Returns To College: What Evidence Is There That It Works?” Change, ( Jul/Aug.): 30 (4): 26-35. doi: 10.1080/00091389809602629.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D., and L. Gow. 1994. “Orientations to Teaching and Their Effect on the Quality of Student Learning.” The Journal of Higher Education 65 (1): 58–74. doi:10.1080/00221546.1994.11778474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. K., and W. B. Wood. 2005. “Teaching More by Lecturing Less.” Cell Biology Education 4 (4): 298–310. doi:10.1187/05-06-0082.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lai, C.-L., and G.-J. Hwang. 2016. “A Self-Regulated Flipped Classroom Approach to Improving Students’ Learning Performance in A Mathematics Course.” Computers & Education 100: 126–140. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lax, N., J. Morris, and B. J. Kolber. 2016. “A Partial Flip Classroom Exercise in A Large Introductory General Biology Course Increases Performance at Multiple Levels.” Journal of Biological Education ( Nov. 17): 1–15. doi:10.1080/00219266.2016.1257503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, W., and J. Sweller. 2008. “The Imagination Effect Increases with an Increased Intrinsic Cognitive Load.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 22 (2): 273–283. doi:10.1002/acp.1373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, T. R. 1997. “A Comparison between Traditional and Constructivist Teaching in College Biology.” Innovative Higher Education 21 (3): 197–216. doi:10.1007/BF01243716.
   Google Scholar
• Love, B., A. Hodge, N. Grandgenett, and A. W. Swift. 2013. “Student Learning and Perceptions in a Flipped Linear Algebra Course.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 45 (3): 317–324. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2013.822582.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. E., L. M. Griffin, D. A. Esserman, C. A. Davidson, D. M. Glatt, M. T. Roth, N. Gharkholonarehe, and R. J. Mumper. 2013. “Pharmacy Student Engagement, Performance, and Perception in a Flipped Satellite Classroom.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 77: 9. doi:10.5688/ajpe779196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, C., and T. B. Jones. 1993. Promoting Active Learning. Strategies for the College Classroom. San Franscisco: Josey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Missildine, K., R. Fountain, L. Summers, and K. Gosselin. 2013. “Flipping the Classroom to Improve Student Performance and Satisfaction.” The Journal of Nursing Education 52 (10): 597–599. doi:10.3928/01484834-20130919-03.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. 2002. “Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Conceptual Change in Limited or Inappropriate Propositional Hierarchies Leading to Empowerment of Learners.” Science Education 86 (4): 548–571. doi:10.1002/sce.10032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, E. E., J. Fried, N. McNulty, P. Shah, J. P. Hogg, P. Lewis, T. Zeffiro, V. Agarwal, and S. Reddy. 2016. “Flipping Radiology Education Right Side Up.” Academic Radiology 23 (7): 810–822. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2016.02.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ost, B. 2010. “The Role of Peers and Grades in Determining Major Persistence in the Sciences.” Economics of Education Review 29 (6): 923–934. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., A. Renkl, and J. Sweller. 2003. “Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments.” Educational Psychologist 38 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. R., and J. E. Trainor. 2014. “Millennial Students and the Flipped Classroom.” Journal of Business and Educational Leadership 5 (1): 102–112.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, S. J., S. E. Gathercole, M. Hall, and S. A. Lloyd. 2001. “Development of Memory for Pattern and Path: Further Evidence for the Fractionation of Visuo-Spatial Memory.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 54 (2): 397–420. doi:10.1080/713755973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 1988. “A Process‐Oriented View of Student Motivation and Cognition.” New Directions for Institutional Research 1988 (57): 65–79. doi:10.1002/ir.37019885707.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., and E. V. DeGroot. 1990. “Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance.” Journal of Educational Psycology 82 (1): 33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rask, K. 2010. “Attrition in STEM Fields at a Liberal Arts College: The Importance of Grades and Pre-Collegiate Preferences.” Economics of Education Review 29 (6): 892–900. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. 2012. “A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, 149–172. Boston, MA: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T. L. 2001. The No Significant Difference Phenomenon. Chicago, IL: International Distance Education Certification Center.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. 1989. “Self-Efficacy and Achievement Behaviors.” Educational Psychology Review 1 (3): 173–208. doi:10.1007/BF01320134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seery, M. K. 2015. “Flipped Learning in Higher Education Chemistry: Emerging Trends and Potential Directions.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 16 (4): 758–768. doi:10.1039/c5rp00136f.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, S., and K. A. Smith. 2013. “Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education 102 (4): 468–471. doi:10.1002/jee.20030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbert, R. 2012. “Inverted Classroom.” Colleagues 9 (1): 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. D., S. H. Cotner, P. M. Baepler, and M. D. Decker. 2008. “A Delicate Balance: Integrating Active Learning into A Large Lecture Course.” Cbe-Life Sciences Education 7 (4): 361–367. doi:10.1187/cbe.08-02-0004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, G. 1997. “Deconstructing Deep and Surface: Towards a Critique of Phenomenography.” Higher Education 33 (2): 195–212. doi:10.1023/A:1002905027633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, A. J. 2012. “Exploring Undergraduates’ Perceptions of the Use of Active Learning Techniques in Science Lectures.” Journal of College Science Teaching 42 (2): 80–87.
   Google Scholar
• Wieman, C. 2007. “Why Not Try: A Scientific Approach to Science Education?” Change 39 (5): 9–15. doi:10.3200/CHNG.39.5.9-15.
   Google Scholar
• Wierstra, R. F. A., J. L. Gellof Kanselaar, H. G. van der Linden, L. C. Lodewijks, and J. D. Vermunt. 2003. “The Impact of the University Context on European Students’ Learning Approaches and Learning Environment Preferences.” Higher Education 45 (4): 503–523. doi:10.1023/A:1023981025796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeager, R. 1991. “The Constructivist Learning Model: Toward Real Reform in Science Education.” Science Teacher 58: 52–57.
   Google Scholar