Reflecting on the relevance of drawing as a tool in eliciting pre-service teachers’ preconceptions of human organs and organ systems

References

• Akeel, M. A. 2021. “Exploring Students’ Understanding of Structured Practical Anatomy.” Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences 16 (3): 318–327. doi:10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.12.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andersson, J., R. Löfgren, and L. A. E. Tibell. 2020. “What’s in the Body? Children’s Annotated Drawings.” Journal of Biological Education 54 (2): 176–190. doi:10.1080/00219266.2019.1569082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaudin, M. W., and J. J. Mintzes. 1985. “Students’ Alternative Conceptions of the Human Circulatory System: A cross-age Study.” Science Education 69 (5): 721–733. doi:10.1002/sce.3730690513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assaraf, O. B.-Z., J. Dodick, and J. Tripto. 2013. “High School Students’ Understanding of the Human Body System.” Research in Science Education 43 (1): 33–56. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9245-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoszeck, A. B., D. Z. Machado, and M. Amann-Gainotti. 2011. “Graphic Representation of Organs and Organ Systems: Psychological View and Developmental Patterns.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 7 (1): 41–51. doi:10.12973/ejmste/75177.
   Google Scholar
• Canlas, I. P. 2015. “The Use of Case Analysis in Teaching Circular Motion.” International Journal of Education and Research 3 (12).
   Google Scholar
• Canlas, I. P. 2019. “Using Visual Representations in Identifying Students’ Preconceptions in Friction.” Research in Science & Technological Education 1–29. doi:10.1080/02635143.2019.1660630.
   Google Scholar
• Cardinot, A., and J. A. Fairfield. 2021. “Alternative Conceptions of Astronomy: How Irish Secondary Students Understand Gravity, Seasons, and the Big Bang.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 17 (4): em1950. doi:10.29333/ejmste/10780.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. 1986. “Cognitive Science and Science Education.” American Psychologist 41 (10): 1123–1130. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-Y., T.-J. Lin, M.-H. Lee, S. W.-Y. Lee, T.-C. Lin, A.-L. Tan, and -C.-C. Tsai. 2020. “A Systematic Review of Trends and Findings in Research Employing Drawing Assessment in Science Education.” Studies in Science Education 56 (1): 77–110. doi:10.1080/03057267.2020.1735822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clavert, P., J. Bouchaïb, F. Duparc, and J. L. Kahn. 2012. “A Plea for the Use of Drawing in Human Anatomy Teaching.” Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 34 (8): 787–789. doi:10.1007/s00276-012-0967-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clement, J., D. E. Brown, and A. Zietsman. 1989. “Not All Preconceptions are Misconceptions: Finding ‘Anchoring Conceptions’ for Grounding Instruction on Students’ Intuitions.” International Journal of Science Education 11 (5): 554–565. doi:10.1080/0950069890110507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coll, R. K., and D. F. Treagust. 2002. “Exploring Tertiary Students’ Understanding of Covalent Bonding.” Research in Science & Technological Education 20 (2): 241–267. doi:10.1080/0263514022000030480.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. M., M. Stieff, and D. DeSutter. 2017. “Sketching the Invisible to Predict the Visible: From Drawing to Modeling in Chemistry.” Topics in Cognitive Science 9 (4): 902–920. doi:10.1111/tops.12285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and J. D. Creswell. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DeBoer, G. E. 2000. “Scientific Literacy: Another Look at Its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to Science Education Reform.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (6): 582–601. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., H. Asoko, J. Leach, P. Scott, and E. Mortimer. 1994. “Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom.” Educational Researcher 23 (7): 5–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X023007005.
   Google Scholar
• Durant, J. 1994. “What Is Scientific Literacy?” European Review 2 (1): 83–89. doi:10.1017/S1062798700000922.
   Google Scholar
• Edens, K., and E. Potter. 2007. “The Relationship of Drawing and Mathematical Problem Solving: Draw for Math Tasks.” Studies in Art Education 48 (3): 282–298. doi:10.1080/00393541.2007.11650106.
   Google Scholar
• Erceg, N., L. Jelovica, Z. Hrepić, V. Mešić, M. Karuza, and I. Aviani. 2021. “University Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Microscopic Models of Electrical and Thermal Conduction in Solids.” European Journal of Physics 42 (4): 45702. doi:10.1088/1361-6404/abf5eb.
