Integration of ‘design thinking’ in a reflection model to enhance the teaching of biology

References

• Airasian, P. W., and M. E. Walsh. 1997. “Constructivist Cautions.” Phi Delta Kappan 78: 444–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arslan, M. 2007. “Constructivist Approaches in Education.” Ankara University, Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal 40 (1): 41–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, K. M. 1991. “Diary Studies of Classroom Language Learning: The Doubting Game and the Believing Game.” In Language Acquisition and the Second/foreign Language Classroom (Anthology Series 28), edited by E. Sadtona, 60–102. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bardach, L., and R. Klassen. 2019. “Smart Teachers, Successful Students? A Systematic Review of the Literature on Teachers’ Cognitive Abilities and Teacher Effectiveness.” Educational Research Review 20. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrows, H. S. 1988. The Tutorial Process. Springfield: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Baviskar, S., T. Hartle, and T. Whitney. 2009. “Essential Criteria to Characterize Constructivist Teaching: Derived from a Review of the Literature and Applied to Five Constructivist-teaching Method Articles.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (4): 541–550. doi:10.1080/09500690701731121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, D. I., S. I. Wasserman, W. P. Thompson, and T. M. Freeman. 2017. “ABAI’s MOC Assessment of Knowledge Program Matures: Adding Value with Continuous Learning and Assessment.” Journal of Allergy Clinical Immunol Pract 5 (1): 80–83. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2016.11.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleske-Rechek, A., and K. Michels. 2010. “RateMyProfessors.com: Testing Assumptions about Student Use and Misuse.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 15: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., R. D. Sherwood, T. S. Hasselbring, C. K. Kinzer, and S. M. Williams. 1990. “Anchored Instruction: Why We Need It and How Technology Can Help.” In Cognition, Education and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology, edited by D. Nix and R. Spiro, 115–141. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. G., and M. G. Brooks. 1999. In Search for Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. 1992. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8 (2): 5–21. doi:10.2307/1511637.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, I., J. O’Connor, R. Pancho, M. Chrzanowski, and S. Sandi-Urena. 2017. “Reform in a General Chemistry Laboratory: How Do Students Experience Change in the Instructional Approach?” Chemistry Education Research and Practical 18 (1): 113–126. doi:10.1039/C6RP00082G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., J. S. Brown, and S. E. Newman. 1989. “Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics.” In Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honour of Robert Glaser, edited by L. B. Resnick, 453–494. Hillsdale. NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Cornu, R. L., and J. Peters. 2005. “Towards Constructivist Classrooms: The Role of the Reflective Teacher.” Journal of Educational Enquiry 6 (1): 50–64.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers, M. R. 2005. Three Approaches as Pillars for Interpretive Information Systems Research: Development Research, Action Research and Grounded Theory. South Africa: SAICSIT.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. 2011. “Core of ‘Design Thinking’ and Its Application.” Design Studies 32 (6): 521–532. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duman, B. 2007. “Contemporary Approaches in Education.” In Teaching Principles and Methods, edited by G. Ocak, 283–391. 1st edition ed. Ankara: Pegem A Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Feiman-Nemser, S. 2001. “From Preparation to Practice: Designing a Continuum to Strengthen and Sustain Teaching.” Teachers College Record 103 (6): 1013–1055. doi:10.1111/0161-4681.00141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney, J. J., and J. McArthur. 2002. “Case Studies of Prospective Science Teachers’ Beliefs Concerning Constructivist Teaching Practice.” Science Education 86 (6): 783–802. doi:10.1002/sce.10038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. S. 1994. “On Constructivism”. Maryland Collaborative for Teacher Preparation. http://www.inform.umd.edu/UMS+State/UMDProjects/MCTP/Essays/Constructivism.txt.
   Google Scholar
• Higuchi, Y., N. Fuwa., K. Kajisa, T. Sato, and Y. Sawada. 2019. “Disaster Aid Targeting and Self-Reporting Bias: Natural Experimental Evidence from the Philippines.” Sustainability 11 (3): 771. doi:10.3390/su11030771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, T., C. Noweski, and C. Meinel. 2010. “Evolving Discourses on Design Thinking; How Design Cognition Inspires Meta-disciplinary Creative Collaboration.” Technoetic Arts 8 (1): 31–37. doi:10.1386/tear.8.1.31/1.
   Google Scholar
• McKeachie, W. J. 2002. „McKeachie’s Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers.„ 11th ed ed. Houghton Mifflin: Boston. 153-160
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J. 1992. Action Research: Principles and Practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, G. R., F. J. Muhammad, and A. K. Muhammad. 2010. “Impact of Parental Socioeconomic Status on Students’ Educational Achievement at Secondary Schools of District Malir, Karachi.” Middle East Journal of Scientific Research 6: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. 2004. “Novice and Expert Teachers’ Conceptions of Learners’ Prior Knowledge.” Science Education 88 (6): 970–983. doi:10.1002/sce.20006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plattner, H., C. Meinel, and U. Weinberg. 2009. Design Thinking. Innovation lernen-Ideenwelten öffnen. Munich: Finanzbuch, Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rearick, M. L., and A. Feldman. 1999. “Orientations, Purposes and Reflection: A Framework for Understanding Action Research.” Teaching and Teacher Education 15 (4): 333–349. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00053-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savaş, B. 2007. “Constructivist Learning.” In Eğitim Psikolojisi, edited by A. Kaya, 529–545. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., and C. Bereiter. 1991. “Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 1 (1): 37–68. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0101_3.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, A., C. Noweski, and C. Meinel. 2012. “Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in Education.” Design and Technology Education 17 (3): 8–19.
   Google Scholar
• Scheurman, G. 1998. “From Behaviorist to Constructivist Teaching.” Social Education 62 (1): 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1991. The Reflective Turn: Case Studies in and on Educational Practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., and M. J. Belmont. 1993. “Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effect of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement across the School Year.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (4): 571–581. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, N., and J. Pascal. 2012. “Developing Critically Reflective Practice.” Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives 13 (2): 311–325. doi:10.1080/14623943.2012.657795.
   Google Scholar
• Treagust, D. F. 1995. “Diagnostic Assessment of Students’ Science Knowledge.” In Learning Science in the Schools: Research Reforming Practice, edited by S. M. Glynn and R. Duit, 327–346. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. P. 2008. “Reflecting-on-the-future: A Chronological Consideration of Reflective Practice.” Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives 9 (2): 177–184. doi:10.1080/14623940802005525.
   Google Scholar
• Yurdakul, B. 2005. “Constructivism.” In Eğitimde Yeni Yönelimler, edited by Ö. Demirel, 39–61. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar