1,037
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Pre-vocational education in the curriculum: the case of Norwegian lower secondary education

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Aftenposten. (2018, February 12). Elevene i ungdomsskolen får praktisk håndverksfag som nytt valgfag [Pupils in lower secondary school get a subject in practical craft as new elective]. Retrieved from https://www.aftenposten.no/norge/politikk/i/gP6wKq/Elevene-i-ungdomsskolen-far-praktisk-handverksfag-som-nytt-valgfag
  • Atkins, M. J. (1984). Pre-vocational courses: Tensions and strategies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(4), 403–415.
  • Atkins, M. J. (1987). The pre-vocational curriculum: A review of the issues involved. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(1), 45–53.
  • Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse, 13(2), 10–17.
  • Berger, S. (2015). Vorberufliche Bildung in Deutschland, Frankreich und Großbritannien: Eine internationale vergleichende Fallstudie zur curricularen Ausformung in Theorie und Praxis [Pre-vocational education in Germany, France and Great Britain: An international comparative case study on curricular implementation in theory and practice]. Bielefeld, Germany: wbv.
  • Berger, S., Canning, R., Dolan, M., Kurek, S., Pilz, M., & Rachwal, T. (2012). Curriculum-making in pre-vocational education in the lower secondary school: A regional comparative analysis within Europe. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(5), 679–701.
  • Bleazby, J. (2015). Why some school subjects have a higher status than others: The epistemology of the traditional curriculum hierarchy. Oxford Review of Education, 41(5), 671–689.
  • Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (2014). Nordic schools in a time of change. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic education model: ‘A school for all’ encounters neo-liberal policy (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Boersma, A., Dam, G. T., Volman, M., & Wardekker, W. (2010). ‘This baby…it isn’t alive.’ Towards a community of learners for vocational orientation. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 3–25.
  • Bundesausschuss für Berufsbildung [German Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training]. (1972). Vorberufliche Bildung und Beratungsdienste: Empfehlung des Bundesausschusses für Berufsbildung (§ 50 BBiG) vom 26. 1. 1972 [Pre-vocational education and counselling services: Recommendation of the German Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training from 26. 1.1972]. Retrieved from https://www.bibb.de/dokumente/pdf/empfehlung_008-vorberufl.bildung_und_beratungsdienste_116.pdf
  • Burgess, R. (1984). It’s not a proper subject. It’s just Newsom. In I. F. B. Goodson (Ed.), Defining the curriculum: Histories and ethnographies (pp. 181–200). London: Routledge.
  • Dale, E. L. (2008). Fellesskolen: Reproduksjon av sosial ulikhet [The comprehensive school: Reproduction of social inequality]. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk.
  • Dokka, H.-J. (1981). Reformarbeid i norsk skole. 1950-årene–1985 [Reform work in Norwegian education: The 1950s–1985]. Oslo: NKS-Forlaget.
  • Dokka, H.-J. (1988). En skole gjennom 250 år: Den norske allmueskole - folkeskole - grunnskole 1739–1989 [A school through 250 years: The Norwegian allmueskole - folkeskole - grunnskole 1739–1989]. Oslo: NKS-Forlaget.
  • Engelsen, B. U. (2015). Skolefag i læreplanreformer 1939–2013 [School subjects in curriculum reforms 1939–2013]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
  • European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf
  • European Union. (2017). Education and training monitor 2017. Luxembourg: Author.
  • Eurydice. (2018). Spain: Organisation of vocational lower secondary education. Retrieved from https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/vocational-lower-secondary-education-basic-vocational-training-cycles-0_en
  • Finnish National Agency for Education. (2018). Pre-vocational programmes. Retrieved from https://www.oph.fi/english/curricula_and_qualifications/pre_vocational_programmes
  • Francis, B., Mills, M., & Lupton, R. (2017). Towards social justice in education: Contradictions and dilemmas. Journal of Education Policy, 32(4), 414–431.
  • Gonon, P. (2002). Berufsbildung zwischen Beruf und Allgemeinbildung [Vocation education in between profession and general education]. In P. Gonon & S. Stolz (Eds.), Arbeit, Beruf und Bildung [Work, profession and education] (pp. 361–366). Bern: h.e.p. Verlag.
  • Goodson, I. (1987). School subjects and curriculum change (2nd ed.). London: Falmer Press.
  • Goodson, I. (1990). Social history and school subjects. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 34(2), 111–121.
  • Goodson, I. (1994). Studying curriculum. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  • Goodson, I. (1995). The making of curriculum. Collected essays (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
  • Goodson, I. (2000). The need for curriculum history. In R. Lowe (Ed.), History of education: Major themes. Vol. 3. Studies in learning and teaching (pp. 93–100). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Goodson, I. (2001). Social histories of educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(1), 45–63.
  • Goodson, I. (2014). Context, curriculum and professional knowledge. History of Education, 43(6), 768–776.
  • Gundem, B. B. (1993). Mot en ny skolevirkelighet? Læreplanen i et sentraliserings- og desentraliseringspersektiv [Towards a new reality of schooling? Curriculum in a centralisation and decentralisation perspective]. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.
  • Gundem, B. B. (1996). Core curriculum; Cultural heritage; literacy: Recent perspectives and trends in Norwegian education. In E. Marum (Ed.), Children and books in the modern world: Contemporary perspectives on literacy (pp. 55–72). London: Falmer Press.
  • Hopmann, S., & Künzli, R. (1994). Topikk der lehrplanung: Das Aarauer lehrplannormal [Topic of lesson planning: The Aarauer curriculum normal]. Bildungsforschung und Bildungspraxis, 16(2), 161–184.
  • Imsen, G., & Volckmar, N. (2014). The Norwegian school for all: Historical emergence and neoliberal confrontation. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic education model: ‘A school for all’ encounters neo-liberal policy (Vol. 1, pp. 35–55). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Karseth, B., & Engelsen, B. U. (2013). Læreplanen for kunnskapsløftet: Velkjente tråkk og nye spor [The curriculum of knowledge promotion – Familiar trails and new tracks]. In B. Karseth, J. Møller, & P. Aasen (Eds.), Reformtakter: Om fornyelse og stabilitet i grunnopplæringen [Reform measures about renewal and stability in basic education] (pp. 43–60). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  • Karseth, B., Møller, J., & Aasen, P. (2013). Reformtakter - Kunnskapsløftets komposisjon [Reform measures – The composition of knowledge promotion]. In B. Karseth, J. Møller, & P. Aasen (Eds.), Reformtakter: Om fornyelse og stabilitet i grunnopplæringen [Reform measures about renewal and stability in basic education] (pp. 231–248). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  • Karseth, B., & Sivesind, K. (2010). Conceptualising curriculum knowledge within and beyond the national context. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 103–120.
  • Kirke- og undervisningsdepartementet [Ministry of Education and Research]. (1974). Mønsterplan for grunnskolen [Curriculum guidelines for compulsory education in Norway]. Oslo: Aschehoug.
  • Kirke- og undervisningsdepartementet [Ministry of Education and Research]. (1987). Mønsterplan for grunnskolen [Curriculum guidelines for compulsory education in Norway]. Oslo: Aschehoug.
  • Kirke- utdannings- og forskningsdepartementet [Ministry of Education and Research]. (1996). Læreplanverket for den 10-årige grunnskolen [The curriculum for the 10-year compulsory school in Norway]. Oslo: Nasjonalt læremiddelsenter.
  • Kunnskapsdepartementet [Ministry of Education]. (2012). Strategi for ungdomstrinnet: Motivasjon og mestring for bedre læring - Felles satsing på klasseledelse, regning, lesing og skriving [Strategy for lower secondary school: Motivation and coping for better learning – Joint aims for classroom management, math, reading and writing]. Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/KD/Vedlegg/Grunnskole/Strategiplaner/F_4276B_strategi_for_ungdomstrinnet.pdf
  • Li, J. (2013). Pre-vocational education in Germany and China: A comparison of curricula and its implications. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
  • Lødding, B., & Holen, S. (2013). Faget utdanningsvalg på ungdomstrinnet: Når valgmodenhet skal læres [Subject choice in education in lower secondary school: When maturity to make choices shall be learned]. In B. Karseth, J. Møller, & P. Aasen (Eds.), Reformtakter. Om fornyelser og stabilitet i grunnopplæringen [Reform measures about renewal and stability in basic education] (pp. 135–152). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  • Lundgren, U. P. (1972). Frame factors and the teaching process: A contribution to curriculum theory and theory of teaching. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Maclean, R., & Wilson, D. (Eds.). (2009). International handbook of education for the changing world of work: Bridging academic and vocational learning. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Meld. St. 22. (2010–2011). Motivasjon – Mestring – Muligheter: Ungdomstrinnet. [White paper to the Storting 22 (2010–2011) Motivation – mastering – opportunities]. Kunnskapsdepartementet [Ministry of Education].
  • Ministry of Education and Research. (1990 [1987]). Curriculum guidelines for compulsory education in Norway. Oslo: Aschehoug.
  • Mølstad, C. E., & Karseth, B. (2016). National curricula in Norway and Finland: The role of learning outcomes. European Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 329–344.
  • NOU 2016:14. (2016). Mer å hente — Bedre læring for elever med stort læringspotensial [More to gain — Better learning for students with higher learning potential]. Kunnskapsdepartementet [Ministry of Education].
  • OECD. (2003). Glossary of statistical terms: Pre-vocational programmes. Retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=5410
  • OECD. (2011). Improving lower secondary schools in Norway 2011. Reviews of national policies for education. Paris: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264114579-en
  • OECD. (2016). Society at a glance 2016: OECD social indicators. Paris: Author. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/social/society-at-a-glance-19991290.htm
  • Pilz, M., Berger, S., & Canning, R. (2012). Fit for business: Pre-vocational education in European schools. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
  • Pilz, M., & Krisanthan, B. (2014). Vorberufliche Bildung in Indien – Eine Analyse der curricularen Verankerung und der schulischen Praxis [Pre-vocational education in India – An analysis of curricular anchoring and educational practice]. Tertium Comparationis, 20(1), 61–80.
  • Pilz, M., Krisanthan, B., Michalik, B., Zenner, L., & Li, J. (2016). Learning for life and/or work: The status quo of pre-vocational education in India, China, Germany and the USA. Research in Comparative & International Education, 11(2), 117–134.
  • Pöysä, S., Vasalampi, K., Muotka, J., Lerkkanen, M.-J., Poikkeus, A.-M., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2018). Variation in situation-specific engagement among lower secondary school students. Learning and Instruction, 53, 64–73.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. (J. B. Thompson, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ross, A. (2000). Curriculum. Construction and critique. London: Falmer Press.
  • Ross, A., & Leathwood, C. (2013). Problematising early school leaving. European Journal of Education, 48(3), 405–418.
  • Royal Ministry of Education Research and Church Affairs. (1999 [1996]). The curriculum for the 10-year compulsory school in Norway. Oslo: KUF.
  • Sahlberg, P. (2016). The global educational reform movement and its impact on schooling. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The handbook of global education policy (pp. 128–144). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Sarid, A. (2017). Rethinking the modernist curriculum with Habermas’s concept of self-critical appropriation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(4), 456–475.
  • Scholl, D. (2012). Are the traditional curricula dispensable? A feature pattern to compare different types of curriculum and a critical view of educational standards and essential curricula in Germany. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 328–341.
  • Sivesind, K., Van Den Akker, J., & Rosenmund, M. (2012). The European curriculum: Restructuring and renewal. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 320–327.
  • Sundberg, D., & Wahlström, N. (2012). Standards-based curricula in a denationalised conception of education: The case of Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 342–356.
  • Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, O. A., & Aasen, P. (2004). From collectivism to individualism? Education as nation building in a Scandinavian perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(2), 141–158.
  • Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, O. A., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245–283.
  • UNESCO. (1997). International standard classification of education. ISCED 1997. Paris: Author.
  • UNESCO. (2011). International standard classification of education ISCED 2011. Paris: Author.
  • Utdanningsdirektoratet [Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training]. (2015a). Læreplan for arbeidslivsfag på ungdomstrinnet [Curriculum for the world of work-subject in lower secondary education]. Retrieved from http://data.udir.no/kl06/ARB1-02.pdf
  • Utdanningsdirektoratet [Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training]. (2015b). Læreplan for utdanningsvalg på ungdomstrinnet [Curriculum for choice of education in lower secondary education]. Retrieved from http://data.udir.no/kl06/UTV1-02.pdf
  • Utdanningsdirektoratet [Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training]. (2017a). Curricula in English. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/lareplanverket/finn-lareplan/#&english
  • Utdanningsdirektoratet [Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training]. (2017b). Fag- og timefordeling og tilbudsstruktur for Kunnskapsløftet Udir-1-2017 [Allocation of subjects and hours for Knowledge promotion 2017]. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/regelverk-og-tilsyn/finn-regelverk/etter-tema/Innhold-i-opplaringen/udir-01-2017/
  • Utdanningsdirektoratet [Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training]. (2017c). Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet [Curriculum for knowledge promotion]. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/lareplanverket/
  • Utdanningsdirektoratet [Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training]. (2017d). Valgfag [Elective subjects]. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/lareplanverket/fag/valgfag/
  • Wiborg, S. (2013). Neo-liberalism and universal state education: The cases of Denmark, Norway and Sweden 1980–2011. Comparative Education, 49(4), 407–423.
  • Wyse, D., Hayward, L., & Pandya, J. (Eds.). (2016). The SAGE handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment: Two volume set. London: SAGE.
  • Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.