7,739
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Students’ conceptions of plant reproduction processes This paper was presented at the ERIDOB conference 2020

, , , &

References

  • Austrian Federal Ministry of Education. 2000. “Curriculum for Biology.” https://bildung.bmbwf.gv.at/schulen/unterricht/lp/ahs5_779.pdf?61ebyf
  • Bartoszeck, A. B., C. R. Cosmo, B. R. da Silva, and S. D. Tunnicliffe. 2015. “Concepts of Plants Held by Young Brazilian Children: An Exploratory Study.” European Journal of Educational Research 4 (3): 105–117.
  • Benkowitz, D., and H. J. Lehnert. 2010. “Denken in Kreisläufen: Lernerperspektiven zum Entwicklungszyklus von Blütenpflanzen.” Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Biologie (ZDB)-Biologie Lehren und Lernen 17 (1): 31–40.
  • Boyer, C. 2000. “Conceptualisation et actions didactiques à propos de la reproduction végétale.” Aster (Paris. En Ligne) 31: 149–171.
  • Clary, R., and J. Wandersee. 2011. “Our Human-plant Connection.” Science Scope 34 (8): 32–37.
  • Duit, R., and D. F. Treagust. 2003. “Conceptual Change: A Powerful Framework for Improving Science Teaching and Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (6): 671–688.
  • Duschl, R., S. Maeng, and A. Sezen. 2011. “Learning Progressions and Teaching Sequences: A Review and Analysis.” Studies in Science Education 47 (2): 123–182.
  • Evans, J. D., C. Saegerman, C. Mullin, E. Haubruge, B. K. Nguyen, M. Frazier, … D. R. Tarpy. 2009. “Colony Collapse Disorder: A Descriptive Study.” PloS One 4 (8): e6481.
  • Gerstenmaier, J., and H. Mandl. 1995. “Wissenserwerb unter konstruktivistischer Perspektive.” Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 41 (6): 867–888.
  • Hallmann, C. A. et al. 2017. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE 12 (10), e0185809.
  • Heß, D. 1990. Die Blüte. Stuttgart: Ulmer-Verlag.
  • Helldén, G. 2000. “A Longitudinal Study of Pupils’ Conceptualisation of the Role of the Flower in Plant Reproduction.” In: The Second Conference of European Researchers in Didaktik of Biology (ERIDOB), 47–59. Sweden: University of Göteborg.
  • Jewell, N. 2002. “Examining Children’s Models of Seed.” Journal of Biological Education 36 (3): 116–122.
  • Kattmann, U. 2015. Schüler besser verstehen. Alltagsvorstellungen im Biologieunterricht. Köln: Aulis-Verlag.
  • Kissi, L., and D. Dreesmann. 2017. “Plant Visibility through Mobile Learning? Implementation and Evaluation of an Interactive Flower Hunt in a Botanic Garden.” Journal of Biological Education 52 (4): 344-363.
  • Klein, A. M., B. E. Vaissiere, J. H. Cane, I. Steffan-Dewenter, S. A. Cunningham, C. Kremen, and T. Tscharntke. 2007. “Importance of Pollinators in Changing Landscapes for World Crops.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 274 (1608): 303–313.
  • Konrad, K. 2010. “Lautes Denken.” In Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie, edited by G. Mey and K. Mruck, 476–490. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Krüger, D. 2007. “Die Conceptual Change-Theorie.” In Theorien in der biologiedidaktischen Forschung, edited by D. Krüger and H. Vogt, 81–92. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Kuckartz, U. 2014. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. 2nd ed. Weinheim: Beltz.
  • Lampert, P. 2012. “Blüten und Bestäuber.” Diploma thesis., University of Vienna.
  • Lampert, P., M. Scheuch, P. Pany, B. Müllner, and M. Kiehn. 2019. Understanding Students’ Conceptions of Plant Reproduction to Better Teach Plant Biology in Schools. Plants, People, Planet. 1(3): 248-260
  • Lampert, P., P. Pany, M. Scheuch, C. Heidinger, M. Kiehn, and S. Kapelari. 2018. “More than Pollination” – Students’ Conceptions of Pollination Biology and Their Implications for Teaching.” ZDB Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Biologie – Biologie Lehren und Lernen 22: 64–79.
  • Lord, E. M., and S. D. Russell. 2002. “The Mechanisms of Pollination and Fertilization in Plants.” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 18 (1): 81–105.
  • MAXQDA, Software für qualitative Datenanalyse. [1989] 2018. VERBI Software. Berlin, Deutschland: Consult. Sozialforschung GmbH.
  • Mayring, P. 2008. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz.
  • NRC, National Research Council, Committee on Conceptual Framework for the New K-12 Science Education Standards. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Nyberg, E., B. Andersson, and J. T. Leach 2005. “Elementary School Students Understanding of Life Cycles.” In: Trends in biological education research in the new biological era. Proceedings of the Vth Conference of European Researchers in Didactics of Biology (ERIDOB), 27–41. Patras, Greece
  • Quinte, J. 2016. “Cycle de la vie des plantes à fleurs – Lebenszyklus der Blütenpflanzen: étu-de comparative des conceptions d’élèves en Alsace et au Baden-Württemberg.” Dissertation, Strasbourg.
  • Riemeier, T. 2007. “Moderater Konstruktivismus.” In Theorien in der biologiedidaktischen Forschung, edited by D. Krüger and H. Vogt, 69–79. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Schussler, E., and J. Winslow. 2007. “Drawing on Students’ Knowledge.” Science and Children 44 (5): 40–44.
  • Strike, K. A., and G. J. Posner. 1992. “A Revisionist Theory of Conceptual Change.” In Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice, edited by R. A. Duschl and R. J. Hamilton, 174–176. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Tunnicliffe, S. D. 2001. “Talking about Plants-comments of Primary School Groups Looking at Plant Exhibits in a Botanical Garden.” Journal of Biological Education 36 (1): 27–34.
  • Wandersee, J. H., and E. E. Schussler. 2001. “Toward a Theory of Plant Blindness.” Plant Science Bulletin 47 (1): 2–9.
  • Willmer, P. 2011. Pollination and Floral Ecology. Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press.