Contemporary curriculum theorizing: crisis and resolution

References

• Alexander, R. (2008). Pedagogy, curriculum and culture. In K. Hall, P. Murphy, & J. Soler (Eds.), Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities (pp. 3–27). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (1990). The politics of official knowledge in the United States. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(4), 377–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, K.-H., & Lindner-Müller, C. (2012). The German tradition in general didactics. Jahrbuch für Allgemeine Didaktik (JfAD – Yearbook for General Didactics), 2, 46–64.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Bokhorst‐Heng, W. D. (2007). Multiculturalism’s narratives in Singapore and Canada: Exploring a model for comparative multiculturalism and multicultural education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(6), 629–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D. (1987). Teachers as political actors: From reproductive theory to the crisis of schooling. Harvard Educational Review, 57(3), 283–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christou, T., & DeLuca, C. (2013). Curriculum studies at a crossroad: Curating inclusive and coherent curriculum conversations in Canada. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 11(1), 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, F. M., & Xu, S. (2010). An overview of research in curriculum inquiry. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 324–334). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, F. M., & Xu, S. (2012). Curriculum and curriculum studies. In J. Arthur & A. Peterson (Eds.), The Routledge companion to education (pp. 115–124). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, M. F. (2010). Notes for an AERA talk that wasn’t: Observations and a proposal. Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association, April May 30-May 4, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, M. F. (2013). Joseph Schwab, curriculum, curriculum studies and educational reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(5), 622–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Alba, A. (2000). Curriculum in the postmodern condition. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2009). The formation of a school subject and the nature of curriculum content: An analysis of liberal studies in Hong Kong. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(5), 585–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2010). Curriculum planning and systems change. In B. McGaw, E. Baker, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International Encyclopaedia of Education (3rd ed., pp. 384–389). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2013). The Practical, curriculum, theory and practice: An international dialogue on Schwab’s the ‘Practical 1ʹ. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(5), 583–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2017). Rethinking curriculum and teaching. In G. W. Noblit (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopaedia of education (pp. 1-25) New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2018a). Bringing knowledge back in: Perspectives from liberal education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(3), 335–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2018b). Pedagogical content knowledge reconceived: Bringing curriculum thinking into the conversation on teachers’ content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 155–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll, W. E., Jr. (1989). Foundations for a postmodern curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(3), 243–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1992a). Constructing curriculum in the classroom. In F. K. Oser, A. Dick, & J. Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching: The new syntheses (pp. 66–79). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1992b). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486–516). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (1984). No easy answers: Joseph Schwab’s contributions to curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 14(2), 201–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (1988). Liberal arts, teaching, and critical literacy: Toward a definition of schooling as a form of cultural politics. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses (pp. 243–263). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A., & McLaren, P. L. (Eds.). (1989). Critical pedagogy, the state, and cultural struggle. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodlad, J. I., & Associates. (1979). Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school. Prospects for the future. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, V. A., Casey, A., & Kirk, D. (2017). Practice architectures and sustainable curriculum renewal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(2), 235–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, R. J. (1992). Currere and reconceptualism: The progress of the pilgrimage 1975-1990. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(1), 27–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grumet, M. R. (1976a). Existential and phenomenological foundations. In W. F. Pinar & M. R. Grumet (Eds.), Toward a poor curriculum (pp. 31–50). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Grumet, M. R. (1976b). Psychoanalytic foundations. In W. F. Pinar & M. R. Grumet (Eds.), Toward a poor curriculum (pp. 111–146). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Gundem, B. B. (2000). Understanding European Didactics. In B. Moon, M. Ben-Peretz, & S. Brown (Eds.), Routledge international companion to education (pp. 235–262). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, S. R. (2004). Explaining postmodernism: Skepticism and socialism from Rousseau to Foucault. Tempe, AZ: Scholargy Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1992). Amid behavioural and behaviouristic objectives: Reappraising appraisals of the Tyler Rationale. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(6), 533–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1995). Interpretations of the Tyler Rationale: A reply to Kliebard. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 89–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S., & Gundem, B. B. (1998). Didaktik meets curriculum. In B. B. Gundem & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum: An international dialogue (pp. 331–350). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (1995). Starting a dialogue: Issues in a beginning conversation between Didaktik and the curriculum traditions. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humboldt, W. V. (2000). Theory of Bildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 57–61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. W. (1992). Conceptions of curriculum and curriculum specialists. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American educational research association (pp. 3–40). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (1998). Didaktik and/or curriculum: An international dialogue. In B. B. Gundem & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Characteristics of critical constructive Didaktik (pp. 307–330). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kliebard, H. M. (1970). The Tyler. Rationale. School Review, 78(2), 259–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliebard, H. M. (1986). The struggle for the American curriculum. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kliebard, H. M. (1992). Forging the American curriculum: Essays in curriculum history and theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Künzli, R. (2013). Memorizing a memory: Schwab’s the practical in a German context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(5), 668–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, D. N. (2006). Powers of the mind: The reinvention of liberal learning in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malewski, E. (Ed.). (2010). Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. (2015). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. (2013). Crisis and new orientation of general didactics in Germany. In X. M. Peng (Ed.), Sino-German dialogue on didactics: Post graduate academic forum (pp. 16–24). Shanghai, China: East China Normal University.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. B. (2017). Identity politics & the Marxist lie of white privilege [You Tube video]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofmuCXRMoSA&t=1230s
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. B. (2018). 12 rules for life: An antidote to chaos. Toronto: CA: Random House Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Pieper, J. (2014). Tradition as challenge: Essays and speeches. South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (Ed.). (1975). Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists. Troy, NY: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (1978). The reconceptualisation of curriculum studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 10(3), 205–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (1992). ‘Dreamt into existence by others’: Curriculum theory and school reform. Theory Into Practice, 31(3), 228–235.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (Ed.). (2003). International handbook of curriculum research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory?. Mahway. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (2008). Curriculum theory since 1950: Crisis, reconceptualization, internationalization. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 491–513). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubaum, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S. (2009). Curriculum study, curriculum history, and curriculum theory: The reason of reason. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(3), 301–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, W. A. (1984). Curriculum, community, and liberal education: A response to the Practical 4. Curriculum Inquiry, 14(1), 103–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, W. A. (2001). Rethinking Schwab: Curriculum theorizing as a visionary activity. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 17(1), 29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ruzgar, M. E. (2018). On matters that matter in the curriculum studies: An interview with Ian Westbury. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 670–684.
   Google Scholar
• Schriewer, J. (2017). Between the philosophy of self-cultivation and empirical research: Educational studies in Germany. In G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 75–99). Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, W. H. (2009). Currere and disciplinarity in curriculum studies: Possibilities for education research. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 136–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, W. H., Willis, G. H., & Short, E. C. (1984). Curriculum theorizing: An emergent form of curriculum studies in the United States. Curriculum Perspectives, 4(1), 69–74.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1960). What do scientists do?. Behavioral Science, 5(1), 1-27.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1969). College curriculum and student protest. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1971). The practical 2: Arts of eclectic. School Review, 79(4), 493–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. School Review, 81(4), 501–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1983). The practical 4: Something for curriculum professors to do. Curriculum Inquiry, 13(3), 239–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (2013). The practical: A language for curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(5), 591–621. (Reprinted from The practical: a language for curriculum by J. J. Schwab, 1970, Washington, D.C: National Education Association).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum development in the postmodern era. New York, NY: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Sokal, A., & Bricmont, J. (1998). Intellectual impostures. London, UK: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers’ efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers’ zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., & Hopkins, M. (2013). Organizing for instruction in education systems and school organizations: How the subject matters. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(6), 721–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., & Hunt, B. R. (2010). Days of their lives: A mixed‐methods, descriptive analysis of the men and women at work in the principal’s office. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(3), 293–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. W. (2012). Building Potemkin schools: Science curriculum reform in a STEM school. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(5), 659–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueit, D., Wang, H., Doll, W., & Pinar, W. F. (Eds.). (2003). The internationalization of curriculum studies. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I., & Wilkof, N. J. (1978). Introduction. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selective essays (pp. 1–40). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: What might Didaktik teach curriculum. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 15–39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (2003). Curriculum, school: overview. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), The encyclopedia of education (2nd ed)., (pp. 529–535). New York: Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (2005). Reconsidering Schwab’s “practicals”: A response to Peter Hlebowitsh’s “Generational ideas in curriculum: A historical triangulation.”. Curriculum Inquiry, 35(1), 89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (2007). Theory and theorizing in curriculum studies. In E. Forsberg (Ed.), Curriculum theory revisited, studies in educational policy and educational philosophy, Research Reports 7 (pp. 1–19). Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (2008). The making of formal curricula: Why do states make curricula, and how? In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 45–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (2013). Reading Schwab’s ‘Practical’ as an invitation to enquiry. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(5), 640–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbury, I., & Milburn, G. (Eds.). (2006). Rethinking schooling: Twenty-five years of the journal of curriculum studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Willbergh, I. (2015). The problems of ‘competence’ and alternatives from the scandinavian perspective of bildung. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 334–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wraga, W., & Hlebowitsh, P. (2003). Toward a renaissance in curriculum theory and development in the USA. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(4), 425–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Heydon, R. (2016). The changing landscape of literacy curriculum in a Sino-Canada transnational education programme: An actor-network theory informed case study. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(4), 547–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zierer, K. (2011). Pedagogical eclecticism. Journal of Educational Thought, 45(1), 3–20.
   Google Scholar