1,371
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Measuring Chinese teacher professional competence: adapting and validating a German framework in China

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &

References

  • AERA, APA, NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.
  • Banville, D., Desrosiers, P., & Genetvolet, Y. (2000). Translating questionnaires and inventories using a cross-cultural translation technique. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19(3), 374–387.
  • Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191.
  • Blömeke, S. (2017). Modelling teachers’ professional competence as a multi-dimensional construct. In S. Guerriero (Ed.), Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession (pp. 119–135). Paris: OECD.
  • Blömeke, S., Bremerich-Vos, A., Haudeck, H., Kaiser, G., Nold, G., Schwippert, K., & Willenberg, H. (Eds.). (2011). Kompetenzen von Lehramtsstudierenden in gering strukturierten Domänen. Erste Ergebnisse aus TEDS-LT. Münster: Waxmann.
  • Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, R. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223, 3–13.
  • Blömeke, S., & Kaiser, G. (2017). Understanding the development of teachers’ professional competencies as personally, situationally, and societally determined. In D. J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 783–802). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
  • Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071.
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Caena, F. (2014). Teacher competence frameworks in Europe: Policy‐as‐discourse and policy‐as‐practice. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 311–331.
  • Cole, Y. (2012). Assessing elemental validity: The transfer and use of mathematical knowledge for teaching measures in Ghana. ZDM, 44(3), 415–426.
  • Delaney, S. (2012). A validation study of the use of mathematical knowledge for teaching measures in Ireland. ZDM, 44(3), 427–441.
  • Deng, Z., & Gopinathan, S. (2016). PISA and high-performing education systems: Explaining Singapore’s education success. Comparative Education, 52(4), 449–472.
  • Döhrmann, M., Kaiser, G., & Blömeke, S. (2012). The conceptualization of mathematics competencies in the international teacher education study TEDS-M. ZDM, 3(44), 325–340.
  • Du, P. (2011). Study on the contents of the criterion of primary and secondary school teachers’ basic teaching ability. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 31(8), 95–100.
  • Fauskanger, J., Jakobsen, A., Mosvold, R., & Bjuland, R. (2012). Analysis of psychometric properties as part of an iterative adaptation process of MKT items for use in other countries. ZDM, 44(3), 387–399.
  • Freeman, D., Katz, A., Gomez, P. A., & Burns, A. (2015). English-for-Teaching: Rethinking teacher proficiency in the classroom. ELT Journal, 69, 129–139.
  • Fu, M., & Liu, Y. (2005). On the ability structure of modern mathematics teachers. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 25(4), 78–82.
  • Guerriero, S. (Ed.). (2017). Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession. Paris: OECD.
  • Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for crosscultural assessment (pp. 3–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Hill, H. C., Dean, C., & Goffney, I. M. (2007). Assessing elemental and structural validity: Data from teachers, non-teachers, and mathematicians. Measurement, 5(2–3), 81–92.
  • Hoth, J., Schwarz, B., Kaiser, G., Busse, A., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2016). Uncovering predictors of disagreement: Ensuring the quality of expert ratings. ZDM, 48(1–2), 83–95.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55.
  • International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). Retrieved from www.InTestCom.org
  • Johansson, S., Strietholt, R., Rosén, M., & Myrberg, E. (2014). Valid inferences of teachers’ judgements of pupils’ reading literacy: Does formal teacher competence matter? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(3), 394–407.
  • Kaiser, G., Blömeke, S., König, J., Busse, A., Döhrmann, M., & Hoth, J. (2017). Professional competencies of (prospective) mathematics teachers—Cognitive versus situated approaches. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 161–182.
  • Kaiser, G., Busse, A., Hoth, J., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2015). About the complexities of video-based assessments: Theoretical and methodological approaches to overcoming shortcomings of research on teachers’ competence. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 369–387.
  • Kane, M. T. (2001). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(4), 319–342.
  • Kane, M. T. (2006). Content-related validity evidence in test development. In M. S. Downing & M. T. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 131–153). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
  • Klieme, E., Hartig, J., & Rauch, D. (2008). The concept of competence in educational contexts. In J. Hartig, E. Klieme, & D. Leutner (Eds.), Assessment of competencies in educational contexts (pp. 3–22). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
  • Krauss, S., Lindl, A., Schilcher, A., Fricke, M., Göhring, A., Hofmann, B., … Mulder, R. H. (Eds.). (2017). FALKO: Fachspezifische Lehrerkompetenzen. Konzeption von Professionswissenstests in den Fächern Deutsch, Englisch, Latein, Physik, Musik, Evangelische Religion und Pädagogik. Münster: Waxmann.
  • Kristjansson, E., Desrochers, A., & Zumbo, B. (2003). Translating and adapting measurement instruments for cross-linguistic and cross-cultural research: A guide for practitioners. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 35(2), 127–142.
  • Krupa, E. E., & Confrey, J. (2017). Effects of a reform high school mathematics curriculum on student achievement: Whom does it benefit? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(2), 191–215.
  • Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805.
  • Leung, F. K. S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35–51.
  • Leung, F. K. S. (2014). What can and should we learn from international studies of mathematics achievement? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 579–605.
  • Lissitz, R. W., & Samuelsen, K. (2007). A suggested change in terminology and emphasis regarding validity and education. Educational Researcher, 36(8), 437–448.
  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.
  • Lloyd, G. M. (2008). Curriculum use while learning to teach: One student teacher’s appropriation of mathematics curriculum materials. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(1), 63–94.
  • Mulder, M. (2014). Conceptions of professional competence. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook on research into professional and practice-based learning (pp. 107–137). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Mulder, M., Weigel, T., & Collins, K. (2007). The concept of competence in the development of vocational education and training in selected EU member states: A critical analysis. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 59(1), 67–88.
  • Newton, P., & Shaw, S. (2016). Disagreement over the best way to use the word ‘validity’ and options for reaching consensus. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 178–197.
  • Ni, Y., Li, Q., Li, X., & Zhang, Z. H. (2011). Influence of curriculum reform: An analysis of student mathematics achievement in Mainland China. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 100–116.
  • Ning, H. (2010). The theoretical model on the standard for teacher competence (in Chinese). Journal of Educational Research, 370(11), 77–82.
  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
  • Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 102–119). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Schilling, S. G., & Hill, H. C. (2007). Assessing measures of mathematical knowledge for teaching: A validity argument approach. Measurement, 5(2–3), 70–80.
  • Schleicher, A. (2016). Teaching excellence through professional learning and policy reform. Paris: OECD.
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Seidel, T., & Stürmer, K. (2014). Modeling and measuring the structure of professional vision in preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 739–771.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
  • Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S. L., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M): Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics. East Lansing: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University.
  • Townsend, T., & Bates, R. (2007). Handbook of teacher education: Globalisation, standards and professionalism in times of change. Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (pp. 653–771). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Wang, B., & Hu, W. (2016). Science teacher instruction competence model construction: A vision of the experts (in Chinese). Teacher Education Research, 28(6), 65–74.
  • Wang, L., Lin, H., Ma, C., & Hu, W. (2012). The research situation and trend analysis of teacher ability in the last thirty years (in Chinese). Theory and Practice of Education, (2012(32), 38–42.
  • Wei, S., Wang, Q., Jia, Y., & Chen, F. (2017). A model of subject teaching competences (in Chinese). Teacher Education Research, 29(4), 84–91.
  • Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45–66). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  • Wolleat, P. L., Pedro, J. D., DeVaney Becker, A., & Fennema, E. (1980). Sex differences in high school students’ causal attributions of performance in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11(5), 356–366.
  • Yang, X. (2014). Conception and characteristics of expert mathematics teachers in China. Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum.
  • Ye, L. (1998). On teachers’professional competences for new century (in Chinese). Educational Research and Experiment, (1998(1), 41–46.
  • Zhang, Q., & Xu, W. (2016). On teachers’ professional literacy and its construct: Based on considerations of teacher professional standard and mathematics curriculum standard (in Chinese). Journal of Mathematics Education, 25(4), 69–73.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.