542
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Doing coursework without doing biology: undergraduate students’ non-conceptual strategies to problem solving

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Aguinis, H., S. A. Culpepper, and C. A. Pierce. 2010. “Revival of Test Bias Research in Preemployment Testing.” Journal of Applied Psychology 95 (4): 648. doi:10.1037/a0018714.
  • Bussey, T. J., M. Orgill, and K. J. Crippen. 2013. “Variation Theory: A Theory of Learning and A Useful Theoretical Framework for Chemical Education Research.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 14 (1): 9–22. doi:10.1039/C2RP20145C.
  • Case, J., and G. Light. 2014. Framing Qualitative Methods in Engineering Education Research. In Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, edited by A. Johri and B. Olds, 535–550. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139013451.034
  • Case, J. M., and G. Light. 2011. “Emerging Research Methodologies in Engineering Education Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (1): 186–210. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00008.x.
  • Chapell, M. S., Z. B. Blanding, M. E. Silverstein, M. Takahashi, B. Newman, A. Gubi, and N. McCann. 2005. “Test Anxiety and Academic Performance in Undergraduate and Graduate Students.” Journal of Educational Psychology 97 (2): 268. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.268.
  • Chi, M. T., P. J. Feltovich, and R. Glaser. 1981. “Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices.” Cognitive Science 5 (2): 121–152. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2.
  • Clement, J. 2000. “Analysis of Clinical Interviews: Foundations and Model Viability.” In Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education, edited by A. E. Kelly and R. A. Lesh,. 547–589. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Corbin, J., and S. Anselm. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • DeMars, C. E. 1998. “Gender Differences in Mathematics and Science on a High School Proficiency Exam: The Role of Response Format.” Applied Measurement in Education 11 (3): 279–299. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1103_4.
  • Disessa, A. A. 2007. “An Interactional Analysis of Clinical Interviewing.” Cognition and Instruction 25 (4): 523–565. doi:10.1080/07370000701632413.
  • England, B. J., J. R. Brigati, and E. E. Schussler. 2017. “Student Anxiety in Introductory Biology Classrooms: Perceptions about Active Learning and Persistence in the Major.” Plos One 12 (8): e0182506. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182506.
  • Federer, M. R., R. H. Nehm, and D. K. Pearl. 2016. “Examining Gender Differences in Written Assessment Tasks in Biology: A Case Study of Evolutionary Explanations.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 15 (1): ar2. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-01-0018.
  • Fletcher, R. B., L. H. Meyer, H. Anderson, P. Johnston, and M. Rees. 2012. “Faculty and Students Conceptions of Assessment in Higher Education.” Higher Education 64 (1): 119–133. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9484-1.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
  • Gamer, M., and J. G. Engelhard 1999. “Gender Differences in Performance on Multiple-choice and Constructed Response Mathematics Items.” Applied Measurement in Education 12 (1): 29–51. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1201_3.
  • Gilley, B. H., and B. Clarkston. 2014. “Collaborative Testing: Evidence of Learning in a Controlled In-class Study of Undergraduate Students.” Journal of College Science Teaching 43 (3): 83–91. doi:10.2505/4/jcst14_043_03_83.
  • Ginsburg, H. 1997. Entering the Child’s Mind: The Clinical Interview in Psychological Research and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gross, L. J. 1982. “Scoring Multiple True/false Tests: Some Considerations.” Evaluation & the Health Professions 5 (4): 459–468. doi:10.1177/016327878200500407.
  • Kılıç, D., and N. Sağlam. 2014. “Students’ Understanding of Genetics Concepts: The Effect of Reasoning Ability and Learning Approaches.” Journal of Biological Education 48 (2): 63–70. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.837402.
  • Kuh, G. D., J. L. Kinzie, J. A. Buckley, B. K. Bridges, and J. C. Hayek. 2006. What Matters to Student Success: A Review of the Literature. Vol. 8. Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.
  • Lau, P. N. K., S. H. Lau, K. S. Hong, and H. Usop. 2011. “Guessing, Partial Knowledge, and Misconceptions in Multiple-choice Tests.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 14 (4): 99–110.
  • Lloyd, G. M., J. Cai, and J. E. Tarr. 2017. Research Issues in Curriculum Studies: Evidence-based Insights and Future Directions. Reston, VA: Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Madsen, A., S. B. McKagan, and E. C. Sayre. 2013. “Gender Gap on Concept Inventories in Physics: What Is Consistent, What Is Inconsistent, and What Factors Influence the Gap?” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 9 (2): 020121. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020121.
  • Marton, F. 1981. “Phenomenography—describing Conceptions of the World around Us.” Instructional Science 10 (2): 177–200. doi:10.1007/BF00132516.
  • McCormick, A. C., and C. M. Zhao. 2005. “Rethinking and Reframing the Carnegie Classification.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 37 (5): 51–57. doi:10.3200/CHNG.37.5.51-57.
  • NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). 2012. “The Nation’s Report Card: Science in Action: Hands-On and Interactive Computer Tasks from the 2009 Science Assessment.” NCES 2012–2468. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2009/2012468.pdf.
  • Noble, T., C. Suarez, A. Rosebery, M. C. O’Connor, B. Warren, and J. Hudicourt‐Barnes. 2012. “’I Never Thought of It as Freezing’: How Students Answer Questions on Large‐scale Science Tests and What They Know about Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (6): 778–803. doi:10.1002/tea.21026.
  • NRC (National Research Council). 2001. Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Odom, A. L., and L. H. Barrow. 1995. “Development and Application of a Two‐tier Diagnostic Test Measuring College Biology Students’ Understanding of Diffusion and Osmosis after a Course of Instruction.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32 (1): 45–61. doi:10.1002/tea.3660320106.
  • Piaget, J. 2007. The Child’s Conception of the World. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Prevost, L. B., and P. P. Lemons. 2016. “Step by Step: Biology Undergraduates’ Problem-solving Procedures during Multiple-choice Assessment.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 15 (4): ar71. doi:10.1187/cbe.15-12-0255.
  • Runesson, U. 2005. “Beyond Discourse and Interaction. Variation: A Critical Aspect for Teaching and Learning Mathematics.” Cambridge Journal of Education 35 (1): 69–87. doi:10.1080/0305764042000332506.
  • Sato, B. K., C. F. Hill, and S. M. Lo. 2019. “Testing the Test: Are Exams Measuring Understanding?” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 47 (3): 296–302. doi:10.1002/bmb.21231.
  • Smith, J. I., E. D. Combs, P. H. Nagami, V. M. Alto, H. G. Goh, M. A. Gourdet, … K. D. Tanner. 2013. “Development of the Biology Card Sorting Task to Measure Conceptual Expertise in Biology.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 12 (4): 628–644. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-05-0096.
  • Stanger-Hall, K. F. 2012. “Multiple-choice Exams: An Obstacle for Higher-level Thinking in Introductory Science Classes.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 11 (3): 294–306. doi:10.1187/cbe.11-11-0100.
  • Walsh, L. N., R. G. Howard, and B. Bowe. 2007. “Phenomenographic Study of Students’ Problem Solving Approaches in Physics.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 3 (2): 020108. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020108.
  • Walton, G. M., and G. L. Cohen. 2007. “A Question of Belonging: Race, Social Fit, and Achievement.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 (1): 82. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82.
  • Yin, R. K. 2017. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.