Envisaging the alternatives: from knowledge of the powerful to powerful knowledge in history classrooms

References

• Ahonen, S. (1998). Historiaton sukupolvi? Historian vastaanotto ja historiallisen identiteetin rakentuminen 1990luvun nuorison keskuudessa [The no-history generation? the reception of history and the construction of historical identity by young people in the 1990’s]. Helsinki: Suomen historiallinen seura [Finnish Historical Society]
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K. (1997). “I just kinda know”: Elementary students’ ideas about historical evidence. Theory and Research in Social Education, 25(4), 407–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, K. (2001). “You’d be wanting to know about the past”: Social contexts of children’s understanding in Northern Ireland and the USA. Comparative Education, 37, 89–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, C. L. (2014). Can teacher education programs learn something from teacher professional development initiatives?. In R. Samwell & A. von Heyking (Eds.), Becoming a history teacher. Sustaining practices in historical thinking and knowing (pp. 249–269). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, S. (2017). History writing and the constructions of national space: The long dominance of the national in modern European historiographies. In M. Carretero, S. Berger, & M. Grever (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of research in historical culture and education (pp. 39–57). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, C. (2019). What is powerful knowledge in school history? Learning from the South African and Rwandan school curriculum documents. The Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 125–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracke, S., Flaving, C., Köster, M., & Zulsdorf-Kersting, M. (2014). History education research in germany. In M. Grever, & S. Stuurman (Eds.), Researching history education (pp. 9–55). Schwalbach: Wochenschau Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Counsell, C. (2011). Disciplinary knowledge for all, the secondary history curriculum and history teachers’ achievement. The Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 201–225.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2016). Teaching history then and now: A story of stability and change in schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, M. T., & Long, K. A. (2016). Teaching for historical literacy. Building knowledge in the history classroom. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duhaylongsod, L., Snow, C. E., Selman, R. L., & Donovan, M. S. (2015). Toward disciplinary literacy: Dilemmas and challenges in designing history curriculum to support middle school students. Harvard Educational Review, 85(4), 587–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., & Coatoam, S. (2013). Disciplinary literacy: What you want to know about it. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 56(8), 627–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish National Agency for Education. (2015). National core curriculum for general upper secondary Eeducation. Helsinki: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Agency for Education. (2019). Kansainvälinen opetuksen ja oppimisen tutkimus TALIS 2018 [Teaching and learning international survey]. Helsinki: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fogo, B. (2014). Core practices for teaching history: The results of a delphi panel survey. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42(2), 151–196.
   Google Scholar
• Gericke, N., Hudson, B., Olin-Scheller, C., & Stolare, M. (2018). Powerful knowledge, transformations and the need for empirical studies across school subjects. London Review of Education, 16(3), 428–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., … Shanahan, C., Project READI. (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Haenen, J., & Schrijnemakers, H. (2000). Learning to teach historical concepts. Teaching History, 22, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Ormond, B. (2019). Historical knowledge in a knowledge economy – What types of knowledge matter? Educational Review, 71(5), 564–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Reynolds, R. (2018). Exploring teachers’ curriculum decision making: Insights from history education. Oxford Review of Education, 44(2), 139–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartzler-Miller, C. (2001). Making sense of “best practice” in history teaching. Theory and Research in Social Education, 29(4), 672–695.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D., Doolittle, P., & Lee, J. (2004). Social studies teachers’ use of classroom-based and web-based historical sources. Theory and Research in Social Education, 32, 213–247.
   Google Scholar
• Husbands, C., Kitson, A., & Pendry, A. (2003). Understanding history teaching. Teaching and learning about the past in secondary schools. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hynd-Shanahan, C. (2013). What does it take? The challenge of disciplinary literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 57(2), 93–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, J. (2008). Teachers as protectors: Making sense of preservice teachers’ resistance to interpretation in elementary history teaching. Theory and Research in Social Education, 36(3), 172–205.
   Google Scholar
• Knupfer, P. B. (2009). A new focus for the history professoriate. Professional development for history teachers as professional development for historians. In R. G. Ragland & K. A. Woestman (Eds.), The teaching American history project. Lessons for history educators and historians (pp. 29–46). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. (2007). “From National canon to historical literacy.” In M. Grever, & S. Stuurman (Eds.), Beyond the canon: History for the twenty first century (pp. 48–62). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. (2011). History education and historical literacy. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in history teaching (pp. 63–72). London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levesque, S. (2008). Thinking historically: Educating students in the 21st century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. C. (2002). Schoolteacher: A sociological study (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D. (1998). The heritage crusade and the spoils of history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maposa, M., & Wasserman, J. (2009). Conceptualising historical literacy – A review of the literature. Yesterday & Today, 4, 41–66.
   Google Scholar
• McPhail, G., & Rata, E. (2018). A theoretical model of curriculum design. “Powerful knowledge” and “21st century learning”. In B. Barrett, U. Hoadley, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and equity: Social realist perspectives (pp. 63–79). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meinander, H. (2013). A history of Finland. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J., Hordern, J., & Hoadley, U. (2019). On the politics and ambition of the ‘turn’: Unpacking the relations between Future 1 and Future 3. The Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 105–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, J., & Young, M. (2019). Knowledge, power and powerful knowledge re-visited. The Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 196–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, G. B., Crabtree, C., & Dunn, R. E. (2000). History on trial: Culture wars and the teaching of the past. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nokes, J. (2010). Observing literacy practices in history classrooms. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(4), 515–544.
   Google Scholar
• Nokes, J. (2013). Building students’ historical literacies. Learning to read and reason with historical texts and evidence. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nordgren, K. (2017). Powerful knowledge, intercultural learning and history education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(5), 663–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, A. (2004). The changing identities of history teachers in an Irish school. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12(3), 415–431.
   Google Scholar
• Orwell, G. (1950). Nineteen eighty-four: A novel (Reset.). London: Secker & Warbur.
   Google Scholar
• Parkes, R. J. (2011). Interrupting history: Rethinking history curriculum after ‘the end of history’. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Puustinen, M., Säntti, J., Koski, A., & Tammi, T. (2018). Teaching: A practical or research-based profession? Teacher candidates’ approaches to research-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 170–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantala, J. (2012). How Finnish adolescents understand history: Disciplinary thinking in history and its assessment among 16-year-old Finns. Education Sciences, 2(4), 193–207.
   Google Scholar
• Rantala, J., & Ouakrim-Soivio, N. (2018). Opettajien näkemyksiä historian opetussuunnitelmaperusteista [Teachers’ views on history curriculum principles]. Ainedidaktiikka, 2(2), 2–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rantala, J., & van den Berg, M., M. (2015). Finnish high school and university students’ ability to handle multiple source documents in history. historical encounters: A journal of historical consciousness. Historical Cultures, and History Education, 2(1), 70–88.
   Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2012). Reading like a historian: A document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 86–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (1945). Knowing how and knowing that: The presidential address. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46, 212–225.
   Google Scholar
• Sandwell, R. (2014). On historians and their audiences: An argument for teaching (and not just writing) history. In R. Sandwell & A. von Heyking (Eds.), Becoming a history teacher. Sustaining practices in historical thinking and knowing (pp. 77–90). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Säntti, J., Puustinen, M., & Salminen, J. (2018). Theory and practice in Finnish teacher education: A rhetorical analysis of changing values from the 1960s to the present day. Teachers and Teaching, 24(1), 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saye, J. W., Stoddard, J., Gerwin, D. M., Libresco, A. S., & Maddox, L. E. (2018). Authentic pedagogy: Examining intellectual challenge in social studies classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 865–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J., Greer, S., & Taylor, S. (2008). Literacy in history: Language and meaning. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(2), 174–187.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, A. (2014). Moving from the periphery to the core: The possibilities for professional learning communities in history teacher education. In R. Samwell & A. von Heyking (Eds.), Becoming a history teacher. Sustaining practices in historical thinking and knowing (pp. 11–29). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (2006). Benchmarks of historical thinking: A framework for assessment in Canada. Centre for the study of historical consciousness.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (2017). A model of historical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(6), 593–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. C., & Morton, T. (2013). The big six historical thinking concepts. Toronto: Nelson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Shemilt, D. (1980). History 13–16: Evaluation study. Edinburgh: Holmes McDougall.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2019). Community and contestation: A Gramscian case study of teacher resistance. Journal of Curriculum Studies.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorp, R. (2014). Towards an epistemological theory of historical consciousness. Historical Encounters: A Journal of Historical Consciousness, Historical Cultures, and History Education, 1(1), 20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Van Sledright, B., & Limon, M. (2006). Learning and teaching social studies: A review of cognitive research in history and geography. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 545–570). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• VanSledright, B. (2002). In search of America’s past: Learning to read history in elementary school. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vettenranta, J., Välijärvi, J., Ahonen, A., Hautamäki, J., Hiltunen, J., Leino, K., ..., Vainikainen, M. P. (2016). Pisa – Ensituloksia. Huipulla pudotuksesta huolimatta [Pisa – First results. At the top despite the drop]. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Education and Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Westhoff, L. M. (2009). Lost in translation. The use of primary sources in teaching history. In R. G. Ragland & K. A. Woestman (Eds.), The teaching American history project. Lessons for history educators and historians (pp. 62–77). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S., Mosborg, S., Porat, D., & Duncan, A. (2007). Common belief and the cultural curriculum: An intergenerational study of historical consciousness. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 40–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, L. (2017). Schools, universities and history in the world of twenty-first century skills: The end of knowledge as we know it? History of Education Review, 46(1), 2–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, L. (2018). History as knowledge: Humanities challenges for a knowledge-based curriculum. In B. Barrett, U. Hoadley, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and equity: Social realist perspectives (pp. 41–60). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2009). Education, globalisation and the ‘voice of knowledge’. Journal of Education and Work, 22(3), 193–204.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2014a). Knowledge, curriculum and the future school. In M. Young, D. Lambert, C. With Roberts, & M. Roberts (Eds.), Knowledge and the future school: Curriculum and social justice (pp. 9–40). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2014b). The progressive case for a subject based curriculum. In M. Young, D. Lambert, C. With Roberts, & M. Roberts (Eds.), Knowledge and the future school: Curriculum and social justice (pp. 89–110)). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2014c). Powerful knowledge as a curriculum principle. In M. Young, D. Lambert, C. With Roberts, & M. Roberts (Eds.), Knowledge and the future school: Curriculum and social justice (pp. 65–88). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (2014). On the powers of powerful knowledge. In B. Barrett, & E. Rata (Eds.), Knowledge and the future of the curriculum: International studies in social realism (pp. 41– 64). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. F. D., & Muller, J. (2010). Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar