3,372
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Assessing ethics education through national tests—an advantage or not?

ORCID Icon

References

  • Agreement’, Bilaga 1. [Attachment 1]. (2011). Retrieved from Göteborg: Dept. of Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies, Gothenburg University.
  • Agreement’, Bilaga 1. [Attachment 1]. (2012). Retrieved from Göteborg: Dept. of Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies, Gothenburg University.
  • Alexander, H. A. (2016). Assessing virtue: Measurement in moral education at home and abroad. Ethics and Education, 11(3), 310–325.
  • Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45.
  • Avci, E. (2017). Learning from experiences to determine quality in ethics education. International Joumal of Ethics Education., 2(1), 3–16.
  • Ball, S. (2012). Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-spy guide to neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 17–28.
  • Ball, S., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 85–96.
  • Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self: Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Benner, D. (2016). Der Berliner Ansatz zur Konstruktion und Erhebung ethisch-moralischer Kompetenzniveaus im öffentlichen Erziehungs- und Bildungssytem [The Berlin approach to the construction and surveying of ethical-moral comptence levels in public education and formation systems]. In D. Benner & R. Nikolova (Eds.), Etisch-moralische Kompetenz als Teil öffentlicher Bildung [Ethical-moral competence as part of public education/formation] (pp. 13-44). Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
  • Benner, D., & Nikolova, R. (Eds.). (2016). Etisch-moralische Kompetenz als Teil öffentlicher Bildung [Ethical-moral competence as part of public education/formation]. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
  • Boesen, J., Lithner, J., & Palm, T. (2018). Assessing mathematical competencies: An analysis of Swedish mathematical tests. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(1), 109–124.
  • Bouchard, N., & Morris, R. W. (2012). Ethics education seen through the lens of Habermas’s conception of practical reason: The Québec Education Program. Journal of Moral Education, 41(2), 171–187.
  • Burns, T., Blachenay, P., & Köster, F. (2016). Horizontal accountability, municipal capacity and the use of data: A case study of Sweden. In W. C. Smith (Ed.), The global testing culture (pp. 279–302). Oxford: Symposium Books.
  • Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre 2011. (2011). Retrieved from https://www.skolverket.se
  • Davis, E., Palincsar, A. S., Smith, P. S., Arias, A. M., & Kademian, S. M. (2017). Educative curriculum materials: Uptake, impact, and implications for research and design. Educational Researcher, 46(6), 293–304.
  • Fancourt, N. (2017). Assessment in ethics education: neoliberalism, values and alignment. In O. Franck (Ed.), Assessment in Ethics Education. A case of national tests in religious education (pp. 163–175). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Forsberg, E., & Lindberg, V. (2010). Svensk forskning om bedömning - en kartläggning [Swedish research on assessment – a survey]. Report no. 2:2010. Stockholm: Swedish Research Council.
  • Franck, O. (2017). Varieties of conceptions of ethical competence and the search for strategies for assessment in ethics education: A critical analysis. In O. Franck (Ed.), Assessment in Ethics Education. A case of national tests in religious education (pp. 13–50). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Korim, V., & Hanesová, D. (2010). The role of character education and its equivalent subjects in the school curriculum in slovakia and selected European countries. The New Educational Review, 21(2), 81–96.
  • Larsson, K. (2017). Critical thinking in students’ ethical reasoning: A reflection of some examples from the Swedish national tests in Religious Education. In O. Franck (Ed.), Assessment in Ethics Education. A case of national tests in religious education (pp. 51–67). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Lee, C.-M., & Taylor, M. J. (2013). Moral education trends over 40 years: A content analysis of the Journal of Moral Education (1971–2011). Journal of Moral Education, 42(4), 399–429.
  • Lindskog, A. (2013). Verksamhetsberättelse [Progress report]. Retrieved from Göteborg: Dept. of Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies, Gothenburg University.
  • Lindskog, A. (2014). Verksamhetsberättelse [Progress report]. Retrieved from Göteborg: Dept. of Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies, Gothenburg University
  • Löfgren, H., & Löfgren, R. (2015). Alone with the test: Students’ perspectives on an enacted policy of national testing in Swedish schools. Utbildning och lärande, 9(2), 35–49.
  • Löfgren, R., & Löfgren, H. (2016). Att få sina första betyg: En rapport om elevers berättelser om sina erfarenheter av att få betyg i årskurs 6 [Receiving one’s first marks: A report on students’ narratives on their experiences of receiving marks in grade 6]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
  • Löfgren, R., & Löfgren, H. (2017). Swedish students’ experiences of national testing in science: A narrative approach. Curriculum Inquiry, 47(4), 390–410.
  • Løgstrup, K. E. (1956). Den etiske fordring [The ethical demand]. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
  • Nicholson, C., & DeMoss, M. (2009). Teaching ethics and social responsibility: An evaluation of undergraduate business education at the discipline level. Journal of Education for Business, 84(4), 213–218.
  • Nussbaum, M. (1990). Love’s knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Osbeck, C. (2017). Ethical competences in Pupils’ texts: Existential understandings and ethical insights as central but tacit in the curriculum. In O. Franck (Ed.), Assessment in Ethics Education. A case of national tests in religious education (pp. 87–113). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Osbeck, C., Franck, O., Lilja, A., & Lindskog, A. (2015). Challenges of assessment in ethics: Teachers’ reflections when assessing national tests. Educare, 2015(2), 19–47.
  • Pascal, C., & Bertram, T. (2016). The nature and purpose of assessment and evaluation within a participatory pedagogy. In J. Formosinho & C. Pascal (Eds.), Assessment and evaluation for transformation in early childhood education (pp. 59–73). London: Routledge.
  • Sahlberg, P. (2010). Rethinking accountability in a knowledge society. Journal of Educational Change, 11(1), 45–61.
  • Silfver, E., Sjöberg, G., & Bagger, A. (2013). Changing our methods and disrupting the power dynamics: National tests in third-grade classrooms. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(1), 39–51.
  • Silfver, E., Sjöberg, G., & Bagger, A. (2016). An ‘appropriate’ test taker: The everyday classroom during the national testing period in school year three in Sweden. Ethnography and Education, 11(3), 237–252.
  • Singer, P. (1993/2003). How are we to live? Ethics in an age of self-interest. Milsons Point: Random House Australia.
  • Sporre, K. (2017). Global responsibilities and ethics education: to be assessed and if so how? In O. Franck (Ed.), Assessment in Ethics Education. A case of National Tests in Religious Education (pp. 115-143). Cham: Springer International Publisher.
  • Stern, J. (2017). The assessment of Ethics and the ethics of assessment. In O. Franck (Ed.), Assessment in Ethics Education. A case of national tests in religious education (pp. 177–191). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15, 398–405.