Enhancing teachers’ curriculum ownership via teacher engagement in state-based curriculum-making: the Estonian case

References

• Ballet, K., & Kelchtermans, G. (2008). Workload and willingness to change: Disentangling the experience of intensification. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 47–67.10.1080/00220270701516463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, M. (2011). National curriculum: A political-educational tangle. Australian Journal of Education, 55, 259–280.10.1177/000494411105500307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I. (1995). National curriculum as social compromise or discursive politics? Some reflections on a curriculum‐making process. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27, 411–430.10.1080/0022027950270405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerych, L. (1999). General report on the symposium ‘Educational reforms in Central and Eastern Europe: Processes and outcomes’. European Education, 31, 5–38.10.2753/EUE1056-493431025
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, F. M. (1972). The functions of curriculum development. Interchange, 3, 161–177.10.1007/BF02137642
   Google Scholar
• De Groof, J., Neave, G., & Švec, J. (1998). Democracy and governance in higher education. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American Educational Research (pp. 486–516). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eggleston, J. (1980). School-based curriculum development in Britain: A collection of case studies. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Erss, M., Mikser, R., Löfström, E., Ugaste, A., Rõuk, V., & Jaani, J. (2014). Teachers’ views of curriculum policy: The case of Estonia. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62, 393–411.10.1080/00071005.2014.941786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodson, I. F. (2000). The crisis of curriculum change. Taboo, Fall-Winter, 109–123.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781483384436
   Google Scholar
• Gundem, B., & Sivesind, K. (1997). From politics to practice: Reflections from a research project on curriculum policy and notes from (outside and inside) a National Curriculum Reform Project. In Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, AERA, Symposium division L: Educational policy and politics. Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Haft, H., & Hopmann, S. (Eds.). (1990). Case studies in curriculum administration history. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Haridusministeerium. 1996. Eesti põhi- ja keskhariduse riiklik õppekava.Vabariigi Valitsuse määrus no 228 [Estonian national curriculum for basic and secondary education. Regulation of the government]. Riigi Teataja I, 65–69, 1201.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. (1990a). Retracing curriculum history. In B. B. Gundem, B. U. Engelsen, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Curriculum work and curriculum content. Theory and practice. Contemporary and Historical perspectives (pp. 49–68). Oslo: University of Oslo, Institute for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. (1990b). Current structures of curriculum making and their impact on content. In B. B. Gundem, B. U. Engelsen, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Curriculum work and curriculum content. Theory and practice. Contemporary and historical perspectives (pp. 158–180). Oslo: University of Oslo, Institute for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga, T., Handelzalts, A., Nieveen, N. M., & Voogt, J. M. (2013). Teacher involvement in curriculum design: Need for support to enhance teachers’ design expertise. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46, 33–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamims.10.1075/pbns
   Google Scholar
• Jõemaa, L. (1996, December 13). EÕL on osalusdemokraatia poolt [Estonian Teachers' Union is for participatory democracy]. Õpetajate Leht, 50, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Kallen, D. (1996). Curriculum reform in secondary education: Planning, development and implementation. European Journal of Education, 31, 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, K. J. (2010). School-based curriculum development for new times: A comparative analysis. In E. H.-F. Law & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Schools as curriculum agencies. Asian and European perspectives on school-based curriculum development (pp. 3–20). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, D., & MacDonald, D. (2001). Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33, 551–567.10.1080/00220270010016874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krull, E., & Mikser, R. (2010). Reflection of the cross-curricular ideas in the Estonian curricula of general education: An historical study. Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 14, 34–53.10.3176/tr.2010.1.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Läänemets, U. (1997, March 7.) Demokraatia hariduses—Eesti moodi [Democracy in education - in the Estonian manner]. Õpetajate Leht, 10, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Law, E. H.-F., Galton, M., & Wan, S. W. Y. (2007). Developing curriculum leadership in schools: Hong Kong perspectives. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 143–159.10.1080/13598660701268569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, W. H.-F., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2010). Schools as curriculum agencies. Asian and European Perspectives on school-based curriculum development. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Leesi, L. (1997, January 10). Selline riigieksam ei aita mitte midagi hinnata [That kind of state examination will not help to assess anything]. Õpetajate Leht, 2, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. (2005). A matter of self-governance and control the reconstruction of Swedish Education Policy: 1980–2003. European Education, 37, 10–25.10.1080/10564934.2005.11042375
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, U. (2013). Sweden—From governing with curricula to steering with outcomes. In W. Kuiper & J. Berkvens (Eds.), Balancing curriculum regulation and freedom across Europe (pp. 269–285). Enschede: SLO.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, D. (2003). Curriculum change and the post-modern world: Is the school curriculum-reform movement an anachronism? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 139–149.10.1080/00220270210157605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikk, J. (1997, November 22). Kas riigieksameid peab korraldama haridusministeerium? [Should state examinations be organised by the Ministry of Education?] Õpetajate Leht, 47, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Mølstad, C. E. (2015). State-based curriculum-making: Approaches to local curriculum work in Norway and Finland. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47, 441–461.10.1080/00220272.2015.1039067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mølstad, C. E., & Hansén, S.-E. (2013). The curriculum as a governing instrument—A comparative study of Finland and Norway. Education Inquiry, 4, 735–753.
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N., & Kuiper, W. (2012). Balancing curriculum freedom and regulation in the Netherlands. European Educational Research Journal, 11, 357–368.10.2304/eerj
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). TALIS 2013 Results: An International Perspective on Teaching and Learning. Author. doi:10.1787/9789264196261-en
   Google Scholar
• Pachociński, R. (1997). Educational development in Central and Eastern Europe. European Education, 29, 6–25.10.2753/EUE1056-493429036
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7, 84–107.10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenmund, M. (2000). OP-ED approaches to international comparative research on curricula and curriculum-making processes. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 599–606.10.1080/00220270050116905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabar, N., Rudduck, J., & Reid, W. (1987). Partnership and autonomy in school-based curriculum development. Sheffield: University of Sheffield, Division of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1983). The practical 4: Something for curriculum professors to do. Curriculum Inquiry, 13, 239–265.10.1080/03626784.1983.11075885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. (2006). For whom do we write the curriculum? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38, 449–457.10.1080/00220270500296606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skilbeck, M. (1984). School based curriculum development. London: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, D., & Wahlström, N. (2012). Standards-based curricula in a denationalised conception of education: The case of Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 11, 342–356.10.2304/eerj
   Google Scholar
• Szebenyi, P. (1992). Two models of curriculum development in Hungary (1972–1992). Educational Review, 44, 285–294.10.1080/0013191920440306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2011). World data in education. Retrieved July 29, 2015, from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/services/online-materials/world-data-on-education/seventh-edition-2010-11.html
   Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15, 398–405.10.1111/nhs.2013.15.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viirpalu, P., Krull, E., & Mikser, R. (2014). Investigating Estonian teachers’ expectations for the general education curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16, 54–70.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (1994). Deliberation and the improvement of schooling. In J. T. Dillon (Ed.), Deliberation in education and society (pp. 37–65). Norwood, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (2008). Making curricula: Why do states make curricula, and how? In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 45–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412976572
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J. (2008). How does the new emphasis on managerialism in education redefine teacher professionalism? A case study in Guangdong Province of China. Educational Review, 60, 267–282.10.1080/00131910802195869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, J. (2011). A self-study of a national curriculum maker in physical education: Challenges to curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43, 87–108.10.1080/00220272.2010.516023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar