2,786
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Epistemic quality for equitable access to quality education in school mathematics

References

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. (Revised Edition). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Boaler, J. (2009). The elephant in the classroom. London: Souvenir Press Ltd.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason. Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Chevallard, Y. ([1985] 1991). La transposition didactique. Du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. Grenoble: La Pensée sauvage.
  • Chevallard, Y. (2007). Readjusting didactics to a changing epistemology. In B. Hudson & B. Schneuwly (Eds.), Special issue of the european educational research journal (EERJ) on didactics: Learning and teaching in Europe (Vol. 6(2), pp. 131–134).
  • Du Plooy, L., & Zilindile, M. (2014). Problematising the concept epistemological access with regard to foundation phase education towards quality schooling. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 4(1), 187–201.
  • Gruson, B., Loquet, M., & Pilet, G. (2012, May 22–24). Analyzing semiosis process in primary classrooms: Case studies in second language and gymnastics. International Colloquium on Forms of Education and Emancipation Processes. Rennes: Centre for Research in Education and Didactics (CREAD).
  • Hudson, B. (2002). Holding complexity and searching for meaning – Teaching as reflective practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(1), 43–57.
  • Hudson, B. (2012, May 22–24). Developing mathematical thinking in the primary classroom. Paper to Symposium on the First Step for a Collaborative Research Project in Didactics in Europe: Shedding mutual light and providing reciprocal contributions to the Joint Action Theory in Didactics, International Colloquium on Forms of Education and Emancipation Processes. Rennes: Centre for Research in Education and Didactics (CREAD).
  • Hudson, B. (2013, September 10–13). Butterflies and moths in the Amazon: Developing mathematical thinking through the rainforest. Paper to Symposium on Teaching-Learning as Joint Action: Developing a common theoretical background for Didactics in Europe, European Conference of Educational Research. Istanbul: University of Bahçeşehir.
  • Hudson, B. (2015). Butterflies and moths in the Amazon: Developing mathematical thinking through the Rainforest/Les Papillons en Amazonie: Le développement de la pensée mathématique au travers de la forêt pluviale. Education and Didactique, 9(2), 119–133.
  • Hudson, B. (2016a). Didactics. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward, & J. Pandya (Eds.), SAGE handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (pp. 107–124). Sage Publications.
  • Hudson, B. (2016b, August 23–26). On the relation between epistemic quality and equitable learning in the mathematics classroom. Invited paper to the WERA Symposium Global challenges for international research in didactics – learning and teaching: Epistemological, pedagogical and methodological issues and questions. European Conference on Educational Research (ECER 2016). Dublin: University College Dublin.
  • Hudson, B. (2017, November 30–December 2). Epistemic quality for inclusive and equitable mathematics education for all. WERA 2017 Focal Meeting/Hong Kong Education Research Association International Conference. Hong Kong: The Education University of Hong Kong.
  • Hudson, B. (2018). Powerful knowledge and epistemic quality in school mathematics. London Review of Education: Special Issue on Knowledge and Subject Specialist Teaching, 16(3), UCL IOE Press, 384–397.
  • Hudson, B., Henderson, S., & Hudson, A. (2015). Developing mathematical thinking in the primary classroom: Liberating teachers and students as learners of mathematics. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 374–398.
  • Hudson, B., Loquet, M., Meyer, M., & Wegner, A. (2018, September 4–7). Epistemic quality for equitable learning across school subjects. Round Table, European Conference on Educational Research (ECER 2018). Copenhagen: University of Bolzano.
  • Humphreys, S., Moses, D., Kaibo, J., & Dunne, M. (2015). Counted in and being out: Fluctuations in primary school and classroom attendance in northern Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Development, 44, 134–143.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 255–276.
  • Loquet, M. (2011). Swimming babies – On joint didactic action in physical and sports activities. A case study in a non-schooling institution. In B. Hudson & M. A. Meyer (Eds.), Beyond fragmentation: Didactics, learning, and teaching (pp. 287–301). Opladen and Farmington Hills: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
  • Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking mathematically. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
  • Morrow, W. (2008). Bounds of democracy; Epistemological access in higher education. Pretoria: HSRC Press.
  • Muller, J. (2016). Knowledge and the curriculum in the sociology of knowledge. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward, & J. Pandya (Eds.), SAGE handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (pp. 92–106). London: Sage Publications.
  • NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The Council.
  • Oduro, E. (2015). Assessment in Mathematics Classrooms in Ghana: A Study of Teachers’ Practices ( Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). University of Sussex.
  • Oduro, E., & Hudson, X. (2016, April 8–12). Studying mathematics teachers’ assessment practices: Implications for teacher education policy and practice in Ghana. Beyond Fragmentation: Global Perspectives on Didactics, Learning and Teaching, Symposium at WERA Focal Meeting 2016, Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). Washington, DC.
  • Pólya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning (Vols. I and II). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Schneuwly, B. (2011, September 13–16). Didactic transposition: A key concept in the French tradition of ‘Didactiques des disciplines/Fachdidaktik’. Symposium on Fachdidaktik – European Perspectives, European Conference of Educational Research. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
  • Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic.
  • Sensevy, G. (2011). Overcoming fragmentation: Towards a joint action theory in didactics. In B. Hudson & M. A. Meyer (Eds.), Beyond fragmentation: Didactics, learning, and teaching (pp. 60–76). Opladen and Farmington Hills: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
  • Sensevy, G., Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L., Mercier, A., Ligozat, F., & Perrot, G. (2005). An attempt to model the teacher’s action in the mathematics class. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(1–3), 153–181.
  • UNICEF/UNESCO. (2013). Envisioning education in the post-2015 development agenda: Report of the global thematic consultation on education in the post-2015 development agenda. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/education/files/Post-2015_EN_web.pdf
  • United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1997). Philosophical Investigations = Philosophische Untersuchungen. (G.E.M. Anscombe, Transl.), Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1953) : .
  • Wright, O. (2016, February 7). Nick Gibb: Teach children important facts not ‘joyless’ processes, minister urges. The Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/nick-gibb-teach-children-important-facts-not-joyless-processes-minister-urges-a6859401.html
  • Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101–118.