Plant blindness and children’s recognition of plants as living things: a research in the primary schools context

References

• Amprazis, A., and P. Papadopoulou. 2018. “Primary School Curriculum Contributing to Plant Blindness: Assessment through the Biodiversity Perspective.” Advances in Ecological and Environmental Research 3 (11): 238–256.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D., B. Piscitelli, K. Weier, M. Everett, and C. Tayler. 2002. “Children’s Museum Experiences: Identifying Powerful Mediators of Learning.” Curator: The Museum Journal 45 (3): 213–231. doi:10.1111/cura.2002.45.issue-3.
   Google Scholar
•  Anggoro, F. K., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. 2005. The Effects of Naming Practices on Children’s Understanding of Living Things. In Proceedings of 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, edited by Bruno Bara, Lawrence Barsalou, & Monica Bucciarelli, 139–144. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Backscheider, A. G., M. Shatz, and S. A. Gelman. 1993. “Preschoolers’ Ability to Distinguish Living Kinds as a Function of Regrowth.” Child Development 64 (4): 1242–1257. doi:10.2307/1131337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balas, B., and J. L. Momsen. 2014. “Attention “blinks” Differently for Plants and Animals.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 13 (3): 437–443. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-05-0080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balding, M., and K. J. Williams. 2016. “Plant Blindness and the Implications for Plant Conservation.” Conservation Biology 30 (6): 1192–1199. doi:10.1111/cobi.12738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barman, C. R., M. Stein, S. McNair, and N. S. Barman. 2006. “Students’ Ideas about Plants & Plant Growth.” The American Biology Teacher 68 (2): 73–79. doi:10.2307/4451935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. F. 1981. “What Is a Plant? Some Children’s Ideas.” New Zealand Science Teacher 31 (3): 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bermudez, G. M., S. Díaz, and A. L. De Longhi. 2018. “Native Plant Naming by High-school Students of Different Socioeconomic Status: Implications for Botany Education.” International Journal of Science Education 40 (1): 46–66. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1397297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozniak, E. C. 1994. “Challenges Facing Plant Biology Teaching Programs.” Plant Science Bulletin 40 (2): 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Brulé, L., F. Labrell, O. Megalakaki, N. Fouquet, and S. Caillies. 2014. “Children’s Justifications of Plants as Living Things between 5 and 7 Years of Age.” European Journal of Developmental Psychology 11 (5): 532–545. doi:10.1080/17405629.2014.881283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S. 1985. Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christoff, K., J. M. Ream, and J. D. Gabrieli. 2004. “Neural Basis of Spontaneous Thought Processes.” Cortex 40 (4–5): 623–630. doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70158-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çìl, E. 2016. “Instructional Integration of Disciplines for Promoting Children’s Positive Attitudes Towards Plants.” Journal of Biological Education 50 (4): 366–383. doi:10.1080/00219266.2015.1117512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and J. D. Creswell. 2017. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• DeMarie‐Dreblow, D. 1991. “Relation between Knowledge and Memory: A Reminder that Correlation Does Not Imply Causality.” Child Development 62 (3): 484–498. doi:10.2307/1131125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fančovičová, J., and P. Prokop. 2011. “Plants Have a Chance: Outdoor Educational Programmes Alter Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Plants.” Environmental Education Research 17 (4): 537–551. doi:10.1080/13504622.2010.545874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., and B. J. Baars. 2010. Spontaneous Remembering Is the Norm: What Integrative Models Tell Us about Human Consciousness and Memory. The Act of Remembering: Toward an Understanding of How We Recall the Past. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gagliano, M. 2013. “Seeing Green: The Re-discovery of Plants and Nature’s Wisdom.” Societies 3 (1): 147–157. doi:10.3390/soc3010147.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G., R. S. Siegler, D. D. Richards, K. Inagaki, R. Stavy, and N. Wax. 1993. “The Development of Biological Knowledge: A Multi-national Study.” Cognitive Development 8 (1): 47–62. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(93)90004-O.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershey, D. R. 1986. “Plant Content in the National Science Education Standards.” http://www.actionbioscience.org/education/hershey2.html?print%201%20/%2016
   Google Scholar
• Hershey, D. R. 1996. “A Historical Perspective on Problems in Botany Teaching.” The American Biology Teacher 58 (6): 340–347. doi:10.2307/4450174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, B. 2000. “Plant Blindness - the Ultimate Challenge to Botanists.” The American Biology Teacher 62: 82–83. doi:10.1662/0002-7685(2000)062[0082:PBTUCT]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugo, G. 2017. New Forms of Urbanization: Beyond the Urban-rural Dichotomy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Inagaki, K., and G. Hatano. 2006. “The Living/nonliving Distinction.” In Young Children’s Naive Thinking about the Biological World, edited by K. Inagaki and G. Hatano, 19–42. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inagaki, K., and G. Hatano. 2006. “Young Children’s Conception of the Biological World.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 15 (4): 177–181. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00431.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jickling, B., and S. Sterling. 2017. “Post-sustainability and Environmental Education: Framing Issues.” In Post-Sustainability and Environmental Education, edited by Robert Jickling & Stephen Sterling, 1–11. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. 2004. The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. 1999. “Investigating Secondary-school Girls’ Preferences for Animals or Plants: A Simple ‘head-to-head’ Comparison Using Two Unfamiliar Organisms.” Journal of Biological Education 33 (2): 95–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, W. H. 1961. “Symposium: Studies of Children’s Scientific Concepts and Interests.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 31 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1961.tb01696.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissi, L., and D. Dreesmann. 2018. “Plant Visibility through Mobile Learning? Implementation and Evaluation of an Interactive Flower Hunt in a Botanic Garden.” Journal of Biological Education 52 (4): 344–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. 2004. “Planning Middle School Schedules for Improved Attention and Achievement.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 48 (4): 441–450. doi:10.1080/0031383042000245825.
   Google Scholar
• Kose, E. O. 2011. “Number of Animal and Plant Species Identified by Biology Students.” Energy Education Science and Technology Part b-Social and Educational Studies 3 (3): 245–252.
   Google Scholar
• Koutsoukos, Μ., Ι. Fragoulis, and E. Valkanos. 2015. “Connection of Environmental Education with Application of Experiential Teaching Methods: A Case Study from Greece.” International Education Studies 8 (4): 23–28. doi:10.5539/ies.v8n4p23.
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, S. E., J. C. Baker, and K. R. Moore. 2018. “The Pet Plant Project: Treating Plant Blindness by Making Plants Personal.” The American Biology Teacher 80 (5): 339–345. doi:10.1525/abt.2018.80.5.339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, G., K. Kienapple, R. L. Sullivan, and J. Allen. 1981. “Relationships between Study Behavior, Object Knowledge, and Recall-Memory Proficiency in Preschool Children.” The Journal of Psychology 109 (1): 11–26. doi:10.1080/00223980.1981.9915281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leddon, E. M., S. R. Waxman, and D. L. Medin. 2009. “Unmasking “alive”: Children’s Appreciation of a Concept Linking All Living Things.” Journal of Cognition and Development 9 (4): 461–473. doi:10.1080/15248370802678463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand Country Almanac. New York: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, P. 2002. “‘loveable’ Mammals and ‘lifeless’ Plants: How Children’s Interest in Common Local Organisms Can Be Enhanced through Observation of Nature.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (6): 655–677. doi:10.1080/09500690500038116.
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, P. 2002. “The Influence of an Educational Program on Children’s Perception of Biodiversity.” The Journal of Environmental Education 33: 22–31. doi:10.1080/00958960209600805.
   Google Scholar
• Link-Perez, M. A., V. H. Dollo, K. M. Weber, and E. E. Schussler. 2009. “What’s in a Name: Differential Labeling of Plant and Animal Photographs in Two Nationally Syndicated Elementary Science Textbook Series.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (9): 1227–1242. doi:10.1080/09500690903002818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Ed. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods, Volume 1: Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margett, T. E., and D. C. Witherington. 2011. “The Nature of Preschoolers’ Concept of Living and Artificial Objects.” Child Development 82 (6): 2067–2082. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01661.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrero, M., M. Puerto, C. Rivero-Camacho, A. Freire-Guerrero, and J. Solís-Guzmán. 2017. “Assessing the Economic Impact and Ecological Footprint of Construction and Demolition Waste during the Urbanization of Rural Land.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 117: 160–174. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Losada, C., S. García-Barros, and M. Garrido. 2014. “How Children Characterise Living Beings and the Activities in Which They Engage.” Journal of Biological Education 48 (4): 201–210. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.849281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, C. 1964. “The Rights and Duties of Beasts and Trees: A Teacher’s Essay for Landscape Architects.” Journal of Legal Education 17: 189–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, R., F. 1989. The Rights of Nature.A History of Environmental Ethics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. doi:10.1348/026151002760390918.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, S. P., and S. A. Gelman. 2002. “Four and 6‐year Olds’ Biological Concept of Death: The Case of Plants.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 20 (4): 495–513. doi:10.1348/026151002760390918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyberg, E., and D. Sanders. 2014. “Drawing Attention to the ‘green Side of Life’.” Journal of Biological Education 48 (3): 142–153. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.849282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opfer, J. E., and R. S. Siegler. 2004. “Revisiting Preschoolers’ Living Things Concept: A Microgenetic Analysis of Conceptual Change in Basic Biology.” Cognitive Psychology 49 (4): 301–332. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özay, E., and H. Öztaş. 2003. “Secondary Students’ Interpretations of Photosynthesis and Plant Nutrition.” Journal of Biological Education 37 (2): 68–70. doi:10.1080/00219266.2003.9655853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pany, P., and C. Heidinger. 2014. “Uncovering Patterns of Interest in Useful Plants. Frequency Analysis of Individual Students’ Interest Types as a Tool for Planning Botany Teaching Units.” Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences 2 (1): 15–39. doi:10.4995/muse.2015.2309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, G.. 2010. Environmental Education for the 21st century: Where Do we Go Now? Journal of Environmental EducationJournal of Science Education and Technology 41 (1): 22–33. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9290-7.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, P., and S. D. Tunnicliffe. 2011. “What Plants and Animals Do Early Childhood and Primary Students’ Name? Where Do They See Them?” Journal of Science Education and Technology 20 (5): 630–642. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9290-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, D. D., and R. S. Siegler. 1984. “The Effects of Task Requirements on Children’s Life Judgments.” Child Development 55: 1687–1696. doi:10.2307/1129916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito, C. 2013. “Environmental Education and Biodiversity Concern: Beyond the Ecological Literacy.” American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 (1): 12–27. doi:10.3844/ajabssp.2013.12.27.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, D. L. 2007. “Making Public the Private Life of Plants: The Contribution of Informal Learning Environments.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (10): 1209–1228. doi:10.1080/09500690600951549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schussler, E. E., and L. A. Olzak. 2008. “It’s Not Easy Being Green: Student Recall of Plant and Animal Images.” Journal of Biological Education 42 (3): 112–119. doi:10.1080/00219266.2008.9656123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. R., and K. Kipp. 2013. Developmental Psychology: Childhood and Adolescence. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, G. E., and D. Zaitchik. 2012. “Folkbiology.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 3 (1): 105–115. doi:10.1002/wcs.150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg, B. C., and M. F. Verde. 2018. “Story of a Seed: Educational Theatre Improves Students’ Comprehension of Plant Reproduction and Attitudes to Plants in Primary Science Education.” Research in Science & Technological Education 37 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavy, R., and N. Wax. 1989. “Children’s Conceptions of Plants as Living Things.” Human Development 32 (2): 88–94. doi:10.1159/000276367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepans, J. 1985. “Biology in Elementary Schools: Children’s Conceptions Of Life.” The American Biology Teacher 47 (4): 222–225. doi:10.2307/4448023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, J. 1991. “The Long‐term Impact of Interactive Exhibits.” International Journal of Science Education 13 (5): 521–531. doi:10.1080/0950069910130503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C. 1972. Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strgar, J. 2007. “Increasing the Interest of Students in Plants.” Journal of Biological Education 42 (1): 19–23. doi:10.1080/00219266.2007.9656102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, Y. 2016. “Young Chinese Children’s Justifications of Plants as Living Things.” Early Education and Development 27 (8): 1159–1174. doi:10.1080/10409289.2016.1210456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T., Ed. 2013. Handbook of Quantitative Methods for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Tunnicliffe, S., and M. Reiss. 2000. “Building a Model of the Environment: How Do Children See Plants?” Journal of Biological Education 34 (4): 172–177. doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uno, G. E. 2018. “Plant Blindness, Science Illiteracy, and the Future of Botany.” South African Journal of Botany 115: 277. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2018.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venville, G. 2004. “Young Children Learning about Living Things: A Case Study of Conceptual Change from Ontological and Social Perspectives.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (5): 449–480. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarroel, J. D., and G. Infante. 2014. “Early Understanding of the Concept of Living Things: An Examination of Young Children’s Drawings of Plant Life.” Journal of Biological Education 48 (3): 119–126. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.837406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wals, A. E., M. Brody, J. Dillon, and R. B. Stevenson. 2014. “Convergence between Science and Environmental Education.” Science 344 (6184): 583–584. doi:10.1126/science.1250515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandersee, J. 1986. “Plants Or Animals – Which Do Junior High School Students Prefer To Study?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 23 (5): 415–426. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandersee, J., and Ε. Schussler. 1999. “Preventing Plant Blindness.” The American Biology Teacher 61: 82–86. doi:10.2307/4450624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandersee, J., and Ε. Schussler. 2001b. “Toward A Theory Of Plant Blindness.” Plant Science Bulletin 47 (1): 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Yorek, N., M. Sahin, and H. Aydin. 2009. “Are Animals ‘more Alive’than Plants? Animistic-anthropocentric Construction of Life Concept.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 5 (4): 369–378. doi:10.12973/ejmste/75287.
   Google Scholar