411
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

To be genuine in artificial circumstances: evaluating the theatre analogy for understanding teachers’ workplace and work

References

  • Aristotle. (1932). The poetics (S. Halliwell, Trans.). In Loeb Classical Library (Ed.), The poetics/aristotle. On the sublime/longinus. On style/demetrius (pp. 5–117). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45.
  • Bakewell, G. W. (2011). Tragedy as democratic education: The case of classical Athens. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(2), 258–267.
  • Biesta, G. (2010). Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503.
  • Blum, R. A. (1989). Working actors: The craft of television, film and stage performance. Boston, MA: Focal Press.
  • Box, G. E. P., & Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model building and response surfaces. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bull, G., Ferster, B., & Kjellstrom, W. (2012). Inventing the flipped classroom. Learning & Leading with Technology, 40(1), 10–11.
  • Burkhauser, M. A., & Lesaux, N. K. (2017). Exercising a bounded autonomy: Novice and experienced teachers’ adaptations to curriculum materials in an age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(3), 291–312.
  • Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531.
  • Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of the public schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), A39.
  • Cole, M., & Packer, M. (2016). Design-based intervention research as the science of the doubly artificial. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 503–530.
  • Cowen, T. (2013). Average is over. New York: Penguin.
  • Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • de Castell, S., & Jenson, J. (2004). Paying attention to attention: New economies for learning. Educational Theory, 54(4), 381–397.
  • Doig, B., & Groves, S. (2011). Japanese lesson study: Teacher professional development through communities of inquiry. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 77–93.
  • Dreyfus, S. E. (2004). The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 177–181.
  • Ebben, M., & Murphy, J. S. (2014). Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: A review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(3), 328–345.
  • Euripides. (2012). Andromache, hecuba, trojan women (D. A. Svarlien, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
  • Frick, J. W. (2012). Uncle Tom’s cabin on the American stage and screen. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
  • Gillespie, J. J., Thompson, L. L., Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (1999). Lessons from analogical reasoning in the teaching of negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 15(4), 363–371.
  • Gillett, J. (2014). Acting Stanislavski: A practical guide to Stanislavski’s approach and legacy. New York: Bloomsbury.
  • Grimmelmann, J. (2014). The merchants of MOOCs. Seton Hall Law Review, 44(4), 1035–1049.
  • Hansen, D. T. (2017). Bearing witness to teaching and teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 7–23.
  • Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 835–854.
  • Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  • Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1996). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 15(1), 133–159.
  • Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Cunard, A., & Turrou, A. C. (2015). Getting inside rehearsals: Insights from teacher educators to support work on complex practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 18–31.
  • Keller, M. M., Hoy, A. W., Goetz, T., & Frenzel, A. C. (2016). Teacher enthusiasm: Reviewing and redefining a complex construct. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 743–769.
  • Kerr, W. (1972, January 2). We call it “live” theater, but is it? The New York Times, p. 1.
  • Khan, S. (2012). The one world school house: Education reimagined. New York: Twelve.
  • Kruger, R. (2008). The significance of the concepts ‘elemental’ and ‘fundamental’ in didactic theory and practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(2), 215–250.
  • Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., … Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243.
  • LeMahieu, P. G., (Producer). (2011). What we need in education is more integrity (and less fidelity) of implementation. Retrieved from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/blog/what-we-need-in-education-is-more-integrity-and-less-fidelity-of-implementation/
  • Long, R. E. (2006). Acting: Working in the theatre. New York: Continuum.
  • Mazoué, J. G. (2012). The deconstructed campus. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24, 74–95.
  • Mazoué, J. G., (Producer). (2013). The MOOC model: Challenging traditional education. Educause Review. Retrieved from https://www.educause.edu/ero/article/mooc-model-challenging-traditional-education
  • Mcquigge, M., (Producer). (2017). Cellphones aren’t leaving the classroom, but Canadian educators split on how best to handle them. National Post. Retrieved from http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/cellphones-arent-leaving-the-classroom-but-canadian-educators-split-on-how-best-to-handle-them
  • Noble, D. (2002). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. Toronto: Between the Lines.
  • Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 510–520.
  • O’Neill, D. K. (2001). Knowing when you’ve brought them in: Scientific genre knowledge and communities of practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(3), 223–264.
  • O’Neill, D. K. (2012). Designs that fly: What the history of aeronautics tells us about the future of design-based research in education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35(2), 119–140.
  • O’Neill, D. K. (2016). When form follows fantasy: Lessons for learning scientists from modernist architecture and urban planning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(1), 133–152.
  • O’Neill, D. K., & Harris, J. B. (2004). Bridging the perspectives and developmental needs of all participants in curriculum-based telementoring programs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(2), 111–128.
  • Pace, D. (2004). The amateur in the operating room: History and the scholarship of teaching and learning. The American Historical Review, 109(4), 1171–1192.
  • Parrish, P. E. (2004). The trouble with learning objects. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(1), 49–67.
  • Patterson, J., & Donahue, T. (2014). A concise history of theatre. New York: Pearson.
  • Pillen, M., Beijaard, D., & den Brok, P. (2013). Tensions in beginning teachers’ professional identity development, accompanying feelings and coping strategies. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 240–260.
  • Popp, J. S., & Goldman, S. (2016). Knowledge building in teacher professional learning communities: Focus of meeting matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 347–359.
  • Powell, R. J., & Keen, C. (2006). The axiomatic trap: Stultifying myths in distance education. Higher Education, 52, 283–301.
  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
  • Rose, T. (2016). The end of average: How we succeed in a world that values sameness. New York, New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
  • Roselli, D. K. (2009). Theorika in fifth-century Athens. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 49(1), 5–30.
  • Roth, H. (2000). The art of lesson preparation. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 127–138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Rubin, L. J. (1985). Artistry in teaching. New York: Random House.
  • Sarason, S. B. (1999). Teaching as a performing art. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.
  • Sherin, M. G. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 163–183.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching machines. Science, 128(3330), 969–977.
  • Timson, D. (2012). The history of theatre. Surrey, UK: Naxos Books.
  • Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Vick, M. J., & Martinez, C. (2011). Teachers and teaching: Subjectivity, performativity and the body. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(2), 178–192.
  • Waller, W. (1965). The sociology of teaching (1st Science Editions printing ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Westbury, I., Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (Eds.). (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Willbergh, I. (2011a). Mimetic Didaktik: Why “the medium is the message” in teaching. In S. Hellen, T. Sturm, & I. Willbergh (Eds.), Challenges facing contemporary didactics: Diversity of students and the role of new media in teaching and learnign (pp. 157–167). Berlin: Waxmann.
  • Willbergh, I. (2011b). The role of imagination when teaching the diverse group. In S. Hellen, T. Sturm, & I. Willbergh (Eds.), Challenges facing contemporary didactics: Diversity of students and the role of new media in teaching and learnign (pp. 61–73). Berlin: Waxmann.
  • Willbergh, I. (2015). The problems of ‘competence’ and alternatives from the Scandinavian perspective of Bildung. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 334–354.
  • Wilson, T. (2011). Every cellphone is a camera; every microphone is live. BC Teacher Newsmagazine, 23(4).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.