   Google Scholar
• Fančovičová, J., and P. Prokop. 2019. “Examining Secondary School Students Misconceptions about the Human Body: Correlations between the Methods of Drawing and open-ended Questions.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 18. doi:10.33225/jbse/19.18.549.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. 2010. “The Role of Visual Representations in the Learning and Teaching of Science: An Introduction.” Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching 11 (1): 1–19. https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v11_issue1_files/foreword.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Guspatni, G. 2021. “Student-generated PowerPoint Animations: A Study of Student Teachers’ Conceptions of Molecular Motions through Their Expressed Models.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 22 (2): 312–327. doi:10.1039/D0RP00229A.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, F., and D. F. Treagust. 1987. “Diagnosing Secondary Students’ Misconceptions of Photosynthesis and Respiration in Plants Using a two-tier Multiple Choice Instrument.” Journal of Biological Education 21 (3): 203–211. doi:10.1080/00219266.1987.9654897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewson, P. W. (1992). Conceptual Change in Science Teaching and Teacher Education. In Documentation and Assessment. https://www.learner.org/workshops/lala2/support/hewson.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. 2011. “Scientific Literacy Revisited Hodson, D.” In Looking to the Future: Building a Curriculum for Social Activism, 1–31. Rotterdam: SensePublishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-472-0_1.
   Google Scholar
• Karpudewan, M., J. Ponniah, and A. N. Md.Zain. 2016. “Project-based Learning: An Approach to Promote Energy Literacy among Secondary School Students.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 25 (2): 229–237. doi:10.1007/s40299-015-0256-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köse, S. 2008. “Diagnosing Student Misconceptions: Using Drawings as a Research Method.” World Applied Sciences Journal 3 (2): 283–293. http://idosi.org/wasj/wasj3%282%29/20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R., C. Jewitt, J. Ogborn, and C. Tsatsarelis. 2001. Multimodal Teaching and Learning : The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. Leeuwen. 2020. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, P., B. Müllner, P. Pany, M. Scheuch, and M. Kiehn. 2020. “Students’ Conceptions of Plant Reproduction Processes.” Journal of Biological Education 54 (2): 213–223. doi:10.1080/00219266.2020.1739424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laugksch, R. C. 2000. “Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual Overview.” Science Education 84 (1): 71–94. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Manjón, A., and Y. P. Angón. 2009. “Representations of the Human Circulatory System.” Journal of Biological Education 43 (4): 159–163. doi:10.1080/00219266.2009.9656176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucero, M. M., C. Delgado, and K. Green. 2020. “Elucidating High School Biology Teachers’ Knowledge of Students’ Conceptions regarding Natural Selection.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 18 (6): 1041–1061. doi:10.1007/s10763-019-10008-1.
   Google Scholar
• Magtolis, J. M., and A. E. Batomalaque (2019). Constructively Aligned Teaching Sequence (CATS): A Tool for Teaching Organismal Biology in STEM Senior High School Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 1254, 12044. 10.1088/1742-6596/1254/1/012044
   Google Scholar
• Maries, A., and C. Singh. 2017. “Do Students Benefit from Drawing Productive Diagrams Themselves while Solving Introductory Physics Problems? the Case of Two Electrostatics Problems.” European Journal of Physics 39 (1): 15703. doi:10.1088/1361-6404/aa9038.
   Google Scholar
• Mattos Feijó, L., V. A. Andrade, and R. Coutinho-Silva. 2020. “A Journey through the Digestive System: Analysis of A Practical Activity’s Use as A Didactic Resource for Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Biological Education 1–33. doi:10.1080/00219266.2020.1791227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. 2009. Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511811678.
   Google Scholar
• Mnguni, L. E. 2014. “The Theoretical Cognitive Process of Visualization for Science Education.” SpringerPlus 3 (1): 184. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-3-184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morsch, L. A., and M. Lewis. 2015. “Engaging Organic Chemistry Students Using ChemDraw for iPad.” Journal of Chemical Education 92 (8): 1402–1405. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Óskarsdóttir, G., B. Stougaard, A. Fleischer, E. Jeronen, F. Lützen, and R. Kråkenes. 2011. “Children’s Ideas about the Human Body – A Nordic Case Study.” Nordic Studies in Science Education 7 (2): 179–189. doi:10.5617/nordina.240.
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir, G., and D. B. Clark. 2007. “An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 3 (4): 351–361. doi:10.12973/ejmste/75414.
   Google Scholar
• Papp, K. K., A. J. Wasserman, and J. I. Townsend. 1987. “Relationship of Students’ Prior Knowledge and Order of Questions on Test to Students’ Test Scores.” Academic Medicine 62 (4): 347–349. doi:10.1097/00001888-198704000-00007.
   Google Scholar
• Pendrill, A.-M. 2020. “Forces in Circular Motion: Discerning Student Strategies.” Physics Education 55 (4): 45006. doi:10.1088/1361-6552/ab8047.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, G. J., K. A. Strike, P. W. Hewson, and W. A. Gertzog. 1982. “Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change.” Science Education 66 (2): 211–227. doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207.
   Google Scholar
• Prokop, P., and J. Fančovičová. 2006. “Students’ Ideas about Human Body: Do They Really Draw What They Know?” Journal of Baltic Science Education 5. http://oaji.net/articles/2014/987-1404235145.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Quillin, K., and S. Thomas. 2015. “Drawing-to-learn: A Framework for Using Drawings to Promote model-based Reasoning in Biology.” CBE Life Sciences Education 14 (1): es2. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-08-0128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. J., and S. D. Tunnicliffe. 2001. “Students’ Understandings of Human Organs and Organ Systems.” Research in Science Education 31 (3): 383–399. doi:10.1023/A:1013116228261.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A. 2007. “Scientific Literacy/Science Literacy.” In Handbook of Research in Science Education (New York: Routledge), edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 729–779.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A., and R. W. Bybee. 2014. “Scientific Literacy, Science Literacy, and Science Education.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education (New York: Routledge), edited by N. Lederman and S. K. Abell, 545–558.
   Google Scholar
• Sanger, M. J. 2005. “Evaluating Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Balanced Equations and Stoichiometric Ratios Using a Particulate Drawing.” Journal of Chemical Education 82 (1): 131. doi:10.1021/ed082p131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, J. H. 1996. “Constructivism in Science Education.” Journal of Geoscience Education 44 (3): 242. doi:10.5408/1089-9995-44.3.242.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöström, J., and I. Eilks. 2018. “Reconsidering Different Visions of Scientific Literacy and Science Education Based on the Concept of Bildung.” In Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education: Learning, Teaching and Assessment, edited by Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, and D. R. Baker, 65–88. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöström, J., and V. Talanquer. 2014. “Humanizing Chemistry Education: From Simple Contextualization to Multifaceted Problematization.” Journal of Chemical Education 91 (8): 1125–1131. doi:10.1021/ed5000718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soyibo, K. 1995. “A Review of Some Sources of Students’ Misconceptions in Biology.” Singapore Journal of Education 15 (2): 1–11. doi:10.1080/02188799508548576.
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, K., and S. Padalkar. 2009. “Visualisation and Reasoning in Explaining the Phases of the Moon.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (3): 395–417. doi:10.1080/09500690802595805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topsakal, U. U., and J. Oversby. 2012. “Turkish Student Teachers’ Ideas about Diagrams of a Flower and a Plant Cell.” Journal of Biological Education 46 (2): 81–92. doi:10.1080/00219266.2011.572988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., V. Prain, G. Aranda, J. Ferguson, and R. Gorur. 2020. “Drawing to Reason and Learn in Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57 (2): 209–231. doi:10.1002/tea.21590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter, P., and J. Garner. 2005. “The Promise and Practice of learner-generated Drawing: Literature Review and Synthesis.” Educational Psychology Review 17 (4): 285–325. doi:10.1007/s10648-005-8136-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, J., and W. Nielsen. 2020. “Multimodal Science Teaching and Learning.” Learning: Research and Practice 6 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1080/23735082.2020.1752043.
   Google Scholar
• Yip, D. Y. 2001. “Promoting the Development of a Conceptual Change Model of Science Instruction in Prospective Secondary Biology Teachers.” International Journal of Science Education 23 (7): 755–770. doi:10.1080/09500690010016067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, C., S. Zhang, H. Cui, W. Hu, and G. Dai. 2021. “Middle School Students’ Alternative Conceptions about the Human Blood Circulatory System Using four-tier multiple-choice Tests.” Journal of Biological Education 1–17. doi:10.1080/00219266.2021.1877777.
   Google Scholar