Examining the effect of reporting based on science writing heuristic approach on written argument quality in general biology laboratory

References

• Aslan, S., and N. Tekin. 2015. “Reporting Laboratory Applications in Argument-based Science Inquiry Report Format Effects on Conceptual Understanding and Using Modal Representation.” Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty 17 (1): 73–97. doi:10.12738/estp.2014.1.1632.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. A., T. J. Greenbowe, and B. M. Hand. 2005. Excerpts from the Process of Using Inquiry and the Science Writing Heuristic. Moravian College, Bethlehem, PA: Prepared for the Middle Atlantic Discovery Chemistry Program.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. C., B. Hand, and S. Park. 2016. “Examining Elementary Students’ Development of Oral and Written Argumentation Practices through Argument-based Inquiry.” Science & Education 25 (3–4): 277–320. doi:10.1007/s11191-016-9811-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, A. 2008. “A Study of Student Written Argument Using the Science Writing Heuristic Approach in Inquiry-based Freshman General Chemistry Laboratory Classes.” Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, A., B. Hand, and T. Greenbowe. 2013. “Students’ Written Arguments in General Chemistry Laboratory Investigations.” Research in Science Education 43: 1763–1783. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9330-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbağ, M. 2011. “The Effect of Multi Modal Instruction on Students Science Achievement and Writing Skills in an Argument Based Inquiry Classroom.” Master diss., Ahi Evran University.
   Google Scholar
• Erkol, M., M. Kışoğlu, and E. Büyükkasap. 2010. “The Effect of Implementation of Science Writing Heuristic on Students’ Achievement and Attitudes toward Laboratory in Introductory Physics Laboratory.” Procedia Social and Behavioral Science 2: 2310–2314. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.327.
   Google Scholar
• Erkol, M., M. Kışoğlu, and Ş. Gül. 2017. “The Effect of Argument-based Science Inquiry Report Format on Pre-service Science Teachers’ Achievements and Attitudes Towards Science Laboratory.” Elementary Education Online 16 (2): 614–627.
   Google Scholar
• Günel, M., B. Hand, and V. Prain. 2007. “Writing for Learning in Science: A Secondary Analysis of Six Studies.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 5: 615–637. doi:10.1007/s10763-007-9082-y.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B. 2017. “Exploring the Role of Writing in Science: A 25-year Journey.” Literacy Learning: The Middle Years 25 (3): 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B., and A. Choi. 2010. “Examining the Impact of Student Use of Multiple Modal Representations in Constructing Arguments in Organic Chemistry Laboratory Classes.” Research in Science Education 40 (1): 29–44. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9155-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, B., M. Gunel, and C. Ulu. 2009. “Sequencing Embedded Multimodal Representations in a Writing to Learn Approach to the Teaching of Electricity.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (3): 225–247. doi:10.1002/tea.20282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, B., L. Hohenshell, and V. Prain. 2004. “Exploring Students’ Responses to Conceptual Question When Engaged with Planned Writing Experiences: A Study with Year 10 Science Students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (2): 186–210. doi:10.1002/tea.10128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, B., and C. W. Keys. 1999. “Inquiry Investigation: A New Approach to Laboratory Reports.” The Science Teacher 66 (4): 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B., Park, S., Kyung Suh, J. & Bae, Y. (2017). Teacher orientation as a critical factor in promoting science literacy, Paper presented at European Science Education Research Association, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B., M. C. Shelley, M. Laugerman, L. Fostvedt, and W. Therrien. 2018. “Improving Critical Thinking Growth for Disadvantaged Groups within Elementary School Science: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Science Writing Heuristic Approach.” Science Education 102 (4): 693–710. doi:10.1002/sce.2134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, B., C. Wallace, and V. Prain 2003. “Teacher Issues in Using a Science Writing Heuristic to Promote Science Literacy in Secondary Science.” Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association Conference, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B., C. Wallace, and E. Yang. 2004. “Using the Science Writing Heuristic to Enhance Learning Outcomes from Laboratory Activities in Seventh Grade Science: Quantitative and Qualitative Aspects.” International Journal of Science Education 26: 131–149. doi:10.1080/0950069032000070252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasançebi, F. 2014. “The Impacts of Argument-based Inquiry (ABI) Approach on Students’ Science Achievements, Argument Skill and Personal Development.” Doctorate diss., Atatürk University.
