The Conceptual Analysis of Disciplinary Evidence (CADE) framework as a guide for evidentiary reasoning: A practical implementation in a Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) laboratory investigation

References

• AAAS. 2011. “Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action.” C. A. Brewer and D. Smith, Editors. Washington, D.C: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). https://visionandchange.org/finalreport/
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., and C. A. Chinn. 2018. “On the Goals of Epistemic Education: Promoting Apt Epistemic Performance.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 27 (3): 353–389. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1392968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., K. D. Glazewski, and J. C. Richardson. 2008. “A Scaffolding Framework to Support the Construction of Evidence-Based Arguments among Middle School Students.” Educational Technology Research and Development 56 (4): 401–422. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9074-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, L. S., and C. W. Beck. 2019. “Laboratory Courses with Guided-Inquiry Modules Improve Scientific Reasoning and Experimental Design Skills for the Least-Prepared Undergraduate Students.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 18 (1): 1. doi:10.1187/cbe.18-08-0152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, K., D. Piechnik, J. Kovacs, A. Warwick, and P. White. 2019. “Clam Spawning & Red Tide: Helping Students Learn the Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium.” The American Biology Teacher 81 (5): 366–371. doi:10.1525/abt.2019.81.5.366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. S., and G. E. Gardner. 2013. “Teaching Evolution through the Hardy-Weinberg Principle: A Real-Time, Active-Learning Exercise Using Classroom Response Devices.” American Biology Teacher 75 (7): 476–479. doi:10.1525/abt.2013.75.7.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadieu, E., M. W. Neff, P. Quignon, K. Walsh, K. Chase, H. G. Parker, B. M. Vonholdt, et al. 2009. “Coat Variation in the Domestic Dog Is Governed by Variants in Three Genes.” Science 326 (5949): 150–153. doi:10.1126/science.1177808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., and B. A. Malhotra. 2002. “Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks.” Science Education 86 (2): 175–218. doi:10.1002/sce.10001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., S. Barzilai, and R. Golan Duncan. 2020. “Education for a ‘Post-Truth’ World: New Directions for Research and Practice.” Educational Researcher 50 (1): 51–60. doi:10.3102/0013189X20940683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, A. C. 2000. “Cats as an Aid to Teaching Genetics.” Genetics 155 (3): 999–1004. doi:10.1093/genetics/155.3.999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, W., J. S. Bruner, and G. Ross. 1976. “The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17 (1): 89–100. doi:10.1080/0305498960220101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobzhansky, T. 1973. “Nothing in Biology Makes Sense except in the Light of Evolution.” The American Biology Teacher 35: 125–129. doi:10.2307/4444260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreger, D. L., B. N. Hooser, A. M. Hughes, B. Ganesan, J. Donner, H. Anderson, L. Holtvoigt, K. J. Ekenstedt, and C. E. Ambrósio. 2019. “True Colors: Commercially-Acquired Morphological Genotypes Reveal Hidden Allele Variation among Dog Breeds, Informing Both Trait Ancestry and Breed Potential.” PLoS ONE 10 14 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. G., C. A. Chinn, and S. Barzilai. 2018. “Grasp of Evidence: Problematizing and Expanding the Next Generation Science Standards’ Conceptualization of Evidence.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55 (7): 907–937. doi:10.1002/tea.21468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., and M. Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre. 2012. “Argumentation in Science Education Research: Perspectives from Europe.” In Science Education Research and Practice in Europe, edited by D. Jorde and J. Dillon, 253–289. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, G. E., and M. Gail Jones. 2011. “Pedagogical Preparation of the Science Graduate Teaching Assistant: Challenges and Implications.” Science Educator 20 (2): 31–41.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, B. L., A. M. L. Cavallo, and E. A. Marek. 2001. “Relationships among Informal Learning Environments, Teaching Procedures and Scientific Reasoning Ability.” International Journal of Science Education 23 (5): 535–549. doi:10.1080/09500690116971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannafin, M., S. Land, and K. Oliver. 1999. “Open Learning Environments: Foundations, Methods, and Models.” In Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (Volume II), edited by C. Reigeluth, 115–140, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, G. H. 1908. “Mendelian Proportions in a Mixed Population.” Science 28 (706): 49–50. doi:10.1126/science.28.706.49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffman, K., S. Leupen, K. Dowell, K. Kephart, J. Leips, and J. Batzli. 2016. “Development and Assessment of Modules to Integrate Quantitative Skills in Introductory Biology Courses.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 15 (2): ar14. doi:10.1187/cbe.15-09-0186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jancuskova, T., M. Langevin, and S. Pekova. 2018. “TYRP1:C.555T>G Is a Recurrent Mutation Found in Australian Shepherd and Miniature American Shepherd Dogs.” Animal Genetics 49 (5): 500–501. doi:10.1111/age.12709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. L., and A. Lawson. 2011. “Effects of Collaborative Group Composition and Inquiry Instruction on Reasoning Gains and Achievement in Undergraduate Biology.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 10 (1): 64–73. doi:10.1187/cbe.10-07-0089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., N. B. Songer, and S. Young Lee. 2007. “Evidentiary Competence: Sixth Graders’ Understanding for Gathering and Interpreting Evidence in Scientific Investigations.” Research in Science Education 37 (1): 75–97. doi:10.1007/s11165-006-9014-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawalkar, A., and J. Vijapurkar. 2013. “Scaffolding Science Talk: The Role of Teachers’ Questions in the Inquiry Classroom.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (12): 2004–2027. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.604684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnear, J. F. 1986. “Using the Domestic Cat in the Teaching of Genetics.” Journal of Biological Education 20 (1): 5–11. doi:10.1080/00219266.1986.9654766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2009. “Do Students Need to Be Taught How to Reason?” Educational Research Review 4 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labrinidis, A., and H. V. Jagadish. 2012. “Challenges and Opportunities with Big Data.” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 5 (12): 2032–2033. doi:10.14778/2367502.2367572.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, S. 2019. Levers for Change: An Assessment of Progress on Changing STEM Instruction. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. https://www.aaas.org/resources/levers-change-assessment-progress-changing-stem-instruction
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J. A., J. P. Kurdziel, G. H. Roehrig, and J. Turner. 2004. “Growing a Garden without Water: Graduate Teaching Assistants in Introductory Science Laboratories at a Doctoral/Research University.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (3): 211–233. doi:10.1002/tea.20004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz, E. 2016. “Examining Evidence Construction as the Transformation of the Material World into Community Knowledge.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (7): 1113–1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, V. 2013. “The Big Challenges of Big Data.” Nature 498 (7453): 255–260. doi:10.1038/498255a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masel, J. 2012. “Rethinking Hardy-Weinberg and Genetic Drift in Undergraduate Biology.” BioEssays 34 (8): 701–710. doi:10.1002/bies.201100178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington DC: National Academies Press. https://ole.sandiego.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-1217592-dt-content-rid-10695894_1/courses/EDUC-509-MED-MASTER/M4/M4_NGSS_App_I.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Erduran, and S. Simon. 2004. “Enhancing the Quality of Argumentation in School Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (10): 994–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelaez, N., T. Anderson, S. Gardner, Y. Yin, J. Abraham, E. Bartlett, C. Gormally, et al. 2017. “The Basic Competencies of Biological Experimentation: Concept-Skill Statements.” PIBERG Instructional Innovation Materials. Paper 4, no. 2017. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/pibergiim/4
   Google Scholar
• Pelaez, N., S. M. Gardner, and T. R. Anderson. 2022.“The Problem with Teaching Experimentation: Development and Use of a Framework to Define Fundamental Competencies for Biological Experimentation Pelaez, N., Gardner, S. M., Anderson, T. R..” In Trends in Teaching Experimentation in the Life Sciences: Putting Research into Practice to Drive Institutional Change. Switzerland: Springer Nature 3-27.
   Google Scholar
• Puntambekar, S., A. Stylianou, and J. Goldstein. 2007. “Comparing Classroom Enactments of an Inquiry Curriculum: Lessons Learned from Two Teachers.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 16 (1): 81–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samarapungavan, A. 2018. “Construing Scientific Evidence: The Role of Disciplinary Knowledge in Reasoning with and about Evidence in Scientific Practice.” In Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation, edited by F. Fischer, C. Chinn, K. Engelmann, and J. Osborne, 56–76. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., and B. J. Reiser. 2004. “Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry.” Science Education 88 (3): 345–372. doi:10.1002/sce.10130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., and K. A. Millwood. 2005. “The Quality of Students’ Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations.” Cognition and Instruction 23 (1): 23–55. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarit, B., and C. A. Chinn. 2020. “A Review of Educational Responses to the ‘Post-Truth’ Condition: Four Lenses on ‘Post-Truth’ Problems.” Educational Psychologist 55 (3): 107–119. doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmutz, S. M., T. G. Berryere, and A. D. Goldfinch. 2002. “TYRP1 and MC1R Genotypes and Their Effects on Coat Color in Dogs.” Mammalian Genome 13 (7): 380–387. doi:10.1007/s00335-001-2147-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmutz, S. M., and T. G. Berryere. 2007. “Genes Affecting Coat Colour and Pattern in Domestic Dogs: A Review.” Animal Genetics 38 (6): 539–549. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01664.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchardt, A. M., and C. D. Schunn. 2016. “Modeling Scientific Processes with Mathematics Equations Enhances Student Qualitative Conceptual Understanding and Quantitative Problem Solving.” Science Education 100 (2): 290–320. doi:10.1002/sce.21198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, S. W., and N. Pelaez . 2022. “Getting by with A Little Help from Friends: A Qualitative Case Study of Students’Strategies for Coping with Failure in an Undergraduate Biology Laboratory Course.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 21 (2): ar17, 1–21. doi:10.1187/cbe.20-07-0155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. U., and J. T. Baldwin. 2015. “Making Sense of Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium.” American Biology Teacher 77 (8): 577–582. doi:10.1525/abt.2015.77.8.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. U. 2017. “Teaching the Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium: A 5E Lesson Plan.” American Biology Teacher 79 (4): 288–293. doi:10.1525/abt.2017.79.4.288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speth, E. B., J. L. Momsen, G. A. Moyerbrailean, D. Ebert-May, T. M. Long, S. Wyse, D. Linton, and J. Jungck. 2010. “1, 2, 3, 4: Infusing Quantitative Literacy into Introductory Biology.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 9 (3): 323–332. doi:10.1187/cbe.10-03-0033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, C. 1943. “The Hardy-Weinberg Law.” Science 97 (2510): 137–138. doi:10.1126/science.97.2510.137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sundberg, M. D., J. E. Armstrong, and E. William Wischusen. 2005. “A Reappraisal of the Status of Introductory Biology Laboratory Education in U.S. Colleges & Universities The American Biology Teacher 67 (9): 525–529 .” doi:10.2307/4451904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabak, I., and E. Baumgartner. 2014. “The Teacher as Partner: Exploring Participant Structures, Symmetry.” And Identity Work in Scaffolding.” Cognition and Instruction 22 (4): 393–429.
   Google Scholar
• Ushiri, K., R. S. Moog, and J. E. Lewis. 2013. “Argumentation and Participation Patterns in General Chemistry Peer-Led Sessions.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (10): 1207–1231. doi:10.1002/tea.21107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Joolingen, W. R., and T. De Jong. 1991. “Supporting Hypothesis Generation by Learners Exploring an Interactive Computer Simulation.” Instructional Science 20 (5–6): 389–404. doi:10.1007/BF00116355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, W. 1908. “Über Den Nachweis Der Vererbung Beim Menschen.” Jahres. Wiertt. Ver. Vaterl. Natkd 64: 369–382. doi:10.1007/BF00531038.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. D., J. A. Taylor, S. M. Kowalski, and J. Carlson. 2010. “The Relative Effects and Equity of Inquiry-Based and Commonplace Science Teaching on Students’ Knowledge, Reasoning, and Argumentation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (3): 276–301. doi:10.1002/tea.20329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, M. J. 2018a. “How to Teach the Hardy-Weinberg Principle Using Engaging, Non-Trivial Evolutionary Scenarios.” Bioscene 44 (1): 28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, M. J. 2018b. “On Hardy-Weinberg in Introductory Biology : Teaching This Fundamental Principle in an Authentic, Engaging, and Accurate Manner.” Bioscene 44 (1): 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Xun, G., and S. M. Land. 2003. “Scaffolding Students’ Problem-Solving Processes in an Ill-Structured Task Using Question Prompts and Peer Interactions.” Educational Technology Research and Development 51 (1): 21–38. doi:10.1007/BF02504515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarocostas, J. 2020. “How to Fight an Infodemic.” The Lancet 395 (10225): 676. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar