The role of the formal written curriculum in standards-based reform

References

• Altrichter, H. (2005). Curriculum implementation – Limiting and facilitating factors. In P. Nentwig & D. Waddington (Eds.), Context based learning of science (pp. 35–62). Waxmann: Münster.
   Google Scholar
• Bergqvist, E., & Bergqvist, T. Teachers’ interpretations of the concept of problem – A link between written and intended reform curriculum. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Boesen, J., Helenius, O., Bergqvist, E., Bergqvist, T., Lithner, J., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2014). Developing mathematical competence: From the intended to the enacted curriculum. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 72–87.10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 145–170.10.3102/01623737023002145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1990). Policy and practice: An overview. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 233–239.10.3102/01623737012003233
   Google Scholar
• Common Core. (2015). Standards for mathematical practice. Common Core State Standards Initiative. Retrieved December 2015 from www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1992). Why some reforms last: The case of the kindergarten. American Journal of Education, 100, 166–194.10.1086/444013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2013). Why so many structural changes in schools and so little reform in teaching practice? Journal of Educational Administration, 51, 109–125.10.1108/09578231311304661
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Instructional policy into practice: ‘The power of the bottom over the top’. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 339–347.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuelsson, G., Johansson, B., & Lingefjärd, T. (1992). Matematikämnet i skolan i internationell belysning [The school subject mathematics in an international contex]. Nämnaren, 1992(1), 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Engelsen, B. U. (2008). Kunnskapsløftet. Sentrale styringssignaler og lokale strategidokumenter  [The Knowledge Promotion's central governing signals and local strategy documents] (Report No. 1). Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Floden, R. (2007). Educational policy research and mathematics education. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 1247–1279). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. G. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehrke, N. J., Knapp, M. S., & Sirotnik, K. A. (1992). In search of the school curriculum. Review of Research in Education, 18, 51–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glatthorn, A. A., Carr, J. F., & Harris, D. E. (1998). Planning and organizing for curriculum renewal: A chapter of the ASCD curriculum handbook. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Graybeal, C. D. (2010). Teachers’ senses of obligation to curricular messages. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1–36. http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 147–179.10.1023/A:1023477131081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, N., Giacquinta, J. B., & Bernstein, M. (1971). Implementing organizational innovations: A sociological analysis of planned educational change. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gundem, B. B., Karseth, B., & Sivesind, K. (2003). Curriculum theory and research in Norway: Traditions, trends, and challenges. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 517–534). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K., Ozark, C., & Valla, Y. (1999). Curriculum reform, with particular reference to primary literacy, in contemporary English and Norwegian official documents. European Journal of Intercultural studies, 10, 85–104.10.1080/0952391990100108
   Google Scholar
• Hemmi, K., Lepik, M., & Viholainen, A. (2013). Analysing proof-related competences in Estonian, Finnish and Swedish mathematics curricula – Towards a framework of developmental proof. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, 354–378.10.1080/00220272.2012.754055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the ‘voice’ of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 344–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C. (2001). Policy is not enough: Language and the interpretation of state standards. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 289–318.10.3102/00028312038002289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. T. (2003). On the evaluation of curriculum reforms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 459–478.10.1080/00220270305520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howson, A. G., & Wilson, B. (1986). School mathematics in the 1990s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karseth, B., & Sivesind, K. (2010). Conceptualising curriculum knowledge within and beyond the national context. European Journal of Education, 45, 103–120.10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01418.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping students learn mathematics: Washington. DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, D., Braams, B. J., Parker, T., Quirk, W., Schmid, W., & Wilson, W. S. (2005). The state of state MATH standards. Washington, DC: The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Retrieved February 2016 from files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED485531.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Claif, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Korkeamäki, R.-L. & Dreher, M. J. (2011). Early literacy practices and the Finnish national core curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43, 109–137. doi:10.1080/00220271003801959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Künzli, R. (2002). Curriculum policy in Switzerland. In M. Rosenmund, A. Fries, & W. Heller (Eds.), Comparing curriculum-making processes (pp. 213–229). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lavrenteva, E., & Orland-Barak, L. (2015). The treatment of culture in the foreign language curriculum: an analysis of national curriculum documents. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47, 653–684.10.1080/00220272.2015.1056233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lgr80. (1980). Läroplan för grundskolan: Allmän del [National curriculum for compulsory education: General part]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Lithner, J., Bergqvist, E., Bergqvist, T., Boesen, J., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2010). Mathematical competencies: A research framework. In C. Bergsten, E. Jablonka & T. Wedege (Eds.), Mathematics and mathematics education: Cultural and social dimensions. Proceedings of MADIF 7, the Seventh Mathematics Education Research Seminar, Stockholm, January 26–27, 2010 (pp. 157–167). Linköping: SMDF.
   Google Scholar
• Lott, J., & Nishimura, K. (Eds.). (2004). Standards and curriculum: A view from the nation. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, U. P. (1999). Ramfaktorteori och praktisk utbildningsplanering. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige [Frame factor theory and educational planning in practice], 4, 31–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, U. P. (2015). When curriculum came to Sweden. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015, 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. (2015). Merriam-Webster. Retrieved December 2015 from www.merriam-webster.com
   Google Scholar
• Mølstad, C. E., & Hansén, S.-E. (2013). The curriculum as a governing instrument – A comparative study of Finland and Norway. Education Inquiry, 4(4), 735–753.
   Google Scholar
• NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics (Vol. 1). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• NE. (2015). The national encyclopedia. Retrieved December 2015 from www.ne.se
   Google Scholar
• Niss, M., & Jensen, T. H. (2002). Kompetencer og matematiklæring: Idéer og inspiration til udvikling af matematikundervisning i Danmark [Competencies and Learning of Mathematics: Ideas and inspiration for development of the mathematics education in Denmark]. Uddannelsesstyrelsens temahaefteserie nr. 18. Undervisningsministeriet.
   Google Scholar
• Palamidessi, M., & Feldman, D. (2003). The development of curriculum thought in Argentina. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 109–122). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Palmberg, B. (2014). The influence of national curricula and national assessments on teachers’ beliefs about the goals of school mathematics (Doctoral dissertation). Umeå universitet, Umeå. Retrieved from http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:713421/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (2004). What is curriculum theory? (Studies in curriculum theory). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. C. (1991). Creating a system of school process indicators. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, 13–29.10.3102/01623737013001013
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31, 3–14.10.3102/0013189X031007003
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., & Sinnema, C. E. (2014). Downgraded curriculum? An analysis of knowledge in new curricula in Scotland and New Zealand. The Curriculum Journal, 25, 50–75.10.1080/09585176.2013.872047
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75, 211–246.10.3102/00346543075002211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., Rothman, R., Slattery, J. B., & Vranek, J. L. (2003). Benchmarking and alignment of standards and testing. Educational Assessment, 9, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Robitallie, D., McKnight, C., Schmidt, W., Britton, E., Raizen, S., & Nicol, C. (1993). TIMSS monograph No. 1. Curriculum frameworks for mathematics and science. Vancouver, CA: Pacific Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., McDougall, D., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (2002). Research on reform in mathematics education, 1993–2000. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 48, 122–138.
   Google Scholar
• SAOB. (2015). Swedish academy dictionary. Retrieved December 2015 from g3.spraakdata.gu.se/saob/
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., Wang, H. C., & McKnight, C. C. (2005). Curriculum coherence: An examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 525–559.10.1080/0022027042000294682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnema, C., & Aitken, G. (2013). Emergent trends in international curriculum development. In M. Priestley & G. J. J. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 141–164). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• SME. (2012). Primary mathematics teaching and learning syllabus. Singapore Ministry of Education (SME). Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/syllabuses/sciences/
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72, 387–431.10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 319–369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sztajn, P. (2003). Adapting reform ideas in different mathematics classrooms: Beliefs beyond mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 53–75.10.1023/A:1022171531285
   Google Scholar
• Tyack, D. (1991). Public school reform: Policy talk and institutional practice. American Journal of Education, 100(1), 1–19.10.1086/444002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utbildningsdepartementet (1994). Läroplaner för det Obligatoriska Skolväsendet och de Frivilliga Skolformerna  [Curriculum for the compulsory school system and the voluntary types of school]. Stockholm: Fritze.
   Google Scholar
• van den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-017-1205-7
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. L. (2007). Issues related to judging the alignment of curriculum standards and assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 20, 7–25.10.1080/08957340709336728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, I. R., Knapp, M. S., Hollweg, K. S., & Burrill, G. (2001). Investigating the influence of standards: A framework for research in mathematics, science, and technology education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. (2015). Wikipedia. Retrieved December 2015 from https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki
   Google Scholar