Same, same but different! Exploring children’s understandings of within-species variation

References

• Achieve. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/
   Google Scholar
• Alred, A. R., J. H. Doherty, L. M. Hartley, C. B. Harris, and J. M. Dauer. 2019. “Exploring Student Ideas about Biological Variation”. International Journal of Science Education. 41(12), 1682–1700. 10.1080/09500693.2019.1635289.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asghar, A., J. R. Wiles, and B. Alters. 2007. “Canadian pre-service Elementary Teachers’ Conceptions of Biological Evolution and Evolution Education.” McGill Journal of Education 42 (2): 189–209. Retrieved from: https://mje.mcgill.ca
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2012). Australian curriculum. Retrieved from https://australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/science/
   Google Scholar
• Bermudez, G. M. A., and P. Lindemann-Matthies. 2018. ““What Matters Is Species Richness”—High School Students’ Understanding of the Components of Biodiversity.” Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-018-9767-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borel, B. (2017). “How Genetically Modified Mice Could One Day Save Island Birds.” Audubon, summer. Retrieved from https://www.audubon.org/magazine
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London, UK: SAGE Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., V. Clarke, N. Hayfield, and G. Terry (2019). Thematic analysis: A reflexive approach. Retrieved from https://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/en/about/thematic-analysis.html
   Google Scholar
• Bruckermann, T., D. Fielder, and U. Harms. 2021. “Identifying Precursory Concepts in Evolution during Early Childhood - a Systematic Literature Review.” Studies in Science Education 57 (1): 85–127. doi:10.1080/03057267.2020.1792678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D., and D. Merton. 1992. The Black Robin: Saving the World’s Most Endangered Bird. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campos, R., and A. Sá-Pinto. 2013. “Early Evolution of Evolutionary Thinking: Teaching Biological Evolution in Elementary Schools.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 6 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1186/1936-6434-6-25.
   Google Scholar
• Corlett, R. 2017. “A Bigger Toolbox: Biotechnology in Biodiversity Conservation.” Trends in Biotechnology 35 (1): 55–65. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.06.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deller, C. 2020. “Magnificent Moths!”. Primary Science 160: 40–42. Retrieved from: https://www.ase.org.uk/resources/primary-science
   Google Scholar
• “Department for Children, Education, Lifelong Learning and Skills.” (2008). Curriculum for Wales 2008. Retrieved from https://hwb.gov.wales/curriculum-for-wales-2008
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2013a) “Science Programmes of Study: Key Stage 3.” Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2013b). Science programmes of study: Key stages 1 and 2. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Department of Conservation. (2021). “Chatham Island Black Robin.” Retrieved from: https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/native-animals/birds/birds-a-z/black-robin
   Google Scholar
• Directorate-General for Environment. 2019. Attitudes of Europeans Towards Biodiversity. 481). Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/456395
   Google Scholar
• Educational Assessment Research Unit & New Zealand Council for Educational Research. (2013). “National Monitoring Study of Student Achievement: Science 2012.” Retrieved from https://nmssa.otago.ac.nz/reports/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Educational Assessment Research Unit & New Zealand Council for Educational Research (2018). “National Monitoring Study of Student Achievement: Science 2017-Key Findings.” Retrieved from https://nmssa.otago.ac.nz/reports/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Emmons, N. A., and D. A. Kelemen. 2015. “Young Children’s Acceptance of within-species Variation: Implications for Essentialism and Teaching Evolution.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 139: 148. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.05.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esvelt, K. M., A. L. Smidler, F. Catteruccia, and G. M. Church. 2014. “Concerning RNA-guided Gene Drives for the Alteration of Wild Populations.” eLife 3 (1). doi:10.7554/eLife.03401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, S. R., and D. L. Zeidler. 2016. “Lack of Evolution Acceptance Inhibits Students’ Negotiation of biology-based Socioscientific Issues.” Journal of Biological Education 50 (4): 407–424. doi:10.1080/00219266.2016.1150869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankham, R., J. Ballou, and D. Briscoe. 2010. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Futuyma, D. 2013. Evolution. 3rd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. 2003. The Essential Child. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. 2004. “Psychological Essentialism in Children.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (9): 404–409. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S., and M. Rhodes. 2012. “Two-thousand Years of Stasis”: How Psychological Essentialism Impedes Evolutionary Understanding.” In Evolution Challenges: Integrating Research and Practice in Teaching and Learning about Evolution, edited by K. S. Rosengren, S. K. Brem, E. M. Evans, and G. M. Sinatra, 3–21. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gormley, K. 2021. “Same, Same but Different! Exploring Children’s understandings of within-species variation.” PhD diss., University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, T. 2009. “Understanding Natural Selection: Essential Concepts and Common Misconceptions.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 2 (2): 156–175. doi:10.1007/s12052-009-0128-1.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, S. E. 1997. “Anthropomorphism: A Definition and A Theory.” In Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals, edited by R. W. Mitchell, N. S. Thompson, and H. L. Miles, 50–58. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallgrimsson, B., and B. Hall. 2005. “Variation and Variability: Central Concepts in Biology.” In Variation: A Central Concept in Biology, edited by B. Hallgrimsson and B. Hall, 1–7. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Harms, U., and M. J. Reiss. 2019. “The Present Status of Evolution Education.” In Evolution Education re-considered, edited by U. Harms and M. J. Reiss, 1–19. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6.
   Google Scholar
• Harrisson, K. A., M. J. Magrath, J. D. Yen, A. Pavlova, N. Murray, B. Quin, P. Sunnucks, K. A. Miller, K. Cartwright, and P. Sunnucks. 2019. “Lifetime Fitness Costs of Inbreeding and Being Inbred in a Critically Endangered Bird.” Current Biology 29: 2711–2717. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K., E. Palaiokrassa, M. Papadopoulou, V. Pavlidi, and M. Argyropoulou. 2012. “Children’s Intuitive Teleology: Shifting the Focus of Evolution Education Research.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 5 (2): 279–291. doi:10.1007/s12052-012-0393-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K. 2020. “Students’ “Teleological Misconceptions” in Evolution Education: Why the Underlying Design Stance, Not Teleology per Se, Is the Problem.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 13 (1). doi:10.1186/s12052-019-0116-z.
   Google Scholar
• Kampurakis, K. (2022), “Reconsidering the Goals of Evolution Education: Defining Evolution and Evolutionary Literacy.” Webinar presentation, National Association for Research in Science Teaching
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. 1999a. “The Scope of Teleological Thinking in Preschool Children.” Cognition 70 (3): 241–272. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00010-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. 1999b. “Why are Rocks Pointy? Children’s Preference for Teleological Explanations of the Natural World.” Developmental Psychology 35: 1440–1452. Retrieved from 10.1037/0012-1649.35.6.1440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D., N. Emmons, R. Schillaci, and P. Ganea. 2014. “Young Children Can Be Taught Basic Natural Selection Using picture-storybook Intervention.” Psychological Science 25 (4): 893–902. doi:10.1177/0956797613516009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, N., R. Kannemeyer, A. Greenaway, E. MacDonald, and D. Stronge. 2020. “Understanding Attitudes on New Technologies to Manage Invasive Species.” Pacific Conservation Biology 26 (1): 35–44. doi:10.1071/pc18080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll, E. 1997. “Dogs, Darwinism, and English Sensibilities.” In Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals, edited by R. W. Mitchell, N. S. Thompson, and H. L. Miles, 12–21. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Legare, C. H., J. D. Lane, and E. M. Evans. 2013. “Anthropomorphizing Science: How Does It Affect the Development of Evolutionary Concepts?” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 59 (2): 168–197. doi:10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.59.2.0168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., and L. Schauble. 2012. “Seeding Evolutionary Thinking by Engaging Children in Modeling Its Foundations.” Science Education 96 (4): 701–724. doi:10.1002/sce.20475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, P., and E. Bose. 2008. “How Many Species are There? Public Understanding and Awareness of Biodiversity in Switzerland.” Human Ecology 35: 731–742. doi:10.1007/s10745-008-9194-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, P., C. Constantinou, X. Junge, K. Köhler, U. Mayer, C. Kadji-Beltran, C. Kadji-Beltran, C. Kadji-Beltran, and C. Kadji‐Beltran. 2009. “The Integration of Biodiversity Education in the Initial Education of Primary School Teachers: Four Comparative Case Studies from Europe.” Environmental Education Research 15 (1): 17–37. doi:10.1080/13504620802613496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, P., C. Constantinou, H. Lehnert, U. Nagel, G. Raper, and C. Kadji-Beltran. 2011. “Confidence and Perceived Competence of Preservice Teachers to Implement Biodiversity Education in Primary Schools—Four Comparative Case Studies from Europe.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (16): 2247–2273. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.547534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuigan, L., and T. Russell. 2015. “Using Multimodal Strategies to Challenge Early Years Children’s Essentialist Beliefs”. Journal of Emergent Science 9: 34–41. Retrieved from: https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org
   Google Scholar
• McVaugh, N., J. Birchfield, M. Lucero, and A. Petrosino. 2011. “Evolution Education: Seeing the Forest for the Trees and Focusing Our Efforts on the Teaching of Evolution.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 4 (2): 286–292. doi:10.1007/s12052-010-0297-y.
   Google Scholar
• Menzel, S., and S. Bögeholz. 2009. “The Loss of Biodiversity as a Challenge for Sustainable Development: How Do Pupils in Chile and Germany Perceive Resource Dilemmas?” Research in Science Education 39 (4): 429–447. doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9087-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, K., A. Cardace, E. Berson, U. Ly, N. Wong, S. Sisk-Hilton, S. Metz, and M. Wilson. 2019. “Primary Grade Children’s Capacity to Understand Microevolution: The Power of Leveraging Their Fruitful Intuitions and Engagement in Science Practices.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 28: 556–615. doi:10.1080/10508406.2019.1667806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2007. The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2007b). The Ontario curriculum: Science and technology. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/scientec18currb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts and Core Ideas. Washington DC: The National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaggio, A. J., G. Segelbacher, P. J. Seddon, L. Alphey, E. L. Bennett, R. H. Carlson, and K. Wheeler. 2017. “Is It Time for Synthetic Biodiversity Conservation?” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32 (2): 97–107. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinou, L., L. Halkia, and C. Skordoulis. 2011. “The Inability of Primary School to Introduce Children to the Theory of Biological Evolution.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 4 (2): 275–285. doi:10.1007/s12052-011-0323-8.
   Google Scholar
• Revive, and R. 2021. “Bringing Biotechnologies to Conservation.” Revive and Restore. Accessed November 21. https://reviverestore.org.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T., and L. McGuigan. 2015. “Why Clone a Sheep When They All Look the Same Anyway?”. Primary Science 137: 18–21. Retrieved from: https://www.ase.org.uk/resources/primary-science
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T., and L. McGuigan. 2019a. “Developmental Progression in Learning about Evolution in the 5–14 Age Range in England.” In Evolution Education re-considered, edited by U. Harms and M. Reiss, 59–80. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_4.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T., and L. McGuigan. 2019b. “Teaching and Learning about Evolution: A Developmental Overview”. Primary Science 156: 33–35. Retrieved from: https://www.ase.org.uk/resources/primary-science
   Google Scholar
• Sá-Pinto, X., G. Realdon, G. Torkar, B. Sousa, M. Georgious, A. Jeffries, and E. Mavrikaki. 2021. “Development and Validation of a Framework for the Assessment of School Curricula on the Presence of Evolutionary Concepts (FACE).” Evolution: Education and Outreach 14 (1). doi:10.1186/s12052-021-00142-2.
   Google Scholar
• San Diego Institute for Conservation Research. (2020). Frozen zoo. Retrieved from https://institute.sandiegozoo.org
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2010). Curriculum for excellence: Sciences experiences and outcomes. Retrieved from https://education.gov.scot/Documents/sciences-eo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2020). Global biodiversity outlook 5: Summary for policymakers. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/gbo/gbo5/publication/gbo-5-spm-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shtulman, A. 2006. “Qualitative Differences between Naïve and Scientific Theories of Evolution.” Cognitive Psychology 52: 170–194. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtulman, A., and L. Schulz. 2008. “The Relation between Essentialist Beliefs and Evolutionary Reasoning.” Cognitive Science 32 (6): 1049–1062. doi:10.1080/03640210801897864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sickel, A., and P. Friedrichsen. 2013. “Examining the Evolution Education Literature with a Focus on Teachers: Major Findings, Goals for Teacher Preparation, and Directions for Future Research.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 6 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1186/1936-6434-6-23.
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G., S. Brem, and E. M. Evans. 2008. “Changing Minds? Implications of Conceptual Change for Teaching and Learning about Biological Evolution.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 1 (2): 189–195. doi:10.1007/s12052-008-0037-8.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. U. 2010. “Current Status of Research in Teaching and Learning Evolution: II. Pedagogical Issues.” Science & Education 19 (6–8): 539–571. doi:10.1007/s11191-009-9216-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, W., C. Proudfoot, S. Lillico, and C. Whitelaw. 2016. “Gene Targeting, Genome Editing: From Dolly to Editors.” Transgenic Research 25 (3): 273–287. doi:10.1007/s11248-016-9932-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, H., N. Dussex, Y. van Heezik, K. A. Harrisson, and M. J. L. Magrath. 2017. “De-extinction Needs Consultation.” Nature Ecology and Evolution 1 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, G., V. Braun, N. Hayfield, and V. Clarke. 2017. “Thematic Analysis.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, edited by C. Willig and W. S. Rogers, 17–37. 2nd ed. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. A., G. W. Roemer, C. J. Donlan, B. G. Dickson, M. Matocq, and J. Malaney. 2013. “Gene Tweaking for Conservation.” Nature 501 (7468): 485–486. doi:10.1038/501485a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tshuma, T., and M. Sanders. 2015. “Textbooks as a Possible Influence on Unscientific Ideas about Evolution.” Journal of Biological Education 49 (4): 354–369. doi:10.1080/00219266.2014.967274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ummers, S., M. Kruger, C. Childs A, and J. Mant. 2000. “Primary School Teachers’ Understanding of Environmental Issues: An Interview Study.” Enviornmental Education Research 6 (4): 293–309. doi:10.1080/713664700.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (2021). “Learn for Our Planet: A Global Review of How Environmental Issues are Integrated into Education.” Retrieved from: https://www.uncclearn.org/wp-content/uploads/library/377362eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Werth, A., and D. Allchin. 2020. “Teleology’s Long Shadow.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 13 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1186/s12052-020-00118-8.
   Google Scholar
• Wisely, S. M., O. A. Ryder, R. M. Santymire, J. F. Engelhardt, and B. J. Novak. 2015. “A Road Map for 21st Century Genetic Restoration: Gene Pool Enrichment of the black-footed Ferret.” The Journal of Heredity 106 (5): 581–592. doi:10.1093/jhered/esv041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J. (2017). Taonga of an island nation: Saving New Zealand’s birds. Retrieved from http://www.pce.parliament.nz
   Google Scholar