   Google Scholar
• Hohenshell, M. L., and B. Hand. 2006. “Writing-to-learn Strategies in Secondary School Cell Biology: A Mixed Method Study.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (2): 261–289. doi:10.1080/09500690500336965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İnaltekin, T., and H. Akçay. 2017. “Examining the Effect on Development of Pre Science Teachers’ Argument Structure of Writing the Argumentation Based Experiment Report.” E-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research 4 (3): 1–19. doi:10.33403/rigeo.529139.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, J., and B. Hand. 2017. “Examining the Value of a Scaffolded Critique Framework to Promote Argumentative and Explanatory Writings within an Argument-based Inquiry Approach.” Research in Science Education 47 (6): 1213–1231. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9542-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W., B. Hand, V. Prain, and S. Collins. 1999. “Using the Science Writing Heuristic as a Tool for Learning from Laboratory Investigations in Secondary Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (10): 1065–1084. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kıncal, R. Y. 2010. Scientific Research Methods. Ankara Nobel Publication, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Kuş, E. 2003. Qualitative and Qualitative Research Techniques. Ankara: Anı Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, H.-C. 2013. “Design of Online Report Writing Based on Constructive and Cooperative Learning for a Course on Traditional General Physics Experiments.” Educational Technology & Society 16 (1): 380–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., and P. Boscolo. 2000. “Writing and Conceptual Change. What Changes?” Instructional Science 28: 199–226. doi:10.1023/A:1003854216687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Prain, V. 2006. “Learning from Writing in Secondary Science: Some Theoretical and Practical Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (2–3): 179–201. doi:10.1080/09500690500336643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, V., and B. Hand. 1999. “Students Perceptions of Writing for Learning in Secondary School Science.” Science Education 83: 151–162. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199903)83:2<151::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivard, L. P., and S. B. Straw. 2000. “The Effect of Talk and Writing on Learning Science: An Exploratory Study.” Science Education 84: 566–593. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200009)84:5<566::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudd, J. A., T. J. Greenbowe, B. Hand, and M. L. Legge. 2001. “Reshaping the General Chemistry Laboratory Report Using the Science Writing Heuristic.” Journal of College Science Teaching 31: 230–234.
   Google Scholar
• Sesen, A., and L. Tarhan. 2013. “Inquiry-based Laboratory Activities in Electrochemistry: High School Students’ Achievements and Attitudes.” Research in Science Education 43 (1): 413–435. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9275-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulu, C., and H. Bayram. 2015. “Effects of Teaching Method Based on the Science Writing Heuristic Approach on Science Process Skills.” Hacettepe University Journal of Education 30 (1): 282–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzoğlu, M. 2014. “Laboratory Attitudes of Prospective Science Teachers: Giresun Faculty of Education Sample.” The Blacksea Journal of Social Sciences 6 (Blacksea Special Issue): 195–209.
   Google Scholar
• Yalçın, D. 2019. “Examining the Development of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Multiple Levels of Representation and Multi-model Repsentations in Written Arguments.” Master diss., Bozok University, Yozgat.
   Google Scholar
• Yaman, F. 2018a. “Effects of the Science Writing Heuristic Approach on the Quality of Preservice Science Teachers’ Argumentative Writing and Their Understanding of Scientific Argumentation.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 (3): 421–442. doi:10.1007/s10763-016-9788-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaman, F. 2018b. “Pre-service Science Teachers’ Development and Use of Multiple Levels of Representation and Written Arguments in General Chemistry Laboratory Courses.” Research in Science Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11165-018-9781-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaman, F., A. Çıkmaz, E. Şahin, and B. Hand. 2019. “Teoriden Uygulamaya Argümantaston Tabanlı Bilim Öğrenme (ATBÖ) Yaklaşımı: Kimya Laboratuvarlarında Uygulama Örneği[the Science Writing (SWH) Approach from Theory to Practice: Implementing in Chemistry Laboratories].” Trakya Journal of Education 9 (2): 260–286. doi:10.24315/tred.474891.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yore, L., G. L. Bisanz, and B. M. Hand. 2003. “Examining the Literacy Component of Science Literacy: 25 Years of Language Arts and Science Research.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (6): 689–725. doi:10.1080/09500690305018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar