‘Sociability before individuality’: lesson structure in lower secondary classrooms

References

• Aasebø, T. S., Midtsundstad, J., & Willbergh, I. (2017). Teaching in the age of accountability: Restrained by school culture? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(3), 273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. (2000). Lesson structure and form. In R. Alexander (Ed.), Culture and pedagogy. International comparisons in primary education (pp. 297–319). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. J. (2001). Towards dialogic teaching. New York, NY: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (2004). Reading Lessons in Guinea, France, and the United States: Local meanings or global culture? Comparative Education Review, 48(3), 229–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, K., Haug, P., & Myklebust, R. (2010). Med rett til å prestere (with rights to achieve). In E. Elstad & K. Sivesind (Eds.), PISA: Sannheten om skolen? (pp. 298–317). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Birkemo, A. (2000). Kan ungdomsskolen forbedres? [Can lower secondary school be improved?]. In G. Grepperud (Ed.), Tre års kjedsomhet?: Om å være elev i ungdomsskolen (pp. 91–110). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2000). After the death of childhood: Growing up in the age of electronic media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I., Klette, K., Mýrdal, S., Schnack, K., & Simola, H. (2006). Changes in Nordic teaching practices: From individualised teaching to the teaching of individuals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(20), 301–326.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., Mesiti, C., O’Keefe, C., Xu, L. H., Jablonka, E., Mok, I. A. C., & Shimizu, Y. (2007). Addressing the challenge of legitimate international comparisons of classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(7), 280–293.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, E. L. (2008). Fellesskolen - reproduksjon av sosial ulikhet [Comprehensive school - reproduction of social inequality]. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Dalland, C. P., & Klette, K. (2014). Work-plan heroes: Student strategies in lower-secondary Norwegian classrooms. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(4), 400–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalland, C. P., & Klette, K. (2016). Individual teaching methods: Work plans as a tool for promoting self-regulated learning in lower secondary classrooms? Education Inquiry, 7(4), 381–404.
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. (2001). Dialog, samspel og læring [Dialogue, interaction and learning]. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson. (1999). Lärares pedagogiska handlingar: En studie av lärares uppfattningar av att vara pedagogisk i klassrumsarbetet, (Teachers’ pedagogical acts: A study of teachers’ perceptions of being pedagogical in classrooms). PhD-thesis, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, S., & Heideman, M.-L. (2013). Individualisering: Ett kliv utanför matematikboken? En studie om lärares förhollningssätt til individualiserad matematikundervisning [Individualisation: A step outside the mathematics-textbook? A study of teachers relations to individualised teaching in mathematics]. Examensarbete vid Institutionen för pedagogik, didaktik och utbildningsstudier, 2013vt00377. Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Fangen, K. (2004). Deltagende observasjon [Participating observation]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Granström, K. (2003). Arbetsformer och dynamik i klassrummet (Instructional methods and dynamics in the classroom). In S. Selander (Ed.), Kobran, nallen och majjen. Tradition och förnyelse i svensk skola och skolforskning (pp. 223–243). Stockholm: Myndigheten för skolutveckling.
   Google Scholar
• Grepperud, G. (2000). Tre års kjedsomhet?: Om å være elev i ungdomsskolen [Three years of bordeom? On being a student in lower secondary school]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, P. (2012). Aktivitetane i klasseromma [The activities in classrooms]. In P. Haug (Ed.), Kvalitet i opplæringa. Arbeid i grunnskolen observert og vurdert (pp. 58–76). Oslo: Det Norske Samlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Herbart, J. F., & Stern, J. (2002). Allgemeine pädagogik. With an introduction by Jeffrey Stern. Bristol: Thoemmes.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. T. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common core of didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–124.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. W. (1990). Life in classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K. (1998). Klasseromsforskning på norsk [Classroom reserach in Norway]. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K. (2007). Trends in research on teaching and learning in schools: Didactics meets classroom studies. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 147–160.
   Google Scholar
• Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2006). Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet (LK06) (KnowledgePromotion). Oslo: The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2012). Motivasjon og mestring for bedre læring. Felles satsing på klasseledelse, regning, lesing og skriving (strategy for lower secondary education in Norway. Motivation and mastery for better learning. Joint effort to improve classroom management, numeracy, reading and writing). Oslo: The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblad, S., & Sahlström, F. (1999). Gamla mönster och nya gränser. Om ramfaktorer och klassrumsinteraktion (Old patterns and new borders. Frame factors and classroom interaction). Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 4(1), 73–92.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Y. Y., & Macaro, E. (2012). The medium of instruction and classroom interaction: Evidence from Hong Kong secondary schools. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(1), 29–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (2012). Embedded literacy: Knowledge as meaning. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maulana, R., Opdenakker, M.-C., Stroet, K., & Bosker, R. (2012). Observed lesson structure during the first year of secondary education: Exploration of change and link with academic engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 835–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaught, L., Maton, K., Martin, J. R., & Matruglio, E. (2013). Jointly constructing semantic waves: Implications for teacher training. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 50–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meld. St. nr 22. (2010–2011). Motivation – Mastery –Opportunities. Oslo: The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Meld. St. nr 28. (2015–2016). Fag - Fordypning – Forståelse av. En fornyelse av Kunnskapsløftet. Subject matters - Deep learning - Understanding. A renewal of the Knowledge Promotion. Oslo: The Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Merill, D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. A. (2007). Didactics, sense making, and educational experience. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 161–173.
   Google Scholar
• Midtsundstad, J. H., & Hopmann, S. T. (2011). Didaktiske posisjoner i et nordisk perspektiv [(Didactic positions in a Nordic perspective]. In J. H. Midtsundstad & T. Werler (Eds.), Didaktikk i Norden (pp. 47–65). Kristiansand: Portal forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Midtsundstad, J. H., & Werler, T. (2011). Didaktikk i Norden (Nordic general didactics). Kristiansand: Portal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Mølstad, C. E., & Karseth, B. (2016). National curricula in Norway and Finland: The role of learning outcomes. European Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 329–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. (2006). Knowledge promotion. Information for pupils and parents/guardians: What is new in the 10-year compulsory school and upper secondary schools from the autumn of 2006? Oslo: The Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. (2018). Nasjonale prøver (National Tests). Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/eksamen-og-prover/prover/nasjonale-prover/
   Google Scholar
• Reichenberg, O. (2016). Identifying mechanisms of teaching practices: A study in Swedish comprehensive schooling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1–16. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00313831.2016.1212262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (2002). Læring, kunnskap og sosiokulturell utvikling [Learning, knowledge and socio-cultural development)]. In I. Bråthen (Ed.), Læring i sosialt, kognitivt og sosialt-kognitivt perspektiv (learning in social, cognitive and social-cognitive perspective) (pp. 31–57). Oslo: Cappelen.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90, 605–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, B. H. (2000). Børn i en digital kultur. In B. H. Sørensen & B. R. Olesen (Eds.), Børn i en digital kultur: Forskningsperspektiver (children in a digital culture) (pp. 55–130). København: Gads forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, D., Wang, Z. H., Xie, W. T., & Boon, C. C. (2014). Status of integrated science instruction in junior secondary schools of China: An exploratory study. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 808–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tønnessen, L. K. B. (2011). Norsk utdanningshistorie: En innføring med fokus på grunnskolens utvikling [Norwegian educational history: An introduction focusing on compulsory education]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Topphol, A. K. (2012). ‘Da klokka klang… ‘Om timesignaturene til matematikk og naturfag. (When the bell rang…’. On lessons signature in mathematics and science. In P. Haug (Ed.), Kvalitet i opplæringa. Arbeid i grunnskolen observert og vurdert (pp. 128–143). Oslo: Det Norske samlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Veem, V., & Vrakking, B. (2006). Homo Zappiens. Growing up in a digital world. London: Network Continiuum Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1993). The voices of mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willbergh, I. (2015). The problems of ‘competence’ and alternatives from the Scandinavian perspective of bildung. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 334–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willbergh, I. (2016). The representation of reality in teaching: A ‘mimetic didactic’ perspective on examples in plenary talk. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 616–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziehe, T. (2000). School and youth - a different relation. Reflections om some blank areas in the current discussion. Young, 8(1), 55–63.
   Google Scholar