Powerful knowns and powerful knowings

References

• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity (2nd ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2014). Pragmatising the curriculum: Bringing knowledge back into curriculum conversation, but via pragmatism. The Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Björkholm, E. (2014). Exploring the capability of evaluating technical solutions: A collaborative study into the primary technology classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloor, D. (2001). Wittgenstein and the priority of practice. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 95–106). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. (2001). Articulating reasons: An introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I., Ahlstrand, P., Björkholm, E., & Nyberg, G. (2015). The meaning of knowing what is to be known. Éducation & Didactique, 9(1), 143–159.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiklin, S., & Lave, J. (1996). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., Flyvbjerg, B., & Haugaard, M. (2014). Reflections on phronetic social science: A dialogue between Stewart Clegg, Bent Flyvbjerg and Mark Haugaard. Journal of Political Power, 7(2), 275–306.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davydov, V. V., & Markova, A. K. (1982). A concept of educational activity for schoolchildren. Soviet Psychology, 21(2), 50–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2015a). Michael Young, knowledge and curriculum: An international dialogue. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 723–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2015b). Content, Joseph Schwab and German Didaktik. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 773–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2018a). Bringing knowledge back in: Perspectives from liberal education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(3), 335–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2018b). Contemporary curriculum theorizing: Crisis and resolution. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSeCo Background Paper. (2001). Definition and selection of competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundations. Paris: OECD. Revised 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. & Bentley, A. (1949/1989) Knowing and the Known. The later works 1949-1952, 16, p.1-280. Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eikeland, O. (2008). The ways of Aristotle: Aristotelian Phrónêsis, Aristotelian philosophy of dialogue, and action research. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, K. (2018). From In-itself to practico-inert. Freedom, subjectivity and progress. Sartre Studies International, 24(1), 48–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, N. (2018). Continuing the dialogue: Curriculum, Didaktik and theories of knowledge. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 724–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gericke, N., Hudson, B., Olin-Scheller, C., & Stolare, M. (2018). Powerful knowledge, transformations and the need for empirical studies across school subjects. London Review of Education, 16(3), 428–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. (1974). Knowledge and the curriculum. A collection of philosophical papers. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. (1993). Education, knowledge and practices. In R. Barrow & P. White (Eds.), Beyond liberal education. Essays in honour of Paul H. Hirst (pp.184–199). London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. (1998). Education, knowledges and practices. In P. Hirst & P. White (Eds.), Philosophy of education. Major themes in the analytic tradition. Vol I: Philosophy and education (pp. 384–395). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoadley, U., Sehgal-Cuthbert, A., Barrett, B., & Morgan, J. (2019). After the knowledge turn? Politics and pedagogy. The Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 99–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common core of Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–124.
   Google Scholar
• Janik, A. (1996). Kunskapsbegrepp i praktisk filosofi. Skåne County: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag Symposion.
   Google Scholar
• Johannessen, K. (1988). The concept of practice in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy. Inquiry, 31(3), 357–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannessen, K. S. (1992). Rule-following, intransitive understanding and tacit knowledge. An investigation of the Wittgensteinian concept of practice as regareds tacit knowing. In B. Göranzon & M. Florin (Eds.), Skill and education: Reflection and experience. Artificial Intelligence and Society (pp.41–63). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. (2014). Curriculum thinking, ’capabilities’ and the place of geographical knowledge in school. Syakaika Kenkyu (Journal of Educational Research on Social Studies), 81, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J, & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (2005). Power: a radical View. Second edition. London, Palgrave, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Molander, B. (2015). The practice of knowing and knowing in practice. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J., & Young, M. (2019). Knowledge, power and powerful knowledge re-visited. The Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 196–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordgren, K. (2017). Powerful knowledge, intercultural learning and history education. Journal Of Curriculum Studies, 49(5), 663–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (1997). Cultivating humanity. A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyberg, G. (2014). Exploring ‘knowings’ in human movement: The practical knowledge of pole-vaulters. European Physical Education Review, 20(1), 72–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakeshott, M. (1962). Rationalism in politics and other essays. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, & Ziegler. (Eds.). (2010). Education, welfare and the capabilities approach. A European perspective. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Phenix, P. (1964). Realms of meaning. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., Pontecorvo, C., & Säljö, R. (1997). Discourse, tools, and reasoning: essays on situated cognition. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge Eds., Discourse, tools and reasoning NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences) (Vol. 160, pp. 1–22). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. (1982). Developing the concept of “curriculum emphases“in science education. Science Education, 66, 243–260.
   Google Scholar
• Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (Eds.). (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Gottingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (1963). The concept of mind. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. (1978). Science, curriculum and liberal education. Selected Essays. In I. Westbury & N. Wilkof (Ed.), Chicago, London: The University of Chicago press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2007). Capability and well-being. In D. Hausman (Ed.), The philosophy of economics: An anthology (pp. 270–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819025.019
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge and growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Slekar, T., & Haefner, A. (2010). Syntactic knowledge in history and science education: Teacher education and neglect in the academy. Journal of Thought, 45(1–2), 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. (2018). The weakness of “powerful knowledge”. London Review of Education, 16(2), 325–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, C. (2009). Ryle on knowing how and the possibility of vocational education. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 26(1), 88–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2014). What is a curriculum and what can it do? The Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229–250.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (2016). Curriculum and the specialization of knowledge. Studies in the sociology of education. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar