Engaging students into their own learning of foundational genetics concepts through the 5E learning cycle and interleaving teaching techniques

References

• Auerbach, A. J., and E. Schussler. 2017. “A Vision and Change Reform of Introductory Biology Shifts Faculty Perceptions and Use of Active Learning.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 16 (4) Winter: ar57. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-08-0258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23) Jun 10: 8410–8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gericke, N., and M. Smith. 2014. “Twenty-First-Century Genetics and Genomics: Contributions of Hps-Informed Research and Pedagogy.” In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, 1 ed., edited by M. R. Matthews. 423-467. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science and Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_15.
   Google Scholar
• Gericke, N., and S. Wahlberg. 2013. “Clusters of Concepts in Molecular Genetics: A Study of Swedish Upper Secondary Science Students Understanding.” Journal of Biological Education 47 (2): 73–83. doi:10.1080/00219266.2012.716785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, B. 2018. “Student Learning that Works: How Brain Science Informs a Student Learning Model.” McREL International. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Haak, D. C., J. HilleRisLambers, E. Pitre, and S. Freeman. 2011. “Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology.” Science 332 (6034) Jun 3: 1213–1216. doi:10.1126/science.332.6026.173-c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, K. K., K. M. Robson, and C. V. Baxter. 2017. “Investigating Aquatic Insect Emergence: A Demonstration of the 5e Learning Cycle.” The American Biology Teacher 79 (3): 225–232. doi: 10.1525/abt.2017.79.3.225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, M. L. 2012. “Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action Presentation to Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, July 2011.” Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education 11 (1) Fall: A22–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linderholm, T., J. Dobson, and M. B. Yarbrough. 2016. “The Benefit of Self-Testing and Interleaving for Synthesizing Concepts across Multiple Physiology Texts.” Advances in Physiology Education 40 (3) Sep: 329–334. doi:10.1152/advan.00009.2016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, A., R. M. Achen, and R. K. Dodd. 2015. “Student Perceptions of Active Learning.” College Student Journal 49 (1): 121–133.
   Google Scholar
• Merkel, S., and A. S. M. Task Force on Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Microbiology. 2012. “The Development of Curricular Guidelines for Introductory Microbiology that Focus on Understanding.” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 13 (1): 32–38. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.363.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patro, E. T. 2008. “Teaching Aerobic Cell Respiration Using the 5 Es.” The American Biology Teacher 70 (2): 85–87. doi:10.1662/0002-7685(2008)70[85:TACRUT]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinagel, A., and E. Bray Speth. 2016. “Beyond the Central Dogma: Model-Based Learning of How Genes Determine Phenotypes.” [In eng]. CBE—Life Sciences Education 15 (1): ar4. doi:10.1187/cbe.15-04-0105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. H., and A. Meyer. 2002. Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. ERIC. Alexandria, VA: ASCD
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, Y., C. R. Madan, and M. A. Sumeracki. 2018. “Teaching the Science of Learning.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 3 (1): 2. doi:10.1186/s41235-018-0099-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, V. X., E. L. Bjork, and R. A. Bjork. 2016. “On the Difficulty of Mending Metacognitive Illusions: A Priori Theories, Fluency Effects, and Misattributions of the Interleaving Benefit.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145 (7) Jul: 918–933. doi:10.1037/xge0000177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar