Basque secondary school students’ understanding of natural selection and teleological reasoning: knowledge vs. knowledge application

References

• Alred, A. R., J. H. Doherty, L. M. Hartley, C. B. Harris, and J. M. Dauer. 2019. “Exploring Student Ideas about Biological Variation.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (12): 1682–1700. doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1635289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2018. “AAAS Science Assessment Project 2061.” http://assessment.aaas.org/topics
   Google Scholar
• Banet, E., and G. E. Ayuso. 2003. “Teaching of Biological Inheritance and Evolution of Living Beings in Secondary School.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (3): 373–407. doi:10.1080/09500690210145716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basque Government. 2016a. Annex II of Decree 236/2015, of December 22, which establishes and implements the Basic Education curriculum in the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country. Official Gazette of the Basque Country 01/ 15/2016.
   Google Scholar
• Basque Government. 2016b. Annex II of Decree 127/2016, of September 6, which establishes and implements the Baccalaureate curriculum in the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country. Official Gazette of the Basque Country 09/ 23/2016.
   Google Scholar
• Beggrow, E. P., and R. H. Nehm. 2012. “Students’ Mental Models of Evolutionary Causation: Natural Selection and Genetic Drift.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 5: 429–444.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, B. A., and C. W. Anderson. 1990. “Student Conceptions of Natural Selection and Its Role in Evolution.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27 (5): 415–427. doi:10.1002/tea.3660270503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Demastes, S. S., J. Settlage, and R. Good. 1995. “Students Conceptions of Natural Selection and Its Role in Evolution – Cases of Replication and Comparison.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32 (5): 535–550. doi:10.1002/tea.3660320509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraedts, C. L., and K. T. Boersma. 2006. “Reinventing Natural Selection.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (8): 843–870. doi:10.1080/09500690500404722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. 1992. “Thinking about Theories or Thinking with Theories?: A Classroom Study with Natural Selection.” International Journal of Science Education 14 (1): 51–61. doi:10.1080/0950069920140106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K. 2020. “Students’ ‘Teleological Misconceptions’ in Evolution Education: Why the Underlying Design Stance, Not Teleology per Se, Is the Problem.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 13: 1. doi:10.1186/s12052-019-0116-z.
   Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K., and V. Zogza. 2008. “Students’ Intuitive Explanations of the Causes of Homologies and Adaptations.” Science & Education 17 (1): 27–47. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9075-9.
   Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K., and V. Zogza. 2009. “Preliminary Evolutionary Explanations: A Basic Framework for Conceptual Change and Explanatory Coherence in Evolution.” Science & Education 18 (10): 1313–1340. doi:10.1007/s11191-008-9171-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucero, M. M., and A. J. Petrosino. 2017. “A Resource for Eliciting Student Alternative Conceptions: Examining the Adaptability of A Concept Inventory for Natural Selection at the Secondary School Level.” Research in Science Education 47 (4): 705–730. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9524-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. 2001. What Evolution Is. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R., G. Mitchell, R. Bally, M. Inglis, J. Day, and D. Jacobs. 2002. “Undergraduates’ Understanding of Evolution: Ascriptions of Agency as a Problem for Student Learning.” Journal of Biological Education 36 (2): 65–71. doi:10.1080/00219266.2002.9655803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehm, R. H., and M. Ha. 2011. “Item Feature Effects in Evolution Assessment.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (3): 237–256. doi:10.1002/tea.20400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehm, R. H., and L. Reilly. 2007. “Biology Majors’ Knowledge and Misconceptions of Natural Selection.” BioScience 57 (3): 263–272. doi:10.1641/B570311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. PISA 2018 Science Framework. PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. doi:10.1787/f30da688-en.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. H. 1999. “Exploring the Link between Students’ Scientific and Nonscientific Conceptions.” Science Education 83 (6): 639–653. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<639::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-O.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinxten, R., E. Vandervieren, and P. Janssenswillen. 2020. “Does Integrating Natural Selection Throughout Upper Secondary Biology Education Result in A Better Understanding? A Cross-national Comparison between Flanders, Belgium and the Netherlands.” International Journal of Science Education 42 (10): 1609–1634. doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1773005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinou, L., L. Halkia, and C. Skordoulis. 2008. “What Conceptions Do Greek School Students Form about Biological Evolution?” Evolution: Education and Outreach 1: 312–317.
   Google Scholar
• Rector, M. A., R. H. Nehm, and D. Pearl. 2013. “Learning the Language of Evolution: Lexical Ambiguity and Word Meaning in Student Explanations.” Research in Science Education 43 (3): 1107–1133. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9296-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivas, L., M. González, and F. García. 2016. “¿comprenden Y Aceptan Los Estudiantes La Evolución? Un Estudio En Bachillerato Y Universidad [Do Students Understand and Accept Biological Evolution? A Study on High School and University Students].” Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza Y Divulgación De Las Ciencias 13 (2): 248–263. doi:10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2016.v13.i2.03.
   Google Scholar
• Settlage, J. 1994. “Conceptions of Natural Selection: A Snapshot of the Sense-making Process.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31 (5): 449–457. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamir, P., and A. Zohar. 1991. “Anthropomorphism and Teleology in Reasoning about Biological Phenomena.” Science Education 75 (1): 57–67. doi:10.1002/sce.3730750106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Robinson, C. 1994. “Young People’s Ideas about Inheritance and Evolution.” Studies in Science Education 24 (1): 29–47. doi:10.1080/03057269408560038.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., and S. Ginossar. 1998. “Lifting the Taboo regarding Teleology and Anthropomorphism in Biology education—Heretical Suggestions.” Science Education 82 (6): 679–697. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199811)82:6<679::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar