The medium matters! The effect of a mobile digital identification tool on students’ intrinsic motivation during plant identification

References

• Abuhamdeh, S., and M. Csikszentmihalyi. 2012. “Attentional Involvement and Intrinsic Motivation.” Motivation and Emotion 36 (3): 257–267. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9252-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Affeldt, S., J. Groß, and D. Stahl. 2012. “Die Artansprache verstehen – Eine evidenzbasierte Analyse des Bestimmungsweges.” Lehr-und Lernforschung in der Biologiedidaktik 5: 185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Balmford, A., L. Clegg, T. Coulson, and J. Taylor. 2002. “Why Conservationists Should Heed Pokémon.” Science 295 (5564): 2367. doi:10.1126/science.295.5564.2367b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayne, D., D. Evans, J. Llewellyn-Jones, and J. Shalders. 1998. Byokeys. London: Blackie and Son Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A. 2005. “The Ability of A-level Students to Name Plants.” Journal of Biological Education 39 (2): 63–67. doi:10.1080/00219266.2005.9655963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, W., B. Eickelmann, J. Gerick, F. Goldhammer, H. Schaumburg, K. Schwippert, M. Senkbeil, R. Schulz-Zander, and H. Wendt. 2014. ICILS 2013 – Computer- und informationsbezogene Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern in der 8. Jahrgangsstufe im internationalen Vergleich. Münster/New York: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., E. Stahl, T. Bartholomé, and S. Pieschl. 2004. “The case of plant identification in biology: When is a rose a rose.” In Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert, edited by P. P. A. Boshuizen, R. Bromme, and H. Gruber, 53–71. Dodrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bühner, M. 2011. Einführung in die Test-und Fragebogenkonstruktion. München: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Z., X. Fan, and J. Du. 2017. “Gender and Attitudes toward Technology Use: A meta-analysis.” Computers & Education 105: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. 1966. “The Scree Test for the Number of Factors.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 1 (2): 245–276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. S., T. C. Kao, and J. P. Sheu. 2003. “A Mobile Learning System for Scaffolding Bird Watching Learning.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19 (3): 347–359. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00036.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., and K. Rathunde. 1993. “The Measurement of Flow in Everyday Life: Toward a Theory of Emergent Motivation.” In Current Theory and Research in Motivation, edited by J. E. Jacobs, Vol. 40, 57–97. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1992: Developmental perspectives on motivation. Lincoln-Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L. 2000. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and self-de- Termination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2003. “Intrinsic Motivation Inventory.” 267. Self-determination theory.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan, Eds. 2004. Handbook of self-determination Research. New York: University Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duman, İ., M. Horzum, and C. Randler. 2020. “Adaptation of the Short Form of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory to Turkish.” International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies 7 (3): 26–33. doi:10.17220/ijpes.2020.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Eickelmann, B., J. Gerick, and W. Bos. 2014. “Kapitel I – Die Studie ICILS 2013 im Überblick – Zentrale Ergebnisse und Entwicklungsperspektiven.” In ICILS 2013 – Computer- und informationsbezogene Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern in der 8. Jahrgangsstufe im internationalen Vergleich, edited by W. Bos, B. Eickelmann, J. Gerick, F. Goldhammer, H. Schaumburg, K. Schwippert, M. Senkbeil, R. Schulz-Zander, and H. Wendt. Münster/New York: Waxmann 9–31 .
   Google Scholar
• Elster, D. 2006. “Student Interests – The German and Austrian ROSE Survey.” Journal of Biological Education 42 (1): 5–11. doi:10.1080/00219266.2007.9656100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fančovičová, J., and P. Prokop. 2011. “Plants Have a Chance. Outdoor Educational Programs Alter Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Plants.” Environmental Education Research 17 (4): 537–551. doi:10.1080/13504622.2010.545874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feketitsch, D. 2013. Eikes Baumschule - Entwicklung und Evaluation einer Online-Bestimmungshilfe für Kinder, 193. Karlsruhe: Dissertation Universität Karlsruhe.
   Google Scholar
• Fraillon, J., J. Ainley, W. Schulz, T. Friedman, and E Gebhardt. 2014. “Preparing for Life in a Digital Age.” The IEA international computer and information literacy study (ICILS), international report. IEA: Springer Open.
   Google Scholar
• Freund, P. A., J. T. Kuhn, and H. Holling. 2011. “Measuring Current Achievement Motivation with the QCM: Short Form Development and Investigation of Measurement Invariance.” Personality and Individual Differences 51 (5): 629–634. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frobel, K., and H. Schlumprecht. 2014. “Erosion der Artenkenner. Abschlussbericht im Auftrag des BUND Naturschutz in Bayern e.V.” Nürnberg 92.
   Google Scholar
• Gikas, J., and M. M. Grant. 2013. “Mobile Computing Devices in Higher Education: Student Perspectives on Learning with cellphones, Smartphones & Social Media.” Internet and Higher Education 19: 18–26. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goller, H. 2002. Kontextabhängiger Erwerb von Arten- und Formenkenntnissen im Biologieunterricht des Gymnasiums. Regensburg: Dissertation Uni Regensburg.
   Google Scholar
• Groß, J., S. Affeldt, and D. Stahl. 2019. “Find My Name! Evidence-based Development of an Interactive Species Identification Tool.” In Science Education Research and Education for Sustainable Development, edited by I. Eilks, S. Markic, and B. Ralle, 97–108. Aachen: Shaker.
   Google Scholar
• Groß, J., J. Langstein, J. Paul, and E. Ritter. 2020. “Identification of Ants – Development of the learner-oriented Digital Tool ID-Logics.” World Journal of Chemical Education 8 (1): 21–28. doi:10.12691/wjce-8-1-3.
   Google Scholar
• Groß, J., A. Lude, C. Nerdel, J. Paul, S. Schaal, P. Schmiemann, and C. Thyssen. 2022. “Biologische Bildung in der digitalen Welt. Die digitale Transformation im Fokus der Biologiedidaktik.” In Fachliche Bildung in der digitalen Welt - Digitalisierung, Big Data und KI im Forschungsfokus von 15 Fachdidaktiken (Münster: Waxmann Verlag) 47–81 , edited by V. Frederking and R. Romeike
   Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K., L. Ilomaki, L. Lipponen, H. Muukkonen, M. Rahikainen, T. Tuominen, M. Lakkala, et al. 2000. “Students’ Skills and Practices of Using ICT: Results of a National Assessment in Finland.” Computers & Education 34 (2): 103–117. DOI:10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00007-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. 2002. “Eine neue Methode zur Überprüfung von Artenkenntnissen bei Schülern, Frühblüher: Benennen- Selbsteinschätzen-Wiedererkennen.” Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften (ZfDN) 8: 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., and J. M. Harackiewicz. 2000. “Motivating the Academically Unmotivated: A Critical Issue for the 21st Century.” Review of Educational Research 70 (2): 151–179. doi:10.3102/00346543070002151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.-M., Y.-T. Lin, and S.-C. Cheng. 2010. “Effectiveness of a Mobile Plant Learning System in a Science Curriculum in Taiwanese Elementary Education.” Computers & Education 54 (1): 47–58. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM SPSS 25. 2019. “IBM Corp. Released 2017.” In IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, L. A., Y. Zhao, A. Koleniclll, H. E. Fitzergald, R. Harold, and A. Von Eye. 2008. “Race, Gender, and Information Technology Use: The New Digital Divide.” CyberPsychology and Behavior 11 (4): 437–442. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jäkel, L. 2005. “Alltagspflanzen im Fokus. Botanisches Lernen in Zusammenhängen – Eine didaktische Herausforderung im Anfangsunterricht.” Praxis der Naturwissenschaften – Biologie in der Schule 54 (3): S. 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Jäkel, L., and A. Schaer. 2004. “Sind Namen nur Schall und Rauch?: Wie sicher sind Pflanzenkenntnisse von Schülerinnen und Schülern?” Biologie Lehren und Lernen–Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Biologie 13 (1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Jeno, L. M., J. A. Grytnes, and V. Vandvik. 2017. “The Effect of A mobile-application Tool on Biology Students’ Motivation and Achievement in Species Identification: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective.” Computers & Education 107: 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K, K. M. K. (2004). “Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss.” Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, https://www.kmk.org/themen/qualitaetssicherung-in-schulen/bildungsstandards.html#c5034 Accessed 20 June 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlemeier, H., and B. Hemker. 2007. “The Impact of Computer Use at Home on Students’ Internet Skills.” Computers & Education 49 (2): 460–480. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusumawardani, W., Muzzazinah, and M. Ramli. 2019. “Plant Taxonomy Learning and Research: A Systematics Review.” In The 2nd International Conference on Science, Mathematics, Environment, and Education 26 – 28th July 2019 Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia (Vol. 2194, No. 1, p. 020051 doi:10.1063/1.5139783). AIP Publishing LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, S. (2016). Identification of animals and plants is an essential skill set. The Conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/identification-of-animals-and-plants-is-an-essential-skill-set-55450, Accessed 20 May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lehnert, H.-J., D. Benkowitz, D. Feketitsch, and B. Jaun. 2013. “Blätter, Blüten, Habitus: Wie pflanzliche Formenkenntnis erworben wird und was bei ihrer Vermittlung beachtet werden sollte.” In Theorie, Empirie, Praxis, edited by J. Mayer, M. Hammann, N. Wellnitz, J. Arnold, and M. Werner, 272–273. Kassel: Kassel University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, P. 2002. “Wahrnehmung biologischer Vielfalt im Siedlungsraum durch Schweizer Kinder Klee, R., Bayerhuber, H. .” In Lehr-und Lernforschung in der Biologiedidaktik, 117–130. Innsbruck: StudienVerlag.
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A., and P. R. Pintrich. 2002. “Motivation as an Enabler for Academic Success.” School Psychology Review 31 (3): 313–327. doi:10.1080/02796015.2002.12086158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, R. L., J. Gulikers, and T. Bastiaens. 2004. “The Impact of Intrinsic Motivation on e-learning in Authentic Computer Tasks.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 (5): 368–376. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00096.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAurley, E., T. Duncan, and V. V. Tammen. 1989. “Psychometric Properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in A Competitive Sport Setting: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 60 (1): 48–58. doi:10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. 1993. “Situational Interest: Its Multifaceted Structure in the Secondary School Mathematics Classroom.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (3): 424–436. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muammer, T., and H. Davut. 2019. “Recognition of Plant Leaves: An Approach with Hybrid Features Produced by Dividing Leaf Images into Two and Four Parts.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 352 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2019.01.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguera, J. M., J. J. Jimenez, and M. C. Osuna-Perez. 2013. “Development and Evaluation of a 3D Mobile Application for Learning Manual Therapy in the Physiotherapy Laboratory.” Computers & Education 69: 96–108. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2006. Are Students Ready for a Technology-Rich World?: What PISA Studies Tell Us. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264036093-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. “Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection.” PISA, OECD Publishing Paris. doi: 10.1787/9789264239555-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. PISA 2015 Results (Volume III): Students’ Well-Being. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264273856-en.
   Google Scholar
• Palmberg, I., I. Berg, E. Jeronen, S. Kärkkäinen, P. Norrgård-Sillanpää, C. Persson, R. Vilkonis, and E. Yli-Panula. 2015. “Nordic–Baltic Student Teachers’ Identification of and Interest in Plant and Animal Species: The Importance of Species Identification and Biodiversity for Sustainable Development.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 26 (6): 549–571. doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9438-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, M. (2015). Save field biology skills from extinction risk. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/comment/opinion/save-field-biology-skills-from-extinction-risk/2018721.article Accessed 20 May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, K., K. Pudney, K. Zachos, N. Maiden, B. Krogstie, S. Jones, M. Rose, J. MacManus, and I. Turner. 2015. “Using Mobile Devices and Apps to Support Reflective Learning about Older People with Dementia.” Behaviour & Information Technology 34 (6): 613–631. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2015.1015165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, R. W., and R. M. Ryan. 1985. “Intrinsic Motivation and the Effects of self-consciousness, self-awareness, and ego-involvement: An Investigation of Internally Controlling Styles.” Journal of Personality 53 (3): 435–449. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1985.tb00375.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puentedura, R. R. 2013. “SAMR: Moving from Enhancement to Transformation.” [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/000095.html
   Google Scholar
• Randler, C. 2008. “Teaching Species Identification – A Prerequisite for Learning Biodiversity and Understanding Ecology.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 4 (3): 223–231. doi:10.12973/ejmste/75344.
   Google Scholar
• Randler, C., and F. X. Bogner. 2006. “Cognitive Achievements in Identification Skills.” Journal of Biological Education 40 (4): 161–165. doi:10.1080/00219266.2006.9656038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler, C., J. Osti, and E. Hummel. 2012. “Decline in Interest in Biology among Elementary School Students during a Generation.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 8 (3): 201–205. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2012.835a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheinberg, F., R. Vollmeyer, and B. D. Burns. 2001. “FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern-und Leistungssituationen (Langversion, 2001).” Diagnostica 2 (2): 57–66. doi:10.1026//0012-1924.47.2.57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2002. “An Overview of self-determination Theory: An organismic-dialectical Perspective.” In Handbook of self-determination Research, edited by E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, 3–36. New York: The University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2020. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation from a self-determination Theory Perspective: Definitions, Theory, Practices, and Future Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 61: 101860. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., R. Koestner, and E. L. Deci. 1991. “Ego-involved Persistence: When free-choice Behavior Is Not Intrinsically Motivated.” Motivation and Emotion 15 (3): 185–205. doi:10.1007/BF00995170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and J. G. La Guardia (2000). What is being optimized?: Self-determination theory and basic psychological needs. In S. H. Qualls and N. Abeles (edited by), Psychology and the aging revolution: How we adapt to longer life (145–172 https://doi.org/10.1037/10363-008). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sachsen-Anhalt, K. 2016. “Fachlehrplan Gymnasium – Biologie.”
   Google Scholar
• Saleem, G., M. Akhtar, N. Ahmed, and W. S. Qureshi. 2019. “Automated Analysis of Visual Leaf Shape Features for Plant Classification.” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 157: 270–280. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharfenberg, F. 2005. Experimenteller Biologieunterricht zu Aspekten der Gentechnik im Lernort Labor: Empirische Untersuchung zu Akzeptanz, Wissenserwerb und Interesse. Bayreuth: Dissertation Universität Bayreuth.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, R. F., R. M. Bernard, E. Borokhovski, R. M. Tamim, P. C. Abrami, M. A. Surkes, C. A. Wade, and J. Woods. 2014. “The Effects of Technology Use in Postsecondary Education: A meta-analysis of Classroom Applications.” Computers & Education 72: 271–291. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schussler, E. E., and L. A. Olzak. 2008. “It’s Not Easy Being Green. Student Recall of Plant and Animal Images.” Journal of Biological Education 42 (3): 112–119. doi:10.1080/00219266.2008.9656123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sha, L., C.-K. Looi, W. Chen, and B. H. Zhang. 2012. “Understanding Mobile Learning from the Perspective of self-regulated Learning.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28 (4): 366–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiq, F., and R. Scherer. 2019. “Is There A Gender Gap? A meta-analysis of the Gender Differences in Students’ ICT Literacy.” Educational Research Review 27: 205–217. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, H., R. Pinho, L. Lopes, A. J. Nogueira, and P. Silveira. 2011. “Illustrated Plant Identification Keys: An Interactive Tool to Learn Botany.” Computers & Education 56 (4): 969–973. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg, B. C., and M. E. Donkin. 2017. “Apps for Angiosperms: The Usability of Mobile Computers and Printed Field Guides for UK Wild Flower and Winter Tree Identification.” Journal of Biological Education 51 (2): 123–135. doi:10.1080/00219266.2016.1177572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg, B. C., M. E. Donkin, and A. M. Smith. 2015. “Bryophytes for Beginners: The Usability of a Printed Dichotomous Key versus a multi-access computer-based Key for Bryophyte Identification.” Journal of Biological Education 49 (3): 274–287. doi:10.1080/00219266.2014.934900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrova, O., and D. Urhahne. 2010. “Modification of a School Programme in the Deutsches Museum to Enhance Students’ Attitudes and Understanding.” International Journal of Science Education (IJSE) 32 (17): 2291–2310. doi:10.1080/09500690903471583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, F., O. Bock, and S. Dern. 2013. “Subliminal Priming of Motivation Magnitude.” Psychology 4 (11): 804–807. doi:10.4236/psych.2013.411115.
   Google Scholar
• Südwest, M. F. 2018. “JIM-Studie 2018. Jugend, Information, Medien, Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 12-bis 19-Jähriger.” https://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/JIM/2018/Studie/JIM_2018_Gesamt.pdf Accessed 20 June 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Uno, G. E. 2009. “Botanical Literacy: What and How Should Students Learn about Plants?” American Journal of Botany 96 (10): 1753–1759. doi:10.3732/ajb.0900025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmeyer, R., and F. Rheinberg. 1998. “Motivationale Einflüsse auf Erwerb und Anwendung von Wissen in einem computersimulierten System.” Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 12: 11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmeyer, R., and F. Rheinberg. 1999. “Motivation and Metacognition When Learning a Complex System.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 14 (4): 541–554. doi:10.1007/BF03172978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmeyer, R., and F. Rheinberg. 2000. “Does Motivation Affect Performance via Persistence?” Learning and Instruction 10 (4): 293–309. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00031-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volman, M., E. van Eck, I. Heemskerk, and E. Kuiper. 2005. “New Technologies, New Differences: Gender and Ethnic Differences in Pupils’ Use of ICT in Primary and Secondary Education.” Computers & Education 45 (1): 35–55. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(04)00072-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandersee, J. H., and E. E. Schussler. 1999. “Preventing Plant Blindness.” The American Biology Teacher 61 (2): S. 82–86. doi:10.2307/4450624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. C., C. L. Lo, M. C. Hsu, C. Y. Tsai, and C. M. Tsai. 2020. “Implementation a Context-Aware Plant Ecology Mobile Learning System.” SAGE Open 10 (2): 215824402092070. doi:10.1177/2158244020920701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, K. 2011. Rothmaler-Exkursionsflora von Deutschland. Ed. E. J. Jäger, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Spektrum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilde, M., K. Bätz, A. Kovaleva, and D. Urhahne. 2009. “Überprüfung einer Kurzskala intrinsischer Motivation.” Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 15.
   Google Scholar
• Wilde, M., J. S. Hußmann, S. Lorenzen, A. Meyer, and C. Randler. 2012. “Lessons with Living Harvest Mice: An Empirical Study of Their Effects on Intrinsic Motivation and Knowledge Acquisition.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (18): 2797–2810. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.654829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W.-H., Y.-C. J. Wu, C.-Y. Chen, H.-Y. Kao, C.-H. Lin, and S.-H. Huang. 2012. “Review of Trends from Mobile Learning Studies: A meta-analysis.” Computers & Education 59 (2): 817–827. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yigit, E., K. Sabanci, A. Toktas, and A. Kayabasi. 2019. “A Study on Visual Features of Leaves in Plant Identification Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques.” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 156: 369–377. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2018.11.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar