Connecting past and present through case-comparison learning in history: views of teachers and students

References

• Alfieri, L., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Schunn, C. D. (2013). Learning through case comparisons: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 87–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, K. C. (2008). Research on students’ ideas about history. In L. S. Levstik & C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 239–258). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2011). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, C. (1932). Everyman his own historian. The American Historical Review, 37(2), 221–236.
   Google Scholar
• Biddulph, M., & Adey, K. (2003). Perceptions v. reality: Pupils’ experiences of learning in history and geography at key stage 4. The Curriculum Journal, 14(3), 291–303.
   Google Scholar
• Blow, F. (2009). How pupils’ conceptions of the relationship between past and present impact on the ways they make sense of the history taught. In K. Nordgren, P. Eliasson, & C. Rönnquist (Eds.), The processes of history education (pp. 125–155). Karlstadt, Sweden: Karlstadt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boix-Mansilla, V. (2000). Historical understanding: Beyond the past and into the present. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 390–419). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (1999). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education. Developing appreciation for particular learning domains and activities. Educational Psychologist, 34, 75–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, A., & Facey, J. (2004). Placing history: Territory, story, identity – and historical consciousness. Teaching History, 116, 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DFE (2013). National curriculum in England: History programs of study. London: Department for Education. Accessed 28 November 2018 Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-history-programmes-of-study
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, R. E. (2000). Constructing world history in the classroom. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching & learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 306–326). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. (2004). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 125–155). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Endacott, J. (2005). It‘s not all ancient history now: Connecting the past by weaving a threaded historical concept. The Social Studies, 96(5), 227–231.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S., Ashby, R., & Lee, P. (2008). Usable historical pasts: A study of students’ frameworks of the past: Full research report ESRC end of award report. (RES-000-22-1676). Swindon: ESRC.
   Google Scholar
• Frechtling, J., & Sharp, L. (Eds). (1997). User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluations. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Shulman, G. M. (1995). What’s in it for me? Increasing content relevance to enhance students’ motivation. Communication Education, 44(1), 40–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogic encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 393–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Reynolds, R. (2014). The history curriculum and its personal connection to students from minority ethnic backgrounds. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(4), 464–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haydn, T., & Harris, R. (2010). Pupil perspectives on the purposes and benefits of studying history in high school: A view from the UK. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(2), 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hycner, R. H. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8, 279–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeismann, K.-E. (1988). ‘Geschichtsbewußtsein’ als zentrale Kategorie der Geschichtsdidaktik. [Historical consciousness as a central category of history didactics.]. In G. Schneider (Ed.), Geschichtsbewußtsein und historisch-politisches Lernen [Historical consciousness and historical-political learning.] (pp. 1–24). Pfaffenweiler, Germany: Centaurus.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, K. G. (2011). Processing time – On the manifestations and activations of historical consciousness. In H. Berg, C. Lenz, & E. Thorstensen (Eds.), Historicizing the uses of the past (pp. 129–143). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures past. On the semantics of historical time. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. (2004). ‘Walking backwards into tomorrow.’ Historical consciousness and understanding history. International Journal of Historical Learning, 4(1), 69–114.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. (2005). Putting principles into practice. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History in the classroom. National research council how people learn (pp. 31–78). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lévesque, S. (2008). Thinking historically: Educating students for the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D. (2000). Dilemmas and delights of learning history. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 63–83). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D. (2004). The heritage crusade and the spoils of history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacMillan, M. (2008). The uses and abuses of history. Toronto: Penquin Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Maggioni, L., Van Sledright, B., & Alexander, P. A. (2009). Walking on the borders: A measure of epistemic cognition in history. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(3), 187–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2003). The student motivation scale: Further testing of an instrument that measures school students’ motivation. Australian Journal of Education, 47(1), 88–106.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mosborg, S. (2002). Speaking of history: How adolescents use their knowledge of history in reading the daily news. Cognition and Instruction, 20(3), 323–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muddiman, A., & Frymier, A. B. (2009). What is relevant? Student perceptions of relevance strategies in college classrooms. Communication Studies, 60(2), 130–146.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, R., Rodriguez, C., Araujo, J., Shaqlaih, A., & Moss, G. (2013). Constructivism-constructivist learning theory. In J. Irby, G. Brown, R. Lara-Alecio, & S. Jackson (Eds.), The handbook of educational theories (pp. 169–185). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• NCHS. (1996). National standards for history. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA/National Center for History in the Schools. Retrieved November 28, 2018, from http://www.nchs.ucla.edu/history-standards
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86, 548–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakeshott, M. (1983). On history and other essays. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. A. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2015). Entering the historical problem space: Whole-class text-based discussion in history class. Teachers College Record, 117(2), 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richland, L. E., & Simms, N. (2015). Analogy, higher order thinking, and education. WIREs Cognitive Science, 6, 177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, R. (2000). How Americans use and think about the past. Implications from a national survey for the teaching of history. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 262–284). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rüsen, J. (2004). Historical consciousness: Narrative structure, moral function, and ontogenetic development. In P. Seixas (Ed.), Theorizing historical consciousness (pp. 63–85). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rüsen, J. (2017). Evidence and meaning: A theory of historical studies [Kindle eBook]. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanism of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 113–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandahl, J. (2015). Civic consciousness: A viable concept for advancing students’ ability to orient themselves to possible futures? Historical Encounters: A Journal of Historical Consciousness, Historical Cultures, and History Education, 2(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saye, J. & Social Studies Inquiry Research Collaborative (SSIRC) (2013). Authentic pedagogy: Its presence in social studies classrooms and relationship to student performance on state-mandated tests. Theory & Research in Social Education, 411, 89–132.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (2000). Schweigen! Die kinder or, does postmodern history have a place in the schools? In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching & learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 306–326). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (Ed.). (2004). Theorizing historical consciousness. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shemilt, D. (2009). Drinking an ocean and pissing a cupful: How adolescents make sense of history. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National history standards. The problem of the canon and the future of teaching history (pp. 141–211). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Shreiner, T. L. (2014). Using historical knowledge to reason about contemporary political issues: An expert-novice study. Cognition and Instruction, 32(4), 313–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SLO/Nationaal Expertisecentrum Leerplanontwikkeling (2016). Karakteristieken en kerndoelen. Onderbouw voortgezet onderwijs. [SLO/National Competence Center Curriculum Development. Characteristics and goals. Lower secondary education.] Retrieved from http://downloads.slo.nl/Documenten/karakteristieken-en-kerndoelen-onderbouw-vo.pdf. Accessed 28 November 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, B. S. (2010). Hilda Taba: Social studies reform from the bottom up. In B. S. Stern (Ed.), The new social studies: People, projects, and perspectives (pp. 41–61). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stoel, G., Logtenberg, A., Wansink, B., Huijgen, T., Van Boxtel, C., & Van Drie, J. (2017). Measuring epistemological beliefs in history education: An exploration of naïve and nuanced beliefs. International Journal of Educational Research, 83, 120–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, S. J., & Barton, K. (2010). Can history stand alone? Drawbacks and blind spots of a “disciplinary” curriculum. Teachers College Record, 112(9), 2471–2495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tileston, D. W. (2004). What every teacher should know about effective teaching strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twyman, T., McCleery, J., & Tindal, G. (2006). Using concepts to frame history content. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(4), 331–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Drie, J., & Van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 87–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Straaten, D., Wilschut, A., & Oostdam, R. (2016). Making history relevant to students by connecting past, present and future: A framework for research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(4), 479–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Straaten, D., Wilschut, A., & Oostdam, R. (2018a). Exploring pedagogical approaches for connecting the past, the present and the future in history teaching. Historical Encounters: A Journal of Historical Consciousness, Historical Cultures, and History Education, 5(1), 46–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Straaten, D., Wilschut, A., & Oostdam, R. (2018b). Measuring students’ appraisals of the relevance of history: The construction and validation of the Relevance of History Measurement Scale (RHMS). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 102–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Straaten, D., Wilschut, A., Oostdam, R., & Fukkink, R. (2018c). Fostering students’ appraisals of the relevance of history by comparing analogous cases of an enduring human issue: A quasi-experimental study. Manuscript submitted for pubication.
   Google Scholar
• VGD (Verband der Geschichtslehrer Deutschlands). (2006). Bildungsstandards geschichte, rahmenmodell gymnasium 5.-10. Jahrgangsstufe [History standards, framework for secondary education, age 10-16. National association of history teachers in Germany]. Schwalbach, Germany: Wochenschau Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wilschut, A. (2012). Images of time. The role of an historical consciousness of time in learning history. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1999). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 488–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar