Biology lecturers’ perceptions of genetics literacy in Indonesia: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study

References

• Acar, O., L. Turkmen, and A. Roychoudhury. 2010. “Student Difficulties in Socio-Scientific Argumentation and Decision‐Making Research Findings: Crossing the Borders of Two Research Lines.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (9): 1191–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902991805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aivelo, T., and A. Uitto. 2021. “Factors Explaining Students’ Attitudes Towards Learning Genetics and Belief in Genetic Determinism.” International Journal of Science Education 43 (9): 1408–1425. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1917789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angraini, E., Zubaidah, S., Susanto, H., Omar, N. 2022. “Enhancing Creativity in Genetics Using Three Teaching Strategies-based TPACK Model.“ Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education 18 (12): em2196. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12697.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, M. 2016. “How to Plan and Perform a Qualitative Study Using Content Analysis.” NursingPlus Open 2:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Boerwinkel, D. J., A. Yarden, and A. Jan Waarlo. 2017. “Reaching a Consensus on the Definition of Genetic Literacy That is Required from a Twenty-First-Century Citizen.” Science and Education 26 (10): 1087–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9934-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böttcher, F., and A. Meisert. 2013. “Effects of Direct and Indirect Instruction on Fostering Decision-Making Competence in Socio-Scientific Issues.” Research in Science Education 43 (2): 479–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9271-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling, B. V., E. E. Acra, L. Wang, M. F. Myers, G. E. Dean, G. C. Markle, C. L. Moskalik, and C. A. Huether. 2008. “Development and Evaluation of a Genetics Literacy Assessment Instrument for Undergraduates.” Genetics 178 (1): 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.079533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catanzaro, M. 1988. “Using Qualitative Analytical Techniques.“ In Nursing Research: Theory and Practice, edited byWoods, N., and Catanzaro, M., 437–456. St Louis: Mosby Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Cebesoy, U. B., and C. Oztekin. 2018. “Genetics Literacy: Insights from Science Teachers’ Knowledge, Attitude, and Teaching Perceptions.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 (7): 1247–1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9840-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, A. 2005. “Understanding of Genetic Information in Higher Secondary Students in Northeast India and the Implications for Genetics Education.” Cell Biology Education 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.04-06-0042.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and J. David Creswell. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, V. M., and G. Venville. 2010. “Teaching Strategies for Developing Students’ Argumentation Skills About Socio-Scientific Issues in High School Genetics.” Research in Science Education 40 (2): 133–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. G., and B. J. Reiser. 2007. “Reasoning Across Ontologically Distinct Levels: Students’ Understandings of Molecular Genetics.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (7): 938–959. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauzi, A., Saefi, M., E. Kristiana, W. C., Adi, and N. Lestariani. 2021. “Factor and Rasch Analysis on COVID-19 Genetics Literacy Assessment Instrument eurasia.” Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education 17 (11): em2032. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/1126.
   Google Scholar
• Gormally, C., P. Brickman, M. Lut, and E. Stone. 2012. “Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): Measuring Undergraduates’ Evaluation of Scientific Information and Arguments.” CBE Life Sciences Education 11 (4): 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBQ (Indonesian Biology Consortium). 2015. “Rumusan Naskah Akademik Standar Nasional Berbasis KKNI.” Retrieved from https://www.kobi-id.org.
   Google Scholar
• INQF (Indonesian National Qualification Framework). 2015. “Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia.” Retrieved from https://skkni.kemnaker.go.id/tentang-kkni/penyetaraan-jenjang.
   Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K., T. A. C. Reydon, G. P. Patrinos, and B. J. Strasser. 2014. “Genetics and Society-Educating Scientifically Literate Citizens: Introduction to the Thematic Issue.” Science & Education 23 (2): 251–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9659-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knippels, M. C. P. J., A. Jan Waarlo, and K. Th Boersma. 2005. “Design Criteria for Learning and Teaching Genetics.” Journal of Biological Education 39 (3): 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leatherman, J. L., and L. M. Cleveland. 2020. “Student Exam Performance in Flipped Classroom Sections is Similar to That in Active Learning Sections, and Satisfaction with the Flipped Classroom Hinges on Attitudes Toward Learning from Videos.” Journal of Biological Education 54 (3): 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1575266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., and J. Leach. 2006. “Discussion of Socio-Scientific Issues: The Role of Science Knowledge.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (11): 1267–1287. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500439348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maghfiroh H., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., and Susanto H. 2023. “Definition and Conceptual Model of Genetics Literacy: A Systematic Literature Review.“ International Journal of Public Health Science 12 (2): 554–567. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijphs.v12i2.22679.
   Google Scholar
• McElhinny, T. L., M. J. Dougherty, B. V. Bowling, and J. C. Libarkin. 2014. “The Status of Genetics Curriculum in Higher Education in the United States: Goals and Assessment.” Science and Education 23 (2): 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9566-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, 2013. “Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods”. SAGE Publications Inc. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-data-analysis/book239534.
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink, L. B., C. B. Terwee, D. L. Patrick, J. Alonso, P. W. Stratford, D. L. Knol, L. M. Bouter, and H. C. W. de Vet. 2010. “The COSMIN Checklist for Assessing the Methodological Quality of Studies on Measurement Properties of Health Status Measurement Instruments: An International Delphi Study.” Quality of Life Research 19 (4): 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murni, D., Lestari, S. R., Indriwati , S. E., Zubaidah, S., Susanto, H., Paidi, P. 2024. “Students’ ICT Literacy and Conceptual Knowledge Correlation: From A Genetic Course And a Gender Perspective.” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education 13 (1): 580–588. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25237.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. 2005. “Evolutionary Theory as a Guide to Socio-Scientific Decision-Making.” Journal of Biological Education 39 (2): 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9655964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., and S. R. Fowler. 2006. “A Threshold Model of Content Knowledge Transfer for Socio-Scientific Argumentation.” Science Education 90 (6): 986–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., and D. L. Zeidler. 2005. “Patterns of Informal Reasoning in the Context of Socio-Scientific Decision Making.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (1): 112–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, N. A., R. Golan Duncan, and C. Stephenson. 2014. “A Tri-Part Model for Genetics Literacy: Exploring Undergraduate Student Reasoning About Authentic Genetics Dilemmas.” Research in Science Education 45 (4): 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9433-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. K. 2004. “Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects.” Education for Information 22 (2): 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, F., and K. Kampourakis. 2017. “Teaching for Genetics Literacy in the Post-Genomic Era.” Studies in Science Education 53 (2): 193–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1392731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susantini, E., Sumitro, S. B., Corebima, A. D., and Susilo H. 2018. “Improving Learning Process in Genetics Classroom by Using Metacognitive Strategy.“Asia Pacific Education Review, 19 (3): 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9540-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee, C. B., C. A. C. Prinsen, A. Chiarotto, M. J. Westerman, D. L. Patrick, J. Alonso, L. M. Bouter, H. C. W. de Vet, and L. B. Mokkink. 2018. “COSMIN Methodology for Evaluating the Content Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Delphi Study.” Quality of Life Research 27 (5): 1159–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2016. “Education 2030 Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action Towards Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Lifelong Learning for All.” Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243278.locale=en.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. 2015. “New Vision for Education Unlocking the Potential of Technology”. Retrieved from https://widgets.weforum.org/nve-2015/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., and F. Nemet. 2002. “Fostering Students’ Knowledge and Argumentation Skills Through Dilemmas in Human Genetics.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (1): 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar